• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Highguard on PC will require kernel level anti cheat

winjer

Member



If you happened to have caught the Game Awards trailer for it, Highguard, an upcoming free-to-play hero shooter from ex-developers of Apex Legends and Titanfall, launches next week. You will need to enable Secure Boot if you plan on playing through.

As we've spotted on the Highguard Steam page, the game needs Secure Boot, TPM 2.0, and Easy Anti-Cheat to run. If you're wondering why that's a big deal, it's not to most gamers. If you have a Windows 11 PC with relatively new hardware, you should be able to enable all with little problem.

However, Secure Boot, as shown with the launch of Battlefield 6, tends to draw criticism. That's for three major reasons. The first is that Secure Boot is a kernel-level security measure, and anti-cheat software that uses it will effectively get privileged access to the inner sanctuary of your PC.

Secondly, older machines may not support Secure Boot or might not even have a Trusted Platform Module (TPM), which is used to store cryptographic keys. This means older machines are left in the dust.
However, one of the biggest complaints levied at Secure Boot is on behalf of Linux gamers. While Linux does have something called Secure Boot, that's not what game devs are tapping into. They want Windows. There are ways to get around it with virtual machines or streaming, but essentially, there's no casual route to playing these games without Windows.
However, Secure Boot and kernel-level anti-cheats are reportedly an effective way of dealing with cheaters, especially when the cost of entry to a free-to-play game is so low. If someone gets banned from playing Highguard, they simply need to use a different Steam account (and possibly use a VPN) to get around it.

bold GIF
 
another game the Steam Machine wont be able to play... just bad news after bad news for that system bros 😢 how will it survive without Highguard?
 
Last edited:
Probably won't play it because of this, same as Valorant.
What games don't have kernel level anticheat nowadays? Battlefield 6 has Javlin which is kernel-level. Call of Duty's RICOCHET is kernel-level. Every game has one now and there are still some cheaters.
 
Last edited:
Meanwhile Marvel Rivals just sits there without kernel level anti-cheat, having less cheating than games I've played with it.
 
Eventually Microsoft/Xbox will have their own anti cheat API that developers can use that will remove the requirements for kernel level anti cheat drivers.

Won't help Linux gaming at all though.
 
What games don't have kernel level anticheat nowadays? Battlefield 6 has Javlin which is kernel-level. Call of Duty's RICOCHET is kernel-level. Every game has one now and there are still some cheaters.
Do you not read anything past the heading? The article literally explains why it's more than just kernel anti-cheat software.
 
Do you not read anything past the heading? The article literally explains why it's more than just kernel anti-cheat software.
Yes I do, what is your issue with it then apart from the kernel level anticheat? The secureboot requirement exists on the games I mentioned

 
Last edited:
Being "free-to-play" already had me not too bothered to play it because of what that normally means, even though I loved how Titanfall's guns act and feel. I usually don't mind all these cheat things, but when Steam says for some games, including this, you have to manually uninstall the anti-cheat yourself, never sits right with me. It feels like picking up someone else's dog's shit.
 
Yes I do, what is your issue with it then apart from the kernel level anticheat? The secureboot requirement exists on the games I mentioned

I don't even play COD/Battlefield. Most games do not require enabling boot protection which makes it a hassle if you ever need to dualboot/install other OSs.
 
Top Bottom