Hilarious or Awful?: What is your first reaction to this image?

Status
Not open for further replies.
jiji said:
A lot of guys here sure seem to feel threatened by the idea of a petite woman wearing nearly nothing tossing a drink at them.
Hey, a dude should be able to make lewd comments to such women without being attacked in an uncouth manner. :lol
 
This thread kind of reminds me of the reactions that came out of the "design my logo for $30" thread. We saw lots of anger, contempt. People were insulted that someone would dare value their work @ $30. I'm worth more than that! How dare you! In this thread we see the same emotions. How dare someone throw beer in his face! She deserved it! Violence is justified! If anyone were to do that to me I'd kick his ass! Beer in the face is insulting and humiliating!

Where are you people getting this stuff?
 
SLAP3.gif
 
For everything that says it wasn't right to physically attack her...... would it have been alright if she had hit him first instead of just throwing a drink?
 
Some these women do feel like they can do anything and get away with it, I see it all the time. But he could have I dunno thrown a drink back or something he really had no right to touch her. Eye for an eye that's how I see it I guess.
 
minx88 said:
For everything that says it wasn't right to physically attack her...... would it have been alright if she had hit him first instead of just throwing a drink?

I dont believe in feminism so No it wouldnt be alright.

Men and women are not created equal. So a man should know he can't hit a woman.
 
RSTEIN said:
This thread kind of reminds me of the reactions that came out of the "design my logo for $30" thread. We saw lots of anger, contempt. People were insulted that someone would dare value their work @ $30. I'm worth more than that! How dare you! In this thread we see the same emotions. How dare someone throw beer in his face! She deserved it! Violence is justified! If anyone were to do that to me I'd kick his ass! Beer in the face is insulting and humiliating!

Where are you people getting this stuff?
You seem more worked up about it than anyone.

2igi26q.jpg
 
saw the video. soooooo... they're all assholes? the guy's the superdouche though. seriously? a leg sweep? they're idiot gringos dude, let them be stupid ass gringos. karma will come their way. and now you're paralyzed from the neck down. don't you feel stupid?

for the record, i'm a white kid living in America
 
minx88 said:
For everything that says it wasn't right to physically attack her...... would it have been alright if she had hit him first instead of just throwing a drink?
If a chick slaps me I will slap her back ( depending on the scenario) now obviously I would try and use equal force. Unless it was a big amazonian Im sure my slap would hurt more and that's not really fair is it?

The way I see it no one has a right to do that once she crosses the line she's no longer a lady and I am no longer a gentleman.
 
minx88 said:
For everything that says it wasn't right to physically attack her...... would it have been alright if she had hit him first instead of just throwing a drink?
Do you think he would have attack if it was a guy stronger than him who throwed that drink?
 
minx88 said:
For everything that says it wasn't right to physically attack her...... would it have been alright if she had hit him first instead of just throwing a drink?

I'm pretty sure I remember reading that two wrongs do make a right, so obviously the answer is yes...

If anyone attacks you and you are physically powerful enough to subdue or restrain them and safely remove yourself from the situation, then that is what you should do. If you are in genuine fear for your safety, then violence is likely acceptable. Violence to protect your precious ego is just dumb.

A large contingent of GAF seems to be lasciviously waiting for the opportunity to "justifiably" knock a woman the fuck out. Bunch of repressed freaks.
 
This thread is really making me question why I bother coming here any more. If the community here has become this misogynistic, man, wtf.
 
The gif isn't funny :( I feel sorry for the woman, that sweep really must've hurt. Damn.
 
SnakeswithLasers said:
Umm..ya, you're exactly right. I was addressing everyone advocating violence as a natural/unquestionable reaction with my one post. If you weren't one of the people advocating violence, it should be pretty obvious then that I wasn't addressing you--right? How is it my fault that you're taking my post to be directed at you if you weren't even taking the position that I was clearly objecting to--yet numerous others were?

:lol I'm over this. When you address no one in particular using someone's exact wording in quotations in a discussion, it's not crazy for the person to think you're addressing him as well when he is the only one in the thread who used the word that you quoted.

I wasn't advocating violence, but I was saying it's natural to feel humiliated and retaliate. I wasn't in the "Hit her!" or "Walk away" camp. Thus, the need for correction.

What you did was vague, my response was normal. The best part is you call built up rage pathetic and then the first thing you respond to me with is not "I didn't mean you when I put the word natural in quotes." but rather "When did I quote your dumb ass." Ironic.
 
arena08 said:
This thread is really making me question why I bother coming here any more. If the community here has become this misogynistic, man, wtf.

This...

SnakeswithLasers said:
I'm pretty sure I remember reading that two wrongs do make a right, so obviously the answer is yes...

If anyone attacks you and you are physically powerful enough to subdue or restrain them and safely remove yourself from the situation, then that is what you should do. If you are in genuine fear for your safety, then violence is likely acceptable. Violence to protect your precious ego is just dumb.

A large contingent of GAF seems to be lasciviously waiting for the opportunity to "justifiably" knock a woman the fuck out. Bunch of repressed freaks.

and this

I amazed by the reactions in this thread.
 
arena08 said:
This thread is really making me question why I bother coming here any more. If the community here has become this misogynistic, man, wtf.
Oh no ... please don't leave.. PLEASE...
 
RSTEIN said:
This thread kind of reminds me of the reactions that came out of the "design my logo for $30" thread. We saw lots of anger, contempt. People were insulted that someone would dare value their work @ $30. I'm worth more than that! How dare you! In this thread we see the same emotions. How dare someone throw beer in his face! She deserved it! Violence is justified! If anyone were to do that to me I'd kick his ass! Beer in the face is insulting and humiliating!
Oh that's reasonable.
 
Joe211 said:
Do you think he would have attack if it was a guy stronger than him who throwed that drink?

While we are making ":what if" statements:

Does anyone think he would have done the same if it was a Transformer that threw a beer on him. A G1 Transformer not a Bay creation. Your opinions on Starscream and possibly Bumblebee.
 
Joe211 said:
Do you think he would have attack if it was a guy stronger than him who throwed that drink?
Do you think it would be ok to leg sweep a guy who tossed a drink in your face?
 
Mister_Mingi said:
While we are making ":what if" statements:

Does anyone think he would have done the same if it was a Transformer that threw a beer on him. A G1 Transformer not a Bay creation. Your opinions on Starscream and possibly Bumblebee.


What makes you think it's ok to hit an Autobot? Fucking repressed fuck...


To answer your question: only if it was a Decepticon. ( or Cosmos )
 
Ryck said:
What makes you think it's ok to hit an Autobot? Fucking repressed fuck...


To answer your question: only if it was a Decepticon. ( or Cosmos )


I am wrong. Sorry. It has been quite some time since an Autobot has touched me where I pee from. I am quite resentful.
 
jonnybryce said:
:lol I'm over this. When you address no one in particular using someone's exact wording in quotations in a discussion, it's not crazy for the person to think you're addressing him as well when he is the only one in the thread who used the word that you quoted.

I wasn't advocating violence, but I was saying it's natural to feel humiliated and retaliate. I wasn't in the "Hit her!" or "Walk away" camp. Thus, the need for correction.

What you did was vague, my response was normal. The best part is you call built up rage pathetic and then the first thing you respond to me with is not "I didn't mean you when I put the word natural in quotes." but rather "When did I quote your dumb ass." Ironic.

cool story bro.
 
Mister_Mingi said:
Does anyone think he would have done the same if it was a Transformer that threw a beer on him. A G1 Transformer not a Bay creation. Your opinions on Starscream and possibly Bumblebee.


Possibly if it was one of Soundwaves cassettes. Maybe Rumble. Definitely not Ravage.
 
Kokaku said:
throwing something = physical attack
calling someone names = verbal/mental attack
low kicking = physical attack

Now that we have cleared up both acts were physical, proceed with your argument.

The difference in degree of the severity of the two 'physical attacks'--as you are inclined to label tossing beer on someone--is enough to place the leg sweep in a different class.

Rumor has it that later the guy got knifed and paralyzed for life. I guess he deserved it. It's also a physical attack.
 
SnakeswithLasers said:
Or want to beat the shit out of a guy who didn't hold an elevator?
depends. how many other people are in the elevator, am i carrying something heavy, did he see me, am i roid raging, etc, etc.
 
First of all, fuck both of them really.

Second, the dude could have seriously injured her by sweeping the fucking leg. The girl deserved another drink to her face, not what he did.
 
Tristam said:
The difference in degree of the severity of the two 'physical attacks'--as you are inclined to label tossing beer on someone--is enough to place the leg sweep in a different class.

Rumor has it that later the guy got knifed and paralyzed for life. I guess he deserved it. It's also a physical attack.


This is such bullshit. She got what she was asking for. He didn't kill her, or probably even physically harm her. He just owned her ass.

Also, if you're going to post a rumor, post a source. Additionally, I think you just demonstrated the true difference in class, were there one to exist. He did pretty much the least he could do and still own her face. She deserved it. I'm not saying we would have done that, or a rational person would have done that. But if you're going to insult a guy like 5 times, especially about English, and then you're going to throw beer, you're going to get what's coming to you.
 
RSTEIN said:
I don't. Get a towel. Wipe off your face. Much easier.
Right.

Getting a drink to the face isn't justification to crack someone's head open just like someone shit talking you isn't justification to throw a drink in their face.
 
Calcaneus said:
First of all, fuck both of them really.

Second, the dude could have seriously injured her by sweeping the fucking leg. The girl deserved another drink to her face, not what he did.

Definitely. I'm pretty surprised at the the people that think a leg sweep onto concrete isn't a big deal. You could get hurt in a variety of ways when your body is slammed onto concrete horizontally.
 
jonnybryce said:
Definitely. I'm pretty surprised at the the people that think a leg sweep onto concrete isn't a big deal. You could get hurt in a variety of ways when your body is slammed onto concrete horizontally.
You guys are trying to be rational in what is an irrational situation. Its purely irrational once alcohol is involved, and if you're going to escalate things then you have to take what's coming to you. RATIONALLY, you're right. Irrationally, all bets are off.

Alcohol is looked at as a bad substance sometimes for a reason.
 
Hate to break this to some of you, but most woman aren't sweet little princesses in floral print dresses skipping across fields of wildflowers. A lot of them are manipulative and catty, backstabbing, vengeful and just plain evil. We are raised on this stereotype of men being the aggressive bastards while woman are the sweet and fragile ones who are waiting for a prince to come down and sweep her up. Its complete nonsense and it's been years since i've felt the need to defend every single woman who get's into with a man.

I love woman, I have loved a lot of woman. But I never forget the simple fact that this isn't a hollywood movie or fairy tale. And the fact that your average women is physically weaker than your average man does not negate the fact that woman are smarter and capable of doing far greater permanent damage. A broken nose will heal, but a woman is crafty enough to ruin you in ways that actually count.

Violence isn't the answer, I've never hit a woman, never ever will. Hell i've never even punched a guy, I always talk my way out of situations. But anybody thinking they wont ever meet a woman they silently wish they could clock right in the face hasn't met enough woman.
 
While I wouldn't personally wouldn't hit a woman outside a handful of super-specific (e.g. life is threatened) instances, I don't blame the guy for retaliating. In any country, there will be consequences to throwing a drink in somebody's face, with an audience watching.
 
missbreedsiddx said:
I love woman, I have loved a lot of woman. But I never forget the simple fact that this isn't a hollywood movie or fairy tale. And the fact that your average women is physically weaker than your average man does not negate the fact that woman are smarter and capable of doing far greater permanent damage. A broken nose will heal, but a woman is crafty enough to ruin you in ways that actually count.
Dunno why but this reminded me of this...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i4FimcDy8jc
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom