History Channel's 9/11 Truther OWNAGE special

Status
Not open for further replies.
M

ManaByte

Banned
 
It's too bad that they'll just ignore it and say it was created by "The Man".

That said, I can't wait to get home and check them out.
 
I believe everything is a conspiracy, everything we do.

If we weren't some ant farm sitting on some guys desk how do you explain the platypus?
 
at what point does a conspiracy theory grow out of that label? Is the FBI/CIA(or whoever was supposed to be behind it) JFK assassination a conspiracy theory still, for instance?
 
One truth that had been ignored and denied, is that the plane in over PA was shot down.

That has nothing to do with any of the insider planned conspiracy claims. It had to be done and was. Sad but true.


So, why have we been lied to about that? Why not tell the truth? People have slipped and mentioned it before, the military most recently.

So, how do you defend the made up stories of people rushing the cockpit?



Just thought I'd throw that out tere.
 
ImperialConquest said:
One truth that had been ignored and denied, is that the plane in over PA was shot down.

That has nothing to do with any of the insider planned conspiracy claims. It had to be done and was. Sad but true.


So, why have we been lied to about that? Why not tell the truth? People have slipped and mentioned it before, the military most recently.

So, how do you defend the made up stories of people rushing the cockpit?



Just thought I'd throw that out tere.
Click to expand...


Not a big enough rolleyes.
 
I just finished the second part.... when do they start disproving anything? I really want this video to go point by point disproving the 9/11 conspiracy. Does that happen?
 
JavaMava said:
I just finished the second part.... when do they start disproving anything? I really want this video to go point by point disproving the 9/11 conspiracy. Does that happen?
Click to expand...

Yes. They get Popular Mechanics in on it, who published a whole book disproving the conspiracies, and they go point by point by showing the Truther's idiot theory and then beating it to the ground.
 
ManaByte said:
Yes. They get Popular Mechanics in on it, who published a whole book disproving the conspiracies, and they go point by point by showing the Truther's idiot theory and then beating it to the ground.
Click to expand...

But they're all a PART of the conspiracy, see? In fact, you wouldn't be posting this unless you were in the know too.... YOU!!! .. wait... I'm in the know... no ME!!! AAAAAAAAAAHHHH!!!
 
GoutPatrol said:
Not a big enough rolleyes.
Click to expand...


Really? You don't think it happened?

You are either un-informed or very mis-informed.

What's worse than conspiracy nuts? Sheep.



You do realize that shooting down planes is an option. There are procedures in place for situations like this.

Not saying it was wrong to shoot it down, it's a tough decision, I just don't like the admin blatantly lying about it and making it into sinething it's not... just to get the patriotic image in place for their later use.
 
ImperialConquest said:
Really? You don't think it happened?

You are either un-informed or very mis-informed.

What's worse than conspiracy nuts? Sheep.



You do realize that shooting down planes is an option. There are procedures in place for situations like this.

Not saying it was wrong to shoot it down, it's a tough decision, I just don't like the admin blatantly lying about it and making it into sinething it's not... just to get the patriotic image in place for their later use.
Click to expand...
Joke Poster. I mean: baa, baa.
 
wtf. i start Part 6 just on a whim to see what's up and what kind of asshole would make these cops and rescue workers go on record to talk about the body pieces they found at the crash site.

god i hate truthers.
 
ManaByte said:
This is awesome. Two hours of completely owning every Truther point ever considered. Idiot Truthers like Alex "WE LIVE IN A REPTOID POLICE STATE" Jones and the Loose Change douchebags are interviewed, and owned.
Click to expand...
icke.jpg



This dude has them ALL BEAT.
 
whytemyke said:
wtf. i start Part 6 just on a whim to see what's up and what kind of asshole would make these cops and rescue workers go on record to talk about the body pieces they found at the crash site.

god i hate truthers.
Click to expand...


Then you should hate the people claiming there were no body parts even more!
 
ImperialConquest said:
Really? You don't think it happened?

You are either un-informed or very mis-informed.

What's worse than conspiracy nuts? Sheep.
Click to expand...

I think the proper response in situations is this: put up or shut up.
 
ImperialConquest said:
One truth that had been ignored and denied, is that the plane in over PA was shot down.

That has nothing to do with any of the insider planned conspiracy claims. It had to be done and was. Sad but true.


So, why have we been lied to about that? Why not tell the truth? People have slipped and mentioned it before, the military most recently.

So, how do you defend the made up stories of people rushing the cockpit?



Just thought I'd throw that out tere.
Click to expand...

facepalm.gif
 
whytemyke said:
wtf. i start Part 6 just on a whim to see what's up and what kind of asshole would make these cops and rescue workers go on record to talk about the body pieces they found at the crash site.

god i hate truthers.
Click to expand...
You should see how conspiracy theorists treated a survivor of the London Subway bombing. Scum of the earth.
 
I also enjoyed History Channel's owning of Kennedy conspiracy theorists. The entire 2 hours just completely dismantled any hint of a conspiracy.
 
Prime crotch said:
Jesus, youtube comments are just so...UGH!
Click to expand...
I'm considering getting an RFID implant from the United Police States of Amerikkka that creates a cataract every time I try to look at them
 
U93 was shot the hell down.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/vicepresident/news-speeches/speeches/vp20010916.html

MR. RUSSERT: What's the most important decision you think he made during the course of the day?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: Well, the--I suppose the toughest decision was this question of whether or not we would intercept incoming commercial aircraft.

MR. RUSSERT: And you decided?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: We decided to do it. We'd, in effect, put a flying combat air patrol up over the city; F-16s with an AWACS, which is an airborne radar system, and tanker support so they could stay up a long time. It doesn't do any good to put up a combat air patrol if you don't give them instructions to act, if, in fact, they feel it's appropriate.

MR. RUSSERT: So if the United States government became aware that a hijacked commercial airline was destined for the White House or the Capitol, we would take the plane down?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: Yes. The president made the decision, on my recommendation as well, wholeheartedly conquered in the decision he made, that if the plane would not divert, if they wouldn't pay any attention to instructions to move away from the city, as a last resort, our pilots were authorized to take them out. Now, people say, you know, that's a horrendous decision to make. Well, it is. You've got an airplane full of American citizens, civilians, captured by hostages, captured by terrorists, headed and are you going to, in fact, shoot it down, obviously, and kill all those Americans on board? And you have to ask yourself, "If we had had combat air patrol up over New York and we'd had the opportunity to take out the two aircraft that hit the World Trade Center, would we have been justified in doing that?" I think absolutely we would have. Now, it turned out we did not have to execute on that authorization. But there were some--a few moments when we thought we might, when planes were incoming and we didn't know whether or not they were a problem aircraft until they'd diverted and gone elsewhere and been able to resolve it.
Click to expand...

IDK what else you need, Bush gave the order.
 
Quote:
MR. RUSSERT: What's the most important decision you think he made during the course of the day?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: Well, the--I suppose the toughest decision was this question of whether or not we would intercept incoming commercial aircraft.

MR. RUSSERT: And you decided?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: We decided to do it. We'd, in effect, put a flying combat air patrol up over the city; F-16s with an AWACS, which is an airborne radar system, and tanker support so they could stay up a long time. It doesn't do any good to put up a combat air patrol if you don't give them instructions to act, if, in fact, they feel it's appropriate.

MR. RUSSERT: So if the United States government became aware that a hijacked commercial airline was destined for the White House or the Capitol, we would take the plane down?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: Yes. The president made the decision, on my recommendation as well, wholeheartedly conquered in the decision he made, that if the plane would not divert, if they wouldn't pay any attention to instructions to move away from the city, as a last resort, our pilots were authorized to take them out. Now, people say, you know, that's a horrendous decision to make. Well, it is. You've got an airplane full of American citizens, civilians, captured by hostages, captured by terrorists, headed and are you going to, in fact, shoot it down, obviously, and kill all those Americans on board? And you have to ask yourself, "If we had had combat air patrol up over New York and we'd had the opportunity to take out the two aircraft that hit the World Trade Center, would we have been justified in doing that?" I think absolutely we would have. Now, it turned out we did not have to execute on that authorization. But there were some--a few moments when we thought we might, when planes were incoming and we didn't know whether or not they were a problem aircraft until they'd diverted and gone elsewhere and been able to resolve it.
Click to expand...

It certainly would be a more exciting world, but I'm gonna go with "not shot down." Baaa!
 
Flo_Evans said:
U93 was shot the hell down.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/vicepresident/news-speeches/speeches/vp20010916.html



IDK what else you need, Bush gave the order.
Click to expand...
Where does this say it was shot down? It says it would have been shot down if they had to. As said in the video, the order didn't reach NORAD until 30 minutes after it crashed.

The order was given, so unless Cheney was banking on that United 93 movie it makes no sense to deny they actually shot it down.
 
Tamanon said:
Who cares if U93 was shot down? It would've been shot down anyways.
Click to expand...


That's just it, nobody's saying that it wasn't the thing to do.

The issue in question is the lie to cover it up.


Why lie?

Why not make the tough but right decision and tell the American public that it had to be done?

Instead, the ycome up with a BS story about passengers rushing the cockpit and forcing a crash. Complete BS.

It was on it's way to the white house, planes had just flown into the WTC, it had to be shot down and was.

Why is it so hard for people to believe the government could and would give the order? Sheep.

The lives of 200(?) john and jane does mean shit compared to having a jetliner fly into the whitehouse where the admin is based.
 
To me it doesn't really matter. They SHOULD of shot it down. If it was passengers overpowering the terrorists or a missile from an f-16 the result is the same. Makes a much better story and movie if it was the passengers though.

I just don't think its that ridiculous to think or question if it was shot down when you have Cheney saying "yeah we authorized jets to shoot it down".
 
ImperialConquest said:
That's just it, nobody's saying that it wasn't the thing to do.

The issue in question is the lie to cover it up.


Why lie?

Why not make the tough but right decision and tell the American public that it had to be done?

Instead, the ycome up with a BS story about passengers rushing the cockpit and forcing a crash. Complete BS.

It was on it's way to the white house, planes had just flown into the WTC, it had to be shot down and was.

Why is it so hard for people to believe the government could and would give the order? Sheep.

The lives of 200(?) john and jane does mean shit compared to having a jetliner fly into the whitehouse where the admin is based.
Click to expand...

The same reason that Pat Tillman wasn't friendly fire at first. The same reason that we still don't admit the assassination attempts done by the US against Chavez or the actual assassinations of Latin American leaders in the 80s and 90s. There's stuff you do in the dark.
 
ImperialConquest said:
That's just it, nobody's saying that it wasn't the thing to do.

The issue in question is the lie to cover it up.


Why lie?

Why not make the tough but right decision and tell the American public that it had to be done?

Instead, the ycome up with a BS story about passengers rushing the cockpit and forcing a crash. Complete BS.

It was on it's way to the white house, planes had just flown into the WTC, it had to be shot down and was.

Why is it so hard for people to believe the government could and would give the order? Sheep.

The lives of 200(?) john and jane does mean shit compared to having a jetliner fly into the whitehouse where the admin is based.
Click to expand...
this is why you weren't listed in the favorite gaffers thread :lol ya know... just sayin...
 
ImperialConquest said:
Why is it so hard for people to believe the government could and would give the order? Sheep.
Click to expand...
good idea to use the term "sheep" in a thread designed to make fun of conspiracy theorists. Like saying fabulous at a homophobe rodeo
 
ImperialConquest said:
That's just it, nobody's saying that it wasn't the thing to do.

The issue in question is the lie to cover it up.


Why lie?

Why not make the tough but right decision and tell the American public that it had to be done?

Instead, the ycome up with a BS story about passengers rushing the cockpit and forcing a crash. Complete BS.

It was on it's way to the white house, planes had just flown into the WTC, it had to be shot down and was.

Why is it so hard for people to believe the government could and would give the order? Sheep.

The lives of 200(?) john and jane does mean shit compared to having a jetliner fly into the whitehouse where the admin is based.
Click to expand...

Uh nobody doubts they could and would do that, we just had Cheney sayng as much. That doesn't mean they did and I'm not sure exactly why you wish they had?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Elon Musk announces Grok being returned to revise history
2
70
665
Ironbunny replied
  • Poll
iPhone 16 vs Google Pixel 9
2
60
971
Grechy34 replied
Lovecraftian inspirations from the real life, science, history and folklore
21
563
Adeptus replied
A24 - Alex Garland - WARFARE - April 11
45
2K
near replied
Kim Kardashian Christmas Special
2
54
4K
Futaleufu replied
Top Bottom