mxbison
Member
This must have achieved the status of the worst attempted boycott in history.
There never was an attempted boycott. Just a bunch of crazies who get way, way too much attention here.
This must have achieved the status of the worst attempted boycott in history.
Not only here, but basically all mass media reported on it. At least here in The Netherlands.There never was an attempted boycott. Just a bunch of crazies who get way, way too much attention here.
Oh wow, that makes it even more impressive. Going to be interesting to see how much last gen help boost the sales up.It didnt release on last gen systems and switch.
Those versions were pushed back to April and June.
Because...?You can tell this is a real cultural moment for Europe.
Surely a sequel announcement will be made soon?
They definitely did.
They went from this game
to this game in less than 6 years
What they've done is something i'd expect from a studio that has experience putting out AAA titles on a regular basis. It reminds me a lot of Skyrim/Witcher 3. Avalanche took everyone by surprise. Well done to them! I hope they get to do a sequel or at least another major open world RPG.
It will be very challenging to make it run on the Switch natively. Steam deck is a lot more powerful and still runs the game on low settings. The switch is basically 2 gens old at this point.Definitely. And all those sales will be achieved at full price. Is the Switch version native or cloud?
Seeing a studio make the quantum leap in real time is always awesome to see (like CDProjeckRed did with Witcher 3).What they've done is something i'd expect from a studio that has experience putting out AAA titles on a regular basis. It reminds me a lot of Skyrim/Witcher 3. Avalanche took everyone by surprise. Well done to them! I hope they get to do a sequel or at least another major open world RPG.
Yeah, first link in the OP tries to create a thread.Link doesn't work for me, is that true for anyone else?
This works: https://www.videogameschronicle.com...es-in-europe-were-56-higher-than-elden-rings/
Because...?
Just goes to show how loud a vocal minority can be. And the ridiculous cowardice of some sites and outlets in bending to the will of that vocal minority.This must have achieved the status of the worst attempted boycott in history.
Nah, people just forgot how massive IP Harry Potter is. HP is larger than SW.The people saying "well, it's Harry Potter so this was to be expected" or "duh, it's Harry Potter" don't seem to realise how unprecedented these numbers are, even for a popular franchise.
Even excellent Star Wars games aren't doing these kind of numbers, and the game isn't even out on all platforms yet. Hogwarts Legacy is exceeding even the most lofty of expectations.
Well for many years now people have been saying Harry Potter was on a decline. That JK Rowling had alienated the majority of the fanbase and it would never sell the same.Well, It's Harry Potter.Duh.
Guess Twitter weirdos turned out to be just that - weirdos. Which the word “Twitter” gives away.Well for many years now people have been saying Harry Potter was on a decline. That JK Rowling had alienated the majority of the fanbase and it would never sell the same.
This proves all the haters wrong.
20m before the end of the year. And that's lowballing it I think.
Not surprising. HP is much more popular.
No decline at all.They can release a harry Potter tv show tomorrow and it will be one of the biggest things on tv.Spin-off movies didn't do great because well they were spin-offs.Well for many years now people have been saying Harry Potter was on a decline. That JK Rowling had alienated the majority of the fanbase and it would never sell the same.
This proves all the haters wrong.
I would say it's a combination of both. Harry Potter is very much still an active player in pop culture for at least the past 20 years. I'd go so far as to say this is global, but this mostly applies to the west. As result, this title was in a situation that very few other games find themselves in.Nah, I greatly disagree.
This isn't the first Harry Potter game, just like the last Battlefront or Fallen Order were not the first Star Wars games, just like the last Spiderman wasn't the FIRST Spiderman game or something.
If the IP alone based on popularity was moving units for them, how come lots of those games flopped prior? How came Transformers the game not moving COD numbers? lol
So I've heard this theory before and I don't see much evidence to support it. I don't think Harry Potter got MORE popular, I believe we merely got a solid team for once putting out a very high quality product and the market is responding.
To merely make it seem as if its based on popularity of the IP, you'd have to explain all those other flops prior.
Recognizability doesn't always 100% translate into sales and people need to stop with that entire myth. Someone knows what Pac Man looks like all of the United States and all over the world, they coming out with a game this fall moving 100 million units at full price? KNOWING what something is has no relevance to if they feel its a quality product that they would want to play. We all here didn't just fucking hear of Harry Potter for the first time here or something, yet look at how hype we are for this game vs the last games.
Elden Ring last year was massive, for this game to be selling better in both physical and digital is completely nuts. Hats off and respect to the team for putting out a solid game, they conveyed their message, made a high quality game and the market responded positively. Something lessor in quality with the name "Harry Potter" was simply not going to be moving theses numbers.
We have history to show us that....
lmao yeah I probably lowballed20m by the end of this month or March I'd say.
I would say it's a combination of both.
Because it was one of the best selling games of 2022, the highest rated game of 2022, and a similar genre as Hogwarts?I dislike this type of comparisons that seems to minimize the success of other non related game, like the recent Forspoken sold more than HI-FI rush. I could understand that for games of the same franchise: COD MW2 sold more than COD Vanguard, for example. But what's the point of mention Elden Ring here?
lmao yeah I probably lowballed
Not surprising. HP is much more popular. Most people, including non gamers, know what Harry Potter is. You could stop anyone in the street and they'll be more likely to recognise Harry Potter than From Software. I love From Software games but it's not even a fair comparison. You could have family members picking the game up for their kids/siblings/nieces/nephews/cousins because they think "Oh, lil Jimbob loves Harry Potter!"
Also, From Software games are "difficult" and that puts a lot of people off. Hogwarts Legacy is for everyone. There is bit of challenge but it's designed for young people to play.
As an elementary school teacher, I can promise you that kids are just as into it (both the movies and the books) as I was when I was their age. This train never ends.Harry Potter audience is 20+
Monster sales.
Pretty much. Elden Ring was a new idea as well. Harry Potter has always been growing.A very well made game based on a popular franchise put out on as many platforms as possible with a massive marketing push.
That's how ya do it.
This must have achieved the status of the worst attempted boycott in history.