Okay, what if they told you that is the reason?
So what you're suggesting is this scenario:
Man: "Hey, can you hold my briefcase? I'm not tired or sore or anything, I just want you to hold it."
I don't really know what to say to that one.
Okay, what if they told you that is the reason?
It can come about more natural.So what you're suggesting is this scenario:
Man: "Hey, can you hold my briefcase? I'm not tired or sore or anything, I just want you to hold it."
I don't really know what to say to that one.
The fact that the OP thinks a price tag is at all a factor shows the type of relationship he's in. My girlfriend would kill me if I spent 10k on a dumb purse. I'd say end the relationship, but I'm sure in the end it'll happen anyways. That 50% divorce rate doesn't drop out of the sky.
He refused to carry it for her without a big reason to do it. That's what my post is referring to. He returned the purse to her as soon as she started walking and wasn't handing it to him for anything she needed to do.
Why this single instance is some big deal is baffling to me.. same with your psycho analysis of her response. She asked him a simple favor and he refused, and she wasn't happy with that.
How is that a sign of things to come? How does her asking this single favor make her someone you wouldn't want to be with? He's been with her long enough to be buying her a $10,000 purse... and this is apparently the first time she's asked him for such a favor.
I think you are being a bit disingenuous with the way you use the price. Me buying that purse would be like someone with an average income buying a coach or Michael Kors purse and people do that for their SO all the time without it meaning that they are madly in love.
The 50% divorce rate is inaccurate. It's something more like 25%.
It's a $10k purse, I am not sure how much nicer of a purse I can get for her.
Sure, if she got lazy, but it went from reasonable to unreasonable when she got upset at the notion of him putting it in the car. That's the difference for me. If she got lazy, she shouldn't get upset at the other person for not wanting to carry and she should not get upset if he offered a reasonable solution to the problem which was putting it in the car.
There's a huge difference here though. If the remote is next to me, it's reasonable for my SO to ask me to pass it over to her. If it's right next to her, and she asks me to get up and go around her to give it to her, that's no longer a reasonable request. If I'm out at the store, then it's reasonable for me to get something while I'm already there. If I'm out but she wants me to go clear across town for something that isn't important or needed in a timely manner, then that's unreasonable.
It's a good thing my SO isn't unreasonable.
The 50% divorce rate is inaccurate. It's something more like 25%.
lol, this. The whole "she has sex with me, I can do this for her" thing is absolutely creepy. It's seeing sex as some sort of commodity or favour to be traded. Just... brrrPut the masculinity aside. Whoever is reading this, you are now my SO in this post. Since it keeps being brought up, we apparently have a great sex life. We are at the mall. I buy a bottle of water. I then ask you to hold my water for me even though I would be empty handed otherwise and I simply don't feel like holding this water bottle I chose to buy for myself. I'd prefer it if you held it for me. We're having sex, so apparently that means you now cannot say no to my request. Peachy?
Agreed.In my experience it has nothing to do with holding a purse and looking "feminine."
It's about her carrying her own shit and not using you as a mule. The girl I'm with now, if she doesn't want to carry her purse around she puts in the the trunk of my car. I'll gladly hold it for her when she's looking at things or trying on clothes when we go shopping, but once we're back on the move she carries it or puts it in a cart, end of story.
I've been with girls who will gladly whip you into doing everything for them and then some, just because they want to be special. Not doing it again.
Actually, no. Seriously, it's a thing in women's clothing that they just don't have proper pockets. I tried shopping for jeans with pockets. Women's jeans just don't have proper pockets. At best I can carry kleenexes (I have allergies) and keys, and even keys are uncomfortable because the pockets are so tight that the keys start digging into my flesh so I'd rather not.I mean, they're not exactly forced to wear pants with no/shitty pockets. I'm sure there are women's pants that have real pockets. If they choose not to get those pants for stylistic reasons, I get it, but they still chose pants with shitty pockets.
Yup, this is my experience as well.Honestly man, I've been shopping with my girlfriend a LOT and even pants that aren't skin tight don't always offer pockets more than an inch or two deep. Totally anecdotal so obviously doesn't mean much, but I swear, watching my girl shop for clothes and seeing the lack of pockets is kinda mind blowing to me. It's not just 'tight clothing' that doesn't have pockets. Even just regular jeans don't offer good sized pockets, and a lot of stores don't seem to offer anything less than well-fitting jeans.
Oh come on. Refusing to enable your SO's pettiness (remember, she asked him to carry the purse just so he could be her mule) has nothing to do with Redpill horseshit. It's not about doing something nice, it's about his SO being petty.Some of these responses are, if not straight up, seem inspired by Redpill/PUA bullshit. Better not do anything nice for a woman without a damn good reason, otherwise you're pussy-whipped! Or a servant, or a pack mule, or whatever. Seriously concerning the way people psychoanalyze their partners.
Whaaaaa.... well then. Um. That's a plot twist I certainly didn't see coming, LOL.I paid almost 10k for that purse
I believe you but boy I've been to about 25 weddings in my life and around 7 are still together. More purse carrying can get us down to 20%, let's do this!
didn't read the whole thread, does SO mean you're married? if so, what's there to test? I wouldn't be worried about your masculinity more about how she still has to "test" you.
as for carrying somebody else's bag. I don't mind holding it for a while. but I'm no stupid mule either. I guess, I would've had the same reaction. if there's some other meaning behind carrying the bag, it's best to confront her about it.
Holding the purse for your SO briefly while she does something = fine, and if you refuse because "holding a purse emasculates me", you're a dick and probably a stupid person.
Carrying your SO's purse even if they're not tired/sore, "just because" = being selfish and petty, fuck off. Carry your own shit, WTF.
lol, this. The whole "she has sex with me, I can do this for her" thing is absolutely creepy. It's seeing sex as some sort of commodity or favour to be traded. Just... brrr
I was joking when I said it earlier in the thread, because the idea of being upset about the request or analyzing it deeply is a joke, as are a lot of these responses to me. But, honestly, us having sex = having a deep, intimate, trusting relationship, which, to me means if my SO were to ask me to carry her purse, I wouldn't question it. I don't need to analyze it. It's a small request that wouldn't burden me in the slightest and if it makes her life a bit easier in that moment, or however many moments it takes, I would do it without hesitation.
My SO has never to my recollection asked me to carry her purse longer than it takes to try something on or look at an item, but even if that weren't the case, I can't see a situation where I would tell her no, even if it's just because she's tired and doesn't want to carry it. That's fine with me. It's such a non-issue that I woudn't even think about it. There wouldn't be any follow up questions.
She would say, "Can you carry this for a bit?" I would say, "Yep," and rock that shit and we'd both go on about our business.
What if she made you do this every day?
bending-sickle tumblr said:From the Harmontown podcast, Episode 105, “Game Recognize Game”
Dan Harmon: My epiphany has been this thing that the [marriage] counselor called emotional bids. Emotional bids, Jeff.
Jeff Davis: Bids.
DH: Yeah. So you know when there’s two people in a conversation, my thing has always been, “Well, one person’s always going to need something, and the other person’s always going to be having to give it,” which means that one person’s getting, like, robbed, y'know… Like I always feel like everyone’s always trying to steal my life force away from me, my time, my energy, like fishhooks are coming at me and are going to get into me and if I don’t fend them off and police my own space, I’m going to get dragged into someone else’s, like, energy and I’m going to get dragged down and I’m going to lose my life for three hours of playing Borderlands 2 or something…
Counselor said, “Here’s the thing that couples do: they make emotional bids." So, you say, like for instance, one of my big things that make me insane is that if I’m driving and Erin says, "Look at that thing, look at that thing over there,” my immediate reaction is to go, “Goddamnit, I don’t want to look at shit." […] That’s how extreme it is - I hate fucking - I hate when people go, "Look at that.” I’m thinking, “I hate you, don’t make me look at that. I have my own head. I can swivel it, I have eyes. If I want to look at something I’ll look at it.” That’s me being crazy.
But that’s just an example of - somebody saying, “Look at that,” or somebody saying, “Oh, Game of Thrones is on tomorrow,” like, like anything, any sound you make, anything, it’s an emotional bid… My new way of seeing it - the counselor -
JD: Wait, wait, why is it a bid? Explain that to me.
DH: Well I’m going to. Don’t interrupt me.
JD: Dan. Look - look over here.
DH: No.
JD: Look over there.
DH: You have to think of the relationship as a third thing in the room with you and your lover. When a person wants something from you, don’t even look at it that way. You think of it as them putting a little poker chip, a bid, into the relationship bank. So you don’t have to think of it like, “I have to give you something” or “You need something,” it’s you putting something in to this third thing.
And then you can have three responses to that, one of three. You can do what’s called facing forward, which is like acknowledging it, which is a form of putting your own bid in there to match it.
So both parties are going to draw checks on this bank from time to time, you need your relationship to be there when you’re feeling bummed out, sometimes you’re sick, or in a bad mood, you feel fat, you - you go like, “Oh, can I fall back on this relationship?”
And if it’s overdrawn, if there’s no trust, it’s like, somebody puts a bid in it and if you go - for example, by saying, “Oh, our favourite show’s on tonight,” if you go, “Yeah, yeah.” Like that’s you taking the bid out, wiping your ass with it, I don’t know where the metaphor goes. You’re not matching it.
And then what happens is - this happens a lot with men and women, is that like, because men have this thing where they’re just like, they think too logically in their discourse, so it’s like, “Look at that thing, isn’t that pretty,” and the guy’ll tend too often to go, “I don’t see how that’s more pretty than anything else in particular,” like trying to make sure - ‘cause I think American men, we’re socialized to like, be more logical, not change our minds, all this stuff, and then like - so that’s an example, you betray the trust and then like, the other person will double down on the bid, they’ll start putting more shit in there. And then they get all messed up, like, “I don’t - I do everything and you don’t do anything,” and it just comes out at random times. “Aw, you put so [much] shit into this relationship”.
All you’ve got to do is retrain your brain, even if it’s perfunctoral - because they’ve done these studies, where they take - they started taking couple’s science into - like, they just study us like animals now - and they just take like people who are happy, as couples, and they study their behaviour and they found that if you can make bad couples emulated good couples’ behaviour, bad couples can turn into good couples, they get happy.
JD: So what is the good behaviour?
DH: The good behaviour is just that rhythm of matching emotional bids. If someone petitions the relationship for acknowledgement, then you got to ring that bell too. Just once, that’s it. “Hey, look at that bridge.” “Oh, yeah, that’s a great bridge.” Like without being sarcastic. You don’t have to agree that it’s a great bridge, but also don’t be a shithead. Just say, “Yeah, it’s a great bridge,” like just stop - face forward - literally face the person that wants your attention, and engage them for just as much time as they said, “Oh, Game of Thrones is on tomorrow.” “Yeah, isn’t that show great?” Like, just fucking match it.
[…]
JD: Alright, so in that moment, now, now that you have that intellectual knowledge of the emotional bids thing […]. Now, if Erin says, “Look at that bridge,” or, “Do you like hotdogs?” you’re still going to probably react, in that first moment of -
DH: No, emotionally, yes. I won’t be able to stop myself from - like the counselor says, it’s like when you hit your knee with a hammer, it’s just a reflex. Reflexes are reflexes, but - you have an internal reflexive reaction - but that can be a dinner bell. Like that can be a triangle that rings, that is a reminder, “Oh, this is that moment where I do that thing, where I stop, face her, and acknowledge what she just said.” And then go back to - y'know - so yeah. It’s literally just changing your behaviour.
[…]
JD: I guess the metaphor for the bid thing is that you can keep ante-ing up and someone can keep just taking the money off the table and not putting anything back in.
DH: That’s every guy’s first questions, is, “What if you keep matching emotional bids and you keep having to look at twenty bridges per second?” That was my first question, and then I went to the […] writer’s room, so excited about these tools I’d learned, and every guy immediately was like, “But what if, what if you look at the bridge and say, 'Oh, nice bridge’, and you’ve got to do it again five seconds later?”
That "What if? What if the other person abuses me doing the normal right thing?“ is called mistrust. And trust is the foundation of a relationship. You can change anything you want about a house, but if you don’t have trust in a relationship, it just doesn’t matter, it’s like a fucked up house.
So you just have to fucking jump in, you just have to do this. You’re not going to have to look at twenty bridges, there aren’t twenty bridges, Jesus. Like, she really just wants - It’s like breathing, it’s respiration. "Look at the bridge.” “’S nice.” Like, am I in a relationship with you? Am I some microscopic little penny stock level - like a little microtrade that keeps the fucking market going? “Look at that bridge.” Yes, I am in the space with you, I am not numb. I am not like astral-projecting over Miami right now.
There's a fantastic Hamontown episode about this particular idea and how it's unrealistic or otherwise the foundation for a relationship is untrustworthy:
If you're being used that's a relationship you shouldn't be in in the first place. But for a relationship about trust the "What if it happens every day" scenario shouldn't exist and you wouldn't expect it to
I can't imagine anyone would want to date a person this cynically paranoid.
Be a gentleman and carry your SO's purse for a little. Why is this an issue? Comes up all the time when I'm shopping for clothes with my girlfriend.
Fuuuuuck that op. It's a pretty clear move don't fall for it.
Not too long ago I was at work chatting with a cop buddy and this couple comes in. Guy is holding the purse and they strike up a conversation with us. Cop makes a light joke about the dude holding the purse and he says how he loves holding it for her....
Don't become that guy brah.
Be a gentleman and carry your SO's purse for a little. Why is this an issue? Comes up all the time when I'm shopping for clothes with my girlfriend.
Obviously the OP cares. So do many other posters in this topic.
You can't have this attitude about everything in every situation. That would lead to abuse by others you're in a relationship with, be it intentionally or unintentionally.
It's her accessory, not his. He would hold it for a period of time for good reason but it's unfair to him to be asked to hold it for and extended period of time "just cause". If she didn't want to have it on her she could leave it in the car as he said.
I'd hold the shit out of that purse until she asks for it back because it'd look better on me than her.
you people have some fucked up relationships goddamn