• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

HomePod Announced (Siri Speaker) Sonos meets Amazon Echo, $349

giga

Member
Du1xFHs.png
Gonna guess this has to do with Apple TV/iOS/AirPlay 2 integration. Lots of room to improve audio playback of content on your TV and seamless audio playback from your iOS devices.
 

mackaveli

Member
Gonna guess this has to do with Apple TV/iOS/AirPlay 2 integration. Lots of room to improve audio playback of content on your TV and seamless audio playback from your iOS devices.

I think maybe there will be a special event for tv in august or something. Or maybe in October. They said they have more to show with Apple TV and maybe it'll be around original content, homepod, and a tv service? The carpool karokee got delayed till August and no idea about planet of the apps is coming out.

Maybe they want to do a bigger launch at an event?

I don't know if they want to have a September event for iPhone, watch and then tv and homepod. They need more events. They can't squeeze everything in a couple of events a year now as they branch out to other things.
 

number11

Member
I also don't understand people calling it ugly. It's a pretty simple design that wouldn't look out of place in a room.. especially compared with the echo.
 

Akira

Member
It's hard to take people saying the design looks "ugly as fuck" seriously.

I mean, these are its competitors:

echo_feature._CB526147196_.png


google_home_assistant.jpg


81c7cBYRjnL._SY355_.jpg


Out of those and the HomePod, I would say the only one that is truly fugly is the Amazon Echo. The Sonos has the most appealing design to me, but it's only a speaker and not an assistant. The Google Home has a cutesy design and the top part with the "sliced" look is somewhat of an odd design feature but it's pretty cool to me. To me, the HomePod (Homepod?) is the most balanced design.

The pricing is a different issue, but a lot of people were expecting pricing between $299-$499 and this is on the lower end of that scale. I think $249-$299 would have been the sweet spot.
 

Futureman

Member
Wait does this use Bing for search?

I think it looks nice and apparently the sounds is amazing but unless Siri is greatly improved that part seems like a wash.
 
I'm intrigued on what they might be able to do with this after a couple of software updates.

Also would love for this to be a mesh network device.

Unless it has more features than announced, however, not really interested.
 

Future

Member
This might be a bigger step in getting more mainstream people to buy new style expensive audio gear

Goodbye big receiver and wired speakers. Hello super expensive single, wireless, tied to music subscription speaker. One that can only be paired with speakers of the same maker. It's a new age!
 

Stinkles

Clothed, sober, cooperative
This might be a bigger step in getting more mainstream people to buy new style expensive audio gear

Goodbye big receiver and wired speakers. Hello super expensive single, wireless, tied to music subscription speaker. One that can only be paired with speakers of the same maker. It's a new age!


Can't tell if satire


However I don't get the aesthetics complaints. They're all innocuous and inoffensive. The Alexa ring of light is garish but actually useful.
 

MercuryLS3

Junior Member
I automatically assumed. But I guess it needs tune in and Spotify and Pandora etc. no way will they exclude those...right?

It's possible that they start with Apple music and open it up over time. I really hope I'm wrong with that and by the time December rolls around they announce that it works with 3rd party apps.
 
It's possible that they start with Apple music and open it up over time. I really hope I'm wrong with that and by the time December rolls around they announce that it works with 3rd party apps.
As far as I can tell it does Apple Music natively and everything else via AirPlay
 

captive

Joe Six-Pack: posting for the common man
As far as I can tell it does Apple Music natively and everything else via AirPlay

if thats true thats stupid. The beauty of Sonos, and how i've demoed it to people that didnt know about it, was showing them starting music on my phone and then literally turning my phone off. They're usually like wait what, you're not playing from your phone?
 
if thats true thats stupid. The beauty of Sonos, and how i've demoed it to people that didnt know about it, was showing them starting music on my phone and then literally turning my phone off. They're usually like wait what, you're not playing from your phone?

We don't know how AIrplay 2 works yet, but I wouldn't be surprised if it was more akin to how Google Cast and Sonos worked. The fact that the thing has a smartphone class chip in it suggests that it would handles streams on it's own.
 
I'm surprised to see so many reporters comparing the Play:3 and the HomePod. Yes they're similar in price, but the Play:1 is superior to the Play:3 in almost every way. The Play:3 also debuted in 2011.

Exactly.

Try comparing this to stereo Play 1 setup, for $50 cheaper. When Sonos updates the Play 3 to gen 2, it'll blow this thing out of the water. Play 5 gen 2 is a marvel and only $150 more than the HomePod.

Also, not sure how much of a good audio comparison you can make on a demo floor.
 

jts

...hate me...
You can always Airplay any music streaming service from your iPhone I guess.

I wonder how Apple will handle the multiple "Hey siri" requests anyway. It's annoying enough as is now with just iPhone + Watch. Maybe should just automatically disable Hey Siri on devices when in the presence of home wifi. Also would be cool to assign new trigger keywords.
 

Giolon

Member
You can always Airplay any music streaming service from your iPhone I guess.

I wonder how Apple will handle the multiple "Hey siri" requests anyway. It's annoying enough as is now with just iPhone + Watch. Maybe should just automatically disable Hey Siri on devices when in the presence of home wifi. Also would be cool to assign new trigger keywords.

iOS 10 already has the ability to detect which device to respond to Hey Siri on automatically, and in my personal experience in a home with 3 devices, one being the watch, it works properly about 80% of the time at identifying the best one.
 
You can always Airplay any music streaming service from your iPhone I guess.

I wonder how Apple will handle the multiple "Hey siri" requests anyway. It's annoying enough as is now with just iPhone + Watch. Maybe should just automatically disable Hey Siri on devices when in the presence of home wifi. Also would be cool to assign new trigger keywords.

For a while now for me if multiple devices pick up my "hey Siri" the one who grabs it first, usually the closest one, takes over and the other things deactivate. I can reproduce this consistently using my watch, phone, and iPad. They must do some kind of Bluetooth packet thing to say "wait guys. I got this"

Of course this only becomes 100% useful if I can tell any device to do something on a different device "hey Siri set an alarm on my iPhone" so I hope that's in the pipeline
 

jts

...hate me...
iOS 10 already has the ability to detect which device to respond to Hey Siri on automatically, and in my personal experience in a home with 3 devices, one being the watch, it works properly about 80% of the time at identifying the best one.
Huh. For me more times than desirable when I raise my Apple Watch and say Hey Siri, both it and my iPhone will respond, if iPhone is nearby.

This with an iPhone 6s+. I don't know if that's the case but don't forget that previous devices don't answer to Hey Siri if they are not charging. That helps a bit.
 

vonStirlitz

Unconfirmed Member
Urgh. Its just HAL with a prettier voice.

I expect it to engage termination mode if you fail to agree to subscribe for Apple Music.
 

jts

...hate me...
I just don't get the branding here.

Of all of the possibilities, like Apple Home, or Siri Speaker, going with this name is baffling.

My thoughts exactly.
The name is in the vein of the very recent (and successful) AirPods and is reminiscent of the iPod that was the big music product that basically turned around Apple.

They are marketing it as a music high quality speaker first and foremost, which also has Siri. Not the other way around. That's the big difference from Google Home and Echo.

Not that I love the name either, mind.
 

Markitron

Is currently staging a hunger strike outside Gearbox HQ while trying to hate them to death
If the sound quality is as good as they say then I might be interested. I like the idea of it using my Apple Music account, so I won't have to mess around with my phone to play music.

If you can pair these with AppleTV, I'd be willing to buy a pair for $349 for a Dolby Atmos-like home theater setup. $700 for that seems high.

How would a pair be similar to an Atmos setup?
 

aznpxdd

Member
Price is not an issue if the audio quality is there, but its Apple we are talking about? Not strongly confident with its audio capability when AirPods cost $160 and sounds about the same as $20 IEM's.
 
Price is not an issue if the audio quality is there, but its Apple we are talking about? Not strongly confident with its audio capability when AirPods cost $160 and sounds about the same as $20 IEM's.

This is the issue. I’ll wait on reviews but as someone with an iPad and iPhone and Apple Music this whole set up is appealing.
 

SteveMeister

Hang out with Steve.
If the sound quality is as good as they say then I might be interested. I like the idea of it using my Apple Music account, so I won't have to mess around with my phone to play music.



How would a pair be similar to an Atmos setup?

The devices use spatial detection to figure out the shape of the room and beam forming to direct the sound optimally, and using two of them in concert gives you even better room filling sound, plus I'd assume more separation of discrete channels. This is similar to what a properly configured Atmos setup is supposed to do, particularly Atmos soundbars. However as far as I can tell there's no approximation of ceiling channels, so it's not exactly like Atmos.
 

samar11

Member
Fuck if it wasn't for Steve jobs, this company would of been in trouble but thanks to Iphone, they can just produce all the crap they want even if becomes a failure. Just as long as they got the iphone cash coming in lol

Edit: Come to think of it, wasn't Apple in a bit of trouble after they let Steve go?
 

giga

Member
I just don't get the branding here.

Of all of the possibilities, like Apple Home, or Siri Speaker, going with this name is baffling.

My thoughts exactly.
Branding. It's a music device first and foremost, so they're branding it for that line of products. iPod, EarPod, AirPod, HomePod.
 

entremet

Member
Sonos protocol is better than airplay 1. Of you just want to play from your device sonos can do that. You can also import iTunes Playlist.

I disagree since it doesn't even support 3rd party podcast players like Overcast or Pocketcast.

I love Sonos. And I'm still going to stay in that ecosystem, but I can't stand their app and slowass support for things like 3rd party podcast players.
 
Top Bottom