Gonna guess this has to do with Apple TV/iOS/AirPlay 2 integration. Lots of room to improve audio playback of content on your TV and seamless audio playback from your iOS devices.
Gonna guess this has to do with Apple TV/iOS/AirPlay 2 integration. Lots of room to improve audio playback of content on your TV and seamless audio playback from your iOS devices.
Yeah, I never really used Siri.
Another echoing its quality over the play 3.
Gonna guess this has to do with Apple TV/iOS/AirPlay 2 integration. Lots of room to improve audio playback of content on your TV and seamless audio playback from your iOS devices.
Sonos protocol is better than airplay 1. Of you just want to play from your device sonos can do that. You can also import iTunes Playlist.Bleh
$349?
what in the living hell is that price point, are you insane
Still gotta pay that Apple tax.
This might be a bigger step in getting more mainstream people to buy new style expensive audio gear
Goodbye big receiver and wired speakers. Hello super expensive single, wireless, tied to music subscription speaker. One that can only be paired with speakers of the same maker. It's a new age!
Yeah. Depends how good it is. I paid $800 for the speakers I have, well worth it. A high quality mini speaker with extra assistant functionality could be fair.If it's a really good wifi speaker, $350 is reasonable.
Watch Apple be vain enough to have it only stream from Apple Music lol
$350? Hahaaaa
I automatically assumed. But I guess it needs tune in and Spotify and Pandora etc. no way will they exclude those...right?
As far as I can tell it does Apple Music natively and everything else via AirPlayIt's possible that they start with Apple music and open it up over time. I really hope I'm wrong with that and by the time December rolls around they announce that it works with 3rd party apps.
As far as I can tell it does Apple Music natively and everything else via AirPlay
if thats true thats stupid. The beauty of Sonos, and how i've demoed it to people that didnt know about it, was showing them starting music on my phone and then literally turning my phone off. They're usually like wait what, you're not playing from your phone?
But I thought Apple was a notorious tax dodger....Still gotta pay that Apple tax.
I'm surprised to see so many reporters comparing the Play:3 and the HomePod. Yes they're similar in price, but the Play:1 is superior to the Play:3 in almost every way. The Play:3 also debuted in 2011.
You can always Airplay any music streaming service from your iPhone I guess.
I wonder how Apple will handle the multiple "Hey siri" requests anyway. It's annoying enough as is now with just iPhone + Watch. Maybe should just automatically disable Hey Siri on devices when in the presence of home wifi. Also would be cool to assign new trigger keywords.
You can always Airplay any music streaming service from your iPhone I guess.
I wonder how Apple will handle the multiple "Hey siri" requests anyway. It's annoying enough as is now with just iPhone + Watch. Maybe should just automatically disable Hey Siri on devices when in the presence of home wifi. Also would be cool to assign new trigger keywords.
Huh. For me more times than desirable when I raise my Apple Watch and say Hey Siri, both it and my iPhone will respond, if iPhone is nearby.iOS 10 already has the ability to detect which device to respond to Hey Siri on automatically, and in my personal experience in a home with 3 devices, one being the watch, it works properly about 80% of the time at identifying the best one.
My thoughts exactly.What an awful name. Why did they think bringing back the Pod name was smart?
The name is in the vein of the very recent (and successful) AirPods and is reminiscent of the iPod that was the big music product that basically turned around Apple.I just don't get the branding here.
Of all of the possibilities, like Apple Home, or Siri Speaker, going with this name is baffling.
My thoughts exactly.
If you can pair these with AppleTV, I'd be willing to buy a pair for $349 for a Dolby Atmos-like home theater setup. $700 for that seems high.
Apple as always "innovating".
Price is not an issue if the audio quality is there, but its Apple we are talking about? Not strongly confident with its audio capability when AirPods cost $160 and sounds about the same as $20 IEM's.
If the sound quality is as good as they say then I might be interested. I like the idea of it using my Apple Music account, so I won't have to mess around with my phone to play music.
How would a pair be similar to an Atmos setup?
Branding. It's a music device first and foremost, so they're branding it for that line of products. iPod, EarPod, AirPod, HomePod.I just don't get the branding here.
Of all of the possibilities, like Apple Home, or Siri Speaker, going with this name is baffling.
My thoughts exactly.
Sonos protocol is better than airplay 1. Of you just want to play from your device sonos can do that. You can also import iTunes Playlist.
Is Siri not going to be ass for that price?
why not just get a sonos which is similar price, well established and absolutely awesomeCould be a good alternative to a Sonos system