Not actually Horror, but highly influenced by horrorI picked up The Satanic Bible for research today. Has anyone read it?
Yep, back in my teens. It's not really influenced by horror; it's just sub-Nietzschean will-to-power philosophy with meaningless rituals sprinkled on top. Please let me know if you agree/disagree with any of this after you've read the book!
I've known a good number of Satanists over the years. Despite the aggressive push towards individuality and uniqueness in the book, they were all pretty similar types of people. They often have the self-assurance and arrogance of the basic pick-up-artist type, and just like PUA, they are able to use a combination of emotional callousness and manipulation to get what they want from certain very specific types of people much of the time. But anyone with a modicum of intelligence or experience can see right through them, and while they're
not sociopaths, the fact that they
wish they were is obvious. Being aware that somebody is trying to manipulate you is a very strange sensation. It's fascinating to have a few Satanists in your friend group, because you can observe them trying to exploit and manipulate each other.
They all tend to be incapable of defining the "rational" part of Satanism's core tenet ("rational self-interest") as anything more complicated than "hidden". I feel like my self-interest is better served by cultivating sincere relationships based on mutual respect and empathy; ideally with diverse types of people who aren't just like me. In my experience, most Satanists are only close to other Satanists. It's like a religion of grifters who bond over their grifting while frequently trying to grift each other. Naturally they are almost all Libertarians, and strong advocates of bootstraps philosophy, small government, and low taxes; despite the fact that this is not always in their rational self-interest.
That's not to say they all have to think this way, of course. LaVey doesn't impose a rigid moral philosophy; so just about anyone who can assert themselves while ignoring ethical systems based on superstition, and has a good sense of who they are and what they want in life, could be defined as a Satanist. It's just that only a certain type of person
also has any desire to choose to adopt the Satanist label.
That probably sounds harsh, but it's been my experience. I feel like out-Satanist King Diamond probably doesn't have this fedora-Satanist kind of personality. Fairly certain a young Christina Ricci did, once upon a time. I should also clarify that I've only known British, American, and Canadian Satanists. If nothing else, I hope GAF's Satanists (I know we have a few) find my perspective informative. It's not my intention to offend you. This was my experience, and these were my findings.