Dr. Claus
Banned
I don't really have an opinion on Jason Schrier as a journalist. Maybe I don't follow him close enough on Twitter or read most of his articles. As this is one of the only articles I've read...taken at face value I think the article is very informative. I've always wondered just how EA figures out how to screw it's developers. I've also wondered how much of this falls on the developer itself. This article at the very least lends some perspective to both questions. Even if Jason Schrier has a narrative to push, as long as what he's saying in this article is true and the information isn't omitting large details that could potentially change ones opinions, then you should look at the work as solid journalism.
The point is, we all know Anthem is not what we hoped it would be. We speculated all through its development that it was in trouble due to the departures of seasoned veterans. We rejoiced when Casey Hudson came back into the fold. Now we have more information about this development cycle than one could ever expect and people are dismissing it because it's Jason Schrier? Seriously? Is it because he's from Kotaku, which seems to have an Xbox-leaning bias?
It just doesn't seem to make sense why he's met with so much vitriol on what seems to me like an unprecedented look into the development hell of one of the most anticipated games of this year.
Seriously, shame on you if you can't put your personal bias aside for this.
That is the problem with Jason Schreier - this is not the typical work he publishes. The majority of what he writes is clickbait or written to push a very specific narrative (the Rockstar scandal). When he wants to, he can put out damn good, non-biased pieces, so when you typically see him go for the idiotic click bait and "GAMERS ARE DEAD" shit, it gets infuriating.
I remember someone putting it in a tweet succinctly:
"You know he can do good work, so seeing him routinely go the opposite direction is just frustrating."