The Dead Flag Blues
Member
Built my new pc just under a month ago. Went from GTX 1080 8GB to 7900XTX 24GB. Very happy with it so far.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
MisterXDTV
Member
Don't worry man, those very same people would absolutely buy a $500 PC that is better than PS5 and Series X combined
LOL
Do you have an onlyfans?
RickSanchez
Member
That's probably because GAF has a higher proportion of users who are enthusiast-level PC tinkerers, atleast the ones who are regularly active and vote on polls. For example i have had more than 10 GB VRAM since 2017 (a 1080Ti, now upgraded to 4090). That's not representative of the entire Steam userbase but a closer representation of GAFfers.
Proteus Maximus
Member
8GB here. Rocking a RTX 4060. That's by choice, not financial restraints. I'm not drinking the cool aid PCMR drinks.
Bojji
Member
Based on replies in many other threads I always thought that half of PC gaf have 4090's.
My vote: 12GB that is in 3080ti (got great deal on it).
Last edited:
StereoVsn
Gold Member
This thread in no way represents vast majority of PC gamers. Look at Steam Survey results and 4080/4090/7900XT/7900XTX represent a very tiny fraction of player base.
Developers don’t just cater to high end gear for obvious reasons. Hell, Steam Deck/Handhelds have been popular and they don’t have much power.
While you can’t build a new PC for $500, you can certainly build a good one for under $1K. If you get some used parts it could be even cheaper.
64bitmodels
Reverse groomer.
.
SportsFan581
Member
Currently a RX5600 6GB @ 1440p.
Primarily picked that up to test AMD drivers and what not. I will likely grab a RX6800 16GB before they are all gone. It's a nice value at $380.
Primarily picked that up to test AMD drivers and what not. I will likely grab a RX6800 16GB before they are all gone. It's a nice value at $380.
Krappadizzle
Member
I have a 3080ti. I play at 3440x1440. 12gbs of vram in the card hasn't been an issue. But I don't foresee it not being an issue in the near future. Having had a 1080ti for a while(one of the best cards Nvidia had made since the 8800) I was sure that skipping the 20xx series was a good idea, I should have waited a bit longer for the 40xx series. Not too peeved about it though, I'll just end up giving the 3080ti to the wife and getting a 50xx series card in the future, gives me time to save up.
But honestly, the prices of the cards have represented less and less value all the years and it's hard to justify spending so much on such a niche device it feels like. I hope AMD and Intel can really step their game up and start really competing. AMD oscillates in doing a great job and then super mediocre in my eyes and I wish they had the capabilities to really compete with Nvidia the way the consumer demand should be entitled to.
But honestly, the prices of the cards have represented less and less value all the years and it's hard to justify spending so much on such a niche device it feels like. I hope AMD and Intel can really step their game up and start really competing. AMD oscillates in doing a great job and then super mediocre in my eyes and I wish they had the capabilities to really compete with Nvidia the way the consumer demand should be entitled to.
diffusionx
Gold Member
The point is that when you see threads like "is 12 GB not enough anymore", it's just so out of touch with what the rest of the PC world is doing and what devs have to think of when they make their games.
64bitmodels
Reverse groomer.
I mean sure but a lot of the biggest games coming out for PC today are not exactly stuff that you'd expect people on 1050s to run.
MisterXDTV
Member
BennyBlanco
aka IMurRIVAL69
Hudo
Member
Skill issue
Senua
Member
Another one who comes into every PC thread upset, for some reason.
MisterXDTV
Member
Why should I be upset? I just laugh at the hypocrisy here
If you can afford a $3000 PC, good for you....
Gaiff
SBI’s Resident Gaslighter
What hypocrisy? Someone having a top-of-the-line rig must shit on budget and mid-tier rigs? Or maybe most of us know that we're enthusiasts and that you don't need to shell out 5 grands to get a solid gaming PC.
Of course, you already know this but you came here to troll so have at it.
Last edited:
MisterXDTV
Member
It seems very clear to me: you just don't want to admit it.
Most people here won't ever DREAM about building a $500 PC because they truly believe it would SUCK, period....
Then those very same people come in console threads complaining about how you could build an AMAZING machine for $500, much better than consoles.
That very same machine they would never use, not even held at gunpoint
It's hilarious, really
Last edited:
D
Deleted member 1159
Unconfirmed Member
You don’t even have to build one, a used Steam Deck can be had for <$300. Or you can spend $2700 on a desktop like I did and play there. Or own both and play on both, like I do. The point is you have options and budget builds are totally realistic and pie in the sky monstrosities are too.
As a PC gamer:
Needlecrash
Member
It's more due to how the game is optimized than your rig.
Gaiff
SBI’s Resident Gaslighter
First of, you keep making shit up with your $500 PC, almost no one says that. Second, if you have the money and are an enthusiast, why would you settle for a budget PC when you can get something better?
You, however, come with the incredibly flawed if not outright moronic premise that someone who has a $3000 rig but also thinks that budget rigs are fine is a hypocrite. Do you realize how stupid it is? Of course, you do, but you're a troll so you don't care.
No, they fucking don't. They correct trolls like you who claim that you need to pay $3-4x for a PC to match the consoles when in actuality, it can be done for $750-1000. You don't need a monstrous rig to have a good gaming experience and most of us recognize that. PCs can be budget conscious, they don't have to cost 3, 4, or 5 grands to be adequate, which is what most of us say.
Yeah, the blatant fallacies you're peddling are indeed hilarious.
Last edited:
MisterXDTV
Member
Let's agree to disagree then, no hard feelings...
If you don't like my posts, put me in the ignore list. It's that simple
KuraiShidosha
Member
Same exact upgrade path here. I had that 11GB VRAM back in March 2017 and laughed at how pathetic the VRAM upgrades were from the 20 and 30 series coupled with the paltry performance gains. The only decent upgrade was the 3090/Ti and those were insanely expensive and offered very weak gains coming from the 1080 Ti. The 4090 has the single biggest generational leap in performance gen over gen since Pascal 10 series vs Maxwell 9, so I knew this was the time to move and upgraded to the 4090 in October 2022. The best time to upgrade is always launch day of a new flagship card because it buys you the most time at the top as possible, since every day that passes following launch the card/chip etc is essentially aging and becoming closer and closer to obsolescence. It's been over a year and a half of owning this card and there's still nothing that comes close, and it will stay that way until the 5090 launches which I'll probably upgrade to.
Bojji
Member
4080 with 24GB?
Gaiff
SBI’s Resident Gaslighter
How about, let’s not go into threads just to platform war? Would be a lot more useful than agreeing to disagree.
MisterXDTV
Member
For the sake of the thread title, I upgraded my old PC from a 1050 Ti (4 GB) to a 4060 ( 8GB) a couple of months ago
I could have bought a 3060 (12 GB) for the same money, but more VRAM on a slower/older card didn't make much sense, especially using it on a 1080p monitor
I could have bought a 3060 (12 GB) for the same money, but more VRAM on a slower/older card didn't make much sense, especially using it on a 1080p monitor
Last edited:
OverHeat
« generous god »
BennyBlanco
aka IMurRIVAL69
Who did that? Lmao. Nice strawman you’ve built there.
Vindicator
Member
2070 8GB since 2019, might go for 16 GB GDDR7 when the 50xx series is out, should be enough for 1440p UW.
smbu2000
Member
Oh forgot to list how much VRAM my retro pc has.
64MB Nvidia Quadro2 Pro (aka Geforce 2 GTS/Ultra)
2 x 12MB 3dfx Vodoo 2 cards in SLI
Super high res/high texture gaming!
Last edited:
FalconPunch
Gold Member
Rtx 4090 gang g’s. Sad thing is I mostly use my pc to browse the web and play on console 
.
.
RickSanchez
Member
The Pascal series and the 1080Ti in particular was an absolute monster, especially for its MSRP. For 6 years it fucking destroyed every game i threw at it.
Finally in 2023 it started showing its age so i pulled the trigger on the 4090. I would advise you to again wait for a couple of generations for maybe the 7090 equivalent. The 5090 may be a decent jump in computing power, but given the current state of the console space (diminishing leaps from gen to gen), game development will still be hamstrung by current gen console power levels for a few years; the 4090 is likely to remain powerful enough to play games at 4k 60 fps high settings for the next 5 years atleast.
Last edited:
Fess
Member
How often does that happen here? Seems like something Digital Foundry would say. I know I would never say it, don’t know whom among the PC enthusiasts I know here would do it either. And it’s not really a point saying it since console enthusiasts don’t stop at $500 either if they want both Xbox and Playstation and Slims and midgen upgrades and online gaming etc etc.
It’s an expensive hobby however you do it if you’re an enthusiast.
YeulEmeralda
Linux User
The 3060 is one of the most popular GPUs and it has 12 gigabyte.