I cried for 45 minutes straight during Inside Out.
They stumbled a bit, but they still got it.
lexluthorwrong.gifI'll be honest - Inside Out didn't really do anything for me. It was fine but it didn't feel like a return to form at all.
No, they haven't.
Inside Out is an exception to a downward trend.
The supposed Disney "Renaissance" has only had two great movies...
Y'know, I still haven't seen Ratatouie. Is it as good as everyone says?
Wasn't a fan of UP. Opening montage is nicely done and melancholic, I'll give it that.
Toy Story 3 I'd also say is fine. Lumping UP and that under weak might be going too far. But after putting out some stellar stuff with Incredibles, Ratatouille, and Finding Nemo, they're middle of the road.
There's literally one mention of Inside Out in the article and none of Coco.
Yeah I found that a bit funny. 'Inside Out' doesn't really support the article's thesis, so the author quickly brushes it aside with barely a sentence to mention it. He also writes off 'Finding Dory' as 'mediocre' without going into why, as if it's just a common knowledge fact.
If they want to argue Pixar is losing its way, that's fine. 2008-2010 may very well be the pinnacle of overall quality for that studio. But this article feels like a lot of complaining about the volume of upcoming Pixar sequels (I don't know how The Incredibles 2 will turn out, but I'm willing to give it a fair shot before criticizing it for being a sequel), complimenting other studios for improving their output of great animated films (which isn't wrong as a lot of recent non-Pixar animated films have been excellent), but not a whole lot of analysis into what the author thinks is wrong with recent Pixar films like Inside Out or Finding Dory.
Y'know, I still haven't seen Ratatouie. Is it as good as everyone says?
Y'know, I still haven't seen Ratatouie. Is it as good as everyone says?
Lost their way? Finding Dory was a fantastic movie.
In combination with ignoring all of the merchandizing, sequels, and other commercialization opportunities for WDFA's recent output, yeah... it's a bunch of very convenient blindspots in order to craft an ephemeral take to grab some clicks. Of Disney's current renaissance, two already have sequels on the way and another two have TV show spinoffs/sequels. But that doesn't support the thesis that they've somehow stolen Pixar's magic and less cynical motivations over what they greenlight.The fact that the article literally doesn't even mention Coco makes it come off as very disingenuous.
Was I the only one that liked Toy Story 3 way more than the other 2?
I think most people did.
Never shared the love for Wreck-It Ralph as many people did and I'm a John C Reilly fan, even. But I can't deny Zootopia was great.
Pixar just needs to ease off the sequels for a little while, which I believe they already announced they'd be doing sometime next year once their in-development stuff was done.
The emotional level is light years (no pun intended) beyond the other two.Really? I thought The first one would be the most popular.
Really? I thought The first one would be the most popular.
I cried for 45 minutes straight during Inside Out.
Wreck It Ralph and Big Hero 6 were turds, though.
Disney bought Pixar and started doing Pixar quality movies better than Pixar.
Not really. Commercially, sure, but Disney movies are markedly more childish and less adult-friendly than Pixar. There is a lot to chew on in movies like Up and Wall-E -- for adults. When Frozen and Moana roll their credits, you can pretty much shrug and conclude "well, I certainly consumed that media."
I think Pixar and Disney are pretty different. Not saying that's good or bad.
We're going to have to disagree.I'd have to disagree with you there, I'm not actually a fan of Zootopia but it had a lot more depth to it than a popcorn flick, Moana too I came away from surprisingly moved by.