The article says that they are cloned human embryos that produced stem cells "indistinguishable from those taken from a naturally fertilized egg". From the wording in the article, it sounds like the embryo may be viable. Now, it is certainly possible that the article has been misleading. If that is the case, then that may change my opinions somewhat. An embryo that can never mature into a human being is a different issue, albeit one that doesn't completely dodge all of the ethical concerns.
From article said:Another important finding in our study is that standard activation treatments involving exposure to ionomycin and 6-DMAP are not sufficient for supporting development of human SCNT embryos. During normal fertilization, sperm entry triggers oocyte activation that is critical for completion of meiosis and for the initiation of mitotic divisions. Activation is also critical for the oocyte’s cytoplasm to acquire the reprogramming and metabolic activity that is necessary to support subsequent development (Susko-Parrish et al., 1994).
Basically, you're not going to get a clone from this method. The article speculates that the pathway to parthenogensis differents from the protocol they used here.
Edit: Let's not forget, secondary sources and those reporting on news stories do not always get what is being said in the article correct. Shall I post the picture?