I'm 100% fine with it being a brutal and difficult proof. It should be one in fact. This shouldn't just be accepted, it should debated, like anything.Peer reviewed by whom? Failed from the start sadly. Other wise hard agree.
Maybe when that nefarious (not all to be sincere) academic closed reasoning and carefully cherrypicking of these well paid "experts" that are in control of these LOL "investigations" could take a back seat, which means ykwyk, we can get some immense investigation going that'll ofc has to be cross referenced, and even then we'll most likely end up with different hypothesis regarding the multiple facets that make not only the Piramids in Gaza but all over the world still a mystery. Wait doesn't the Vatican holds miles of ....
![]()
![]()
Quick examples
That idiot is saying there is a 2Km structure bellow the pyramids. Not 20m.
That shit reads like AI generated word salad.Is that the same study as this one?
But why are people so quick to dismiss him?That idiot is saying there is a 2Km structure bellow the pyramids. Not 20m.
But why are people so quick to dismiss him?
Me no understand words, me thinks science words are fake, ooga booga.That shit reads like AI generated word salad.
I find it really strange how aggressively some people resist ideas put forward by non-mainstream historians and theorists.
You can use a pig and coiled tubing units to collect seismic readings with a crap ton of down hole data without the need of digging a "big hole".Thing is it can never be proven because the only way to prove it is by digging to it and the Egyptian government ain't going to let anyone start digging a big hole next to a pyramid to find out.
Because they're the aliensBut why are people so quick to dismiss him?
Let me guess, you are the kind of person, to whom the teacher gave back the test faced down.
It's okay to be a NPC. Embrace it!
![]()
I've been lurking on some ufo subreddits and boy oh boy is ufoism becoming more and more a new age religion.This guy is deep into conspiracy theories, UFOs, spirituality non-sense and the like.
He is not a scientist and is very far from being a reliable source.
Seems like he is the kind of guy that makes stuff up to sell his youtube channel and twitter.
Big claims, require big evidence.
So fell free o prove there is a 2km structure under the pyramids.
It's true, I saw one once. It was 3am, I'd just left club, half a mile down the road the sky lit up with blue flashing lights, everything went dark
Y so emo bro lol ffs that response
![]()
sad.
All these "Ancient civilization" folks use wierd language and don't sound like professional scientists. Graham Hancock is the worst, he'll take a since data point and then spin it off into an entire "lost knowledge of an advanced civilization with a forgotten legacy".But why are people so quick to dismiss him?
It's a power station for consciousness
Nah YOU feel insulted.
I merely gave non invasive/pressured resources for information.
I've never claimed to have information/claims of evidence.
Seems you're triggered AF and I feel very VERY sorry for you.
You can always PM when you get triggered/upset
winjer
Dude, you have issues.
You act like everyone here insulted you for not believing in this non-sense, you insulted several people here you you, and now you try to play it as if you are the reasonable, level headed one.
And of course, when someone asks you for evidence for such claims, you answer with more insults.
Nice gaslighting ya npc
Thanks for proving me right, by using more insults.
Yeah I was just messing around lolAll these "Ancient civilization" folks use wierd language and don't sound like professional scientists. Graham Hancock is the worst, he'll take a since data point and then spin it off into an entire "lost knowledge of an advanced civilization with a forgotten legacy".
Because these people are conmen and grifters taking advantage of gullible fools or might be gullible fools themselves. Like, have you ever wondered why Graham Hancock hasn't used some of his personal fortune to finance an expedition? That's how you know he's a grifter - the mormons actually put their money where their mouth is and financed multiple expeditions to South America to try to find evidence of the stories in the Book of Mormon.
They take advantage of the fact people aren't experts so they exploit these gaps in knowledge: as an example, you know these idiots claiming the perfectly grooved holes in Egyptian stone looked like modern electric tools? plausible right? But if you dig archeologists actually characterised these groves and compared them against modern tools and found substantial differences in depth, distance between groves, timing etc.... they started doing experiments and they found a match: manual drilling using a wet slurry of olive oil and an abrasive (check https://www.penn.museum/sites/expedition/ancient-egyptian-stone-drilling/ ).
As for the topic of the thread, they were supposed to host a press conference the 15th of march, then the 16th, then the 20th.... and we still waiting.
Yeah, now considering the flash cockney walk and the drawings we have from way back then… a lot of things start making sense…I see what you did there.
any dissident opinion is disregarded as a "grift" just makes me question what exactly are you afraid of the consequences being
I'm not sure people don't believe it. They just want some solid proof. There is a difference. We certainly dont have that here either lol, at least yet.Dude, you have issues.
You act like everyone here insulted you for not believing in this non-sense, you insulted several people here you you, and now you try to play it as if you are the reasonable, level headed one.
And of course, when someone asks you for evidence for such claims, you answer with more insults.
You'd have to be a real, braindead NPC to believe this nonsense.I am so fed up with theese sort of sensationalists.
Buy their new book for 50 bucks and be done with it, it's regurgitated nonsense, move on.
AliensOh for fucks sake
Is there big pillars under the pyramids or not?
Just say yes, or no
This is nonsense IMO. Science is about endlessly testing itself, and that is exactly what happens. There are thousands of organizations all over the entire world doing various studies, there is no one set of "politics" controlling anyone.I find it really strange how aggressively some people resist ideas put forward by non-mainstream historians and theorists.
I mean, why not entertain some of the contentions? When there absolutely is evidence and artifacts out there that does not conform with the standard picture of history and human civilization.
Despite what is commonly stated, science has always been entwined with politics. Soft-sciences especially so as they are more interpretive, so the idea of the "purity" of the academy has always been more of an aspiration than an actual reality. And the obvious consequence of that is that maintaining the absolute dominance of a certain canonical view is frequently extremely valuable both reputationally and economically for its champions.
I think seeing the orthodoxy challenged by dissidents is healthy and absolutely necessary.