Acrylamid said:http://www.esa.int/esaCP/SEMBQO71Y3E_index_1.html
Why does a link named "HI-RES JPG" give me a pic with a resolution of 300 x 215 pixels?
?
Does the transmission work like a 56k modem, making the resolution better and better?
I believe the bandwidth is the limiting factor (coupled with battery life). Since they can only transmit so much, purdy pictures for the press are kind of low on the list, next to things like scientific data.gofreak said:With most of these expeditions, first pics tend to have no-colour, be lacking in resolution etc. Not sure what the explanation for that is, but hopefully we'll have larger pics with colour later.
Saturn's moon Titan looks orange -- at least that's what the first refined photo from the Huygens space probe shows.
The pale orange surface is covered by a thin haze of methane and what appears to be a methane sea complete with islands and a mist-shrouded coastline.
Koshiro said:That "first colour image" is FALSE colour, as said by the ESA themselves. I'm not sure how the media has gotten the idea it's true colour at all.
Saturnman said:It looks like... Mars. :lol
jett said:Really...that's disappoiting. I thought it was really going to look "otherwordly" or something.I thought I had read it was an icy planet of sorts...
Heh, you just reminded me of this post over at /.'s poll of the day.Saturnman said:It looks like... Mars.
Rorschach1 (at Slashdot) said:
fallout said:Heh, you just reminded me of this post over at /.'s poll of the day.
gofreak said:It's not exactly the colour your eye would see, but some reports do mention that (and some don't as you rightly say). Hopefully we'll get absolutely "true" colour representations soon.
Teza said:Should we even be expecting high-resolution images, btw? I thought the probe was only sending back a couple of floppy disks worth of data.
gofreak said:I read somewhere that there will be high resolution pics later. It was only one article though, don't know where they were getting their info from. There's about 350 pics alone, so either way, that's more than a couple of floppy disks worth of data..
Teza said:Well, I read this on the BBC:
"We might even have three floppy disks now," said Professor Zarnecki, referring to the previous assumption that the SSP would only collect enough data to fill a floppy disk.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4175099.stm
But I dunno whether the 'SSP' (surface science package) data accounts for all the images/measurements that the probe took....
You have to remember that hey had absolutely no idea where this thing was going to touch down, if it was even going to touch down at all. The seas were merely hypothesized. With a melting point of around -180C, which is around the average temperature of Titan, it would make sense. But again, it was just speculation though.Teza said:Given that most people are interested in Titan's seas (which they might compare with the primordial liquid 'soup' on Earth billions of years ago), a liquid landing would have been more useful.
Yeah, they had similar problems with the moon landings too. Only the last two had any scientific value IIRC.Saturnman said:The problem, especially the Martian missions, is that they send the probes to particularly flat areas (making lander easier, I know). Mars has poles, canyons and gigantic mountains, the view must be much more interesting over there.
gofreak said:No, it doesn't, it's just from one of the instruments, designed to take measurments re. the surface when the probe landed. They were only expecting a floppy, or whatever, because the batteries were expected to die very quickly, but they lasted much longer than expected, presumably allowing that instrument to work for longer and send more data. The rest of the data is seperate, I've no idea how much was sent from the probe in total.
You have to remember that hey had absolutely no idea where this thing was going to touch down, if it was even going to touch down at all. The seas were merely hypothesized. With a melting point of around -180C, which is around the average temperature of Titan, it would make sense. But again, it was just speculation though.
Saturnman said:That ocean is at minus 170 C...
AssMan said:I see. So, we're looking at some penguin-type creatures then?
Saturnman said:That ocean is at minus 170 C...
Exactly. They thought no living beings existed at the bottom of the ocean. Too much pressure, no light, it makes sense. However, all it took was a collecting device and a 10000 ft long string to prove that wrong. Titan will be much more difficult... I don't know how anything could live at -170°C, but sometimes nature finds a way.Phoenix said:If life on earth has taught us anything, life tends to exist in places that just defy reason.
Crap, are you serious? I just finished 2010 and loved it (the film was utter trash, though)... was damn ready to plunge right into 2061 or whatever the hell it was.DarienA said:To say that the series spirals hoplessly out of control after 2010 is an understatement. Don't read any of it...really.
LakeEarth said:I don't know how anything could live at -170°C, but sometimes nature finds a way.
Lots of problems here.Teza said:Yeah, it was ultimately speculation, but a strong enough possibility that they built Huygens to handle a liquid landing. Could they not have factored Titan's revolution into the equation and aimed for the darker areas? Maybe this wasn't feasible before Cassini's launch, but what about when it was closer to Titan?
LakeEarth said:Titan will be much more difficult... I don't know how anything could live at -170°C, but sometimes nature finds a way.
Naked Snake said:So the entire place smells like fart?