Smokey said:Yes Im using two fans on it (came with the setup). Plan to get better fans later on.Noise isn't bad at all. It's noticeable when you're not doing anything and when playing a game you won't hear it at all.
That being said you will get similar temps if you go with something like a 212+.
I just really like the look of the cooler. I have a side panel as well and didn't want to see a mammoth fan sticking out of the corner of my eye![]()
Don't worry about idle temps. What are your load temps while running Prime95 with small fft? And, at what voltage?Eltacoman said:My idle temps are usually around 44 and at 4.2 Ghz It's running about 62 degrees, all with a 212+. Do you think I applied the thermal paste incorrectly? I wonder why I'm running so high.
My cables are a mess at the moment, and I ordered more case fans, to see if that's the problem.
knitoe said:Don't worry about idle temps. What are your load temps while running Prime95 with small fft? And, at what voltage?
One more thing, what cpu?Eltacoman said:~63 degrees, 1.950 volts.
Zimbardo said:isn't a 2500k supposed to be around 1.3 volt when overclocking?
i dont own one, but i thought i read that.
Eltacoman said:Hm, I haven't heard of it being that low. I once tried 2.20 @ 4.5Ghz and got BSOD.
HooYaH said:Please tell me that is a mini MB?? If not, wow that they make heatsinks that huge.
Hazaro said:Normally you want the hot air flowing left (to the exhaust at the back of the case).
I may be wrong, but it looks like the fans are going to blow to the front..
Eltacoman said:Hm, I haven't heard of it being that low. I once tried 2.20 @ 4.5Ghz and got BSOD.
Wow. That's way too high for Sandy bridge CPU. At your speed, 1.30V or below. And, I don't recommend going over 1.35V for 24/7 overclock. Either you are wrong about your voltages or you better hope you didn't damage the CPU with 1.95V.Eltacoman said:Hm, I haven't heard of it being that low. I once tried 2.20 @ 4.5Ghz and got BSOD.
I wouldn't think it would even let you go up that high or function without some PLL stuff.Eltacoman said:~63 degrees, 1.950 volts.
Phew. I could see a CPU going 100+ just booting up at that voltage.Eltacoman said:I meant I'm at 1.190V, not 1.9.
Is that stress tested or general loads?Eltacoman said:Do those temps seem pretty high now that I corrected myself?
LabouredSubterfuge said:I need help GAF.
Which mobo do I need that'll output 5.1 sound in games?
I know not many do but I recall someone saying that the Gigabyte P67 UD4's do? Is this right?
If not, what should I be looking at?
toasty_T said:Is that stress tested or general loads?
63C is pretty decent.
Don't worry too much about that. If you had the intel cooler on and ran the CPU at stock clocks it'd probably be hotter than it is now.Eltacoman said:It's using the Prime stress test, but I was reading on a lot of guides that I shouldn't really be going above 55 degrees at 4.5Ghz, and this is at 4.1
Don't know what guide you are reading, but at 4.5GHz @ ~1.30V, 65-70C is normal using a 212+. Under 60C would require those insanely huge air or water coolers. And, you shouldn't worry if it's under 80C. People shouldn't really be worrying about idle and load temps if you are within safe / good range.Eltacoman said:It's using the Prime stress test, but I was reading on a lot of guides that I shouldn't really be going above 55 degrees at 4.5Ghz, and this is at 4.1
LordCanti said:On Newegg, under "details" (and then "Onboard Audio") it lists the number of channels a board can output. This P67 UD4 board (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813128478&Tpk=P67 UD4) lists that it outputs 8 channels (I'm guessing 7 and a subwoofer? Either way, it will do 5 channels).
For what its worth, most modern motherboards will do 5.1. My jank old HP computer from 2006-2007ish had integrated 5.1.
Edit: If you're getting a new video card, it can probably pass the audio along to your receiver, saving you from having to run an optical cable (assuming that you have a receiver, and not one of those analog 5.1 setups from Logitech or something)
LabouredSubterfuge said:I get that. It's just a lot of mobos output 8 channels of audio, but many of them don't have the particular audio codec license required to output that many channels in games, which is why many people buy cheap soundcards for their 5.1 set ups, because they actually have that codec.
LordCanti said:Aah, I see what you mean now. Googling around, I was able to find out that the board supports Dolby Digital Live (the p67A-UD4 does anyway). Further googling seems to suggest that Dolby Digital Live support implies 5.1 support in games. Whether that is in all games, or some games, is proving difficult for me to discern. Sorry that I can't provide a definitive answer.
Sources:
http://www.dolby.com/consumer/understand/playback/dolby-digital-live.html
http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=3648#ov
Edit: The first reviewer here (http://www.amazon.com/dp/B004PGAMG2/?tag=neogaf0e-20) goes into the 5.1 support of this board. He claims it supports 5.1 audio in gaming.
Azure Phoenix said:Alright, I'm finally ready to start putting together a new PC and this will be the first time I've ever built one. I've got roughly around £1000 to spend but that must include a monitor as well, so I need to keep some aside for that. I've already chosen the case and CPU, but I need help with everything else.
Budget - £1000
Case - Silverstone FT03 (sizes and specs)
CPU - i5 2500k
The two most important things are that it's quiet and can run Skyrim at maximum, but I realise that will be a bit more awkward due to the design of the case. As I'm in the UK that also rules out Newegg and it's crazy bargains.
Gamble said:Can anyone recommend a build/starter pc that may run rift on moderate settings, I'm thinking my laptop and putting it towards the cost of a new one looking to spend between 600-800 give or take![]()
Eltacoman said:It's using the Prime stress test, but I was reading on a lot of guides that I shouldn't really be going above 55 degrees at 4.5Ghz, and this is at 4.1
TheExodu5 said:The $600 build in the OP will play Rift very nicely.
Gamble said:#palmtoface never even thought to look at the OP builds......bless you kind sir
Smokey said:Your idle temps of 44 seem a bit high. I'm around 28-33 and I hit lower 70s on my I7 2600k @ 4.5ghz in prime. While I thought that was a little high reading other forums I hear that the I7s run hot. I've reseated my h70 twice and still get same temps *shrugs*.
When gaming though I'm around the 55c range and that's all I really care about.
knitoe said:Don't know what guide you are reading, but at 4.5GHz @ ~1.30V, 65-70C is normal using a 212+. Under 60C would require those insanely huge air or water coolers. And, you shouldn't worry if it's under 80C. People shouldn't really be worrying about idle and load temps if you are within safe / good range.
Other factors are room temp and case airflow. Where are you regarding that? You might be slightly high given only 4.1GHz @ low 1.19V.
Smokey said:Your idle temps of 44 seem a bit high. I'm around 28-33 and I hit lower 70s on my I7 2600k @ 4.5ghz in prime. While I thought that was a little high reading other forums I hear that the I7s run hot. I've reseated my h70 twice and still get same temps *shrugs*.
When gaming though I'm around the 55c range and that's all I really care about.
TheExodu5 said:Just to tweak that build a little bit to your $800 budget, I'd suggest bumping up the GPU to a GTX 560 Ti or 6950 2GB, and bumping the i3 2100 to an i5 2400 (which gets you a quad core). As for the case, it's up to you, but the HAF 912 gets a hearty recommendation from me, as it has nice cooling and is very easy to work with, though there are other options that might suit your tastes better.
edit: oh, those builds don't come with Windows 7...I forgot. Might need to drop something from my recommendations if you want to keep it at $800, then, unless you can get a cheap student copy of Windows 7. If you can manage to keep the GTX 560 or 6950, as well as the 2400, that would be great. Otherwise, you can just worry about upgrading it later on if you like.
I think room temps affect idle temps quite a bit, which may be the reason he's hitting 44. Over here at my place (philippines) with no airconditioning unit on, it can get freakishly hot and it shows in my rig's temps as well. My 2500k @ 4.5 for example easily reaches 70+/near 80 on load, especially on a really sunny day and that's with a v6gtSmokey said:Your idle temps of 44 seem a bit high. I'm around 28-33 and I hit lower 70s on my I7 2600k @ 4.5ghz in prime. While I thought that was a little high reading other forums I hear that the I7s run hot. I've reseated my h70 twice and still get same temps *shrugs*.
When gaming though I'm around the 55c range and that's all I really care about.
If you get a N router with gigabit ports and you have devices that also has them, your LAN speed would increase ~10X. Your wireless should at least double if the your devices support N. And, your internet speeds should stay about the same unless your current router couldn't handle the max download/upload speeds.Trojita said:I was wondering if I would benefit enough from a new router to justify its purchase? I see a e3000 refurb for $65.
Right now I live in a studio apartment. I have a Linksys WRT54G connected to a DOCSIS 3.0 Modem. The router has DD-WRT installed on it. My computer is hooked up to my Router with a LAN Cable. I have a laptop that I use as well as that has wireless N. I have PS3 which is wireless but can be wired, a 360 which I don't have wired in right now but would be wired (I also have the wireless adapter for if needed), as well as my cell phone which occasionally connected to my wireless. I plan on adding a NAS as well as a HTPC which I would both have most likely wired to the router. Would I see any speed increase in my wired connections, namely my PC?
I decided to go for the FT03 due to the way my room is going to be set up (the tower will have to sit on the top of the desk), plus I absolutely detest all these massive black towers with vents, grills, LEDs and other junk. It needed to be something small and stylish. Due to the way the FT03 is designed it's the same height as a normal tower but half the depth, yet still can fit full size video cards and keeps everything cool.goodfella said:I'm in exactly the same situation as you, here is a link to my post from a page back...
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=29039763&postcount=3256
That is the build I have come up with, but it could probably use some tweaking. Any reason you chose that case?
I think my cable speed was like 28/15. I think the LAN speeds supposedly of the b/g router I currently have is 54Mbps. Would the actual internet connected to the computer on the LAN be faster because the LAN Speed is faster, or would it not see any difference since 28 is lower than 54 anyways?knitoe said:If you get a N router with gigabit ports and you have devices that also has them, your LAN speed would increase ~10X. Your wireless should at least double if the your devices support N. And, your internet speeds should stay about the same unless your current router couldn't handle the max download/upload speeds.