I was filmed having sex.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Londa said:
I see that, but before that you show a rude image to my comment. I'm sorry but you come off as contrary to what you claim. Do you blame me for thinking that way? Its like me saying that you are an asshole and I wish the worse for you but in my next post I say that I want the best for you and I think you are a great person.
It's not really the same at all. I didn't actually say anything to you, or call you an insult. I used the all my friends are dead post because I thought it was applicable to your post because you didn't explain your reasoning. I do realize that it probably came off as a little harsh and for that I apologize. If you really don't want to explain yourself then don't, but if you are going to inject yourself into a discussion, be prepared to actually discuss your opinion. And the reason no one else has explained their opinion is because no one else has been asked to. RDreamer explained his in a perfectly rational way, saying that there are benefits to both sides, without saying that your opinion was inferior in anyway. Actually, no one has said that your opinion is inferior, just that they want you to explain your reasoning.
 
Londa said:
Real mature.
ironing-board6u8y.jpg
 
Londa said:
derp! I disagree with you so I'm going to call you mentally ill. Real mature.

I don't think he's maliciously asking if you're mentally ill. There are just...certain things about your posting style and the way you interact with people on here, I guess.
 
Londa said:
To sum it up. Its my opinion, that is why I think that way. Good on you, that you see things differently. But don't go trying to convince me to think like you. I'm not going to debate this. Or have someone saying I'm wrong. I have a right to my opinion and I don't have to go into detail either.


You are a fucking shit poster.


REEEEAL TAAAALK


-fuck it, slamming that idiot on ignore, waste of my eyes reading some thread shitters rubbish
 
dream said:
I don't think he's maliciously asking if you're mentally ill. There are just...certain things about your posting style and the way you interact with people on here, I guess.


asperger's is a mental illness. My posting style doesn't give of a vibe of aspergers.

"Hans Asperger who, in 1944, studied and described children in his practice who lacked nonverbal communication skills, demonstrated limited empathy with their peers, and were physically clumsy."

these symptom would be identified by studying a person interacting with the real world. Not from someone's style of writing on a forum.

Blair: bye bye ^^
 
Oh, you can DEFINITELY tell when someone on a forum has Asperger's. I'm not saying you have it, but it's usually pretty clear.
 
CHEEZMO™ said:
Wronger than a wrong thing.

The Mod thread alone convinced me.

You are a doctor?

I'm not sorry for finding a rude joke, rude. Put me on ignore if you don't like what I find offensive.

I'm out, this thread has become less about the OP and more about being upset with me. PM me about your issue, don't change the subject of this thread.
 
Londa said:
You are a doctor?

I'm not sorry for finding a rude joke, rude. Put me on ignore if you don't like what I find offensive.
It wasn't that you found it offensive. It was the 10 pages on Not Getting The Message after it.

And I don't put anyone on Ignore, cos I'm not a tool.

Edit:
I'm out, this thread has become less about the OP and more about being upset with me. PM me about your issue, don't change the subject of this thread.
Seems to happen a lot 'round here.
 
CHEEZMO™ said:
It wasn't that you found it offensive. It was the 10 pages on Not Getting The Message after it.

And I don't put anyone on Ignore, cos I'm not a tool.

Edit:
Seems to happen a lot 'round here.


People who post spoilers and thread shitters are the only people who go on my ignore list.


I am a tool though.
 
I think what everyone is trying to say, Londa, is that you have a history of almost...I don't know...not being able to comprehend what people are trying to explain to you once you set your mind to something. Maybe it's just stubbornness, but I can understand why Qwomo and CHEEZMO™ might think it's something else.
 
:lol, wow, what happened in this thread, some touchy people here. Why was everyone picking on Londa? All he/she said was that they don't see the point of getting married if you're gonna go sleeping with other people. I'm sure that's a widely held opinion everywhere on earth, and yet everyone acts surprised and jump down Londa's throat and on top claims he/she has aspergers?

Meanwhile, the OP is a large hairy ginger who is a professional porn actor in gay bear films, who recently got married to another dude. They have an open relationship and enjoy threesomes and he doesn't mind getting filmed having sex for 5 years without his knowledge. This is clearly what we need to be focused on here. Way to ruin the thread you bullies!
 
Yeah, that's seriously not cool he didn't inform you. I've ventured around with filming sex and it's really fun. But to me, that is a HUGE breach of trust to do it without your knowledge. Less fun too.

Not to mention just plain creepy he mentioned "the other videos."
 
Personally, I think the OP and his compadres are whoring around and I don't respect what they're doing, but you don't see ME trotting around posting my opinion when not aske---

....oops.
 
VelvetMouth said:
So believing in staying faithful and not fucking other people other than your spouse, that makes one a puritan these days?
The couple decides what constitutes faithfulness, not you or anyone else.
 
Roto13 said:
The couple decides what constitutes faithfulness, not you or anyone else.

Nobody said it was my decision. I only find it funny that the same people who are so open an non judgemental are quick to call those who do not share their beliefs puritans.
 
I bought a used Mini DV tape at a Goodwill in Austin TX a few years for a quarter to mess around with a new videocamera I had purchased. I joked around with nmy wife in the car that I bet it had porn on it and Ill be damned. I loaded it into the camera and I was watching some chick go down on a dude. lol

Still have the vid around here somewhere. If anyone in Austin lost a tape of them and tehir other I have it...
 
VelvetMouth said:
Nobody said it was my decision. I only find it funny that the same people who are so open an non judgemental are quick to call those who do not share their beliefs puritans.

That's not a judgment, it's a truth based on how they share an ideal with the Puritans. Any negative spin on that you brought to the table yourself.
 
krypt0nian said:
That's not a judgment, it's a truth based on how they share an ideal with the Puritans. Any negative spin on that you brought to the table yourself.

I must be the only one who saw puritans as being used as a derogatory term, a slight as in you are close minded and living in the past or forever alone.
 
VelvetMouth said:
I must be the only one who saw puritans as being used as a derogatory term, a slight as in you are close minded and living in the past or forever alone.
It is derogatory. Sex should be safe, honest and consensual; beyond that, any notion of a sexual morality beyond a sense of what's right for you personally has no place outside religious conservatism.
 
Teh Hamburglar said:
Not so stealth brag


OP is troubled a casual sex partner didn't treat him with respect. Where is the outrage supposed to be? Suck it up and move on.
this "argument" is about three steps away from arguing that a rape victim asked for it. (note that I'm talking about the situation in principle, not in the attention whoring OP's specific case.)
 
Okay this thread has taken a really strange turn.

Is this a bragging thread? No. At least, it wasn't meant to be. Had conflicted feelings about the situation and wanted to share.

I didn't think this would provoke some kind of "traditional marriage" debate.

I'm "married". Committed to one person. We're best friends, partners, worst enemies and in love. We are also Men. Men are not monogamous creatures... especially in pairs. We've watched countless relationships shattered by "cheating" when in reality it's just instinct for men. We understand, that as a couple, we're emotionally dedicated to one another and we make love. We don't fuck. We fuck boys from the bar because that's what they're there for. The idea of only having sex with one person is purely religious in origin, which neither of us are.

Marriage to us is sharing our lives completely, not impressing god by how pias we are.

That said, this argument this thread has turned into is ridiculous. I'm a believer in "live and let live". So being "my" thread, let's treat each other with respect, okay?
 
TheWiicast said:
Okay this thread has taken a really strange turn.

Is this a bragging thread? No. At least, it wasn't meant to be. Had conflicted feelings about the situation and wanted to share.

I didn't think this would provoke some kind of "traditional marriage" debate.

I'm "married". Committed to one person. We're best friends, partners, worst enemies and in love. We are also Men. Men are not monogamous creatures... especially in pairs. We've watched countless relationships shattered by "cheating" when in reality it's just instinct for men. We understand, that as a couple, we're emotionally dedicated to one another and we make love. We don't fuck. We fuck boys from the bar because that's what they're there for. The idea of only having sex with one person is purely religious in origin, which neither of us are.

Marriage to us is sharing our lives completely, not impressing god by how pias we are.

That said, this argument this thread has turned into is ridiculous. I'm a believer in "live and let live". So being "my" thread, let's treat each other with respect, okay?


1233928590_citizen%20kane%20clapping.gif
 
TheWiicast said:
Okay this thread has taken a really strange turn.

Is this a bragging thread? No. At least, it wasn't meant to be. Had conflicted feelings about the situation and wanted to share. . . .
I don't agree but at least you two do.
 
TheWiicast said:
I'm "married". Committed to one person. We're best friends, partners, worst enemies and in love. We are also Men. Men are not monogamous creatures... especially in pairs. We've watched countless relationships shattered by "cheating" when in reality it's just instinct for men. We understand, that as a couple, we're emotionally dedicated to one another and we make love. We don't fuck. We fuck boys from the bar because that's what they're there for. The idea of only having sex with one person is purely religious in origin, which neither of us are.

Just because you and your husband are unable to be satisfied solely with each other does not mean that all gay men are in open relationships. While I, quite frankly, don't give a fuck if people have open relationships, this tendency for gay men to generalize all others as sluts is nothing more than a false stereotype that serves as more ammunition for opponents of marriage equality to use and claim that we will "destroy the foundation of marriage." And monogamy is not something that is religious. :/
 
hateradio said:
What else would it be?
You might have meant you didn't agree with the situation he was in - sorry, worded that pretty poorly. and yeah, I disagree with the notion that guys are just all complete horndogs by nature and can't stay monogamous. Everyones different.
 
MaximumX2 said:
Just because you and your husband are unable to be satisfied solely with each other does not mean that all gay men are in open relationships. While I, quite frankly, don't give a fuck if people have open relationships, this tendency for gay men to generalize all others as sluts is nothing more than a false stereotype that serves as more ammunition for opponents of marriage equality to use and claim that we will "destroy the foundation of marriage." And monogamy is not something that is religious. :/

I don't see him as saying any of that. Men are not programmed as monogamous. That's not saying they cannot do this very thing, but he's saying that it's against a basic truth.

That said, I agree with you on a certain level in that gay men like straight men can and do have stable, and fulfilling monogamous relationships. I don't think he was saying otherwise. Just that for he and his partner, this would not work out.
 
TheWiicast said:
Okay this thread has taken a really strange turn.

Is this a bragging thread? No. At least, it wasn't meant to be. Had conflicted feelings about the situation and wanted to share.

I didn't think this would provoke some kind of "traditional marriage" debate.

I'm "married". Committed to one person. We're best friends, partners, worst enemies and in love. We are also Men. Men are not monogamous creatures... especially in pairs. We've watched countless relationships shattered by "cheating" when in reality it's just instinct for men. We understand, that as a couple, we're emotionally dedicated to one another and we make love. We don't fuck. We fuck boys from the bar because that's what they're there for. The idea of only having sex with one person is purely religious in origin, which neither of us are.

Marriage to us is sharing our lives completely, not impressing god by how pias we are.

That said, this argument this thread has turned into is ridiculous. I'm a believer in "live and let live". So being "my" thread, let's treat each other with respect, okay?

Hmmn, well said. The urge to stick a dick in every hole that comes a long isn't equally strong in every guy though.

Still, i think you shouldn't film people without permission (while having sex). You have every right to confront him or even be very mad.
 
TheWiicast said:
We are also Men. Men are not monogamous creatures... especially in pairs. We've watched countless relationships shattered by "cheating" when in reality it's just instinct for men.

I agree with a lot of what you said but this is plain ridiculous. You are saying as if it is an instinct in only men to cheat, and not women. Boys will be boys type of justification. That it is more understandable why men cheat because they cannot "help" it.

Even if you can play that logic that men are supposed to spread their ancestry, thats why they in nature they could have multiple partners.
I still find it wrong way to justify actions just because being men. Men can be very different, as well as women.

It is of course up to you how you handle your relationship and thats not my concern, but I am offended with the boys will be boys excuse.
 
storafötter said:
I agree with a lot of what you said but this is plain ridiculous. You are saying as if it is an instinct in only men to cheat, and not women. Boys will be boys type of justification. That it is more understandable why men cheat because they cannot "help" it.

Even if you can play that logic that men are supposed to spread their ancestry, thats why they in nature they could have multiple partners.
I still find it wrong way to justify actions just because being men. Men can be very different, as well as women.

It is of course up to you how you handle your relationship and thats not my concern, but I am offended with the boys will be boys excuse.
not cheat, but spread them seeds (a.k.a. fuck).
 
TheWiicast said:
I'm "married". Committed to one person. We're best friends, partners, worst enemies and in love. We are also Men. Men are not monogamous creatures... especially in pairs. We've watched countless relationships shattered by "cheating" when in reality it's just instinct for men. We understand, that as a couple, we're emotionally dedicated to one another and we make love. We don't fuck. We fuck boys from the bar because that's what they're there for. The idea of only having sex with one person is purely religious in origin, which neither of us are.
Speak for yourself.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom