Support NeoGAF

[Thurible]

First of all, I want to thank you for being open to discuss what, given your religious views, is a rather sensitive subject.
It seems to me, if contraception is immoral, it means that sex for purely "bonding with your spouse" is also immoral.
Which, as I read your comment, it is, unless you still leave a chance of getting pregnant.

But this leads to another question, if reducing chances of pregnancy, just not down to zero, is OK, isn't contraception that isn't working 100% of the time (which, we are told, none of it is) also fine? Why does it matter how does one reduce the chances to non-zero, using calendar or using rubber?

First of all I want to thank you for addressing me civilly. Our beliefs on sex are not necessarily the most popular or well liked. As for your comment on having sex purely for bonding being immoral if contraception is wrong, that is true to some extant. One must have unity AND fruitfulness in mind during sex. However, couples who are infertile are not doing anything wrong because their is still the small chance of life giving, there is still an openess. Sex is about giving yourself completely to your spouse, and just because the man may be "shooting blanks" or the woman may be infertile does not mean it is wrong as you are still giving all of yourself that you can. This may sound a little messed up, but did you know that if you physically can't have sex you can't get married in the Church? While we believe being chaste is very important, one HAS to consummate their marriage and be their for each other both physically and spiritually. Sex is that important in marriage.

Just because contraception isn't full proof does not mean it is acceptable. The reason we believe it is immoral is because it is the act of actively trying to supress one's reproductive gifts. With natural family planning there is no barrier preventing ejaculation. We believe that by purposefully supressing one's sexual gifts, one is not giving their all in sex. One should give all of themselves to their spouse, and not be ashamed of possibly procreating and having a hand in giving life. Sex is one of the most beautiful and loving things in the world, a man literally gives a part of himself to a woman who then takes that and creates life and nutures it in her womb. Does that make any sense? I hope I have been clear in my explanation.

 

[Takuan]

If the option were available to me as a man, I'd at least give it a shot.

Every attractive woman gets eyefucked whenever she's in public. Who am I to say they shouldn't profit from being desirability? It's their biological advantage, and one with a relatively short timer, so they should be able to use it as they see fit.

 

[Dacon]

Believe me, if I was hot I would definitely exploit it to my benefit. I wouldnt whore myself out, but I'd have no prob showing off some skin.

 

[Phunkydiabetic]

Are you asking people if they would be willing to whore themselves on camera to make money if they were a girl?

 

[manfestival]

I always said to myself that I would be a stripper if I was a hot enough female. This whole surge of camwork is way more lucrative without having to touch any disgusting or seedy folk. You also get most of the things you want bought for you while still making money.

 

[Tesseract]

Are you asking people if they would be willing to whore themselves on camera to make money if they were a girl?

 

[Warm Machine]

Yes. I'd have no problem exploiting my own image for my own personal gain. If I, as a 43 year old man, had the body and the audience right now I'd be doing it selling fit tea and protein powder on Instagram.

 

[Wings 嫩翼翻せ]

A woman gets rich off men on tinder by advertising a cheap, $5 surprise:

https://www.iheart.com/content/2017-03-28-woman-gets-rich-on-tinder-using-curious-guys/

Someone clearly GAFs.

 

[Kadayi]

I don't know. Obviously, girls can make money doing it, but I see it as short-term gains versus long-term consequences. I think you're always going to run up against some degree of social stigma if it comes to light and once something is on the internet its never going away.

 

[JimmyJones]

I'm a guy and could do naked butler shit or be a male stripper if I wanted, but I choose not to?

 

[Pallas]

If I was a female I might consider it as long as it doesn't involve me having sex or showing intimate parts of my body for the cash. Everyone has to make a living, I see nothing immoral about a woman who uses her body that doesn't involve sex to make a living. I would never pay for that stuff myself but I see nothing wrong.

 

[jolof96]

if I generally thought I could I would, but it aint likely to happen

 

[CosCom]

So, this got me thinking..

First of all, if you use the the same contact info on Instagram on an alt account your basic account followers will see your alt as a "person you may know"
This means you, and your girlfriend, will see that her friend has started selling herself on Instagram via PayPal to guys who have a "Giant Woman Stepping on Them/Foot Fetish"
Basically, dudes are paypaling her to step on her phone via facetime and act as if they are being squished...paying for her socks..paying for pics/videos of her feet and or her washing them.

My girlfriend wasnt as shocked as I was..
Why? Cause her friend a few years ago had a pretty profitable "Selling her used underwear" online business at one point.

And she isnt highly attractive, but its clear if your a woman you can "sell yourself" safely outside the sex trade and make pretty good money.
Dont get me wrong, if your smoking with a huge rack...stream on twitch and make LOTS of money.

I'm a middle of the road dude, I think if I was the female version of myself I couldnt be a big time Twitch thot but damn...I might do my 40 at work every week and go home and make foot videos, sell my under garments, etc.. to make a quick, safe, fast buck.

This question is very thick.

 

[gela94]

But that is not how sex supply/demand pans out across genders, citizen.


Sorry, but what it should be about?


There is no disrespect for porn stars in Germany, by the way (was surprised when discovered).

Oh really??? Maybe in your crowd but I don't have any respect for porn stars!

 

[Fuz]

I would.

 

[llien]

Oh really??? Maybe in your crowd but I don't have any respect for porn stars!

Thinks are relative, I guess.
It isn't even remotely imaginable to see journalists interviewing active or ex porno stars in where I'm from.
In Germany I have seen it prime time as well as in mid-day interviews.

I think it's positive that people are relaxed about it, even if attitudes like yours also exist.