If you were/are a woman, would you use your body to hustle online?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 713885
  • Start date Start date
No. But I would probably get a boob job if I had anything less than perfect tits. But I'd like to think that if I were a woman I would be so shallow and vain.
 
I'd probably be a really ugly girl, but as I've found out everything has its own niche on the internet. So I might make enough for packs of Mr Noodles and Kraft Dinner to get by, but why do I have to be female to exploit the internet?

Why can't you exploit your body as a man? Seems to me there are plenty enough rich gay dudes that anything you would be willing to do as a women, there will be guys willing to pay you to do it as a guy.

Just need to get out there and get guys paying you for things you already do. Sell your pubes, take pictures of your giant/tiny feet. Sell shirts you sweat through at the gym, or offer up skidmarked underwear.

There has to be a market for this stuff.
 
iconmasterX said:
Aren't you a bit low-poly for that?
Click to expand...

images
 
7echnicolor said:
Absolutely. Men are suckers when they're thinking with their dick. I'd be crazy richer.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I see a group of guys falling over themselves at work just to please a pretty woman at work and it is kinda pitiful , especially when you know it isn't going to happen. I couldn't do the online hustle though. At most I could do some modeling for a magazine.

way more said:
No. But I would probably get a boob job if I had anything less than perfect tits. But I'd like to think that if I were a woman I would be so shallow and vain.
Click to expand...

I would probably get a boob job as well. I know I would definitely get work done to make me taller right now if i had that kinda time and money to do it with. I'm already shallow.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, I'd hustle if I was female, just depends on how far I'd take it.

Sexy cosplay and even a little nudity like toplessness would probably be fine with me, I don't know about full frontal though and I would almost definitely cross the line at full on porn/camwhoring.

I'd LOVE to have some extra spending money though and if people looking at my boobs could make it so, well, it'd be hard to resist.
 
Not a woman, but I've had guys on Grindr ask me if I was a hustler.

If reading Crime and Punishment has taught me anything it's that degrading the value of human life in any capacity has significant consequences on your psyche, in ways you can't predict, even if you're not Religious.

The more I've come to terms with that the better off I've been.
 
Last edited:
No. But just because I am not the type for it. If anyone wants to do it they are free to do so. Still if you use scam like tactics, lie etc you are an asshole to me. If you actually do a real business or just have fun doing this stuff be my guest^^
 
RokkanStoned said:
That example, sure. I would do it now, as not female as well, making it kinda a pointless thing to include "woman" as the subject.
Click to expand...
But that is not how sex supply/demand pans out across genders, citizen.

CatholicGamerGuy said:
Stuff like fetishisizing and pornography really only objectifies women and makes sex only about pleasure.
Click to expand...
Sorry, but what it should be about?

brap said:
Only a bigoted incel wouldn't respect a woman while she shoves a giant dildo in her butt in front of 5 people in a chat room.
Click to expand...
There is no disrespect for porn stars in Germany, by the way (was surprised when discovered).
 
KageyK said:
I'd probably be a really ugly girl, but as I've found out everything has its own niche on the internet. So I might make enough for packs of Mr Noodles and Kraft Dinner to get by, but why do I have to be female to exploit the internet?

Why can't you exploit your body as a man? Seems to me there are plenty enough rich gay dudes that anything you would be willing to do as a women, there will be guys willing to pay you to do it as a guy.

Just need to get out there and get guys paying you for things you already do. Sell your pubes, take pictures of your giant/tiny feet. Sell shirts you sweat through at the gym, or offer up skidmarked underwear.

There has to be a market for this stuff.
Click to expand...
My baseless assumption is that there isn't a market in the same way. Guys are desperate for girls because girls withhold and play hard to get because they know they can get whatever they want in exchange for their sexuality. Gay guys can just install grindr or go to a gay bar and get the action they're looking for. Only straight men can be brought to the level of desperation necessary to pay a woman for her used panties on Reddit.
 
Last edited:
I'm new be nice said:
Not a woman, but I've had guys on Grindr ask me if I was a hustler.

If reading Crime and Punishment has taught me anything it's that degrading the value of human life in any capacity has significant consequences on your psyche, in ways you can't predict, even if you're not Religious.

The more I've come to terms with that the better off I've been.
Click to expand...

That is why I'd cross the line at porn, not to knock porn stars too hard but I just couldn't go down that path.

I don't think nudity is a big deal though, thinking about it again I probably wouldn't have a problem with full frontal after all.
 
Whatever brings in dem ez Benjamins, imo. I'd draw the line at actual porn, because that's just a job of its own right but if I was a woman and I was actually decent looking you can bet your right nut I'd use it to my advantage to rake in the cash.

And honestly, it's not just being sexual that works, it seems that just being a female streamer in most cases will get you more views than a guy. And views can equal money. Look at MMO's, I can't even count the number of guilds I've joined in numerous games where the guys were all falling over themselves to help and please the women. Sure, in a competitive game, guys are going to say gendered stuff to shit talk girls, like they shit talk guys too but as soon as the focus is community and cooperation, women have it way better than men.
 
Well, free market. I'm wondering if a guy doing the same would actually have an audience willing to pay for such services?
 
Sure. People have been using their bodies to get ahead in life since forever.

On the list of things one can do for money, getting nude in front of a web cam is pretty harmless.

Edit: That being said, it is kind of annoying when some streamers pretend anyone watches them for anything else than the cleavage they flash. Own that shit, no need to pretend.
 
Last edited:
llien said:
Sorry, but what it (sex) should be about?
Click to expand...

The believe as a Roman Catholic that sex is something that is very special. Sex has two purposes, to be fruitful (as in have children), and to be unitive. When one is having relations with their spouse they must have these two things in mind. Pleasure from sex is not wrong, but it shouldn't be the reason to have relations. I have heard that the euphoria from sex can be seen as a sort of weak precursor to the feeling of being in the communion of saints with God in heaven. If I ever marry and have relations, I should have sex for bonding with my wife and procreation. This is the reason we actually believe that contraception is immoral, because it seperates sex from procreation. This isn't to say that whenever we have relations that we should be trying to have children, rather we should be always be OPEN to having children. This is why Natural Family Planning (which is scheduling the woman's reproductive cycle and having relations when she is least fertile) is acceptable (also it can be helpful when wanting a child). We also believe things like pornography and masturbation is wrong because it seperates the sexual act from its purpose of unity and procreation. St. John Paul II book of Theology of the Body explains a lot of it if you want to learn more.
 
I would probably try to get famous on insta, doing something more "aspirational" and "noble" to the regular folk than selling undies... though to be honest if I could anonymously sell some undies I probably would.
 
LordPezix said:
The real question is why you would believe you would act different if your gender changed?

Do you use your body now to hustle online?

Do you think that the fleshly exterior that is your human body would alter your consciousnesses just because your wee-wee tucked back up inside and you grew fatty lumps on your chest?
Click to expand...

let's just say there's less demand.
That i know of.
Or maybe i just don't know, in which case point me to people interested in buying pics and i'll sell them left and right.
 
No. And it's not a high standard to uphold. All of your mothers seemed to figure it out and do just fine without degrading themselves for grocery money. It's only until recently that deviant, perverse behavior ought not to be looked down upon. Every person who claims "sex work" isn't the least bit societally unsavory and damaging to the spirit and should be treated as any other job would never wish their own daughters follow that line of work, either.

A great read from my political polar opposite: https://www.truthdig.com/articles/pornography-is-what-the-end-of-the-world-looks-like/

Years ago on GAF, there was a thread very similar to this. Someone mentioned that there are moments on the sets of pornographic videos where it's obvious women don't want to be there. In some egregious cases they even explicitly express it on camera and still go through with it. Someone asked if that was considered rape, to which several GAF regulars replied, "No, it's just another day at the office that people aren't enthusiastically feeling up to working." This is the issue when it comes to this line of work -- you have to create an equivalency to reconcile the very real differences that entail 'sex work' from "real" work or else it compromises the integrity and legitimacy of 'sex work' as a suitable employment option for women. In that case, women forced to have sex when they didn't want to wasn't considered at all like rape, because they still consented to be there at "another day at the office". I've always wondered why women who do not work in the sex industry, and consent to sex with men and then claim they were manipulated or abused into it, are suddenly defended and given acknowledgement of manipulation via "power dynamics" by these same exact people who claim places of "sex work" are absolutely suitable place for women to work.

Finally, respect is like belief: It's a self-evident propositional attitude. It is only as expressed as it is evident, ie: You cannot believe something unless you believe it. You cannot respect someone unless you respect them. It's truth value is innate and self-evident. It is impossible to respect someone who degrades and reduces themselves for the most impulsive desires of men, when there is something more essential to do and be with oneself.
 
Last edited:
I mean, we can do it as dudes..but as we know the amount of women in visual stimuli is slim when it comes to fetish type things.

So, while this guy on can get 20k views..for just sitting reading a book with the camera trained onto his feet, its categorized under "Gay fetish" lol

2s8fgbt.jpg
 
Pretty sure the legalisation of porn was a byproduct of the female liberation in the 60's..
Why are people now upset about and even prudish about sex as enjoyment outside of marriage and relationships?
Even some modern feminists are against it even though it's a liberation of what a woman can and can't do with her own body.. or Male for that matter..
Or maybe it's just an American thing?
 
Last edited:
I probably couldn't do degrading stuff like porn or nudes etc... But I think I could use my sex appeal (if I was a bombshell) to sell products or garner attention. Like if I could get lots of IG followers or twitch followers by showing clevage or wearing sexy clothes why not.

And I don't think this really has to apply just to women. If I was a beefcake dude with an 8 pack and perfect V-shape form I would try to make a buck off of that too.

If you have looks its a waste not to use it. If someone is really smart no one would tell them to pretend to be dump and not use their smarts to make money. Good looks is just a tool some people are lucky enough to have (or work for) and if they can monetize it why not.
 
I think so, especially if I was doing stuff like Swimsuit Succubus. She doesn't even do anything hardcore yet calls herself a "sex worker" all while taking sexy snapshots.
 
Hustle? Hmmm. I see that word and interpret it as having negative connotations.

People use their qualities for personal gain all the time. If you have supply and can respond to demand then more power to you.

If you're knowingly exploiting others in some way then things get a lot more shady.

As for me, I'm going to use what I've got to get ahead in life. But I've no plans or interest in hustling anyone.
 
5secondrulesucks said:
lmao okay you can just be a contrarian then
Click to expand...
I don't know why you are so mad, I never said I defend people who degrade themselves. I said there are people who don't care if they do, maybe you should learn how to read instead of getting mad cause you can't read. If you are going to keep getting mad for no reason I'm going to put you on ignore list.
 
brap said:
Yikes! Only a bigoted incel wouldn't respect a woman while she shoves a giant dildo in her butt in front of 5 people in a chat room. It takes a strong, stunning and brave woman to do that.
Click to expand...
not to mention loose butt
 
CatholicGamerGuy said:
If I ever marry and have relations, I should have sex for bonding with my wife and procreation. This is the reason we actually believe that contraception is immoral, because it seperates sex from procreation.
Click to expand...

First of all, I want to thank you for being open to discuss what, given your religious views, is a rather sensitive subject.
It seems to me, if contraception is immoral, it means that sex for purely "bonding with your spouse" is also immoral.
Which, as I read your comment, it is, unless you still leave a chance of getting pregnant.

But this leads to another question, if reducing chances of pregnancy, just not down to zero, is OK, isn't contraception that isn't working 100% of the time (which, we are told, none of it is) also fine? Why does it matter how does one reduce the chances to non-zero, using calendar or using rubber?
 
Stepping on a phone for quick money? I see no issues with that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

  • Poll
Would you rent a friend?
2
72
1K
nush replied
  • Poll
Would you consider yourself a snacker?
2
60
2K
NotMyProblemAnymoreCunt replied
  • Poll
How would you handle your wealth.
42
2K
jason10mm replied
What is the first cartoon or tv series you can remember when you were young
2 3
107
227
dispensergoinup replied
Do you think there are any police departments in the U.S. these days without body cams ?
2
183
Mistake replied
Top Bottom