• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

IGN: PDZ Hands-On

surrender.jpg
 
AtomicShroom said:
I've seen games that ran at 15fps a month away from Gold, and turned out a smooth 30fps. So gaining 5 fps is nothing.

Yeah, but this is Rare. You have to take anything that a normal dev can do and multiply by 3. They take long on everything they do. :lol
 
AtomicShroom said:
I've seen games that ran at 15fps a month away from Gold, and turned out a smooth 30fps. So gaining 5 fps is nothing.
yep, it is easy, just reduce the quality of the graphics
 
m0dus said:
Alot of negatvity/LOLAMIRITE-ing in this thread. . . . funny, where were all these concerned critics when the NBA 2K6 shots got posted? caught in traffic? :lol

negative spin of ANY kind at teh Gaf really can bring out the trolls :)


i dunno about the rest of the trolls, but i was in there saying the game looked good.


this however, is sweet sweet vindication.
 
m0dus said:
Alot of negatvity/LOLAMIRITE-ing in this thread. . . . funny, where were all these concerned critics when the NBA 2K6 shots got posted? caught in traffic? :lol

negative spin of ANY kind at teh Gaf really can bring out the trolls :)

Rare + Perfect Dark Zero + Bad Impressions + no more beta kits = recipe for disaster :lol
 
m0dus said:
Alot of negatvity/LOLAMIRITE-ing in this thread. . . . funny, where were all these concerned critics when the NBA 2K6 shots got posted? caught in traffic? :lol

negative spin of ANY kind at teh Gaf really can bring out the trolls :)

I honestly hadn't even bothered to look for NBA 2K6 shots until just now. I don't care about that crap.

Rare, however, is always good for a laugh.
 
quetz67 said:
yep, it is easy, just reduce the quality of the graphics
Bullshit. You should know by now that the way you write code for the CPU cores greatly affects the speed of the game. If you don't perfectly optimize the code for the 3 cores it can slow a game down to a crawl. I don't think it's a case that PDZ is so graphically intensive that the Xbox 360 can't handle it. I think it's a matter of getting the code right. If they were complaining about the framerate and saying it was sluggish in 32-player multiplayer then I might believe that the engine was taxing the system, but they're saying the framerate is 25fps in single player.


I must say that this is a bit of deja vu though. The original Perfect Dark was notorious for it's poor framerate. In that case though I think the game was simply throwing more at the N64 than it could handle.
 
Unison said:
I honestly hadn't even bothered to look for NBA 2K6 shots until just now. I don't care about that crap.

Rare, however, is always good for a laugh.

even kameo?
 
Unison said:
Well, I find the fact that it's now on its third system to be pretty damn funny, for one thing.

Yeah, that is kinda lame. Kameo does look better than PD0 from what I have seen though.
 
Odysseus said:
http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/655/655583p1.html


"Perfect Dark Zero looks good and is certainly much improved over the sporadic leaks we've seen and those early, rather bleak, screenshots. But even the build we played didn't convince us that Perfect Dark is entirely ready. It looks like Rare will work until the last possible day to put all the finishing touches on it, and in the meantime, we can say it was fun while it lasted. I'm not ready to say it's the killer-app we were hoping it would be. Hopefully, we'll be able to play a near-final or final build in the next month, at which time I hope to have better, cheerier news."

oh, CRAP!
 
NBA2k6 looks fantastic, Gears of War looks fantastic, Project Gotham Racing 3 look fantastic. There's plenty of 360 games that look truly next-gen and look to offer some quality gameplay. So no one should feel the need to counteract every negative thing said about a game that legitimately has problems.

PDZ is one crazy ride, though. Looks good one moment, looks terrible another, sounds like a dream to play then, buzzin' downward. I don't know which way to look at the moment!
 
Dr_Cogent said:
Yeah, that is kinda lame. Kameo does look better than PD0 from what I have seen though.

No arguments there... I pre-ordered Kameo (along w/ CoD2, PGR3 & Oblivion)... I have no interest in buying PD0 at this point.
 
Unison said:
No arguments there... I pre-ordered Kameo (along w/ CoD2, PGR3 & Oblivion)... I have no interest in buying PD0 at this point.

i dunno how pd0 as a game will turn out, but it is far more impressive graphically then CoD2 to me.
 
IJoel said:
I guess WALL GUY LIVES!
No he doesn't.

IGN said:
"Perfect Dark Zero looks good and is certainly much improved over the sporadic leaks we've seen and those early, rather bleak, screenshots."

Wall Guy represented bad graphics. If the graphics have much improved then why would you say that "Wall Guy Lives?"


Amir0x said:
PDZ is one crazy ride, though. Looks good one moment, looks terrible another, sounds like a dream to play then, buzzin' downward. I don't know which way to look at the moment!


I disagree. I don't think it's been a crazy ride. The graphics and framerate started out horrible on the alpha kits, now on the final hardware the graphics have improved drastically but the framerate is still a problem. That's not crazy at all, that's what happens to a lot of games.
 
"Don't hate guys, Obviously RARE is trying to make Perfect Dark Zero more cinematic by having it only run at 24 frames per second."

And add a little bit of motion blur and it's as good as 60 fps. No worries guys.
 
Dr_Cogent said:
The bar for me is Ghost Recon on the 360.

as far as first (2nd) person shooters go, i agree. gr3 looks awesome, especially in motion with its purdy grain filters, animation, lighting and HOT explosions.

i just think people enjoy bashing rare games.

OMG the first site with hands on says it may not be AAA! end of the world, game looks like utter shit, el-oh-el, etc
 
op_ivy said:
i just think people enjoy bashing rare games.

You have to consider the context as well though. Rare created this image they have, no one else gave it to them but themselves. Even Nintendo said they couldn't get shit done in a timely fashion. It's all just coming back to bite them in the ass is all.
 
PGR3 is so far beyond this bashing and/or nitpicking that it's laughable. I might actually buy this just for the graphics.
 
---- said:
Bullshit. You should know by now that the way you write code for the CPU cores greatly affects the speed of the game. If you don't perfectly optimize the code for the 3 cores it can slow a game down to a crawl. I don't think it's a case that PDZ is so graphically intensive that the Xbox 360 can't handle it. I think it's a matter of getting the code right. If they were complaining about the framerate and saying it was sluggish in 32-player multiplayer then I might believe that the engine was taxing the system, but they're saying the framerate is 25fps in single player.


I must say that this is a bit of deja vu though. The original Perfect Dark was notorious for it's poor framerate. In that case though I think the game was simply throwing more at the N64 than it could handle.
It is almost boring how some guys fall for stupid jokes.

But seriously, downgrading graphics is a common way to improve framerates. Sure there are other way to get a better framerate, especially when the game obviously doesnt use much of the machines power. But have you ever thought about the fact that messing with mult-core code weeks before release may introduce some really, really nasty bugs?
 
Judging by the preview, I don't thinks theres anything fundamentally wrong with it at the moment. It's just lacking polish.

The only thing that got a negative vibe was about the framerate and that's usually the last thing that gets worked on.
 
Dr_Cogent said:
You have to consider the context as well though. Rare created this image they have, no one else gave it to them but themselves. Even Nintendo said they couldn't get shit done in a timely fashion. It's all just coming back to bite them in the ass is all.

heh, no i agree completely. with the amount of time both pd0 and kameo have had, they should be very complete and full games.

but they are launch titles for a rushed (as in, devs havent had final kits for long) next-gen console. both titles look good to great. certainly better then a lot of other launch titles.
 
quetz67 said:
It is almost boring how some guys fall for stupid jokes.

But seriously, downgrading graphics is a common way to improve framerates. Sure there are other way to get a better framerate, especially when the game obviously doesnt use much of the machines power. But have you ever thought about the fact that messing with mult-core code weeks before release may introduce some really, really nasty bugs?
First of all I don't think they need to downgrade PDZ's graphics to get it running smoothly at 30fps. Second of all I don't know that this game is weeks away from release. Nobody has ever guaranteed that it was going to be a launch game.

In fact people have been saying for weeks now that it is probably not going to make launch. I'm sure once this is confirmed the trolls will act like the sky is falling and say there are no good games at the Xbox 360 launch. :lol

All I know is I'd be a lot more worried about this game if they were saying that the graphics were still bad. Right now PDZ is in the same position that PGR3 is in. Good graphics, bad framerate. And the solution isn't that they have to downgrade the graphics. Anyone who thinks that any of these launch games are pushing the Xbox 360 hardware is just being stupid.
 
This is a bit disapointing. the recent video leaks impressed me. I love the art style and the lighting, plus the game just looks fun. Hopefully they won't hesitate to delay if they need to, because it sounds like this has a lot of potential. In the leaked video, i couldn't see any problems with the framerate. It actually looked very smooth so this is surprising news. I guess the low quality of the video was hiding something?
 
---- said:
I'm sure once this is confirmed the trolls will act like the sky is falling and say there are no good games at the Xbox 360 launch. :lol
But how does the delay of PDZ change that fact? ;-)

ttw. there arent any launch games any more, just 'Titles that will form part of the impressive Christmas holiday portfolio'
 
Amir0x said:
NBA2k6 looks fantastic, Gears of War looks fantastic, Project Gotham Racing 3 look fantastic. There's plenty of 360 games that look truly next-gen and look to offer some quality gameplay. So no one should feel the need to counteract every negative thing said about a game that legitimately has problems.

PDZ is one crazy ride, though. Looks good one moment, looks terrible another, sounds like a dream to play then, buzzin' downward. I don't know which way to look at the moment!
Yeah. But a lot of people getting a X360 are getting it just for PD0.
 
Looking at the total number of high quality games that are bought for an average system launch, the Xbox 360 at least matches the current generation consoles and perhaps surpasses them.

Do you guys even remember what launched with the Xbox, Gamecube, and PS2?


Xbox was Halo, Amped, and PGR.
Gamecube was friggin' Super Monkey Ball, Luigi's Mansion, and Rogue Leader.
PS2 was what, SSX, Ridge Racer, and Madden?


Tell me that you don't think the 360 loses to any of these launches... I mean, unless of course you consider Halo to be the "If I own this I don't need another game." title, which is dumb IMO.
 
Speevy said:
Looking at the total number of high quality games that are bought for an average system launch, the Xbox 360 at least matches the current generation consoles and perhaps surpasses them.

Do you guys even remember what launched with the Xbox, Gamecube, and PS2?


Xbox was Halo, Amped, and PGR.
Gamecube was friggin' Super Monkey Ball, Luigi's Mansion, and Rogue Leader.
PS2 was what, SSX, Ridge Racer, and Madden?


Tell me that you don't think the 360 loses to any of these launches... I mean, unless of course you consider Halo to be the "If I own this I don't need another game." title, which is dumb IMO.
Reading the press release I didnt find any games confirmed for launch
 
op_ivy said:
i dunno how pd0 as a game will turn out, but it is far more impressive graphically then CoD2 to me.

It just seems way too early to tell in a case like this. I mean, it's been all over the map since day one. I refuse to commit my money to a game that could be a total trainwreck. At least with CoD2, I have a good idea of what I'm in for. It seems like the safe fps choice from the launch lineup.
 
PDZ has been a roller coaster since inception. Hopefully, Rare can pull it out here at the end.
 
Kameo went through the same bs and has turned out amazing and definitely next-gen. Obviously there are different teams involved and the PD0 team = not so good.
 
i had a brief chance to play perfect dark the other week, and to me it seemed great. no noticeable framerate issues at all, and yes it looks gorgeous including the walls! up until seeing it, i had no interest in it, so it came as a pleasent surprise when i actually saw how good it was (and it was running from a dev kit)
i think everyone slating it on here will be eating at least some of their words when they get a chance to play it

http://www.rllmukforum.com/index.php?showtopic=102551&st=300
 
So we have a "legitimate" (i use that word liberally here) news source saying it has framerate problems and then some guy who says it doesnt.
 
sp0rsk said:
So we have a "legitimate" (i use that word liberally here) news source saying it has framerate problems and then some guy who says it doesnt.

thanks for summing it up like that, that was helpful
 
bitwise said:
thanks for summing it up like that, that was helpful


Yes well i thought id throw that in before people thought "sega kid" was a legitimate news source.
 
Top Bottom