Nirolak said:Right, any assessment I am making of this is based on the presumption that they aren't actively downgrading the card.
They've never done so in the past anyway. Obviously handhelds are a different story.
Nirolak said:Right, any assessment I am making of this is based on the presumption that they aren't actively downgrading the card.
Haha, oh god.IchigoSharingan said:I hope they don't "3DS" the GPU. Man that chapped my ass.
Well honestly I just want a Nintendo system with some god damn brass balls again.
Jin34 said:I think 2GB of GDDR5 is being overly optimistic even though it would be the best safeguard against the PS4/720. 1GB is what I've always expected.
midonnay said:is it possible in this day and age to have a ram upgrade unit like the N64?
Mr_Brit said:Wii 2 is using a 4850 which isn't just a 4870 using GDDR3, it also has a much lower core clock and much lower TDP so is quite a bit slower. Using GDDR5 will get it closer to a 4870 but it will still be quite a bit slower thanks to the vastly lower core clock.
shadyspace said:If IGN is trolling us with these specs I will literally evolve into SSJ4 Rage Guy.
midonnay said:is it possible in this day and age to have a ram upgrade unit like the N64?
SneakyStephan said:Haha, oh god.
350 / 450 mhz core/vram clocks down from 700/900 , 256MB of gddr3 with a 64bit memory bus.
384MB of DDR2 ram.
That would pretty much put it in the 'slightly more powerful than 360' rumour ballpark, having it butchered like that.
I'd agree that 2GB gddr5 would be rather expensive btw, but is there any reason to go unified when you have plenty to begin with?
1GB gddr5, 2GB ddr3 ram (which is cheap as chips), believe.
Actually make that 3GB, so we can finally get some functionality out of those multiple cores...
Multitasking/ browser with tabs open during gameplay/ background apps like a music player and mumble.
Don't start with the 'then get a pc' bollox, the ps3 and psp have a browser and can play media but it's bloody useless because you can only do one thing at a time.
IchigoSharingan said:Not if you solder the goddamn memory into the system. Ugh... what a dick move!
It'd be great to have a console that lets you upgrade some things like that, and in the game config you can adjust settings accordingly. Upgrade PS4 to 5GB of DDR3 1800 RAM, set textures to EYEGASM Mode.
IchigoSharingan said:Not if you solder the goddamn memory into the system. Ugh... what a dick move!
It'd be great to have a console that lets you upgrade some things like that, and in the game config you can adjust settings accordingly.
ReyVGM said:Jeez... why would you want that? If you want to do that, then get a PC!
Upgrading RAM only segments the market.
IchigoSharingan said:Not really. You can keep the basic RAM requirements, but just offer more and scale it accordingly. How is this not desirable? N64 didn't suffer from market segmentation.
ReyVGM said:And what, be like PC gamers constantly having to update the hardware to be able to play the latest games at fullspeed/res/frames/whatever?
No thank you. There's a reason why consoles are successful and one of them is that you don't have to mess with upgrading anything. You buy a box and you play with it for 5 or so years.
(You're actually not being sarcastic?)
IchigoSharingan said:Define constantly.
ReyVGM said:And what, be like PC gamers constantly having to update the hardware to be able to play the latest games at fullspeed/res/frames/whatever?
ReyVGM said:Google it
3rd parties won't.Medalion said:Nintendo magic will fill in for that missing RAM and lower clock speeds...BELIEVE!
I am in the realm of believing we are getting at least 1GB RAM, not the proposed 512mb RAM, the specs can change from debut till launch as wellBuckethead said:3rd parties won't.
I'm all for Nintendo going Naughty Dog on Cafe, but the rumored amount of RAM is disappointing.
3rd parties need the cushion.
ReyVGM said:LOL at people wanting consoles to be like PCs.
Pray tell, why even have consoles then? Why not just use PCs? Why are you even interested in this topic if PCs are so superior and the Wii2 or any console is already outdated by the time it comes out?
Opus Angelorum said:Can I just point out that all of this great performance potential won't be used explicitly for graphical fidelity.
If the console is streaming video content to multiple controllers, that will require some grunt.
?EVH said:Oh boy, here we go!
Opus Angelorum said:Can I just point out that all of this great performance potential won't be used explicitly for graphical fidelity.
If the console is streaming video content to multiple controllers, that will require some grunt.
Streaming video requires very little grunt at all.Opus Angelorum said:Can I just point out that all of this great performance potential won't be used explicitly for graphical fidelity.
If the console is streaming video content to multiple controllers, that will require some grunt.
Opus Angelorum said:Can I just point out that all of this great performance potential won't be used explicitly for graphical fidelity.
If the console is streaming video content to multiple controllers, that will require some grunt.
Mr_Brit said:Streaming video requires very little grunt at all.
Assuming it's streaming 1080p split to 4 controllers then it should take very little work.le.phat said:Depends of the quality & resolution of the video stream, and number of devices it streams to.
le.phat said:What i was thinking. The streaming to multiple devices is going do a number on the CPU, not to mention the RAM.
IT'S ALL MY FAULTMedalion said:Now you've jinxed it... 256mb RAM again
Mr_Brit said:Assuming it's streaming 1080p split to 4 controllers then it should take very little work.
le.phat said:Don't forget the console is not just decoding/encoding video to stream it, but also has to do the actual render passes for every device that has its own unique stream. You don't think that will put strain on the CPU ? Or will use a conciderable amount of the RAM to buffer ?
SneakyStephan said:499 already gets you a pre built phenom II x4 955, 4 gb ram, 1 TB hdd, hd6850 , dvd writer and case + psu.
Where do they shop :lol
Mr_Brit said:Streaming video requires very little grunt at all.
My 4890 is definitely starting to show its age.Teetris said:The 4850 is the best videocard of all time, that's all
Error Macro said:Which goes back to that fake David Perry quote:
"[...] But like the 3DS and it's 3D, that raw power only counts if you leave it's main feature off."
Van Owen said:The ign guys are pretty much shitting on the system on the latest game scoop. Theyre dissapointed that it isn't significantly more powerful than 360, which us something they originally claimed, and then proceeded to build a system that was more in line with the current systems lol. why would they report it was significantly more powerful if it is basically a 4850 with 1GB of ram?
Which is why he said it was fake. Why are you calling me illiterate?1-D_FTW said:That's was confirmed to be a lie. He never said that.
Because you're illiterate when it come to tech and it is? What were you expecting? Something that drew 300 watts? This is a fantastic system if true.
Elixist said:Wtf? I smell bullshit. Link please I would love to see that.
Anything less than a 6990 will leave half the forum bitching about next gen systems.Medalion said:If only it was a 5850?