IGN review: Zelda The Minish Cap

9.0 Presentation
This fully original adventure keeps with the Zelda tradition, just missing the mark Flagship nailed with its first GBA Zelda game.
9.0 Graphics
What made Four Swords gorgeous remains gorgeous two years later, while still seeming quite modest in its imagery.
9.0 Sound
Link's vocal grunts make more sense in this context than they did attached to Link to the Past. The music, beautiful.
9.5 Gameplay
It's not quite up there with Link to the Past's length, but Minish Cap offers something entirely new and fun while keeping with the successful formula.
7.5 Lasting Appeal
As far as Zelda games go, Minish Cap is a bit on the short side, but the quest still lasts a hefty amount of time regardless.
9.0 OVERALL
(out of 10 / not an average)


"The Minish Cap is certainly worthy to sit among the best of the Zelda best. The slight repetitive nature of the kinstones, the slightly shorter quest, and the lack of the four player Four Swords mode does put this new adventure slightly under the previous GBA effort. It's still a fantastic offering on the handheld, retaining everything that makes a Zelda title so great, improving the single-player quest with ideas the team introduced in the first multiplayer Legend of Zelda title. And it definitely bodes well for the future of the property when the development team moves these ideas into another 2D adventure for our Nintendo hero."
 
Ironclad_Ninja said:
Good score, but the grievances with length are getting rather annoying.

It's a valid criticism. Should they just ignore that fact?
 
tedtropy said:
It's a valid criticism. Should they just ignore that fact?
No, but if the experience is memorable as it is, who knows how it could run out if were to be extended. Artificially lengthening a game is something that can easily ruin a game.
 
Flagship has even taken its experience with The Four Swords and has incorporated new puzzle elements that utilize two, three or four Links to accomplish.

I'm glad to see many of 4S's elements make it to other games in the series. I'd enjoy seeing what puzzels could be done with 4S's elements in 3d.... If not an actual multiplayer in the next game.... (asking a lot I know... but I did leave out any online part)
 
I think they underscored MC's lasting appeal. You're bound to go back to it. Its THAT GOOD. and 1p is about 20+ hours first go.

Um. MC is a longer game than ALTTP. Its also more fun and challenging than it SNESprequel. Is Craig on crack?

Its about a 9.8 :)
 
So, what are the extras that are supposedly in the North American version? Why is there no mention of this in IGN's review?
 
Spike said:
So, what are the extras that are supposedly in the North American version? Why is there no mention of this in IGN's review?
I'm starting to get the sinking feeling that they don't exist. Or that they are just more kinstone quests, which is something that is not instantly noticeable.
 
The game is great, buy it. I will be getting my copy when I get paid this week, but the urge to finish this copy before my boss demands it back is killing me :lol
 
If they give the freaking Oracles 10s, this deserves a lot better. Granted, I haven't finished it. Maybe the ending is abrupt and disappointing, or something.
 
ALttP only takes about 5 to 6 hours to complete. A speed run can be done in about an hour or two. Is MC shorter than that, or has the memory of LttP turned into a mythical epic (I'm trying to avoid the pun)?

Also, for those who have played this and the Oracles games:

I've loved just about every Zelda game I've played, but didn't like the Oracle games. I was about third dungeon in Ages and got bored with it. Is MC more like the Oracle games or LttP? Hopefully you already recognize the differences between the games, because I can't explain it.

Also, also, john tv can you endulge me about how the development of this game came about? I honestly haven't heard it before and I guaranty that I'll remember it for the future.
 
What is going on, when 9.0 is considered some sort of tragedy?

If you enjoyed the game, then great. You don't need some quantitative redemption for your experiences. Just enjoy the fucking game.
 
Socreges said:
If they give the freaking Oracles 10s, this deserves a lot better. Granted, I haven't finished it. Maybe the ending is abrupt and disappointing, or something.

IGN's standard has been highered.

The oracle games are no where near minish cap in quality, plus that MC actually feels like a real Zelda game.
 
SantaCruZer said:
:lol

I didn't know the correct grammatical word for it. Maybe raised it better? :P

"IGN's has standard been much highered very ginormouse-a-tronly to teh times infinities concussion..."
 
SantaCruZer said:
IGN's standard has been highered.

The oracle games are no where near minish cap in quality, plus that MC actually feels like a real Zelda game.
Yeah it seems that IGN pocket finally stopped dishing out 10s all over the place.
 
Top Bottom