IGN: Splatoon's lack of voice chat is "cheap and lazy"

I honestly think it's a bit sadder that so many people are actually bothered by the Nintendo defense force. If someone wants to make up ridiculous arguments in defense of Nintendo... So what ...
We just want stupid to stop being such. Even if it's to no avail.
 
Some people on this site have defended:

- The lack of online in Mario Party 10 because "Mario Party is meant to be played locally"
- The artificial supply constraints of sought after Amiibo because "they underestimated demand"
- The fact that Amiibo functionality has basically turned into on-disc DLC because "it's minor content"
- Nintendo's Youtube creator's program because they're "protecting their IP"
- Nintendo butchering the picture of quality their legacy titles to "prevent epilepsy"
- Nintendo refusing to add GBA games to the 3DS eShop because they only offer "perfect emulation"
- Nintendo's decision not to bring the New 3DS to North America because "too many options"
- Nintendo's decision not to include a charger with the New 3DS XL because "it helps reduce environmental waste"

And many more. You're surprised by the fact that they're doing the same for Splatoon, an unfinished game that doesn't have voice chat in 2015? I consider myself to be a big Nintendo fan, but the constant excuses are embarrassing.



And now we have pedophilia accusations. Wonderful.

Where is the LIE???

*Bookmarked*
 
Some people on this site have defended:

- The lack of online in Mario Party 10 because "Mario Party is meant to be played locally"
- The artificial supply constraints of sought after Amiibo because "they underestimated demand"
- The fact that Amiibo functionality has basically turned into on-disc DLC because "it's minor content"
- Nintendo's Youtube creator's program because they're "protecting their IP"
- Nintendo butchering the picture of quality their legacy titles to "prevent epilepsy"
- Nintendo refusing to add GBA games to the 3DS eShop because they only offer "perfect emulation"
- Nintendo's decision not to bring the New 3DS to North America because "too many options"
- Nintendo's decision not to include a charger with the New 3DS XL because "it helps reduce environmental waste"

And many more. You're surprised by the fact that they're doing the same for Splatoon, an unfinished game that doesn't have voice chat in 2015? I consider myself to be a big Nintendo fan, but the constant excuses are embarrassing.
It's ridiculous at this point, any other developer/publisher would've got a bigger backlash from any of this.
 
Are you saying there are competitive people going out of their way to chat with their friends in order to win?

Must suck for the members here who will play this game as "intended." Good luck.

Competitive players are always pushing the limits of what would be considered "intended" play in almost every platform. Be it third party chat programs on pc even when voice comms are included to specialized equipment like custom controllers to in-game strategies/exploits that become part of 'standard competitive play'.

I hope Splatoon does attract a competitive core. It will be healthy for the game's potential as a franchise.
 
Some people on this site have defended:

- The lack of online in Mario Party 10 because "Mario Party is meant to be played locally"
- The artificial supply constraints of sought after Amiibo because "they underestimated demand"
- The fact that Amiibo functionality has basically turned into on-disc DLC because "it's minor content"
- Nintendo's Youtube creator's program because they're "protecting their IP"
- Nintendo butchering the picture of quality their legacy titles to "prevent epilepsy"
- Nintendo refusing to add GBA games to the 3DS eShop because they only offer "perfect emulation"
- Nintendo's decision not to bring the New 3DS to North America because "too many options"
- Nintendo's decision not to include a charger with the New 3DS XL because "it helps reduce environmental waste"

And many more. You're surprised by the fact that they're doing the same for Splatoon, an unfinished game that doesn't have voice chat in 2015? I consider myself to be a big Nintendo fan, but the constant excuses are embarrassing.



And now we have pedophilia accusations. Wonderful.

That really puts things into perspective. Wow.
 
Nintendo Nation gets pretty ridiculous wherever and whenever it mobilizes, defending company honor as if it was a duty. This post is an unfortunate reminder.

Every group of fanboys are fucking ridiculous. Also why lump all those issues together with this one? I absolutely can't stand Nintendo's region locking, their online infrastructure, and I think locking content behind Amiibos is absolutely stupid yet I don't give two shits about there not being voice chat in this game.
 
Of course not. I always make sure to say things like "some Nintendo fans" or "people" to avoid making broad generalizations. I'm a Nintendo fan and I definitely do not give them a free pass on anything.

Yeah, but giving a list of things "Nintendo fans" or "people" defend certainly gives the impression that you're lumping everyone together. I'm not bothered by the lack of voice chat in Splatoon but I'm not a fan of Nintendo's Youtube policy. So I'm pretty sure there were *different* people that "defended" Nintendo decisions you thought were bad. This was the obvious problem with your previous post but I couldn't bother to make an issue. Now that you called out someone else, I couldn't resist.
 
You can't moan at IGN's guy because it's his opinion, but you can moan about Nintendo's decision because their opinions are WRONG(!)

You do know there is a difference between an opinion piece representing the opinion of one person and a product rollout of a major corporation which represents the collective decisions of dozens of people, right?

Of particular note, one is just an article a small group of people will read. The other is a bought and paid for product that people will be actually using.

Not to mention, anyone is free to criticize either.
 
Who forced you to come to this thread then? Telling people they are acting like crybabies over a feature that has become standard for many years now isn't about us acting juvenile, it's about why Nintendo continually tries to monitor what they think consumers want. What's worse are those who constantly defend their decisions that make absolutely no sense other than refusing to ever be critical towards them.

What's so difficult in understanding giving people options is not a bad thing?

Easy, because it makes you miss out on simple fun. Life isn't about getting everything you want, otherwise you will always be disappointed. Us discussing on a thread is not going to change anything, but just have you all waste breath. Iam no defending I think it's stupid splatoon does not have voice chat, but I will still love the game because I have accepted it's shorcomings and postive sides. That's the difference from immaturity and maturity.
 
It's ridiculous at this point, any other developer would've got a bigger backlash from any of this.

Not necessarily. Bungie's boneheaded decision to not include voice chat in Destiny was met with a similar amount of justification on the part of the fans.

At least there though there were system options to somewhat circumvent it.
 
Of course not. I always make sure to say things like "some Nintendo fans" or "people" to avoid making broad generalizations. I'm a Nintendo fan and I definitely do not give them a free pass on anything.

Neither do I. I don't want anyone to assume Nintendo should get a free pass.


They are a company which does SO MANY THINGS wrong, but so does every other company and every other human.


It's like people who go "Oh, Nintendo is so backwards"...Nintendo ain't backwards, just some of their staff are.


I just fear that people will complain and shut this game down and it will bomb because reviews will be like "No Voice Chat! 6.9!" and people will browse and be like "Yup, another dud from Nintendo with a new ip...hey, when's the last time Nintendo made a new ip which was good?".
 
Are you saying there are competitive people going out of their way to chat with their friends in order to win?

Must suck for the members here who will play this game as "intended." Good luck.

I don't see how that has anything to do with my post.

The people who will play competitively with their own group will, probably, be people who use the matchmaking update that comes out in August. No shit will you be expecting people to be more co-ordinated, they've got their own squad going.
 
Some people on this site have defended:

- The lack of online in Mario Party 10 because "Mario Party is meant to be played locally"
- The artificial supply constraints of sought after Amiibo because "they underestimated demand"
- The fact that Amiibo functionality has basically turned into on-disc DLC because "it's minor content"
- Nintendo's Youtube creator's program because they're "protecting their IP"
- Nintendo butchering the picture of quality their legacy titles to "prevent epilepsy"
- Nintendo refusing to add GBA games to the 3DS eShop because they only offer "perfect emulation"
- Nintendo's decision not to bring the New 3DS to North America because "too many options"
- Nintendo's decision not to include a charger with the New 3DS XL because "it helps reduce environmental waste"

And many more. You're surprised by the fact that they're doing the same for Splatoon, an unfinished game that doesn't have voice chat in 2015? I consider myself to be a big Nintendo fan, but the constant excuses are embarrassing.



And now we have pedophilia accusations. Wonderful.

Pretty much. Some people just can't accept that their favourite company has made a mistake let alone numerous ones.
 
Easy, because it makes you miss out on simple fun. Life isn't about getting everything you want, otherwise you will always be disappointed. Us discussing on a thread is not going to change anything, but just have you all waste breath. Iam no defending I think it's stupid splatoon does not have voice chat, but I will still love the game because I have accepted it's shorcomings and postive sides. That's the difference from immaturity and maturity.

Oh man...
 
Easy, because it makes you miss out on simple fun. Life isn't about getting everything you want, otherwise you will always be disappointed. Us discussing on a thread is not going to change anything, but just have you all waste breath. Iam no defending I think it's stupid splatoon does not have voice chat, but I will still love the game because I have accepted it's shorcomings and postive sides. That's the difference from immaturity and maturity.

Basically your argument is that we should shut up and accept whatever scraps Nintendo throws at our feet because discussing their faults on a message board dedicated to video games is immature.

This might be the worst post I've ever read on neogaf.
 
Not necessarily. Bungie's boneheaded decision to not include voice chat in Destiny was met with a similar amount of justification on the part of the fans.

At least there though there were system options to somewhat circumvent it.

I think bungie (deservedly) got it even worse for their complete lack of social features in a game they marketed as a social game.

People just tend to ignore or forget these kinds of things if it wasn't something they were invested in.
 
You can TOTALLY camp. It just has diminishing returns.

But If you want to push people back into their base, camping is a good way to do it.

It has varying usability depending on how people respond. Taking high ground with a charger can ley you coat a large area, and pop any enemies, and if they are the vengeful type theyll waste time and come right back to you instead of covering ground. Hook a couple and you can have a devastating win. Its more fantastic if its near a base, and you can keep em from advancing.

If not then you can just teleport to any ally near an area that needs some paint once you are done coating.
 
Yeah, but giving a list of things "Nintendo fans" defend certainly gives the impression that you're lumping everyone together. I'm not bothered by the lack of voice chat in Splatoon but I'm not a fan of Nintendo's Youtube policy. So I'm pretty sure there were *different* people that "defended" Nintendo decisions you thought were bad. This was the obvious problem with your previous post but I couldn't bother to make an issue. Now that you called out someone else, I couldn't resist.

Some people on this site

Some people on this site

Some people on this site

Some people on this site

Some people on this site

Some people on this site
I didn't use the term "Nintendo fans" once. Since I too am a Nintendo fan, that would mean I share the same views, which I don't.
 
Easy, because it makes you miss out on simple fun. Life isn't about getting everything you want, otherwise you will always be disappointed. Us discussing on a thread is not going to change anything, but just have you all waste breath. Iam no defending I think it's stupid splatoon does not have voice chat, but I will still love the game because I have accepted it's shorcomings and postive sides. That's the difference from immaturity and maturity.

You actually typed out these words and then hit enter.
 
Easy, because it makes you miss out on simple fun. Life isn't about getting everything you want, otherwise you will always be disappointed. Us discussing on a thread is not going to change anything, but just have you all waste breath. Iam no defending I think it's stupid splatoon does not have voice chat, but I will still love the game because I have accepted it's shorcomings and postive sides. That's the difference from immaturity and maturity.
Sure you can't always get what you want but Nintendo leaving voice chat out is leaving being served with a burger that only has half a bun. You'd obviously expect a full bun from a burger, no? That is how some people feel.
 
Some people on this site have defended:

- The lack of online in Mario Party 10 because "Mario Party is meant to be played locally"
- The artificial supply constraints of sought after Amiibo because "they underestimated demand"
- The fact that Amiibo functionality has basically turned into on-disc DLC because "it's minor content"
- Nintendo's Youtube creator's program because they're "protecting their IP"
- Nintendo butchering the picture of quality their legacy titles to "prevent epilepsy"
- Nintendo refusing to add GBA games to the 3DS eShop because they only offer "perfect emulation"
- Nintendo's decision not to bring the New 3DS to North America because "too many options"
- Nintendo's decision not to include a charger with the New 3DS XL because "it helps reduce environmental waste"

And many more. You're surprised by the fact that they're doing the same for Splatoon, an unfinished game that doesn't have voice chat in 2015? I consider myself to be a big Nintendo fan, but the constant excuses are embarrassing.

Maybe, just maybe, these aren't excuses but explanations for the design decisions that were made. Maybe there's more to the story than Nintendo is teh silly. There's actually a logical path of cause and effect that arrived at such a point.

So these explanations should be analyzed; as well as the mindset of the people reacting to them.

Defense force or not, if there's a shortage of Amiibos, Id like to know why it has happened. (To be fair underestimating demand is only a part of the overall picture; but you get my point)
 
Yeah, diminishing returns.

The one thing I noticed about snipers during the stress test was that they didn't hide in the ink more to conseal their position more often. They would just keep firing. And in Splatoon that still helps but...it sort of negates the idea of a sniper, right?

The sniper rifle is a great offensive support weapon, but it doesn't really have much of a place in Turf war.

That's a good strategy. As a roller I would often hide behind things in squid form if an enemy got too close. Tilting the stick slightly also helps too as it conceals your movement. It's definitely more of a support weapon in Turf Wars allowing others to do more heavy duty stuff. But watching Amano play sniper in two matches I can see alternative play methods. His accuracy is crazy high too with gyro https://youtu.be/PjpcbDmDSEA?t=1h8s
 
Easy, because it makes you miss out on simple fun. Life isn't about getting everything you want, otherwise you will always be disappointed. Us discussing on a thread is not going to change anything, but just have you all waste breath. Iam no defending I think it's stupid splatoon does not have voice chat, but I will still love the game because I have accepted it's shorcomings and postive sides. That's the difference from immaturity and maturity.

Oop!

Welp, Its immature to want options now, and totally mature to take what someone gives to you with no opinions whatsoever.

Time to re-enroll in elementary school.
 
Easy, because it makes you miss out on simple fun. Life isn't about getting everything you want, otherwise you will always be disappointed. Us discussing on a thread is not going to change anything, but just have you all waste breath. Iam no defending I think it's stupid splatoon does not have voice chat, but I will still love the game because I have accepted it's shorcomings and postive sides. That's the difference from immaturity and maturity.

So talking about why a game in 2015 that has teams does not have voice chat on a game forum is immature but coming to the same forum to say that we should not always expect standard features is being mature?
 
I think it's a sign that a topic discussed a month ago before this article has run its course.



It's also a thread about a Nintendo game. Of course a list of Nintendo things would be posted here.

But it's a post about things "people" defend not a post about the Nintendo game.
And the poster has claimed that the "people" referred to are not Nintendo fans because that term wasn't used.
Please.
I'm just cutting past the BS here.
 
Why would a director want to make a silent movie in modern times? People not talking is no fun. No logic to it at all. The director is just behind the times.

Do you see how fucking weird that sounds? Only video-games are reviewed and critiqued like they are garage tools serving a function.
This doesn't make any sense. You don't have to interact with other people during a silent movie. The chatting function in a video game is not the same as a silent movie. They are not even close to serving the same purpose. This isn't even close to being a good analogy.

If they held an Olympics for mental gymnastics, you would probably win the Gold with that post.
 
Oop!

Welp, Its immature to want options now, and totally mature to take what someone gives to you with no opinions whatsoever.

Time to re-enroll in elementary school.


This thread is seriously incredible. The number of contortions people can make to justify their ability to stay mum or not care about this problem is truly extraordinary. It just goes to show how varied the human mind is. And how stubborn!

We're immature, we're complaining not criticizing, we haven't played the game, or we have played it but don't understand it, think of the war zone, it's for kids only not adults, it's like a playground you can't complain when you hit your head on the slide, think of the parents

Just remarkable.
 
Some people on this site have defended:

- The lack of online in Mario Party 10 because "Mario Party is meant to be played locally"
- The artificial supply constraints of sought after Amiibo because "they underestimated demand"
- The fact that Amiibo functionality has basically turned into on-disc DLC because "it's minor content"
- Nintendo's Youtube creator's program because they're "protecting their IP"
- Nintendo butchering the picture of quality their legacy titles to "prevent epilepsy"
- Nintendo refusing to add GBA games to the 3DS eShop because they only offer "perfect emulation"
- Nintendo's decision not to bring the New 3DS to North America because "too many options"
- Nintendo's decision not to include a charger with the New 3DS XL because "it helps reduce environmental waste"

And many more. You're surprised by the fact that they're doing the same for Splatoon, an unfinished game that doesn't have voice chat in 2015? I consider myself to be a big Nintendo fan, but the constant excuses are embarrassing.



And now we have pedophilia accusations. Wonderful.

I won't defend any one of those points but I'm all for Nintendo's Youtube stance.
 
Yea I stand by it because that is my opinion on this message board. And I have express my small thoughts on the situation so now ima out of this thread to preoccupy myself with other stuff. Bye guys

Thank you for that response. It's great to know you can communicate with others when the time is right isn't it?
 
I don't see how that has anything to do with my post.

The people who will play competitively with their own group will, probably, be people who use the matchmaking update that comes out in August. No shit will you be expecting people to be more co-ordinated, they've got their own squad going.

Yes but the squad using third party communication will always exceed competitive groups not using voice chat (as the game was originally meant to be played).

This is why the whole "no chat" feature is a big issue in the first place.
 
This thread is about Nintendo. I'm not going to deflect and start ragging on Sony and Microsoft for all the stupid decisions (of which there are many) they've made over the years.

Well be consistent and don't deflect to what "people" say about amiibo or youtube either...

The thread is about Splatoon voice chat.
 
Well reviews and editorials are more directly the opinion of an individual person rather than a company which outputs a physical product in which multiple parties have a defining influence.

Op-Eds in newspaper certainly don't reflect the opinion of all the staff working there or even a large number.
Yes, but it is still common to refer to newspapers as one entity and see the opinion as a whole. I just need to mention the name Daily Mail and a certain image is conjured up. Usually because you have a company culture that's going to attract like minded individuals. We all see IGN and IGNorant™, Kotaku as slow and Polygon as... well I don't think anyone looks at them anymore. It's not unfair to lump all their staff under one umbrella. Heck people often treat all of GAF like a hivemind.
 
Easy, because it makes you miss out on simple fun. Life isn't about getting everything you want, otherwise you will always be disappointed. Us discussing on a thread is not going to change anything, but just have you all waste breath. Iam no defending I think it's stupid splatoon does not have voice chat, but I will still love the game because I have accepted it's shorcomings and postive sides. That's the difference from immaturity and maturity.

h1pVFZQ.png
 
But it's a post about things "people" defend not a post about the Nintendo game.
And the poster has claimed that the "people" referred to are not Nintendo fans because that term wasn't used.
Please.
I'm just cutting past the BS here.

Even though it is not specifically for this type of game, trying to dredge up other companies mistakes that were defended would've instead, sounded like a desperate attempt to defend Nintendo, which would be the opposite of what Gonzo has done in this topic.

Not to mention it's other people who use Nintendo fans more often than Gonzo has. Unfortunately for you, "Nintendo fans" is a very direct. "Some People" is a vague term in comparison.
 
Everything you brought up is focused around a traditional shooter.

Why the hell do i care if a team mate is in trouble? Good. The more enemies focusing on a single player the better. Why the hell would I rush to their defence? Thats time to go the opposite way and take back all that land.

There is no penalty for dying. There is no bonus for killing. Someone with zero kills and 15 deaths can be the top scorer on the team.

You guys are nowhere near as good at formulating stratagems as you think you are.

The real time feed doesnt mess up. It doesnt describe the wrong place, it doesnt send the wrong number of enemies, its information is not obsolete before the message is finished.

You would have just been whiny noise, and judging by your misplaced concerns, noise whining about a losing strategy

no no no no , ignoring the possibility of new strategies is not a misplaced concern.. you're just stuck in one way to play and ignore what might happens if player could talk and formulate strategies on the fly by talking to each other.

Hey i'm not saying that i'm godly at splatoon, i'm far from it .. but if your answer is "get good" to those wanting voice chat , then you're as deluded as me.
Also i didn't implying ANYTHINg about killing, i said that this was a game about territory control , there are a number of things that make splattoon different BUT , like any other game, new strategies and new behavior will happen , It would have been much easier for this game if there was voice chat

" i don't need voice chat because i already have all the info i want" << that's not the point ..
 
Actually, now that I think about it: Why did Oddduck create this thread (and then ran away never to reply to it)?


Why are we even arguing over something that we argued about 2 months ago about?


We shouldn't have threads about people's opinions if we already have a thread about these exact thoughts.
 
Top Bottom