OceanicAir
Member
Splinter what are your thoughts on Blarg?
I wonder...That Flame kill must have been Bronx. The second kill has usually been someone that was suspected of being scum and 2/3 times were second in the vote. Waffle wasn't really suspected so that was probably scum.
It might be safe to say that cabot is town, though.
? Do explain.
While it is certainly possible that Bronx didn't target anyone on either night 2 or night 3, I find that unlikely. He wasn't going to win unless he made kills. He also made a kill every other night he could, since it had to have taken him two attempts to take out Swamped.With two nights of no second kill, I wonder if Bronx just didn't target someone night 2 or if he learned some other piece of information.
I townread him quite early on due to his approach to day 1 (trying to bring the new players more into the game which helped get a read on them). Since then he's generally been on the same side as me for most arguments, which could be intentional but most likely isn't.Splinter what are your thoughts on Blarg?
I've been thinking about this.Missing night kills -> maybe a blocker -> maybe scum knew who the sk was -> lulz let sk kill lul.
Sense, none.
Bronx removes Swamped's BP on N2. Scum block not-Bronx and are wondering where the second kill went.
Bronx shoots Swamped again on N3 but is blocked by scum who at this point are confused about what is happening.
Bronx finally kills Swamped on N4. Scum are wondering what the order of actions was - what happened on what night.
There's also nothing in her PM about killing either and I'm 99% sure if she was the last one left she'd get a killing power. So that could have been left to further clarification.I don't see why a BP would be informed that they've lost their shield. If it ain't in the pm (it is not), it does not exist.
Bronx removes Swamped's BP on N2. Scum block not-Bronx and are wondering where the second kill went.
Bronx shoots Swamped again on N3 but is blocked by scum who at this point are confused about what is happening.
Bronx finally kills Swamped on N4. Scum are wondering what the order of actions was - what happened on what night.
I am not sure if this makes sense. N3 scum could kill the one they blocked N2. Scum block Bronx, Kawl dies and is not the SK. Kill is missing again. N4 scum shoot Bronx, block x. Bronx lives and shoots Swamped. The idea falls apart.
Missing something.
This seems fairly irrelevant in the grand scheme of things since "random stuff that Blarg does" seems mostly non-alignment indicative. What would you say a scum-Blarg would do differently?I townread him quite early on due to his approach to day 1 (trying to bring the new players more into the game which helped get a read on them). Since then he's generally been on the same side as me for most arguments, which could be intentional but most likely isn't.
There's been a couple of odd things, the time he didn't vote Cabot is by far the worst. Blarg is strange, but town-Blarg generally has a reason for doing things, whether I can see it or not. That unvote I can't see a reason for and he refuses to explain.
Overall though this game has been more town-Blarg than scum-Blarg.
There's also nothing in her PM about killing either and I'm 99% sure if she was the last one left she'd get a killing power. So that could have been left to further clarification.
Does it change if Cabot is lying and is really and even night commuter?
Point being that everything Blarg does seems random, but more of it has a hidden (pro town) purpose when he is town.This seems fairly irrelevant in the grand scheme of things since "random stuff that Blarg does" seems mostly non-alignment indicative. What would you say a scum-Blarg would do differently?
Bronx targeting Swamped twice makes little sense, but it must have happened, since it is the only reasonable explaination. Maybe the very fact that his first shot was blocked convinced him Swamped was scum? It is also possible that he was just angry after two blocked shots and wanted revenge. We will find out either way once the game is over.hmm
N2 Bronx shoots cabot. No blocker necessary. cabot dodges the shot. One kill.
N3 Bronx shoots Swamped. BP is expended. No blocker necessary. One kill.
N4 Bronx shoots Swamped. Swamped dies. No blocker necessary. Two kills.
1. Why double on Swamped instead of cabot?
2. After a successful N1 townie kill, Bronx needed a scum. From this arises the implication that Bronx considered both cabot and Swamped scum.
Also, I was looking back through and this popped out. The presumably is a weird caveat to make, I mean we had no reason to believe that scum wouldn't have a faction kill. It is thing, just not something that would be foremost in my mind.It doesn't mesh with my assumptions of the role. Choosing someone's target I can understand, but forcing them to use the faction kill is surprising to me.
I guess the faction kill is (presumably) listed on the scum role pm as a thing they can do. Meh.
It also makes the role a lot more powerful, especially if he can force people to self target. Actually if he can force a self target he's an even bigger asset to town, but I cba to keep arguing for that. Noone reads it anyway.
Plus that part being hard to believe makes the whole thing more likely to be a lie.
Why did CCS say it? Because it's true and/or he thought it was believable.
I wasn't talking about scum having a faction kill or not, I was talking about whether or not CCS' ability would trigger it. The way it was worded made it sound more likely if the faction kill was included in the pm.Out of cabot, kyan, splinter, and blarg (top 4 posters i believe) who do people think is most scummy?
This same scenario arose in DR3 where high volume posters were kept alive. The one chance that scum had to kill someone that was not a confirmed town outside of n1 (where a doctor wasn't in play) they go after Waffle. Taking someone from the low end of posts rather than the higher end. Could mean nothing besides removing low impact and low interaction players but I feel like one or more could be scum (also odds).
Also, I was looking back through and this popped out. The presumably is a weird caveat to make, I mean we had no reason to believe that scum wouldn't have a faction kill. It is thing, just not something that would be foremost in my mind.
Hmm, I can see what you're saying but just the way it's worded bothered me. It's still a rather small quibble.I wasn't talking about scum having a faction kill or not, I was talking about whether or not CCS' ability would trigger it. The way it was worded made it sound more likely if the faction kill was included in the pm.
Out of cabot, kyan, splinter, and blarg (top 4 posters i believe) who do people think is most scummy?
I mean... Do I really need to answer that? I've been trying to lynch him for how long now?Hmm, I can see what you're saying but just the way it's worded bothered me. It's still a rather small quibble.
Anyways, what about the first part in my last post?
Why zipped? Is there anything you can point to?I think zipped is a scum mate.
Splinter could be anything at this point. Deal with him last
Why do you think those two are scummier than cabot and *Splinter? Any behavior of their's that you can point to?Out of those four Kyan and Blarg are the ones that stick out to me. I've went back and forth on Blarg this whole game and right now I'm on a "maybe scum" swing. Kyan is in the same boat. I'm slightly less suspicious of the other two but I'm not ruling them out.
hmm
N2 Bronx shoots cabot. No blocker necessary. cabot dodges the shot. One kill.
N3 Bronx shoots Swamped. BP is expended. No blocker necessary. One kill.
N4 Bronx shoots Swamped. Swamped dies. No blocker necessary. Two kills.
1. Why double on Swamped instead of cabot?
My claim is the same. Bronx consistently said he town read me, which made me think he shot me on an odd night. I actually thought flame was the sk and that's why he strongly town read me, as he shot me.
I think Bronx 's more generous win condition made him play more town. I think he shot swamped N2 and me N3.
I see no point in discussing what Bronx did or didn't do. We should be grateful that he got around Swamped's BP, otherwise we'd be in even worse shape now. He can come gloat after the game's over.
I concur with Kyaaan's assessment
cabot's a humongous liar
But why would scum cabot lie about this?