Damn straightfeels like he's nailed a scum
It is... Kinda? I mean we're getting dangerously close to end game, it's the time to be considering every possibility. OTOH I find it weird that he's suddenly scumreading me after sheeping me all game.is it not strange blarg now just springs this theory instead of ever talking about it before?
Wait... You think Cabot is a scum commuter? With a scum bulletproof?IMO, I don't think there's a Mafia!Roleblocker in this game. Well, the existence of Killer Bronx might add to the likelihood of that existence, but... nah, a filthy Roleblocker just as a counter for an SK? Don't think so
Especially seeing as this Town's been rather devoid of Power Roles
nope.
Any explanation for the Nightly events is likely sans Mafia-aligned Roleblocker
so yeah cabot probably lied, & dodged
explain cabot
I think you are being a little too eager to jump into this three-way thunderdome scenario that is brewing. I know that cabot is really pushing it, but we still need to keep alert to scum hiding elsewhere.Vote: Blargonaut
I'd rather lynch Blarg between the three of you. I need to look over Splinter again though.
I think you are being a little too eager to jump into this three-way thunderdome scenario that is brewing. I know that cabot is really pushing it, but we still need to keep alert to scum hiding elsewhere.
Also, you never answered my previous question. Why do you think Blarg and Kyan are scummier than Splinter and cabot?
Wait... You think Cabot is a scum commuter? With a scum bulletproof?
What is this nonsense?
Since no one has come forward with any sort of blocking/BP power, it's not unreasonable to think that the reason Bronx didn't kill anyone one night was because of cabot the commuter. What are the other possibilities? Mafia roleblocker got lucky and then stopped blocking him? He missed an action entirely?
With two skipped nights and no reason to assume a blocker exists. A swing and a miss on Cabot makes the most sense for the other missing kill night.What do you think cabot is?
Hmm... I had been assuming scum roleblocked the SK. I can kind of explain why they wouldn't kill him, but it hadn't occured to me that they could also have continued blocking him.Since no one has come forward with any sort of blocking/BP power, it's not unreasonable to think that the reason Bronx didn't kill anyone one night was because of cabot the commuter. What are the other possibilities? Mafia roleblocker got lucky and then stopped blocking him? He missed an action entirely?
Scum or commuter.What do you think cabot is?
Cabot and Blarg are scum.
There was that infamous (lol) unvote, where Blarg could have had Cabot lynched but didn't, despite tunnelling him for at least a day phase. Current excuse for that is feigned frustration (why?) followed by falling asleep. AKA "I totally wanted to vote for him it was an accident". Uh huh.
Last phase, Cabot is AGAIN up for possible lynch, and Blarg starts pushing for Bronx (the SK) instead?
And now today, I think his vote is currently on Cabot but he's already introduced the idea of me being scum.
Blarg has been tunnelling Cabot almost as long as I have, and yet twice he's passed up the opportunity to lynch him, with today looking likely to be a third. I can't believe I didn't spot this sooner. It also explains Blarg's nonsensical opinion on Cabot today (scum AND commuter). He thinks town believes Cabot is commuter so going along with that opinion, while also tactically scumreading him, and not realising those two opinions don't line up.
Cabot is scum.
Scum maybe knew about Bronx, most likely due to a roleblocker.
Why didn't they kill Bronx? Don't know. Maybe feared he was bulletproof? (Common for SK)
Why didn't they block him? Don't know again, roleblocker was x-shot is the only thing I can think of.
Maybe they didn't know about Bronx, that's a point in cabot's favour more than Blarg's. Most damning thing here is Blarg keeping his convenient tunnel alive all game.
I'll come back to Cabot after we mass claim. In all honesty him going all in with the frustrated act has had me doubting myself for a while.
VOTE: Blargonaut
Forgive me lover.
Unless you're scum.
Which you still most likely are.
Like, 70%.
That's rich when you've been sheeping me all game. How can I piggyback off your tunnel if I was on him first?Doing nothing but freeload on MY tunnel for the whole game
Blarg has been tunnelling Cabot almost as long as I have, and yet twice he's passed up the opportunity to lynch him, with today looking likely to be a third.
no
VOTE: *Splinter
vote: kyanrute
Out of Cabot, *splinter and blargonaut I am the most sure of Cabot being town, then splinter and then BLarg. However, until I get a better handle on you three, I'm going to go with a fourth option today.
whyyy kyaaa?
Why?vote: kyanrute
Out of Cabot, *splinter and blargonaut I am the most sure of Cabot being town, then splinter and then BLarg. However, until I get a better handle on you three, I'm going to go with a fourth option today.
Cabot is scummy. Blarg avoids lynching him. Conclusion: both are scum.Vote: *Splinter
I don't like that last bunch of posts. You start out by considering that cabot might be town, but then quickly launch into a convoluted theory about how cabot and Blarg must be scum.
Now, I can understand a townie having fluid opinions, but it feels like you are doing the opposite. Instead of changing your opinions based on new information, you are starting with the outcome you want to sell and twist your logic into pretzels to suit that outcome.
To see if you were still lurking and ask what you think of Cabot, blargonaut and *splinter?
unvote
That isn't a convincing argument. The commuter thing makes it likely cabot is town. Furthermore, Bronx_Man has been scummy all game, so someone voting for him isn't inherently scummy. I might buy Blarg being scum, but I can't agree with your theory that cabot and Blarg are in cahoots.Why?
Cabot is scummy. Blarg avoids lynching him. Conclusion: both are scum.
Doesn't seem that hard to follow.
We've passed the point where we lynch for info. Removing one of Splinter/cabot/Blarg resolves little. Maybe it's a bus. Maybe it's three townies.
cabot might have just gotten dealt some bad luck with a scummy role and poor timing on his reveal. I feel like he's interacted with most other players, been relatively transparent in his posts, and while he has switched targets a lot, thought about giving up, and hasn't voted optimally, it's not like any of us have done better. I mean, yeah, he could be cackling in scum chat how he's escaped a lynch since Day 2, but I'm fairly certain he's town.
Going to do a reread of Splinter and Blarg's posts.
vote: kyanrute
Out of Cabot, *splinter and blargonaut I am the most sure of Cabot being town, then splinter and then BLarg. However, until I get a better handle on you three, I'm going to go with a fourth option today.
Blarg is totes scum. You're only probs scum.Splinter why are you choosing blarg over me
Blarg why do you think i am scum commuter, you've clearly claimed I've been lying multiple times in this game.
Vote: *Splinter
I don't like that last bunch of posts. You start out by considering that cabot might be town, but then quickly launch into a convoluted theory about how cabot and Blarg must be scum.
Now, I can understand a townie having fluid opinions, but it feels like you are doing the opposite. Instead of changing your opinions based on new information, you are starting with the outcome you want to sell and twist your logic into pretzels to suit that outcome.
The tone is weird here with the "the trio ain't that good a lynch info-wise but I'll look into them anyway".
It seems to me that lynching one of them is less about "they're scummy" than "removing one will change my opinion of the others and reveal pertinent info". I just think it's a bad way to go about a D6 vote.
And I think *splinter has played a very town forward game.
Blarg's second point Day 4 (after trying to spread that Cabot is mafia) was to defend swamped and say that Cabot was groundless (see post 2326)
The rest of the day he hammers into Cabot, endlessly/mercilessly. Which isn't scummy because getting under people's skin is a good strategy to win.
What stands out was the quick defend. Why go through that trouble when only Cabot and I had posted suspicion on swamped? Why discount my theory on her? I think it was a quick defend of a fellow scum player and then refocus to get back under someone's skin.
vote: Blargonaut