Lie about what?
Ah, lie in that context makes little sense. Let me re-explain myself.
The bit you quoted and seemed to agree with was in response to Zipped's query about an alternative scenario where cabot was an even night commuter instead of an odd night one. cabot has now said that this is not the case and that he stands by his old claim.
The thing is that I am not seeing how what cabot is claiming fits into the night kills we've had, or to be exact, to the kills we haven't had. The even night commuter scenario would explain the missing kills without adding new roles into play. cabot's own theory where Bronx targets an odd night commuter on a odd night is nonsense. I am wondering if there is a scenario without a blocker where cabot is what he claims to be?
Thus, the original question about the "lie". Why wouldn't scum cabot embrace the theory I presented as truth? Why not change the claim to an even night commuter and claim he wanted to tank kills (which he might've even succeeded to do)? The answer I see that the tower of lies is getting too high as it is.
You call cabot a humongous liar yourself. Do you think he dodged a kill?