Crysis 3 is different. Dunno about frametimes, but the 8350 outperforms the 3570k in average FPS.
3570k gets beaten in far cry 3 too, i guess.
Crysis 3 is different. Dunno about frametimes, but the 8350 outperforms the 3570k in average FPS.
I have the intel 980x and nothing touches it. Even 4K video uses a small amount of power. Same with any game. I won't be upgrading for years to come.![]()
Guess I'm going to look for deals on the 3570k or 3770k.
Is there any real benefit to the -E line if you're not making the jump to six or more cores? The 3820 looked like a pretty insignificant improvement over the 2700k, and even less impressive compared to Ivy Bridge, at least at stock clocks.
That's exactly what caused me to bite earlier than I wanted with my current system.
Continued having issues after upgrade, only to finally discover it was my Razer Deathadder mouse causing the issues. POS. It didn't even have the dignity to die, just mess with my computer (hard locks and stuff).
CPU bottlenecks exist on most games. It's not an either/or thing most of the time.im on an i5 760 and i dont think ive experienced any cpu bottlenecks except for starcraft 2. which is probably why intel is focusing on mobile.
Hey, toothpaste does a good job!
![]()
I still wonder if IB's temperatures were caused by the TIM or process immaturity, perhaps it's both.
Vegemite??? Fuckin' lol
I gotta say, I love Intel, but their process for naming processors is so damn convoluted and confusing. It's to the point where you need to do all this research just to know which to even start considering.
So they are using the same shitty heatspreader design from Ivy Bridge?
Sticking with my Sandy Bridge if so.
Vegemite??? Fuckin' lol
As a guy who is building his first PC, I was waiting for this for my build.
Some disappointments for PC enthusiast but I read one review in this thread that its perfect for new comers although I don't know how reliable that is.
Should I go with this? the USB 3.0 glitch is kinda off putting and extra heat sounds bad but I'm a first timer at this, I don't know how much I should be concerned about this, is it still a good purchase for someone who didn't have much expectations on it before?
The USB 3 issue is overblown, just turn off sleep state and its all good.As a guy who is building his first PC, I was waiting for this for my build.
Some disappointments for PC enthusiast but I read one review in this thread that its perfect for new comers although I don't know how reliable that is.
Should I go with this? the USB 3.0 glitch is kinda off putting and extra heat sounds bad but I'm a first timer at this, I don't know how much I should be concerned about this, is it still a good purchase for someone who didn't have much expectations on it before?
As a guy who is building his first PC, I was waiting for this for my build.
Some disappointments for PC enthusiast but I read one review in this thread that its perfect for new comers although I don't know how reliable that is.
Should I go with this? the USB 3.0 glitch is kinda off putting and extra heat sounds bad but I'm a first timer at this, I don't know how much I should be concerned about this, is it still a good purchase for someone who didn't have much expectations on it before?
The real problem with a lot of these is they only work while moist which is not a lot. (dry toothpaste is no good)Haha, no way. I have to try that one day.
Yeah sticking with my OC'd 2500k.They are yes.
The real problem with a lot of these is they only work while moist which is not a lot. (dry toothpaste is no good)
As a guy who is building his first PC, I was waiting for this for my build.
Some disappointments for PC enthusiast but I read one review in this thread that its perfect for new comers although I don't know how reliable that is.
Should I go with this? the USB 3.0 glitch is kinda off putting and extra heat sounds bad but I'm a first timer at this, I don't know how much I should be concerned about this, is it still a good purchase for someone who didn't have much expectations on it before?
Putting a video card in a PCI-E slot is the only thing that separates difficulty between the two. That is probably the easiest thing to do on a PC build too.Want an easy 1st PC, build an APU with the new A10-6800K.
Those 'few people' make up the majority of the PC gamers on this forum. It's pretty important stuff.
Absolutely. And yes.Are you really suggesting that the majority of PC gamers on this board overclock their CPUs? That it's actually "important" to be able to get acceptable performance?
Absolutely. And yes.
You change *two* values in BIOS. It takes a total of 30 minutes of your active time to get 10-30% increased linear performance. It's not the scary endeavor it used to be.
You're conflating difficulty with desire and willingness. And you're forgetting the fact that:
1) It requires that the person actually built his own PC
2) The person actually bought a decent cooler because the stock cooler (especially for Sandy/Ivy Bridge) is absolutely not going to give you a stable overclock.
It's times like these where you really need to re-examine your understanding of the bubble you don't realize you're in.
Are you really suggesting that the majority of PC gamers on this board overclock their CPUs? That it's actually "important" to be able to get acceptable performance?
You're conflating difficulty with desire and willingness. And you're forgetting the fact that:
1) It requires that the person actually built his own PC
2) The person actually bought a decent cooler because the stock cooler (especially for Sandy/Ivy Bridge) is absolutely not going to give you a stable overclock.
It's times like these where you really need to re-examine your understanding of the bubble you don't realize you're in.
Max clock under water is 4.8GHz
4.9 and 5.0 not bootable into windows and stuck at logon screen
Asus Maximus VI Extreme
Custom water Loop
Yup.Yeah I was scared, but it turns out its really easy. Is there any confirmation that haswell is NOT soldered?
My 6 year old Intel LGA775 mATX setup went up in smoke.
RIP
You're conflating difficulty with desire and willingness. And you're forgetting the fact that:
1) It requires that the person actually built his own PC
2) The person actually bought a decent cooler because the stock cooler (especially for Sandy/Ivy Bridge) is absolutely not going to give you a stable overclock.
It's times like these where you really need to re-examine your understanding of the bubble you don't realize you're in.
Cross posting:
Haswell overclocking is a fucking joke. Not to mention load draw while OC'd is TWICE the amount Sandy / Ivy needed. That's 8350 territory.
100C+ on stock cooler:
![]()
You can have a CPU capable of 4.8GHz with a DDR3-1600 DRAM divider. (High OC can screw up memory OC)
You can have a CPU capable of 4.8GHz with a DDR3-2400 DRAM divider.
You can have a CPU capable of 4.8GHz with a 48 cache ratio with a DDR3-2400 DRAM
divider.
1. Approximately 70% of CPUs can go up to 4.5GHz. Overall, most CPUs are capable of
reaching 44x to 45x with varying levels of voltage. Voltage will be a key item as it defines thermal
output. It is possible to run out of thermal headroom at lower frequencies due to a processor
requiring excessive voltage for stability.
2. Approximately 30% of CPUs can go up to 4.6GHz
3. Approximately 20% of CPUs can go up to 4.7GHz
4. Approximately 10% of CPUs can go up to 4.8GHz
Currently we are seeing voltage ranges between 1.150v to as much as 1.400 for similar/same
frequencies. An example would be 4.6GHz requiring 1.200 and another CPU requiring 1.400.
This is important as a the overall maximum load a single radiator single 120mm closed loop
cooling solution can dissipate under synthetic stress test load is approximately 1.250 to 1.275v.
This is assuming the ambient temperature is reasonable.
A voltage level of 1.350v or greater, is too high for enthusiast cooling solutions including water
cooling. With this in mind, maximum temperatures should be gauged by the use of real world
applications rather than synthetic stress tests.
Given Haswell’s thermal characteristics, pursuing per core overclocking can be beneficial as this
helps to maximize core frequency for various loading conditions.
For a 4.6 GHz overclock attempt: However you set the voltage, it is advised you set a VID of
1.200.
For a 4.8 GHz overclock attempt: However you set the voltage, it is advised you set a VID of
1.300
For voltages up to 1.250-1.265 a cooling solution meeting a minimum of a Corsair H80i is
advised.
For voltages up to 1.275-1.300 a cooling solution meeting a minimum of a Corsair H100i is
advised.
So if I wanted to 4-4.2 GHz on a 4770k, would the stock cooler be good enough, or an aftermarket cooler be necessary?
Part of me wants to chance it, but the other part was unsure if the EVO/Noctua cooler was as effective on Haswell as they are on SB/IB. Seeing as they still are, I'll pick one up.With the way Haswell is looking I'd invest in something aftermarket like the Hyper 212 Evo to be on the safe side. If you can afford a 4770K you can afford an aftermarket cooler![]()
Stock is probably fine, but you are already paying a $30 CPU and mobo premium, might as well buy a cooler.So if I wanted to 4-4.2 GHz on a 4770k, would the stock cooler be good enough, or an aftermarket cooler be necessary?
With near zero competition right now on the desktop front, why rush? Our sources say that, instead of Broadwell, the 2014 will see just a Haswell refresh first, likely a new CPU stepping combined with a new chipset.
Even with only the incremental CPU performance gain over the Ivy Bridge, Haswell still firmly rules the mainstream desktop CPU world. The substantially higher GPU performance and the improved power bill do help as well. So, since the tick tock model from 2008 is anyway a thing of the past now, why not extend the new CPUs shelf life too, and maximise the return on the investment? After all, its not the case like some eight years ago when the competition was actually having a better performing product, and it wont be the case for a while read end 2014 at least.
So, our Computex sources advised us to give more focus on the Haswell, as well be stuck with it pretty much until early 2015 at least; thats the current Broadwell launch timeframe, too bad.
Long live Haswell: With Broadwell only in 2015, a midterm refresh is on the cards
VR-Zone claims that Broadwell will launch in 2015 now.
The A10 is a very low cost APU though, it's down at Core i3 money.
Maybe so, but the i3 still beats it when it comes to latency and destroys it in wattage. You can undervolt an i3 quite a bit and still run at stock voltages. The thing sips energy.
Why are they still focusing on the desktop version? The mobile should be front page, no one's buying desktops anymore