Boss Mog
Member
It was probably mentioned in here already but IBM had a similar concept in a commercial a decade ago: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eob532iEpqk
I found the video introduction pretty sad. Everyone just walks in, grab their stuff, walk out.
There is no interaction among the customers. At least there is some interaction between the customer and cashier.
Boss★Moogle;226053673 said:It was probably mentioned in here already but IBM had a similar concept in a commercial a decade ago: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eob532iEpqk
We can easily stop this through legislation. We just need for our legislative leaders to actually show some courage and fight to protect jobs.
I wonder what it will take for people to turn on Amazon. They have been such a destructive force within our economy and treat their employees like human garbage.
Push for universal basic income, push for free or cheap education. Trying to limit automation isn't going to do anyone any good and will ultimately fail.Respect.
We might not be able to stop it, but we can certainly regulate it. Rolling over and giving up is what the people who stand to profit from it want us to do.
We lose manufacturing jobs, people tell us that nothing can be done. Now we begin to lose service sector jobs, and people tell us nothing can be done. At some point we need to push back against corporate greed and the consolidation of wealth/power.
I don't know what problem this is trying to solve. Are people seriously that busy that they forgo grocery shopping because of the inconvenience of having to check out?
You said we should slow down progress, so I was wondering who you were appealing to. The common individual? The employees? The executives of the company? The shareholders? The government?
I don't get why people keep bringing up "middle class jobs" when referring to jobs like cashiers/stockers.
If you've ever worked retail, you know that these are purely poor/high school student type jobs. Unless you think 10$ an hour makes somebody "middle class", it doesn't actually affect the "middle class" whatsoever. Outside of making their shopping easier of course.
Yes, jobs will be lost and that's tragic, but if you think it affects anybody beyond those who could have their wage loss supplemented by a halfway decent welfare system, or a system that rewards people for learning a skill/trade, you're deluding yourself.
That's why so many people speak about things like guaranteed basic income, it simply make much more sens than preventing innovation for the sake of saving the jobs themself."Meaningless". Do you know how the economy works at all? We are a consumer based economy. If people don't have money to buy things the economy damn near stops working. So even a "meaningless" job like a cashier or clerk has actual meaning. That person gets paid, pays bills, buys things and that supports other jobs downstream. You eliminate too many jobs then things dry up and there aren't people with money to buy things from these stores. So then these stores close because they have no customers. Etc.
Frankly I don't understand what you're getting at and I feel like you are very selectively addressing my points or outright ignoring them. I wasn't making some sort of appeal, this is a video game forum. Nobody is changing pubic policy here. Amazon isn't scouring NeoGAF to decide whether they should go through automation. I was simply stating that I feel like the progress of automation is actively going to hurt people and most people don't really seem to care because now they can check out easier or not even check out at all.
And progress isn't a monolith. You can make progress as a society and make progress in technology with or without complete automation.
Wait until your 90 and that's the only interaction you'll have all day.That is forced interaction. No one wakes up saying, I can't wait to have a conversation with the supermarket cashier.
Uh, so how the fuck does this work, EXACTLY? Face recognition? They don't give any details. How do they know it was YOU who took the product, and not the person beside you? I see so many avenues for error, and unless there is a human being manually tracking what you're grabbing I don't see how this will be completely reliable given the types of technology that will most likely be used, especially when there's multiple people in close proximity to you.
I've been scanning and walking out with items in Apple Stores with zero human interaction for a while. I just don't see how this Amazon Store can maintain that level of accuracy.
Y'all crying about jobs need to get over it. We are rapidly headed for a post-work world and we need to focus on easing the transition rather than fighting it tooth and nail.
Y'all crying about jobs need to get over it. We are rapidly headed for a post-work world and we need to focus on easing the transition rather than fighting it tooth and nail.
I was trying to figure out if what you were saying point to any solutions, but I think we agree there isn't any in there. Sure, progress isn't a monolith. You got that right and I agree with you.
Yeah, they set up one in the Billa store I frequent last week and it's soooo great! So much quicker to self-check out than to stand in line. Especially if you only grabbed lunch and something to drink. So good, I was blown away lolSelf-check out machines are starting to appear here in Austria, so the move away from cashiers is happening, one way or another
can we do it in a way that doesn't make greedy Bezos even wealthier
I was suggesting that legislation is the only real solution that I can see, either the government needs to expand on programs to get people working these jobs into jobs that won't be automated or they need to legislate in a way that slows down total automation for a few years while they can get their ducks in a row to get people into jobs that won't be automated. Either way they need to help people get into other jobs. The problem is that if they don't a lot of people will suffer. Trying to keep those jobs long term is a mistake, I just want there to be a transition period rather than a sudden shift.
I don't think automation is a bad thing, I absolutely think that automation should happen because people shouldn't be stuck doing manual labor for their entire lives. We as a society should move past the need for that to be done by people.
I don't have a lot of faith that the government will step up and take this on but I don't really see another way to fix the problem.
Yeah, they set up one in the Billa store I frequent last week and it's soooo great! So much quicker to self-check out than to stand in line. Especially if you only grabbed lunch and something to drink. So good, I was blown away lol
Also I need an Amazon Go store here asap. I'm just a little worried about errors and bugs that are bound to happen. But as long as you can check your cart before checking out, no biggie.
It's easier to just "get over it" when your own welfare doesn't depend on it. I'd imagine there are a few people on GAF who work as cashiers.Y'all crying about jobs need to get over it. We are rapidly headed for a post-work world and we need to focus on easing the transition rather than fighting it tooth and nail.
It's easier to just "get over it" when your own welfare doesn't depend on it. I'd imagine there are a few people on GAF who work as cashiers.
I scoff at the notion that automation can improve the errors made in the receiving process.
The vendors can't even ship product to us correctly. Supposed to send us double stuffed Oreos but instead they send low fat. This is just one example out of literally hundreds in a day just in my department.
Too many hands in the process.
How much?I found the video introduction pretty sad. Everyone just walks in, grab their stuff, walk out.
There is no interaction among the customers. At least there is some interaction between the customer and cashier.
This,
What they need to do is have scanners or whatever on the shelves or nearby or at least prior to the paying area where you can double check the price is what is listed, calculate the total etc. to stop any errors like something not being 2for1, half price like what happens when I go shopping.
The label says an offer - after checkout reading the receipt - it wasn't on offer.
There is zero reason why someone will not be allowed view the total before committing to a purchase with all this tech, unless it's for anti-consumer reasons.
The user experience needs to be as seamless as possible.well you can just look at the app surely?
So how would coupons work?
So another technology that removes even more jobs from the economy? No thanks.