I think when we're thinking simply politically, of course a country is defined by the head of state, but broader, when thinking about that country we're more likely to think of the cultural contributions.
When I think of what defines a country like Italy, I don't think of Paolo Gentiloni the Prime Minister (and truthfully, I had to Google who the PM was), I think of wine, food, and fashion. When thinking of Australia, I think of the country as being defined by beer and beaches, not Malcolm Turnbull. The UK, I think of pork pie, double-decker busses, pubs, and phone boxes, not Theresa May (although in fairness, I do think of the Queen as well, though I think for semi-permanent heads of state or dictators [not that the Queen is a dictator] this is probably more likely). Likewise, I think when somebody wants to stick it to a country they say, "Well, yeah, of course your unpopular leader defines your country that I want to dislike," but in actuality when they're not trying to be argumentative, they're more likely to think of those persistent brands or features that persist far longer than the temporary head of state. For billions of people around the world, the Nike swoosh or McDonalds arches are more recognizably American than whoever the president is.
Though, this phenomenon of associating cultural contributions to a country rather than its sitting head of state could also be different for people looking in at the US, rather than me, looking out at other countries from the US. US politics generally gets far more media coverage in Italy than Italian politics gets in the United States, and so our top politicians might become household names after an election.
Trump is the face of the US to the rest of the world.
The overall feeling on my country is "how stupid have Americans to be, to elect someone so clearly incompetent and evil as Trump for president?"
Trump is the face of the US to the rest of the world.
The overall feeling on my country is "how stupid have Americans to be, to elect someone so clearly incompetent and evil as Trump for president?"
For those of you that think we are defined by Donald Trump; does this give you disdain when talking to Americans? WIll you now hold a pretense/assumption about their beliefs?
You really believe that all progress America has made will be destroyed in Trump's 4 years? I can't help but see this belief as gross over-reaction.When the majority who voted for Clinton are willing to grab their pitchforks and get trump and the corporations out of office. Until then the millions of racists who voted Trump run this country and are about to destroy everything good its tried to do for the last 100 years.
Right now, no. After 15 years of him in the office? Definitely yes
You really believe that all progress America has made will be destroyed in Trump's 4 years? I can't help but see this belief as gross over-reaction.
The moment Trump even tried an idea that goes against the morals of metropolitan America (the millions of people in cities), it clearly won't be easy.
Let's take the idea of a Muslim registry. Imagine that Donald Trump pushes that idea forward and Congress passes it.The republicans own every level of governance, there is no one to stop them.
When the majority who voted for Clinton are willing to grab their pitchforks and get trump and the corporations out of office. Until then the millions of racists who voted Trump run this country and are about to destroy everything good its tried to do for the last 100 years.
There should have been nightly riots on the streets in dozens of cities following this election. You don't let an authoritarian take power when you understand history and know how quickly they can destroy any limits on their power.
Let's take the idea of a Muslim registry. Imagine that Donald Trump pushes that idea forward and Congress passes it.
I still don't see states like my own (California) following this federal mandate. I imagine many other states will not listen to the voice of the federal government, either.
Every 8 years or so the other side wins and the people on the other side scream to the sky.
This is no different to Bush. It's pretty much exactly the same as Bush, complaints about popular vote included. The country is "defined" by a small swinging one way or the other every few years. The country is no different today than 4 years ago.
Are we talking about the U.S government or the entire U.S? The current government is defined by Trump, as he is the leader, but nearly 3 million more people don't want him than do. He is not the defining symbol of the people.
You actually believe this? It's a belief not based in reality. Someone who didn't vote isn't necessarily OK with a Trump presidency.The "win the popular vote" talk would only work if EVERYONE HAD TO VOTE.
The fact that the majority of people didn't vote means the majority of americans was happy either way or wanted trump for sure. So the RIDICULOUS MAJORITY is happy with trump as president.
You actually believe this? It's a belief not based in reality. Someone who didn't vote isn't necessarily OK with a Trump presidency.
You actually believe this? It's a belief not based in reality. Someone who didn't vote isn't necessarily OK with a Trump presidency.
You actually believe this? It's a belief not based in reality. Someone who didn't vote isn't necessarily OK with a Trump presidency.
You actually believe this? It's a belief not based in reality. Someone who didn't vote isn't necessarily OK with a Trump presidency.
I agree, people should vote.maybe he should have voted then?
Every 8 years or so the other side wins and the people on the other side scream to the sky.
This is no different to Bush. It's pretty much exactly the same as Bush, complaints about popular vote included. The country is "defined" by a small swinging one way or the other every few years. The country is no different today than 4 years ago.
No.
Also, the idea that white nationalism/white supremacism is more popular than ever before is utterly ridiculous.
I agree, people should vote.
That doesn't mean their statement that 'becuase 50% of people didn't vote, they are OK with a Trump presidency' is pretty clearly wrong. He's going into office with the highest dissaproval rating in history.
I agree, people should vote.
That doesn't mean their statement that 'becuase 50% of people didn't vote, they are OK with a Trump presidency' is pretty clearly wrong. He's going into office with the highest dissaproval rating in history.
I think we need to remind ourselves of the coverage before the election. Most polls and pundits predicted a landslide from Clinton. A lot of people base their information off this, I'm sure. Not to mention the Democrat voting bloc was hardly as energized due to their candidate.Right, but if people arent motivated enough to even go out and vote when they see someone like him running, maybe it doesnt bother them that much then? I think that was the point he was making.
If something really bothers me, ill make sure to do my part. They didnt. That in itself says a lot.
I think we need to remind ourselves of the coverage before the election. Most polls and pundits predicted a landslide from Clinton. A lot of people base their information off this, I'm sure. Not to mention the Democrat voting bloc was hardly as energized due to their candidate.
I mean, I agree with your guys base premise that people should vote regardless of the coverage. I disagree that those non-voters are complacent or OK with a Trump presidency.
I agree, people should vote.
That doesn't mean their statement that 'becuase 50% of people didn't vote, they are OK with a Trump presidency' is pretty clearly wrong. He's going into office with the highest dissaproval rating in history.
Still, it wasn't exactly a landslide in the popular vote either. He lost it but not by an insane amount. Fact is, he represents too many people of that country and thats the biggest problem. The fact that so many people even voted for this incompetent idiot shows me that yes, the US is defined by him. So many voter are convinced by an "attitude" or what they see on TV. Its fucking sad as hell.
Hes exactly what the US deserves.