I had to google that car. Type F. Goes for around $130,000 CDN doing a quick search. So maybe around $90,000 US.
(typo I originally said Type 5)
I swear. If any car company can make a car that looks like with decent performance (doesnt have to be a super car) for lets say $60,000 like lots of other decent cars that go for that price in Canada, they get a shit load of sales.
Too bad car companies purposely make their best looking cars at the highest prices. Probably too afraid to make cars too good looking at too low of a price.
Many factors play a role in this. In the era of strict safety and fuel economy requirements, creating a vehicle that meets these conditions and is, at the same time, striking in style requires a lot of technical know-how, and this costs a lot of money and recources.
Car manufacturers like to play it safe, there's a reason why we have so many stylistically bland cars with little difference between them.
And it seems to me that this applies not only to the car industry, many stylists struggle with limitation problems that have evolved from economical and functional changes, as well as the customer's approach to the product as such. I still remember the times when owning any car was a privilege, today it's just another tool that drives our everyday routine.
Practicality, ease of use, safety - this is what sells now, even in the premium car segment. So you could say that we ourselves have become part of the problem, actually.
Giving way to pure function, beauty is no longer a bargaining chip, a culture-building element. It's a pain in the ass for the industry and we have to pay extra for it, hovewer sad it might be.