FFVIII was considered the "black sheep" of the FF series. What's so unbelievable about the "black sheep" FFVIII being outsold by Tony Hawk in its own home US market? The FF game that really mattered, FFVII, outsold every Tony Hawk game in its own US backyard. And on a worldwide scale (which is what really matters), FF 7-9 each outsold every Tony Hawk game. Even if we exclude the Japanese market, FF VII & VIII both sold more units outside Japan than any Tony Hawk game did across the world.
It doesn't make any difference to popularity whether or not they were bundled. If anything, that just makes it even more popular than the sales would indicate, since that would mean GT was a system-seller. If a game is bundled with a console, it's usually because that game is a system-seller that can help shift consoles. That's the whole point of console bundles. Hence why the NES was bundled with Super Mario Bros, the SNES with Mario World, the Genesis with Sonic, the Wii with Wii Sports, etc.
I didn't dodge any of this, I addressed it in the post you ignored because you are a projecting hypocrite.
FFVIII wasn't even the game I talked about originally it was FFVIII, you are so weak minded that I got you to go off subject my mentioning FFVIII. Also FFVII did not outsell every Tony Hawk game, Tony Hawk 1 and 2 outsold FFVII you're unreliable magic box is garbage with inaccurate numbers and the full list in your link is missing games. Another problem with your charts unreliability, how the hell would Tony Hawk to be head of Tony Hawk one by a good margin by 2004, when Tony Hawk one had been off the shelf years before, then Tony Hawk one somehow gets ahead of Tony Hawk 2 when PSX sales were low as balls in software and would be dicontinued 2 years later in 2006?
This is the problem, you don't use your brain.
Also yes, it does make a difference if a game is bundled since Crash was a system seller and was statistically tied with GT with less bundle presense with its games, one of which had zero bundles even limited. You don't really have an argument in this case, Crash was a stronger brand and the US would start buying less GT games after GT 2.
This is the same flawed argument Mario 64 fans use to dismiss GoldenEye sales.
Also your NES comparison doesn't work, GT wasn't a full-on bundle it was a numerous but not a massively bundled game, in the US, GT and GT 2 were only bundled with the Psone and while a good many of those bundles were out they were nothing like SMB, Halo, or M64 style bundles were there was an insane load of them. This again, like with the frogger nonsense, shows you have no clue what you are talking about.
Also yes, Frogger PSX is not a japenese game, you being a baby is not going to change that. Just like Kill.Switch or Silient Hill Homecoming are also not japanese games, just because they may "own the ip", that doesn't mean the game was made buy a japanese company. When people play games they decide whether it's good or not based on the game, and the developer is
mostly responsible for the quality of the game, especially back then, Konamis name isn't even on the damn case.
And let's not dodge the fact you took 5 seconds looking up the game on google images, didn't see the other levels, other than the highway, and thought it was jsut a 3D remaster of the 80's arcade game.
Keep digging that hole tho.