Is Hogwarts open or concealed carry when it comes to wands?This is a school in 'Murica after all.
People should consider reading the actual text before making sweeping judgments: https://www.pottermore.com/collection-episodic/history-of-magic-in-north-america-en
This seems to be the part in dispute:
I guess people are saying they don't want her using the skin walker legends? Otherwise it seems totally unobjectionable. Certainly ignoring Native Americans altogether and excluding them from her magical history would've been way worse.
Also read about the issue Rowling took Native lore and said it wasn't true it was created by anti magic people aka probably white folk to oppress wizards.
People should consider reading the actual text before making sweeping judgments: https://www.pottermore.com/collection-episodic/history-of-magic-in-north-america-en
This seems to be the part in dispute:
I guess people are saying they don't want her using the skin walker legends? Otherwise it seems totally unobjectionable. Certainly ignoring Native Americans altogether and excluding them from her magical history would've been way worse.
People should consider reading the actual text before making sweeping judgments: https://www.pottermore.com/collection-episodic/history-of-magic-in-north-america-en
This seems to be the part in dispute:
I guess people are saying they don't want her using the skin walker legends? Otherwise it seems totally unobjectionable. Certainly ignoring Native Americans altogether and excluding them from her magical history would've been way worse.
Get what right? A historically accurate depiction of Native American culture in a fictional world where magicians with wands fly on brooms?what if they were fans and they actually wanted to see her get this right?
but hey, complainers gonna complain, rowling can do what she wants and it does it even really matter, etc, etc. but lets leave the nihilism out of it.
What you are talking about happened so long ago that the Romans are gone too. I'm not excusing it but there is a difference. What happened to the Aboriginal people is incredibly recent. You know those schools that I mentioned? The ones where they tortured, raped and abused Aboriginal children while stripping away their culture? The last one in Canada closed in 1996. Right now, I think Aboriginal people are trying to reclaim their culture. As far as I know, today's Egyptians don't have to worry about that.Dude I am really sorry to say this but the Egyptian's went through the exact same thing when the roman's came into power. Their original culture was basically eradicated most of their monument's where forgotten or pillaged to construct other structures. This of course doesn't lessen the tragedy that the native american's went through but they are not the only culture that was attacked like that.
I haven't played it but I look forward to doing so when it is on sale.Walpurgis, didn't you like Until Dawn? Hypocrite much?
Is Hogwarts open or concealed carry when it comes to wands?
Appropriation is also the flippant use of elements of other cultures because they're exotic until they become commercialised or caricatured. The thing is that it's not necessarily always a bad thing and it's impossible to gauge the long-term effects of a trend until it's much too late to do anything about it. So people get really jumpy.Appropriation is, as I understand it, taking something from another culture and presenting it as your own. That's why, for instance, Rock & Roll is an example, because very rarely are the black people involved in its creation given any credit. But if this story does present it as a Native American myth, and then puts its own spin on it to incorporate it into the general setting... I'm not sure that's an issue.
The way I read it she's saying that medicine men were charlatans who spread rumours about actual magical folk in order to demonise them and avoid their own exposure as frauds.Not white people, but Native Muggles. Like how Europeans oppressed and demonized witches in their way, so too did muggle Native Americans decide that the Animagi were evil beings.
Some Christians did still get upset about him misrepresenting the devil as a sympathetic character thoughHe wrote the actual devil of a pretty popular religion as a protagonist. But I guess that religion is dominant so it lacks the "appropriation" angle.
I haven't played it but I look forward to doing so when it is on sale.
Not white people, but Native Muggles. Like how Europeans oppressed and demonized witches in their way, so too did muggle Native Americans decide that the Animagi were evil beings.
There's a bunch of fantasy out there with angels and God and the devil and shit all over the place. People just don't like it when a popular author does it apparently. Someone already mentioned Gaiman in the thread, there's a dude who just eats mythology and mashes it with everything until it works for his stories. No direct uproar I recall, though he's had a long career and I can't keep track of everything. (Although, to be fair, I believe most of the mythologies he mined were already dead or dead-ish)
what if they were fans and they actually wanted to see her get this right?
but hey, complainers gonna complain, rowling can do what she wants and it does it even really matter, etc, etc. but lets leave the nihilism out of it.
Appropriation is also the flippant use of elements of other cultures because they're exotic until they become commercialised or caricatured. The thing is that it's not necessarily always a bad thing and it's impossible to gauge the long-term effects of a trend until it's much too late to do anything about it. So people get really jumpy.
The way I read it she's saying that medicine men where charlatans who spread rumours about actual magical folk in order to demonise them and avoid their own exposure as frauds.
Hasn't this stuff (like skinwalkers) been used dozens of times in other fictions?
Yeah that's the part that really annoys me.Oooh, that's not great.
Yeah, Game of Thrones has it.
Heck, everyone here would think Christians ridiculous for raising a fuss over the Shin Megami Tensei series or other JRPGs that utilize Christian mythology.
Relax and read the article. Your post is actually offensive.
So, from what I gather from looking at Jo's Twitter, a major detail here is that skinwalkers, as they are commonly known and present in American beliefs, are actually a Muggle-created myth in the Potterverse, invented to demonize indigenous American wizards... who I guess are just Animagi, using the same basic magical process that Europeans use in HP? (I may have that last part wrong)
I can... actually see why some people would be annoyed by that? Rowling saying that common European "Halloween" depictions of the Wizarding World being Muggle distortions seems a bit different from that.
I guess I'm also not that surprised since I've come across Native activists who outright deny any mainstream anthropological explanations of human migration to the Americas as just more European lies to undermine their beliefs and justify taking the land, which comes across as more extreme than this.
I swear her books need a preface that states that everything in them is complete fantasy and should not be seen as an accurate depiction of reality or cultures as they exist in the real world.
That just means I went on Metacritic.Huh. You made a post about its Metacritic score that only really makes sense if you'd played it.
Get what right? A historically accurate depiction of Native American culture in a fictional world where magicians with wands fly on brooms?
No matter the culture the whole thing is bullshit from the bottom to the top.
honestly the best way she could've done it. The other options are worse imo.Kind of a lose lose situation
No one knows what that is.
She would probably get backlash if she acted like they weren't part of the history of a magical America too. Is this a no win scenario?
We exist in the real world as does her books. So when she talks about real cultures the people she is describing have every right to offended.
honestly the best way she could've done it. The other options are worse imo.Kind of a lose lose situation
And?
And?
Actually yes to number 2. The Roman's basically destroyed Egyptian culture after they took over and same with the Greeks.
But a First Nation medicine man or shaman is not the same as a bearded, robed Merlin wizard shooting fireballs out his hands. One was actually real!
I swear I read that 3 times and I have no idea wtf she's saying. Are all her books this ridiculous?
When expressing yourself in any form don't ever use elements from my culture or resort to using stereotypes which are offensive to me.and to speak up about it and take action if necessary. boy this is fun. we should hang out more often, chimpy.
she could have called a native american. they have phones now.
So... optimally written Harry Potter backstory is more important than the marginalization of an entrenched people.
.... and you're acting like a preface changes anything when it literally changes nothing. Telling someone "it's not you though" won't stop them from taking offense.
Alternative Thread Title: Doctorate-holding Twitter User is confused by lack of genocide and historically accurate portrayal in series about boys playing with each other Quaffles and Bludgers.