crisdecuba
Member
I actually thought the prologue was the weakest scene and I loved the first act table-setting because I enjoy the world they are creating. The third act setting was great to watch because of a) the limited resources (one gun, seven bullets), which made it fun to see how he was getting more ammo / weapons throughout, and b) the homage to enter the dragon. I liked the villain because of how smarmy / despicable he was - I was right there with John when facing him at the Continental. I'm not sure what is stupid about the epilogue within the context of the world they've built. It got me excited to watch part 3 - in fact, if part 3 was playing in the theatre next door I would immediately go in and watch. I do agree JW was sometimes protected by the script rather than his own resourcefulness / abilities (a similar thing happened in the first). I didn't need funny one-liners, and I thought the chemistry between JW and Cassian was excellent.Well, in reference to Mr. Aaronology, I liked the film. What I'm counter-pointing is the hyperbole of declaring this "one of the greatest action films of all time." Like, would some people seriously put this in the same breath as Aliens, Predator, Mad Max, Drunken Master (remake), Raid 2, etc.?
(1) That's fine. It has superlative gun and hand-to-hand choreography in the second act, but it is absolutely the same rinse-and-repeat action by Act III. Don't get me wrong: Act II is excellent. That middle 40 minutes is a ton of fun, but the third act is completely deflated by the time it comes around.
(2) Obviously, JW2 is better. I'm simply saying that turning something into a franchise can be problematic, and Taken is a fairly appropriate analogue to this, I feel.
In general, the point I'm making is that I liked the film, but I'm kind of floored by people calling something "one of the greatest action films of all time" when it has:
- A slow first act with way too much table setting (after the great prologue)
- A totally watered down third act (fun house mirrors... because they basically had no other ideas)
- A completely limp villain
- An epilogue that's cool on paper but is sort of ridiculous when you realize that is just sort of stupid
- A hero that has zero vulnerability
- A lack of meaningful dialogue or funny one-liners
- A running time that's 20 minutes too long
- A shocking lack of dynamism for such a strong cast (Ian McShane could do that role in his sleep)
Really, where do you go from here for a third film? For John Wick to be John Wick, the choreography has to kind of stay the same, and I feel that will only hurt the film over time.
Love that 2nd act, though.
So all this is to say that I can understand where you're coming from, but I think the positive reaction can be explained by the fact that people are genuinely liking the world building that went on here, they like (especially right now) protagonists that are the "best in the world" at whatever skill, they like inventive action choreography, and they personally appreciate Keanu Reeves and how he's thrown himself into the role. There's room to diverge in our opinions, of course, but it shouldn't just be chalked up to hyperbole or people being caught up in the moment.