Johnny Depp loses libel case

I also thought that would go the other way, especially considering the audio files that were released.
 
Well. Turns out he's a nasty bastard then. If a court hears evidence and decides you're a wife beater, then there's not much else to say.
 
Last edited:
I'm surprised by the verdict but I guess living with a crazy manipulative and violent partner can eventually turn a man into a wife beater.
 
tumblr_mrlam6RYuQ1r3z1j3o1_400.gif

Poor Johnny
 
Grinchy said:
Did they decide he couldn't show damages? Like how his entire career is over?
Click to expand...

Basically calling Johnny Depp a wife beater is justified.

I would say the current main studios he works with, Disney and Warner Bros will cut ties with him.

Hes currently filming the next Fantastic Beasts
 
It's a disgrace, Depp was obviously abused by Heard and provided actual audio and everything and it still didn't go his way

I guess in the eyes of the law domestic abuse is only a problem for women, pathetic
 
Awful result, but in context of what the case was about it's possibly right.

It was about whether the Sun was justified in calling him a wife beater and unfortunately all they had to prove is that he had at some time hit her. Unfortunately Heard's abuse of him wasn't what was being judged and for all there is ample and damning evidence that she did indeed abuse him (mentally and physically) that didn't absolve him of being called a wife-beater for hitting her. So, the audio tapes were thrown out as was a lot of the stuff against her.

Nick Wallis has laid out the judges statment on Twitter:



There's also some strange choices from the Judge like discounting Police statements and oral testimony from one based on their having no notebook notes and discounting Depps employee statments becuase they were employed by him while simultanously accepting statements from Heard's witnesses who stood to gain financially.

Personally, I think it's an awful result that further cements the bias against male victims of domestic violence and has enabled a god-awful abuser (Heard) to get away with and profit from her vile behaviour.
 
Last edited:
Oh yeah this case was about if SUN is allowed to call him a wife beater. The actual case Johnny Depp vs Amber Heard is next year.
 
gradient said:
Awful result, but in context of what the case was about it's possibly right.

It was about whether the Sun was justified in calling him a wife beater and unfortunately all they had to prove is that he had at some time hit her. Unfortunely Heard's abuse of him wasn't what was being judged and for all there is ample and damning evidence that she did indeed abuse him (mentally and physically) that didn't absolve him of being called a wife-beater for hitting her. So, the audio tapes were thrown out as was a lot of the stuff against her.

Nick Wallis has laid out the judges statment on Twitter:



There's also some strange choices from the Judge like discounting Police statements and oral testimony from one based on their having no notebook notes and discounting Depps employee statments becuase they were employed by him while simultanously accepting statements form Heard's witnesses who stood to gain financially.

Personally, I think it's an awful result that further cements the bias against male victims of domestic violence and has enabled a god-awful abuser (Heard) to get away with and profit from her vile behaviour.
Click to expand...



This is insanity. How on earth isn't it relevant that in their case, Heard was actually abusing Johnny Depp? The Suns reporting actually made it clear that they were biased to the point of accusing Johnny Depp of being sole aggressor if i'm not mistaken. this isn't journalism.

In my honest opinion this is clean cut defamation!
 
Orpheum said:
This is insanity. How on earth isn't it relevant that in their case, Heard was actually abusing Johnny Depp? The Suns reporting actually made it clear that they were biased to the point of accusing Johnny Depp of being sole aggressor if i'm not mistaken. this isn't journalism.

In my honest opinion this is clean cut defamation!
Click to expand...

Because being a victim doesn't preclude you from also being an abuser. They are not mututally exclusive of one another.

The Sun only had to prove that Depp had laid hands on Heard in order to support their claim that he was a "wife beater". As long as their Solicitors could demonstrate that there was some factual basis for their claim then it's not libel. Depp on the otherhand had to prove that he had never done such a thing regardless of circumstances which unfortunately is much harder to do in the scope of such a toxic relationship, alcohol, substance and prescription drug abuse and the apparent fact that he was continually pushed and goaded by his then wife.

One can only hope that the the case of Depp vs. Heard that is being held next year will come out in his favor as that case is actually focussed on the behaviour of Heard rather than whether a reported label was technically accurate.

And The Sun isn't journalism. It's a gutter rag that thrives on half-truths, manipulation and partisan bias. Never trust The Sun as a credible source for anything.
 
Last edited:
Has anyone considered... and I know this sounds like a truly RADICAL idea... that both of them are just a right couple of twats?
 
Last edited:
Absolutely no evidence of it, and a mountain of evidence of the contrary that in fact Turd was the abuser. Incredible really
 
This is insane. The judge is a fucking hack. There is zero proof of depp hitting her and incontrovertible evidence that She hit him.

This judge needs to be relieved of his job. What a piece of shit.
 
FunkMiller said:
Has anyone considered... and I know this sounds like a truly RADICAL idea... that both of them are just a right couple of twats?
Click to expand...
Show me proof that he is a twat first.

And no, arguing with a woman who is acting like cunt isn't the worst thing in the world
 
gradient said:
Because being a victim doesn't preclude you from also being an abuser. They are not mututally exclusive of one another.

The Sun only had to prove that Depp had laid hands on Heard in order to support their claim that he was a "wife beater". As long as their Solicitors could demonstrate that there was some factual basis for their claim then it's not libel. Depp on the otherhand had to prove that he had never done such a thing regardless of circumstances which unfortunately is much harder to do in the scope of such a toxic relationship, alcohol, substance and prescription drug abuse and the apparent fact that he was continually pushed and goaded by his then wife.

One can only hope that the the case of Depp vs. Heard that is being held next year will come out in his favor as that case is actually focussed on the behaviour of Heard rather than whether a reported label was technically accurate.

And The Sun isn't journalism. It's a gutter rag that thrives on half-truths, manipulation and partisan bias. Never trust The Sun as a credible source for anything.
Click to expand...

While I understand why the judge through it out, the point of bringing it up in the first place was to show how manipulative she was and how she was very capable of lying. The part of the recording where she says "No one will believe you because I'm a woman" should've been damning towards the idea that he was a wife beater, pointing out that all she had to do was say he hit her and people will believe her. In this case she is proven right as the judge wisk away most evidence against the idea that she was lying and he didn't do it.
 
Sybrix said:
Really thought it would go the other way tbh
Click to expand...
Nope. This is a woman's world. Because all the evidence against her didn't mean dick again. On the other hand the lack of evidence against a man still gets him convicted.
 
FunkMiller said:
Has anyone considered... and I know this sounds like a truly RADICAL idea... that both of them are just a right couple of twats?
Click to expand...

Has anyone considered that abusers like Heard often claim to be victims?

SLoWMoTIoN said:
Nope. This is a woman's world. Because all the evidence against her didn't mean dick again. On the other hand the lack of evidence against a man still gets him convicted.
Click to expand...

Sex robots and full-dive VR can't come fast enough, and neither can I.
 
Last edited:
She's just a horrible person. In a just world the court would sentence her to have sex with me many, many times for everything she's done to poor Johnny






:messenger_beaming:.
 
Kimahri said:
He got fired from Fantastic Beasts now.

Clever of them to do it right now so it'd get drowned in the election.
Click to expand...

I hate that he was fired over this.
But at the same time though, the most recent one of those movies was so incredibly bad it might be a blessing in disguise for him to be bale to bail from that shitty franchise.

Not that all of his movies are good, but the crimes of grindelwald was on a whole other tier of bad.


Danteyke223 said:
At this point, no men should marry, the legal system is rigged against men when it comes to marriages, or civil unions.
Click to expand...

Or at least get a pre nub. Specially if you are famous/wealthy
 
Last edited:
This is shit.

Likely, he'll never work again. At best it's 2 psychos fucking up each other so who cares, at worst Amber Heard is a monster. But she gets to keep her career and Depp gets blacklisted.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Disney Wants Johnny Depp Back for ‘Pirates of the Caribbean 6'
Rumor  2 3
102
10K
SirKicksalot replied
First look at Karl Urban as Johnny Cage in MK2
15
1K
bitbydeath replied
Your favorite Johnny Depp flicks.
48
3K
DGrayson replied
The Sean 'Diddy' Combs Trial: Unraveling the Curious Case of Baby Oil
Drama  2 3 4
179
3K
OverHeat replied
UK Woman convicted in first known case of cyber farting
47
3K
MayauMiao replied
Top Bottom