• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Johnny Depp Vs Amber Heard Defamation trial live

Sony

Nintendo
I cannot believe they are recalling Bania. His testimony was ridiculous and his ridiculous Q-scores proved nothing and could be easily dismissed with the argument of being within statistical uncertainty/insignificance. By far the worst witness JD has called. Just why? Richard Marks has made it clear how his reputation in Hollywood was damaged by the op-ed. Stick with that.

Who are Dr. Richard Shaw and Morgan Tremaine?

Really like that Dr. Curry is second to last witness to just destroy Hughes, Spiegel and Amber. That's a good call.
Being subject to recall =/= recall. In other words, they don't have to recall everyone on the list.

Apparently there is a video going around where Dr. Spiegel is asking Elaine in court whether he can lie about certain things on the stand. Not sure about the authenticity of it, but if it turns out to be true...
 

Artoris

Gold Member
I can't tell which one I like best :messenger_grinning_smiling:

L195beJ.jpg
TAFfWP5.jpg
BiqL57W.jpg
say what you want about him at least he is potty trained
 

Nico_D

Member
It may be uncomfortable to watch Dennison work, because of what or may not be actual stutter, but without him letting the psychiatrist ramble and get angry, the psychiatrist would've kept some credibility.

I think Dennison knew exactly what he was doing. These people aren't stupid.

That said, Dennison does miss - or decides to miss - some obvioud follow-up questions. But instead of being a mistake, that too may be a decision to let the jury imagine the answer. If you do the follow-up and it turns out bad or inconsequential for Johnny, it is probably worse than what the jury imagined it would be.
 

Nitty_Grimes

Made a crappy phPBB forum once ... once.
Holy shit it would have been nice if they gave a 5 second heads up before showing the pictures of Depp's finger with a fucking hole in them full screen .. and I was having my lunch when that came up.
Ah shit missed that it’s always pixelated out.
 

Nico_D

Member
This was a good discussion about Dennison. Legalbytes:



A very interesting point about Dennison. If that is true and strategic, it's really, really clever, forcing them to run out of time:



As they say, now Elaine's team is out of time and they can't cross the rebuttals and there's also no redirect so less time wasted on that by Johnny's team.
 
Last edited:

DJ12

Member
Amber and the rent-a-looney defense.

Camille is an absolute savage on these whackjobs. Gently leading them down a garden path the , boom, perjury mother fucker.
 

NotMyProblemAnymoreCunt

Biggest Trails Stan
Damnnn they got the flight attendant
And a hickville witness
AND Curry is making a return?

Rebuttal is going to be fire 🔥

AND they got Whitney’s former friend and boss

If she wins this i’m gonna to lose my mind


Narcissists want to dominate isolate and destroy their victims. They confuse love with power. And want to overrule anything and everything you do. Their whole identity is based on manipulating people. They are vile soulless creatures.

May Amber lose her money, child and reputation. May her mind soul spirit and body be mutilated to the point she cant even recognize herself. And may she burn in hell for all eternity. And may love light god and the angels in heaven turn their back on her across all realms inside and outside of time.

Narcissists have no soul.

Someone once said “They stick their hand out of the fire. You run and grab their hand to pull them out. Only for them to pull you in and step out of the fire. Leaving you to burn”

He put her on. Rum Diaries, Aquaman. He “loved her for so many years, but she was this made up thing in” his “fucking head”

Death to all narcissists. May they all perish from our souls and memories. Death!
Hey

Just want to say that I hope you feel better. I been through something similar and I have the same thoughts on narcissists. If she wins she will still lose. The whole world knows how she really is. I have never been more proud of how Depp is handling this trail compared to Heard.
 

Zeroing

Banned
what does she write all the time? or just drawing pictures, would love to see her paperwork lol
She tries to adapt her story depending on what the witness are telling or write stuff she knows about the witness so her lawyers can use it to undermine anyone.

It is also a good technique to not think about the bad stuff they are talking about her… anyone remembers when she stormed out of the courtroom after her cross examination by Camille ended? Her true personality was nearly showing off!
 
Last edited:
How does perjury work? If a witness commits perjury on the stand, can they arrest them right and there or what?
Nothing But the Truth: What Happens When You Lie Under Oath

Penalties​

State and federal penalties for perjury include fines and/or prison terms upon conviction. Federal law (18 USC § 1621), for example, states that anyone found guilty of the crime will be fined or imprisoned for up to five years. Most state laws have similar provisions, but judges typically have discretion to use leniency (including probation in lieu of a prison sentence) where appropriate.

And if you're convicted, you may even lose your livelihood. If you work in a profession where truthfulness is valued, such as the legal profession, law enforcement, and some public service jobs, you could lose your professional license.

Perjury is rarely charged and it's hard to prove. However, the threat of perjury is often a tool prosecutors use to ensure that witnesses provide candid testimony and to garner convictions.
 

jonnyp

Member
Being subject to recall =/= recall. In other words, they don't have to recall everyone on the list.

Apparently there is a video going around where Dr. Spiegel is asking Elaine in court whether he can lie about certain things on the stand. Not sure about the authenticity of it, but if it turns out to be true...

I know that but the list I responded to actually states he is actually scheduled to be recalled 24th of May, i.e. today. If that information is wrong, then fair enough.
 

Lord Panda

The Sea is Always Right
Being subject to recall =/= recall. In other words, they don't have to recall everyone on the list.

Apparently there is a video going around where Dr. Spiegel is asking Elaine in court whether he can lie about certain things on the stand. Not sure about the authenticity of it, but if it turns out to be true...

This one?


I can’t really make it out though.
 
Last edited:

jonnyp

Member
Motion denied, as expected but it did give Ben sometime to practice part of his closing arguments and also once again paint Heard as the abuser in front of everyone.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom