What the actual fuck is this??
Is a text from Johnny?
He already won it, amber is getting dragged through the mud in his view that's the only win there. About roles, sure he will lose probably roles but at the end does he really care anymore. It's about proving amber is bat shit insane which is working well for him.In the end Depp will probably not win this, since there seems to be episodes of abuse from both sides. ‘She was shit to me as well’ doesn’t make her Op-Ed less valid.
However it will probably help his chances to start getting new roles.
There was likely an agreement that they wouldn't talk about editing colors of the photographs to add or enhance the appearance of bruising. The fun part is that the lawyer for AH stepped in it and "opened the door" to a rough explanation of some of the many things the witness wasn't allowed to talk about, even if he wasn't allowed to explain them.I am a graphic designer and I was so pissed at that stupid AH lawyer not letting the expert talk about Images and editing software etc. He was just trying to change the narrative.
I had to learn so much about images, formats etc at University and there goes a stupid lawyer with no idea of what he is talking about trying to turn everything upside down and argue with an expert. So ridiculous. We people who work with photographs and editing software have our eyes trained so much that we can tell right away if gama is up or down, if hue is not accurate etc.
Nowadays it does not take a genius to change photos, Apple photos make it so easy, you can use the burn or dodge tool to change parts of an image, even take out any imperfections...
I though lawyers in America were better than this...
Have you been watching the trial, or just reading news reports about it? Because I'd gladly "both sides" this as well, if there was anywhere near the level of evidence showing Depp to be an abuser as there is that shows Heard to be the abuser. There's an ton of evidence that conflicts with nearly every example she's given, including witnesses, video recordings, audio recordings, body cam footage, pictures, etc.In the end Depp will probably not win this, since there seems to be episodes of abuse from both sides. ‘She was shit to me as well’ doesn’t make her Op-Ed less valid.
However it will probably help his chances to start getting new roles.
I searched the thread but could not figure out... who wrote that to whom?AH embarrassed upset face when it was read aloud was priceless.
I searched the thread but could not figure out... who wrote that to whom?
Where can I see who is testifying today?
i imagine this lol
Here we go boys! Dr Gilbert - first witness from JD’S team
Rofl holy shit.
Could be a number of reasons. It’s in Va they aren’t compelled to show up or even give any testimony. Or they changed their mind and cancelled last min.Where is the flight attendant? Samantha MacMillan, their shared stylist? Trinity Esparza, the housekeeper? Kevin Murphy, the house manager?
They have a lot of time left, why not use it?
Could be a number of reasons. It’s in Va they aren’t compelled to show up or even give any testimony. They changed their mind and cancelled last min.
Can’t take this tech forensics guy seriously….This tech guy is a waste of time! We already saw the picture comparisons.
Keep going waste that time! They under hour by now!
I doubt MacMillan, Murphy or Esparza would cancel on Depp.
Can the real Amber Turd take the stand.No fucking way they brought back Dr. Hughes..........WTFFFFFFFFFFFFF
Yep.....having this guy testify was a mistake for Team Amber. Wow
Edit: Yeah I actually felt that one from Dennison. Good job finally.
Where were you when he made the Doc brown psychiatrist look like a quack?Dennison finally killing an expert.
Amber's team is fucking stupid. You don't keep reminding the jury of a popular opposing witness. I guarantee every juror has Dr. Curry in their mind right now.I despise this activist lying Dr Hughes!!
Where were you when he made the Doc brown psychiatrist look like a quack?
Dennison just handed him the rope and watched him do the rest.That guy did that himself, hardly due to Dennison.
I disagree. Looking at how he's acting now compared to then, the way Dennison came off as a "layman" or a novice in the field as he had the quack explain his reasoning was why he was so good.That guy did that himself, hardly due to Dennison.
I disagree. Looking at how he's acting now compared to then, the way Dennison came off as a "layman" or a novice in the field as he had the quack explain his reasoning was why he was so good.
Most of the “Experts” seem to feel superior to Dennison, to them he’s slow or not as smart as them. So he lulls them in and gets under their skin until he query that contradicts them, they get either pissed or feel need to blabber!I disagree. Looking at how he's acting now compared to then, the way Dennison came off as a "layman" or a novice in the field as he had the quack explain his reasoning was why he was so good.