Norway.
I agree, as long as he's never released from prison.
That said, I think Breivik is getting far too many luxuries in prison than he deserves, luxuries that innocent people living in poverty in Europe don't even get.
Norway.
The defense team's only job was to save their client's life since there was not any doubt to his guilt.If we're giving him what he wants with the death penalty, why did his defense team try so hard to save him from it? Couldn't he have instructed them to simply allow them to sentence him to death and offer no resistance to it?
The defense team's only job was to save their client's life since there was not any doubt to his guilt.
I'd rather not give him what he's cool with lolRight, but I think his point is that if Tsarnaev is cool with dying, why bother having his attorneys put up any kind of fight at all?
I'm against the death penalty in general. This asshole is getting exactly what he wants, the easy way out.
Life in prison is a far worse punishment IMO, you have your whole life to think about what you did.
Breivik vs Tsarnaev. Which country did the right thing?
I always go back to Thomas Paine:Meet tragedy with barbarism. Great. Opposing the dp is not about caring about the lives of terrorists or killers, it's about what we as a society want to become. Murder is wrong. The death penalty does not lead to less crime. It's simple murder. There's a reason it's a thing of the past in almost all civilized societies on earth. The existence of the dp is a disgrace on the usa.
Who does not remember the execution of Damien, torn to pieces by horses? The effect of those cruel spectacles exhibited to the populace is to destroy tenderness or excite revenge; and by the base and false idea of governing men by terror, instead of reason, they become precedents. It is over the lowest class of mankind that government by terror is intended to operate, and it is on them that it operates to the worst effect. They have sense enough to feel they are the objects aimed at; and they inflict in their turn the examples of terror they have been instructed to practise.
-Thomas Paine
Meet tragedy with barbarism. Great. Opposing the dp is not about caring about the lives of terrorists or killers, it's about what we as a society want to become. Murder is wrong. The death penalty does not lead to less crime. It's simple murder. There's a reason it's a thing of the past in almost all civilized societies on earth. The existence of the dp is a disgrace on the usa.
It's doubtful that he'll ever get out. As far as I understand it can his sentence be prolonged indefinitely.
Meet tragedy with barbarism. Great. Opposing the dp is not about caring about the lives of terrorists or killers, it's about what we as a society want to become. Murder is wrong. The death penalty does not lead to less crime. It's simple murder. There's a reason it's a thing of the past in almost all civilized societies on earth. The existence of the dp is a disgrace on the usa.
I dunno... if I knew that Tsarnaev could sit in prison and play Playstation 2, and then have the gaul to say that those games are "torture" and he's going on a hunger strike until he's gets a PS3 and more adult games ... I'd feel sick.
I'd rather not have tax payers pay to keep him in prison forever.
I'd rather not have tax payers pay to keep him in prison forever.
That only is the case when there's constant appeals.instead, have them pay even more to keep him on death row.
I'd rather not have tax payers pay to keep him in prison forever.
I'd rather not have tax payers pay to keep him in prison forever.
Meet tragedy with barbarism. Great. Opposing the dp is not about caring about the lives of terrorists or killers, it's about what we as a society want to become. Murder is wrong. The death penalty does not lead to less crime. It's simple murder. There's a reason it's a thing of the past in almost all civilized societies on earth. The existence of the dp is a disgrace on the usa.
I'd rather not have tax payers pay to keep him in prison forever.
instead, have them pay even more to keep him on death row.
I'd rather not have tax payers pay to keep him in prison forever.
Cases without the death penalty cost $740,000, while cases where the death penalty is sought cost $1.26 million. Maintaining each death row prisoner costs taxpayers $90,000 more per year than a prisoner in general population.
He's a human being, no matter what awful things he's done, he should still be treated as one. The mind needs stimulation. I'm fine with him having entertainment that is available to other inmates. Norway is very progressive in it's jail system.
I'm against the death penalty in general. This asshole is getting exactly what he wants, the easy way out.
Life in prison is a far worse punishment IMO, you have your whole life to think about what you did.
Because its not used as entertainment. If you want to see him suffer, put him in isolation for the rest of his years. The death penalty can remove him from our world in the least painful way possible. I consider it a mercy for all involved.You really are the pillars of freedom and peace, why not do it in front of a cheering crowd?
I'd rather not have tax payers pay to keep him in prison forever.
If anything he'll be considered a martyr to other terrorists.Won't the death sentence just rile up the overseas terrorists even more?
Life in prison is actually cheaper than capital punishment.
I'm generally against the death penalty (I say "generally" just to avoid talking in absolutes), but... In this case, and other's like Timothy McVeigh, I can sort of appreciate the decision. When Tsarnaev is killed this situation is over. While, obviously, there are no appeals for sentences like his, that he continues to exist gives more possibility of him being relevant 10, 15, 20, or 50 years from now. With him dead, that possibility of future stories about him or some person making an appeal about him, or something, are over.
I've been at the Boston Marathon every year for the last 10, never at the finish line, and obviously I wasn't directly affected by any of this other than a egocentric "damn I live 20 miles from this nightmare" sort of thing... But even while I'm against the death penalty and I get no joy in any "sick revenge fantasy" as other people have put it, for me, when he's dead, it's the end of Tsarnaev without some glimmer of a chance that he'll ever be relevant in my life, without some teenage girl on Twitter posting "Free Dzokar" because he's supposedly handsome, or some right wing conspiracy theorist thinking that this was a CIA false flag government takeover program therefore he's innocent.
As uncomfortable as the death penalty is for me, for some illogical reason, the elimination of relevance of Tsarnaev is more comforting to me than the slim chance of his relevance 10, 20, or 50 years from now.
It's one of those times when my feelings lack a convincing explanation.
You really are the pillars of freedom and peace, why not do it in front of a cheering crowd?
You really are the pillars of freedom and peace, why not do it in front of a cheering crowd?
That only is the case when there's constant appeals.
Is he expected to be on Death Row for long? I don't think so, personally.
I don't want him tortured, raped or whatever. I do want him to have a lot of time to think about what he did.
He had a lot of time to think about what he did, two years, and this was his answer:
Yes, because detaining people indefinitely or for life makes radicals all kinds of happy.He gets the easy way out, and radicals get a new handsome looking martyr. A win win.
Well done US.
It's doubtful that he'll ever get out. As far as I understand it can his sentence be prolonged indefinitely.
He gets the easy way out, and radicals get a new handsome looking martyr. A win win.
Well done US.
He's still human. If he were killed while posing an immediate threat to society or another individual, then fine. The threat is over, he has been captured. What does the death penalty serve other than revenge?I really don't understand the pitty for someone like this. Care to explain why you're so upset about it?
You can assume you live in a morally superior society all you want, but you'll have to explain why you think his humanity should not be stripped from him.
Except one day he can decide to show remorse, repent his sins, tend to sick orphans and be out in a few years.
He had a lot of time to think about what he did, two years, and this was his answer: