• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Jury has reached verdict in Dzhokhar Tsarnaev trial - sentenced to death

Status
Not open for further replies.

Flo_Evans

Member
Fuck this guy.

There is no "justice" or happy ending for anybody. The end result is the same. He is going to die in prison one way or another and I am fine with that.
 

Stormy

Member
Judge quoted Shakespeare during the sentencing.

"A federal judge has quoted William Shakespeare as he formally sentenced Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev (joh-HAHR' tsahr-NEYE'-ehv) to death for the 2013 terror attacks.

Judge George O'Toole Jr. spoke Wednesday after Tsarnaev apologized in court for what he had done.

The judge says, "One of Shakespeare's characters observes, 'The evil that men do lives after them. The good is often interred with their bones.'

He added: "So it will be for Dzhokhar Tsarnaev."
 
It's 2015, and we're still executing folk, putting us right there with some other really shady governments. (and this will probably go through endless appeals, which will cost everyone far more money and time)
 
It's fine to execute terrorists in 2015

It's revenge, appealing to emotion and blood lust, and puts us right there with a nation like North Korea. It's also a system that can and has fucked over innocent people, so the fact that this guy is 100% a piece of trash doesn't change that. Also, if he goes through the appeals process(talk about prolonging things for the victims and their families), he's not gonna be executed for a long long time, and hell he might just win one of those appeals to get out of death row. It will just end up costing an obscene amount of money, more than a sentence of life in prison, mostly in solitary confinement ever would have.
 

Flo_Evans

Member
It's revenge, appealing to emotion and blood lust, and puts us right there with a nation like North Korea. It's also a system that can and has fucked over innocent people, so the fact that this guy is 100% a piece of trash doesn't change that. Also, if he goes through the appeals process(talk about prolonging things for the victims and their families), he's not gonna be executed for a long long time, and hell he might just win one of those appeals to get out of death row. It will just end up costing an obscene amount of money, more than a sentence of life in prison, mostly in solitary confinement ever would have.

LOL. North Korea will execute your entire family for speaking out against the leadership. Not quite the same level.

You should really read up on solitary confinement and its effects... are you worried about the cost or humanity? Life in solitary is torture plain and simple.
 

entremet

Member
It's revenge, appealing to emotion and blood lust, and puts us right there with a nation like North Korea. It's also a system that can and has fucked over innocent people, so the fact that this guy is 100% a piece of trash doesn't change that. Also, if he goes through the appeals process(talk about prolonging things for the victims and their families), he's not gonna be executed for a long long time, and hell he might just win one of those appeals to get out of death row. It will just end up costing an obscene amount of money, more than a sentence of life in prison, mostly in solitary confinement ever would have.

I'm anti death penalty, but it is not revenge. It's justice.

Don't wanna be put to death, don't murder innocent people.

But I'm generally anti DP not due to the revenge factor, but its efficacy and the fact that an innocent person can be executed. It's already happened multiple times.

Death is actually better than rotting in a prison in solitary confinement.
 

zsswimmer

Member
It's revenge, appealing to emotion and blood lust, and puts us right there with a nation like North Korea. It's also a system that can and has fucked over innocent people, so the fact that this guy is 100% a piece of trash doesn't change that. Also, if he goes through the appeals process(talk about prolonging things for the victims and their families), he's not gonna be executed for a long long time, and hell he might just win one of those appeals to get out of death row. It will just end up costing an obscene amount of money, more than a sentence of life in prison, mostly in solitary confinement ever would have.

Why does this put us up there with North Korea? That sounds like blatant hyperbole
 

entremet

Member
Very few nations are still sentencing people to death, North Korea is, and so are we.

That doesn't mean anything, though.

Does everything nation have to be lockstep?

If a confessed and 100 percent proven mass murderer gets the death penalty, I'm not shedding any tears. That's the price they chose to pay when they killed people.
 

Lone Wolf

Member
It's revenge, appealing to emotion and blood lust, and puts us right there with a nation like North Korea. It's also a system that can and has fucked over innocent people, so the fact that this guy is 100% a piece of trash doesn't change that. Also, if he goes through the appeals process(talk about prolonging things for the victims and their families), he's not gonna be executed for a long long time, and hell he might just win one of those appeals to get out of death row. It will just end up costing an obscene amount of money, more than a sentence of life in prison, mostly in solitary confinement ever would have.

He is going to appeal? It has been said here by posters that he wants to die. If that is true, why would he appeal?
 

Alavard

Member
It's fine to execute murdering terrorists in 2015

Countries such as Canada, the UK, France, Italy, Germany, Sweden, Denmark, Switzerland, Norway, Finland, Australia, Brazil, Argentina, Ecuador, Honduras, Mexico, Venezuela, Cambodia, New Zealand, Philippines, Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Iceland, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, and Turkey disagree.

Meanwhile the US is on the same side of the issue as Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Egypt, Libya, Nigeria, Somalia, Sudan, Bahrain, China, North Korea, and Saudi Arabia.
 

entremet

Member
Countries such as Canada, the UK, France, Italy, Germany, Sweden, Denmark, Switzerland, Norway, Finland, Australia, Brazil, Argentina, Ecuador, Honduras, Mexico, Venezuela, Cambodia, New Zealand, Philippines, Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Iceland, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, and Turkey disagree.

Meanwhile the US is on the same side of the issue as Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Egypt, Libya, Nigeria, Somalia, Sudan, Bahrain, China, North Korea, and Saudi Arabia.

To clarify, not every state has the death penalty.
 
I'm anti death penalty, but it is not revenge. It's justice.

Don't wanna be put to death, don't murder innocent people.

But I'm generally anti DP not due to the revenge factor, but its efficacy and the fact that an innocent person can be executed. It's already happened multiple times.

Death is actually better than rotting in a prison in solitary confinement.

I dunno, Murdering murderer's sound like revenge to me. And yeah, I consider it state-sanctioned murder, because there's no valid excuse, no actual need for it. He's in custody, and he's never getting out, and yet we still feel he has to die. Of course, it's up to him if he want's to prolong this, but appeals can take a very very long time, and a disgusting amount of tax payer money. Just going after the death penalty cost more money (to continue on the economic route)
 

zsswimmer

Member
Very few nations are still sentencing people to death, North Korea is, and so are we.

I still don't see how that puts us up with North Korea unless youre ignoring the absolute oppressive regime, concentration camps where bloodlines of families are killed through multiple generations, extreme propganda and brainwashing, and much more.
 

Flo_Evans

Member
Countries such as Canada, the UK, France, Italy, Germany, Sweden, Denmark, Switzerland, Norway, Finland, Australia, Brazil, Argentina, Ecuador, Honduras, Mexico, Venezuela, Cambodia, New Zealand, Philippines, Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Iceland, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, and Turkey disagree.

Meanwhile the US is on the same side of the issue as Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Egypt, Libya, Nigeria, Somalia, Sudan, Bahrain, China, North Korea, and Saudi Arabia.

The US is divided, it is left to states for most crimes. He was tried federally and even then it has to be approved by the attorney general.
 
That doesn't mean anything, though.

Does everything nation have to be lockstep?

If a confessed and 100 percent proven mass murderer gets the death penalty, I'm not shedding any tears. That's the price they chose to pay when they killed people.

Oh, I'm not shedding tears here, but the death penalty should be abolished, give me a good reason for it's existence in this country that doesn't appeal to emotion(which isn't a good reason), why it should still be on the books. You can say someone is 100% guilty, and he is, but it still being a thing means there's the very real potential for an innocent getting caught in the crossfire. It's happened many times before.

Either you're against it, or you aren't.

I still don't see how that puts us up with North Korea unless youre ignoring the absolute oppressive regime, concentration camps where bloodlines of families are killed through multiple generations, extreme propganda and brainwashing, and much more.

You're going off on tangents, whereas I've focused solely on capital punishment, and a nation(one of the few) that still regularly seeks it out.
 

entremet

Member
I dunno, Murdering murderer's sound like revenge to me. And yeah, I consider it state-sanctioned murder, because there's no valid excuse, no actual need for it. He's in custody, and he's never getting out, and yet we still feel he has to die. Of course, it's up to him if he want's to prolong this, but appeals can take a very very long time, and a disgusting amount of tax payer money. Just going after the death penalty cost more money (to continue on the economic route)

There's a difference because death is the penalty the guilty party pays.

It's not murder legally, though, as it is not unlawful. It's similar to military action, which has the same legal protections.

Again, I'm anti DP for many reasons, but I find the revenge argument pretty facile.

I also find it funny that those who are against the DP are fine with people rotting in solidarity confinement for life, which humanely speaking, is far worse than death.

Life in prison in solitary confinement is a fate far worse that death.
 
There's a difference because death is the penalty the guilty party pays.

It's not murder legally, though, as it is not unlawful. It's similar to military action, which has the same legal protections.

Again, I'm anti DP for many reasons, but I find the revenge argument pretty facile.

I also find it funny that those who are against the DP are fine with people rotting in solidarity confinement for life, which humanely speaking, is far worse than death.

Life in prison in solitary confinement is a fate far worse that death.

I'm not for the torture of solitary confinement, but that would be his reality, and it still might be if he goes the appeals route.
 

Nephtis

Member
It's a bit weird how my views have been changing as time passes.

I used to be completely against death penalty

then I was indifferent

then I was like, well, maybe they deserve it

then I was like, okay, don't kill them but do torture them a la north korea type of fucked upness, then I actually started looking at the rationale from an economic standpoint -- ie. just put a bullet in them 1 year after veredict so we don't have to pay so much for their stay

now I'm afraid that I will be against the death penalty, but instead be for something super sadistic, like they must be put in a crate -- not a room -- where they can't move for 23 hours a day.

but, y'know, do this for serial killers, and terrorists, or child rapists, etc

still, it's scary that my thinking is heading in that direction
 
IMO, Life Behind bars without parole is a better punihsment than the Death Penalty

the Death Penalty just ends his misery.

Serving Life at his young age would be a better punishment. Spend 60 to 70 years behind bars
 

fawaz

Banned
It's revenge, appealing to emotion and blood lust, and puts us right there with a nation like North Korea. It's also a system that can and has fucked over innocent people, so the fact that this guy is 100% a piece of trash doesn't change that. Also, if he goes through the appeals process(talk about prolonging things for the victims and their families), he's not gonna be executed for a long long time, and hell he might just win one of those appeals to get out of death row. It will just end up costing an obscene amount of money, more than a sentence of life in prison, mostly in solitary confinement ever would have.
My opinion is that it is justice.

However, what's wrong with revenge? If he had killed a family member, I would ask to pull the trigger/flip the switch/strangle him myself.
 

Stet

Banned
My opinion is that it is justice.

However, what's wrong with revenge? If he had killed a family member, I would ask to pull the trigger/flip the switch/strangle him myself.

If you did kill him and you support the death penalty, why shouldn't you be executed for it?
 
I dunno, Murdering murderer's sound like revenge to me. And yeah, I consider it state-sanctioned murder, because there's no valid excuse, no actual need for it. He's in custody, and he's never getting out, and yet we still feel he has to die. Of course, it's up to him if he want's to prolong this, but appeals can take a very very long time, and a disgusting amount of tax payer money. Just going after the death penalty cost more money (to continue on the economic route)

Prisoners escape from maximum level security prisons on occasion. There were a couple that escaped earlier this month in the US. There's a slim chance that Tsarnaev could escape if he's allowed to live. The only way to ensure he will never do harm in society again would be to kill him.
 

Amory

Member
Meanwhile the US is on the same side of the issue as Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Egypt, Libya, Nigeria, Somalia, Sudan, Bahrain, China, North Korea, and Saudi Arabia.

And Japan. For some reason people always forget/omit that Japan has the death penalty. Probably because Japan is beyond reproach to a lot of people on Gaf.
 
Prisoners escape from maximum level security prisons on occasion. There were a couple that escaped earlier this month in the US. There's a slim chance that Tsarnaev could escape if he's allowed to live. The only way to ensure he will never do harm in society again would be to kill him.

Rigggggggggght.
 

Ensirius

Member
Prisoners escape from maximum level security prisons on occasion. There were a couple that escaped earlier this month in the US. There's a slim chance that Tsarnaev could escape if he's allowed to live. The only way to ensure he will never do harm in society again would be to kill him.
That's the worst excuse I have ever read in favor of the death penalty.

That said, this guy deserves to be sentenced to death.
 
Which "people"?

Don't kill him, let him rot in jail. let him see just how much he didn't change anything for the rest of his life.

Yes, just put him in general population in a Massachusetts prison. Feed his ass to the wolves. Hopefully he lives to be 100 and hates everyday day he's alive.

Can't wait to see him get put behind bars for the rest of his life. But as heinous as his crimes are I'm still a staunch opponent of the death penalty.

Put him in jail for life with long solitary sentences. Let him be forgotten about in some basement room with no windows.

Should be life in prison. Death is the easy way out for this guy. Dude should rot.

They will probably give him death though.

There's definitely a part of me that feels this person doesn't deserve to exist anymore and should just be put to death. But I have a lot of reasons for not supporting the death penalty, and really, he'll die some day anyway, why not after decades of mentally rotting in a prison cell?


This was just page 1. No one wants the death penalty because it's just as bad as murder. But, let's let him physically and mentally rot for the rest of his life, ignoring the fact that this is worse than the death penalty.
 
the greatest gift any of us have been given is the gift of life. although I'm on the fence regarding the death penalty, i can see how some would advocate for it especially in the topic of terrorism and taking the lives of multiple other people. he took other people's greatest gift, why not take his greatest gift in return? characterizing those in favor of the death penalty (especially in extreme cases like this) as being nothing but blood thirsty is a bit of a false label imo

i think i'd prefer him to have solitary confinement for life, but like i said i'm on the fence. and even then some would argue that that's too cruel or too lenient depending on their views

My opinion is that it is justice.

However, what's wrong with revenge? If he had killed a family member, I would ask to pull the trigger/flip the switch/strangle him myself.

many of the people calling the death penalty barbaric have never (and hopefully will never be) been put into a situation where it would be relevant and personal. losing loved ones to a conscious act of murder and then advocating the murderer live out the rest of his/her days, would take being a bigger person than many of us here are.
 

Abounder

Banned
Yea I suppose I'm fine with all of the options whether it's keeping the killer in a cage, executing him, or using him as a rehab experiment...in the end they should never be near the public. I'm also fine with high court costs (to an extent) because everyone should be able to defend themselves until the bitter end.

Then we - as in the USA - better execute that SC shooter as a murdering terrorist, as well.

No objection to that. I'm also glad that some companies are doing their part by finally removing Confederate flag merchandise
 

entremet

Member
This was just page 1. No one wants the death penalty because it's just as bad as murder. But, let's let him physically and mentally rot for the rest of his life, ignoring the fact that this is worse than the death penalty.

Exactly.

It's so damn hilarious.

the greatest gift any of us have been given is the gift of life. although I'm on the fence regarding the death penalty, i can see how some would advocate for it especially in the topic of terrorism and taking the lives of multiple other people. he took other people's greatest gift, why not take his greatest gift in return? characterizing those in favor of the death penalty (especially in extreme cases like this) as being nothing but blood thirsty is a bit of a false label imo

i think i'd prefer him to have solitary confinement for life, but like i said i'm on the fence. and even then some would argue that that's too cruel or too lenient depending on their views



many of the people calling the death penalty barbaric have never (and hopefully will never be) been put into a situation where it would be relevant and personal. losing loved ones to a conscious act of murder and then advocating the murderer live out the rest of his/her days, would take being a bigger person than many of us here are.

Solitary for life is way worse than the DP. The affect it has on the brain is downright cruel.

I'm just laughing at the cognitive dissonance here from some DP opponents.

They don't want the DP because its "inhumane" yet are fine with killing the mind of another human in solitary for life, which could be decades for a young man like the accused.

Either admit that you're fine with endorsing a crueler punishment that sounds way more revenge based than the DP, or offer a third option.
 

FStop7

Banned
This was just page 1. No one wants the death penalty because it's just as bad as murder. But, let's let him physically and mentally rot for the rest of his life, ignoring the fact that this is worse than the death penalty.

I can only speak for myself - I don't think he should ever see a day of freedom for the rest of his life. But that doesn't mean throwing him down a dark hole, either.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom