Yep. Fuck this guy.
"But it's not about what he deserves! Because bla bla bla barbarism bla bla bla we're better than that, etc"
This guy is getting exactly what he wants, unfortunately. And yet that's too harsh for some people.
Yep. Fuck this guy.
You're not supposed to eat it!What a weird address... this is why faith leaves such a bad taste in my mouth.
It's fine to execute terrorists in 2015
It's revenge, appealing to emotion and blood lust, and puts us right there with a nation like North Korea. It's also a system that can and has fucked over innocent people, so the fact that this guy is 100% a piece of trash doesn't change that. Also, if he goes through the appeals process(talk about prolonging things for the victims and their families), he's not gonna be executed for a long long time, and hell he might just win one of those appeals to get out of death row. It will just end up costing an obscene amount of money, more than a sentence of life in prison, mostly in solitary confinement ever would have.
It's revenge, appealing to emotion and blood lust, and puts us right there with a nation like North Korea. It's also a system that can and has fucked over innocent people, so the fact that this guy is 100% a piece of trash doesn't change that. Also, if he goes through the appeals process(talk about prolonging things for the victims and their families), he's not gonna be executed for a long long time, and hell he might just win one of those appeals to get out of death row. It will just end up costing an obscene amount of money, more than a sentence of life in prison, mostly in solitary confinement ever would have.
It's revenge, appealing to emotion and blood lust, and puts us right there with a nation like North Korea. It's also a system that can and has fucked over innocent people, so the fact that this guy is 100% a piece of trash doesn't change that. Also, if he goes through the appeals process(talk about prolonging things for the victims and their families), he's not gonna be executed for a long long time, and hell he might just win one of those appeals to get out of death row. It will just end up costing an obscene amount of money, more than a sentence of life in prison, mostly in solitary confinement ever would have.
Why does this put us up there with North Korea? That sounds like blatant hyperbole
Very few nations are still sentencing people to death, North Korea is, and so are we.
It's revenge, appealing to emotion and blood lust, and puts us right there with a nation like North Korea. It's also a system that can and has fucked over innocent people, so the fact that this guy is 100% a piece of trash doesn't change that. Also, if he goes through the appeals process(talk about prolonging things for the victims and their families), he's not gonna be executed for a long long time, and hell he might just win one of those appeals to get out of death row. It will just end up costing an obscene amount of money, more than a sentence of life in prison, mostly in solitary confinement ever would have.
It's fine to execute murdering terrorists in 2015
Countries such as Canada, the UK, France, Italy, Germany, Sweden, Denmark, Switzerland, Norway, Finland, Australia, Brazil, Argentina, Ecuador, Honduras, Mexico, Venezuela, Cambodia, New Zealand, Philippines, Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Iceland, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, and Turkey disagree.
Meanwhile the US is on the same side of the issue as Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Egypt, Libya, Nigeria, Somalia, Sudan, Bahrain, China, North Korea, and Saudi Arabia.
I'm anti death penalty, but it is not revenge. It's justice.
Don't wanna be put to death, don't murder innocent people.
But I'm generally anti DP not due to the revenge factor, but its efficacy and the fact that an innocent person can be executed. It's already happened multiple times.
Death is actually better than rotting in a prison in solitary confinement.
Very few nations are still sentencing people to death, North Korea is, and so are we.
Countries such as Canada, the UK, France, Italy, Germany, Sweden, Denmark, Switzerland, Norway, Finland, Australia, Brazil, Argentina, Ecuador, Honduras, Mexico, Venezuela, Cambodia, New Zealand, Philippines, Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Iceland, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, and Turkey disagree.
Meanwhile the US is on the same side of the issue as Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Egypt, Libya, Nigeria, Somalia, Sudan, Bahrain, China, North Korea, and Saudi Arabia.
That doesn't mean anything, though.
Does everything nation have to be lockstep?
If a confessed and 100 percent proven mass murderer gets the death penalty, I'm not shedding any tears. That's the price they chose to pay when they killed people.
I still don't see how that puts us up with North Korea unless youre ignoring the absolute oppressive regime, concentration camps where bloodlines of families are killed through multiple generations, extreme propganda and brainwashing, and much more.
I dunno, Murdering murderer's sound like revenge to me. And yeah, I consider it state-sanctioned murder, because there's no valid excuse, no actual need for it. He's in custody, and he's never getting out, and yet we still feel he has to die. Of course, it's up to him if he want's to prolong this, but appeals can take a very very long time, and a disgusting amount of tax payer money. Just going after the death penalty cost more money (to continue on the economic route)
There's a difference because death is the penalty the guilty party pays.
It's not murder legally, though, as it is not unlawful. It's similar to military action, which has the same legal protections.
Again, I'm anti DP for many reasons, but I find the revenge argument pretty facile.
I also find it funny that those who are against the DP are fine with people rotting in solidarity confinement for life, which humanely speaking, is far worse than death.
Life in prison in solitary confinement is a fate far worse that death.
It's fine to execute murdering terrorists in 2015
Then we - as in the USA - better execute that SC shooter as a murdering terrorist, as well.
My opinion is that it is justice.It's revenge, appealing to emotion and blood lust, and puts us right there with a nation like North Korea. It's also a system that can and has fucked over innocent people, so the fact that this guy is 100% a piece of trash doesn't change that. Also, if he goes through the appeals process(talk about prolonging things for the victims and their families), he's not gonna be executed for a long long time, and hell he might just win one of those appeals to get out of death row. It will just end up costing an obscene amount of money, more than a sentence of life in prison, mostly in solitary confinement ever would have.
IMO, Life Behind bars without parole is a better punihsment than the Death Penalty
the Death Penalty just ends his misery.
Serving Life at his young age would be a better punishment. Spend 60 to 70 years behind bars
The anticipation of death is worse than death itself.
No objection from me.Then we - as in the USA - better execute that SC shooter as a murdering terrorist, as well.
My opinion is that it is justice.
However, what's wrong with revenge? If he had killed a family member, I would ask to pull the trigger/flip the switch/strangle him myself.
My opinion is that it is justice.
However, what's wrong with revenge? If he had killed a family member, I would ask to pull the trigger/flip the switch/strangle him myself.
I dunno, Murdering murderer's sound like revenge to me. And yeah, I consider it state-sanctioned murder, because there's no valid excuse, no actual need for it. He's in custody, and he's never getting out, and yet we still feel he has to die. Of course, it's up to him if he want's to prolong this, but appeals can take a very very long time, and a disgusting amount of tax payer money. Just going after the death penalty cost more money (to continue on the economic route)
Are you serious?If you did kill him and you support the death penalty, why shouldn't you be executed for it?
Good for you.I wouldn't.
Meanwhile the US is on the same side of the issue as Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Egypt, Libya, Nigeria, Somalia, Sudan, Bahrain, China, North Korea, and Saudi Arabia.
Prisoners escape from maximum level security prisons on occasion. There were a couple that escaped earlier this month in the US. There's a slim chance that Tsarnaev could escape if he's allowed to live. The only way to ensure he will never do harm in society again would be to kill him.
Are you serious?
People claiming the death penalty is barbaric.
Yet won't argue against solitary confinement which is more barbaric than a quick death.
That's the worst excuse I have ever read in favor of the death penalty.Prisoners escape from maximum level security prisons on occasion. There were a couple that escaped earlier this month in the US. There's a slim chance that Tsarnaev could escape if he's allowed to live. The only way to ensure he will never do harm in society again would be to kill him.
People claiming the death penalty is barbaric.
Yet won't argue against solitary confinement which is more barbaric than a quick death.
People claiming the death penalty is barbaric.
Yet won't argue against solitary confinement which is more barbaric than a quick death.
Which "people"?
Don't kill him, let him rot in jail. let him see just how much he didn't change anything for the rest of his life.
Yes, just put him in general population in a Massachusetts prison. Feed his ass to the wolves. Hopefully he lives to be 100 and hates everyday day he's alive.
Can't wait to see him get put behind bars for the rest of his life. But as heinous as his crimes are I'm still a staunch opponent of the death penalty.
Put him in jail for life with long solitary sentences. Let him be forgotten about in some basement room with no windows.
Should be life in prison. Death is the easy way out for this guy. Dude should rot.
They will probably give him death though.
There's definitely a part of me that feels this person doesn't deserve to exist anymore and should just be put to death. But I have a lot of reasons for not supporting the death penalty, and really, he'll die some day anyway, why not after decades of mentally rotting in a prison cell?
My opinion is that it is justice.
However, what's wrong with revenge? If he had killed a family member, I would ask to pull the trigger/flip the switch/strangle him myself.
Then we - as in the USA - better execute that SC shooter as a murdering terrorist, as well.
Then we - as in the USA - better execute that SC shooter as a murdering terrorist, as well.
This was just page 1. No one wants the death penalty because it's just as bad as murder. But, let's let him physically and mentally rot for the rest of his life, ignoring the fact that this is worse than the death penalty.
the greatest gift any of us have been given is the gift of life. although I'm on the fence regarding the death penalty, i can see how some would advocate for it especially in the topic of terrorism and taking the lives of multiple other people. he took other people's greatest gift, why not take his greatest gift in return? characterizing those in favor of the death penalty (especially in extreme cases like this) as being nothing but blood thirsty is a bit of a false label imo
i think i'd prefer him to have solitary confinement for life, but like i said i'm on the fence. and even then some would argue that that's too cruel or too lenient depending on their views
many of the people calling the death penalty barbaric have never (and hopefully will never be) been put into a situation where it would be relevant and personal. losing loved ones to a conscious act of murder and then advocating the murderer live out the rest of his/her days, would take being a bigger person than many of us here are.
This was just page 1. No one wants the death penalty because it's just as bad as murder. But, let's let him physically and mentally rot for the rest of his life, ignoring the fact that this is worse than the death penalty.