LyleLanley
Banned
I also think he should spend the rest of his life in prison.
He will.
I also think he should spend the rest of his life in prison.
Fucking stupid. A perfect execution of his original plan ends in his and his brothers' death.
So we give it to him.
I'd still argue that the contrast is important, because that position again implies that a huge majority of the field is forming an incorrect belief on the position through flawed methodology, flawed research, flawed supporting evidence, etc. To have that significant of a disparity between what the experts believe versus the appraisal of existing research quality would severely question the practice and credibility of criminology in its entirety.]
It's not like Amnesty International "accidentally" put that prefatory sentence/link in there. They knowingly included that. Furthermore, even if you grant that all the research should be thrown out due to taint, that leaves you with no evidence to believe one way or the other, so your position should be a neutral, no evidence for deterrence one way or the other, not an assumption that there is an effect because it's "rational".
Fallible courts shouldn't make irreversible decisions. It's that simple.Why do you think that authority is lacking? Or is that just a tautology?
Are we on strictly religious grounds here?
I also think he should spend the rest of his life in prison.
Fucking stupid. A perfect execution of his original plan ends in his and his brothers' death.
So we give it to him.
I also think he should spend the rest of his life in prison.
LOL What do you think life is like for a TERRORIST in a US prison anyway?While being tortured. Like making him be naked in a room full of ants for a few hours a day.
I'm against the death penalty but I was never convinced Dzhokhar was genuinely into the ideological part of this whole thing, especially since his brother was killed and he has been sitting in jail. I don't think he's going to be focusing on the martyr bullshit when they lead him out for execution. I think he's going to be a frightened kid.
Lethal injection - the very method used in assisted suicides - and only after due process legitimizes setting off explosives in crowds of innocents?The major problem with the death penalty imo is not about authority, but that the barbaric action of intentionally murdering a convicted criminal legitimizes the barbaric action he's found guilty of on a very fundamental level
His plan was to have his brother die in a shootout and him try to escape and be captured alive so the US would execute him making them look bad and him look good???
I'm against the death penalty but I was never convinced Dzhokhar was genuinely into the ideological part of this whole thing. It seemed like his brother roped him into a lot of this shit and he's dead. Plus, Dzhokhar has been withering away in jail. I don't think he's going to be focusing on the martyr bullshit when they lead him out for execution. I think he's going to be a frightened kid.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/178790/americans-support-death-penalty-stable.aspx
A minority of Americans want to get rid of the death penalty. For whatever reason, Americans feel it is a moral, political, or economic good. If the research is inconclusive about deterrence, then we should do the democratic thing and hold off making a policy decision that betrays American voters. People that live in their own state and are familiar with the criminality in their own state, vote in their own interests as members of that state.
Lethal injection - the very method used in assisted suicides - and only after due process legitimizes setting off explosives in crowds of innocents?
One thing is for sure, capital punishment is a very heartfelt issue and deserves to be kept in the spotlight of public attention.
Why they gonna kill this dude... Come on son, let this mofugga rot in prison for life... Imo they basically doing this dude a favor :|
Why they gonna kill this dude... Come on son, let this mofugga rot in prison for life... Imo they basically doing this dude a favor :|
Like I said previously, most of those people in this situation were opposed to the death penalty.Sometimes I wonder if those opposed to the death penalty ever think of the victim or their families.
Bill Richards' testimony at trial
He knew is 8 year old son wouldn't make it and had to act fast or risk loosing his 7 year old daughter too. He left his dying son and rushed his daughter to the hospital where her life was saved.
Bill Richards did NOT want the jury to pursue the death penalty. He lost his son, and his daughter was maimed, because of the actions of this man and his brother.
A lot of the surviving victims and the families of the deceased have expressed wanting him to get life in prison for closure. Now it's going to be appeal after appeal for years while he sits on deathrow.
'To end the anguish, drop the death penalty' - In Bill and Denise Richards own words
In Globe poll, most favor life term for Dzhokhar Tsarnaev
Most In Boston Think Tsarnaev Should Get Life In Prison Over Death Penalty
Massachusetts isn't OK with the death penalty
It's really easy to sit back and see that this man took lives and therefore his own should be forfeit but I really think the victims and the community affected's desires should convey that it really isn't so black and white.
While being tortured. Like making him be naked in a room full of ants for a few hours a day.
Sometimes I wonder if those opposed to the death penalty ever think of the victim or their families.
What does it accomplish for the family? What's the net gain here?Sometimes I wonder if those opposed to the death penalty ever think of the victim or their families.
Sometimes I wonder if those opposed to the death penalty ever think of the victim or their families.
Its not though. As a society we have sought out the most humane methods possible to end a person's life. That intent does matter, especially when it comes to accusations of bloodlust and barbarism for sport being tossed around by some.Method is completely irrelevant.
This is a path we've been on from the very beginning. Our entire history as tribes and societies of people has been down that very road.My argument is that it removes intentional murder from the sphere of thing's we should absolutely not do, and instead makes it into a question of "who has the authority to decide if somone deserves to be killed". This is a very dangerous path to go down, because that is a question that different people will have different opinions on
A majority of Americans used to believe segregation was appropriate too, that doesn't mean it's in keeping with the principles of democracy or human rights to keep something going just because it has a majority of support. That's the tyranny of the majority at work.
Oh great, now we're martyring him.
I'm not opposed to eliminating the death penalty, but I'm not convinced that it is as untenable a position to have as racism is, and so I would defer to voters to decide what they think is best for them. I can potentially see how someone can be for the death penalty and still be in keeping with the habitus of American liberty and law...but I can't see how someone could reconcile a policy of racial inequality.
I don't really get where this idea comes from. Is he actually being treated like a martyr? Honest question, I've never heard of any extremists or terrorist groups singing this kid's praises and wishing him a safe trip to the afterlife
And sentencing him to death is giving him the easy way out.Good. 3 meals a day would have been too lenient a punishment.
Its not though. As a society we have sought out the most humane methods possible to end a person's life. That intent does matter, especially when it comes to accusations of bloodlust and barbarism for sport being tossed around by some.
This is a path we've been on from the very beginning. Our entire history as tribes and societies of people has been down that very road.
Not to say we can't or shouldn't change things, but this is no slippery slope. Its as old as the conception of justice itself.
Oh great, now we're martyring him.
I think method is very important, but we can just hold an honest disagreement on that point and tackle the larger issue.Disagree. To me, injecting lethal poison into someone is just as barbaric and perverse as cutting his throat or whatever. But as I said, this is not really about method for me, which ultimately, in matters of life and death, is a trivial matter, no?
It's really not that shocking. The justice system worked here properly I think.No its not. There is no wrong case against the death penalty. They all are equally shocking in that the state decides it has the authority to kill someone who poses no further threat to anyone (he's in prison)
But the death penalty is still implicated in racial inequality because it is disproportionately targeted against minorities. And it is not in keeping with liberty and law to allow the death penalty to exist given the number of innocents who have sentenced to death.
That is your ethics. But there are arguments that exist for the death penalty that see it as being congruent with liberty and law. You probably disagree with them, but they can be made: Closure, utility, etc. Some have even argued that it is the ideal answer for murder precisely because it regards life as sacred - it is an explicit punishment for an explicit crime, whereas imprisonment is not. Do I agree with this? Not necessarily, but to many people that's a tenable argument for upholding the sanctity of life in America. Others point to the lengthy and expensive appeals process as a reason for the death penalty being the ultimate punishment - Ted Bundy famously appealing his death multiple times and had even strategized piece-meal negotiations by helping law enforcement catch other killers in order to extend his life. For as many innocent people you can count that were put to death by capital punishment, another could find the amount of people that were potentially spared by murderers who didn't want to pick up a sentencing in a death-penalty state -- Which maximizes the most liberty?
I'm against the death penalty but I was never convinced Dzhokhar was genuinely into the ideological part of this whole thing. It seemed like his brother roped him into a lot of this shit and he's dead. Plus, Dzhokhar has been withering away in jail. I don't think he's going to be focusing on the martyr bullshit when they lead him out for execution. I think he's going to be a frightened kid.
He's probably going to be in his 30s by the time the execution goes down. People sit on death row for years
Six years from the act, four years from conviction, so yeah, pretty quick.It didn't take long for Timothy McVeigh to be executed.
Sometimes I wonder if those opposed to the death penalty ever think of the victim or their families.
solitary for the rest of his life would be a better punishment
humans can't handle that, go crazy
Sixty-one percent of registered voters said they would favor a punishment for murder other than the death penalty, according to a survey made public on Tuesday by the Death Penalty Information Center
Wouldn't that be torture?
Warning: Very disturbing
Bill Richards testimony: http://www.cnn.com/2015/03/05/us/boston-marathon-bombing-trial/
Tldr: He knew is 8 year old son, Martin Richards, wouldn't make it and had to act fast or risk losing his 7 year old daughter too (she was missing her leg). He left his son to die and rushed his daughter to the hospital where her life was saved. That was the last time he saw his son alive.
Every time I hear about Boston I think about what Bill and his family went through that day. It is one of the saddest things I have ever heard. As a father myself it makes me feel Ill when I think about it.
Bill Richards urged the jury to not pursue the death penalty.
http://www.reddit.com/r/news/comments/363d2m/boston_marathon_bomber_will_receive_the_death/cradbx8