• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Jury has reached verdict in Dzhokhar Tsarnaev trial - sentenced to death

Status
Not open for further replies.
Fucking stupid. A perfect execution of his original plan ends in his and his brothers' death.

So we give it to him.

His plan was to have his brother die in a shootout and him try to escape and be captured alive so the US would execute him making them look bad and him look good???
 

Buzzati

Banned
I'd still argue that the contrast is important, because that position again implies that a huge majority of the field is forming an incorrect belief on the position through flawed methodology, flawed research, flawed supporting evidence, etc. To have that significant of a disparity between what the experts believe versus the appraisal of existing research quality would severely question the practice and credibility of criminology in its entirety.]

It's not like Amnesty International "accidentally" put that prefatory sentence/link in there. They knowingly included that. Furthermore, even if you grant that all the research should be thrown out due to taint, that leaves you with no evidence to believe one way or the other, so your position should be a neutral, no evidence for deterrence one way or the other, not an assumption that there is an effect because it's "rational".

http://www.gallup.com/poll/178790/americans-support-death-penalty-stable.aspx

A minority of Americans want to get rid of the death penalty. For whatever reason, Americans feel it is a moral, political, or economic good. If the research is inconclusive about deterrence, then we should do the democratic thing and hold off making a policy decision that betrays American voters. People that live in their own state and are familiar with the criminality in their own state, vote in their own interests as members of that state.
 

Siegcram

Member
Why do you think that authority is lacking? Or is that just a tautology?

Are we on strictly religious grounds here?
Fallible courts shouldn't make irreversible decisions. It's that simple.
Doubly so if they've shown predisposition to impose said judgement on minorities and the occasional disabled person.
 
Fucking stupid. A perfect execution of his original plan ends in his and his brothers' death.

So we give it to him.

I'm against the death penalty but I was never convinced Dzhokhar was genuinely into the ideological part of this whole thing. It seemed like his brother roped him into a lot of this shit and he's dead. Plus, Dzhokhar has been withering away in jail. I don't think he's going to be focusing on the martyr bullshit when they lead him out for execution. I think he's going to be a frightened kid.
 
I'm against the death penalty but I was never convinced Dzhokhar was genuinely into the ideological part of this whole thing, especially since his brother was killed and he has been sitting in jail. I don't think he's going to be focusing on the martyr bullshit when they lead him out for execution. I think he's going to be a frightened kid.

Yep.
 
The major problem with the death penalty imo is not about authority, but that the barbaric action of intentionally murdering a convicted criminal legitimizes the barbaric action he's found guilty of on a very fundamental level :(
Lethal injection - the very method used in assisted suicides - and only after due process legitimizes setting off explosives in crowds of innocents?

One thing is for sure, capital punishment is a very heartfelt issue and deserves to be kept in the spotlight of public attention.
 

Stet

Banned
His plan was to have his brother die in a shootout and him try to escape and be captured alive so the US would execute him making them look bad and him look good???

I'm against the death penalty but I was never convinced Dzhokhar was genuinely into the ideological part of this whole thing. It seemed like his brother roped him into a lot of this shit and he's dead. Plus, Dzhokhar has been withering away in jail. I don't think he's going to be focusing on the martyr bullshit when they lead him out for execution. I think he's going to be a frightened kid.

Yeah, it's not like he left an ideological message for us or anything.
 

Kusagari

Member
This is one of the few cases where I support the death penalty.

We have unequivocal proof that he committed the crime and he's a mass murderer.

I don't believe it's a deterrent to others and it doesn't make me feel good. I just believe someone like this doesn't deserve to live in our already crowded prison system. We have enough people who don't deserve to be there toiling away. Just give this guy the death he asked for instead of having him join them.
 

Sigmaah

Member
Why they gonna kill this dude... Come on son, let this mofugga rot in prison for life... Imo they basically doing this dude a favor :|
 
http://www.gallup.com/poll/178790/americans-support-death-penalty-stable.aspx

A minority of Americans want to get rid of the death penalty. For whatever reason, Americans feel it is a moral, political, or economic good. If the research is inconclusive about deterrence, then we should do the democratic thing and hold off making a policy decision that betrays American voters. People that live in their own state and are familiar with the criminality in their own state, vote in their own interests as members of that state.

A majority of Americans used to believe segregation was appropriate too, that doesn't mean it's in keeping with the principles of democracy or human rights to keep it going. That's the tyranny of the majority at work. This is just one of many issues where a majority of constituents want something that their elected representatives should not give into.
 
D

Deleted member 125677

Unconfirmed Member
Lethal injection - the very method used in assisted suicides - and only after due process legitimizes setting off explosives in crowds of innocents?

One thing is for sure, capital punishment is a very heartfelt issue and deserves to be kept in the spotlight of public attention.

Method is completely irrelevant. My argument is that it removes intentional murder from the sphere of things we should absolutely not do, and instead makes it into a question of "who has the authority to decide if somone deserves to be killed". This is a very dangerous path to go down, because that is a question that different people will have different opinions on
 
Why they gonna kill this dude... Come on son, let this mofugga rot in prison for life... Imo they basically doing this dude a favor :|

but mah tax dollas

Really though, if we aren't going to rehabilitate the dude then what is the point of spending money to keep him in prison forever? So people can get their vengeance at terror they experienced behind a computer screen?
 

Syder

Member
Sometimes I wonder if those opposed to the death penalty ever think of the victim or their families.
Like I said previously, most of those people in this situation were opposed to the death penalty.
Bill Richards' testimony at trial

He knew is 8 year old son wouldn't make it and had to act fast or risk loosing his 7 year old daughter too. He left his dying son and rushed his daughter to the hospital where her life was saved.

Bill Richards did NOT want the jury to pursue the death penalty. He lost his son, and his daughter was maimed, because of the actions of this man and his brother.

A lot of the surviving victims and the families of the deceased have expressed wanting him to get life in prison for closure. Now it's going to be appeal after appeal for years while he sits on deathrow.

'To end the anguish, drop the death penalty' - In Bill and Denise Richard’s own words

In Globe poll, most favor life term for Dzhokhar Tsarnaev

Most In Boston Think Tsarnaev Should Get Life In Prison Over Death Penalty

Massachusetts isn't OK with the death penalty

It's really easy to sit back and see that this man took lives and therefore his own should be forfeit but I really think the victims and the community affected's desires should convey that it really isn't so black and white.
 

Derwind

Member
Sometimes I wonder if those opposed to the death penalty ever think of the victim or their families.

I have that same nagging question but towards people who support the death penalty. Do they even know or care about the victims of the family? Or is this more about justifying the state sanctioned murder of people, using the victims family as a prop?

Edit; Beaten by a better response
 
Method is completely irrelevant.
Its not though. As a society we have sought out the most humane methods possible to end a person's life. That intent does matter, especially when it comes to accusations of bloodlust and barbarism for sport being tossed around by some.

My argument is that it removes intentional murder from the sphere of thing's we should absolutely not do, and instead makes it into a question of "who has the authority to decide if somone deserves to be killed". This is a very dangerous path to go down, because that is a question that different people will have different opinions on
This is a path we've been on from the very beginning. Our entire history as tribes and societies of people has been down that very road.

Not to say we can't or shouldn't change things, but this is no slippery slope. Its as old as the conception of justice itself.
 

TheJLC

Member
I'm okay with this. Dude doesn't need to be on this planet.

Death penalty isn't about deterrence it is about punishment for an offense against the State.
 

Buzzati

Banned
A majority of Americans used to believe segregation was appropriate too, that doesn't mean it's in keeping with the principles of democracy or human rights to keep something going just because it has a majority of support. That's the tyranny of the majority at work.

I'm not opposed to eliminating the death penalty, but I'm not convinced that it is as untenable a position to have as racism is, and so I would defer to voters to decide what they think is best for them. I can potentially see how someone can be for the death penalty and still be in keeping with the habitus of American liberty and law...but I can't see how someone could reconcile a policy of racial inequality.
 

Blader

Member
Oh great, now we're martyring him.

I don't really get where this idea comes from. Is he actually being treated like a martyr? Honest question, I've never heard of any extremists or terrorist groups singing this kid's praises and wishing him a safe trip to the afterlife
 
I'm not opposed to eliminating the death penalty, but I'm not convinced that it is as untenable a position to have as racism is, and so I would defer to voters to decide what they think is best for them. I can potentially see how someone can be for the death penalty and still be in keeping with the habitus of American liberty and law...but I can't see how someone could reconcile a policy of racial inequality.

But the death penalty is still implicated in racial inequality because it is disproportionately targeted against minorities. And it is not in keeping with liberty and law to allow the death penalty to exist given the number of innocents who have sentenced to death.
 

lednerg

Member
D

Deleted member 125677

Unconfirmed Member
Its not though. As a society we have sought out the most humane methods possible to end a person's life. That intent does matter, especially when it comes to accusations of bloodlust and barbarism for sport being tossed around by some.

Disagree. To me, injecting lethal poison into someone is just as barbaric and perverse as cutting his throat or whatever. But as I said, this is not really about method for me, which ultimately, in matters of life and death, is a trivial matter, no?


This is a path we've been on from the very beginning. Our entire history as tribes and societies of people has been down that very road.

Not to say we can't or shouldn't change things, but this is no slippery slope. Its as old as the conception of justice itself.

It's a path most civilized socities has transcended a good while ago. USA is the odd one out, really.
 
Oh great, now we're martyring him.

When I see this comment, it makes me wonder...

If we execute him, he's a martyr.

If he spends the rest of his life in jail, when he finally does die, he's still a martyr.

If he lives a long, miserable, lonely, horrible existence in jail, in his mind, he'll be rewarded even more when he dies because of all the "suffering" he had to endure at the hands of the infidels who he tried to kill in the first place. He'll think he's a "Job" figure of sorts. Suffering just to prove his faith to his god.

So at the end of the day, is there nothing we can do to actually punish this guy and make him feel guilty for his crimes?

If not, then why are we so worried about what HE thinks or wants? Shouldn't we be more concerned with justice and what OUR society thinks about his crimes? And if killing this guy somehow coincides with his own thinking or wants, so be it. But we should not be taking into any consideration what HE wants or believes. In fact, it should be ignored completely because he will only be a martyr to himself and whoever else believes his nonsense.

To the victims and the survivors of his crimes, he will be dead. And that's all that matters.
 
Disagree. To me, injecting lethal poison into someone is just as barbaric and perverse as cutting his throat or whatever. But as I said, this is not really about method for me, which ultimately, in matters of life and death, is a trivial matter, no?
I think method is very important, but we can just hold an honest disagreement on that point and tackle the larger issue.

One thing I'm fine with is that the burden of justification falls on the pro-death penalty side, and its something that should be done anew with each case rather than relying purely upon historical norms and institutional inertia. Its not at all a trivial thing to take a life. To that extent the anti-death penalty movement can be a very positive force to check the state's power. I'd like to think we can reach a place where these executions are incredibly rare while also not going full on Norway.
 
No its not. There is no wrong case against the death penalty. They all are equally shocking in that the state decides it has the authority to kill someone who poses no further threat to anyone (he's in prison)
It's really not that shocking. The justice system worked here properly I think.

Now I fully understand the overall system has major issues and I wouldn't be upset if the death penalty ended.

And inmates are perfectly capable of causing more harm. Either to others physically or by spreading their message outside.
 

Buzzati

Banned
But the death penalty is still implicated in racial inequality because it is disproportionately targeted against minorities. And it is not in keeping with liberty and law to allow the death penalty to exist given the number of innocents who have sentenced to death.

That is your ethics. But there are arguments that exist for the death penalty that see it as being congruent with liberty and law. You probably disagree with them, but they can be made: Closure, utility, etc. Some have even argued that it is the ideal answer for murder precisely because it regards life as sacred - it is a specific punishment for a specific crime, whereas imprisonment is not. Do I agree with this? Not necessarily, but to many people that's a tenable argument for upholding the sanctity of life in America. Others point to the lengthy and expensive appeals process as a reason for the death penalty being the ultimate punishment - Ted Bundy famously appealing his death multiple times and had even strategized piece-meal negotiations by helping law enforcement catch other killers in order to extend his life. For as many innocent people you can count that were put to death by capital punishment, another could find the amount of people that were potentially spared by murderers who didn't want to pick up a sentencing in a death-penalty state -- Which maximizes the most liberty? I really don't have a position on the matter - so I can't really argue on behalf of pro-penalty voters.
 

AmyS

Member
Io1byD5.jpg


OQVy9Vf.jpg
 
That is your ethics. But there are arguments that exist for the death penalty that see it as being congruent with liberty and law. You probably disagree with them, but they can be made: Closure, utility, etc. Some have even argued that it is the ideal answer for murder precisely because it regards life as sacred - it is an explicit punishment for an explicit crime, whereas imprisonment is not. Do I agree with this? Not necessarily, but to many people that's a tenable argument for upholding the sanctity of life in America. Others point to the lengthy and expensive appeals process as a reason for the death penalty being the ultimate punishment - Ted Bundy famously appealing his death multiple times and had even strategized piece-meal negotiations by helping law enforcement catch other killers in order to extend his life. For as many innocent people you can count that were put to death by capital punishment, another could find the amount of people that were potentially spared by murderers who didn't want to pick up a sentencing in a death-penalty state -- Which maximizes the most liberty?

If we're proposing that we should use the death penalty, there should be good reasons to use it that also outweigh the consequences. But all I see are platitudes that ignore the reality of how it works. It is emblematic of the entire justice system's racist structure and has had a large number of innocent citizens sentenced to death. We know that these things have happened. We don't know and probably can't ever know who "potentially" was saved by it who wouldn't otherwise have been saved by life in prison. If we're weighing a known versus an unknown, then the known loss of liberty clearly outweighs a merely "possible" gain of liberty. International Law is also clearly trending towards a global ban as well.
 
I'm against the death penalty but I was never convinced Dzhokhar was genuinely into the ideological part of this whole thing. It seemed like his brother roped him into a lot of this shit and he's dead. Plus, Dzhokhar has been withering away in jail. I don't think he's going to be focusing on the martyr bullshit when they lead him out for execution. I think he's going to be a frightened kid.

He's probably going to be in his 30s by the time the execution goes down. People sit on death row for years
 
Also when you poll Americans about whether they support the death penalty or an alternative like life in prison without parole, then support for the death penalty drops significantly.


Other studies found a majority favored alternatives:

Sixty-one percent of registered voters said they would favor a punishment for murder other than the death penalty, according to a survey made public on Tuesday by the Death Penalty Information Center
 
I don't know if this has been posted or not, if it has then I apologize

Warning: Very disturbing

Bill Richards testimony: http://www.cnn.com/2015/03/05/us/boston-marathon-bombing-trial/

Tldr: He knew is 8 year old son, Martin Richards, wouldn't make it and had to act fast or risk losing his 7 year old daughter too (she was missing her leg). He left his son to die and rushed his daughter to the hospital where her life was saved. That was the last time he saw his son alive.
Every time I hear about Boston I think about what Bill and his family went through that day. It is one of the saddest things I have ever heard. As a father myself it makes me feel Ill when I think about it.

Bill Richards urged the jury to not pursue the death penalty.

http://www.reddit.com/r/news/comments/363d2m/boston_marathon_bomber_will_receive_the_death/cradbx8
 

TCRS

Banned
will that be after 20 years on death row? we should have figured out a way to make his life as miserable as possible on earth. fucking scum.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom