Angelus said:
Sony wants this game to sell. Throwing a tantrum won't help,they should make the controls better for the mainstream,no? This could be like the next Halo or Golden Eye, in that those games sold a ton of systems,they were automatic system sellers. Sony has a great game here,bettering the controls would make it more than likely a more accessible game for first timers. I'm ok with the control but I do wish they would tweak it abit more overall myself. It'll make a great game just that much better.
I think the problem over the past 10 - 15 pages has been that some of people think that changing the controls so they represent some other game's controls would be making the controls of KZ2 "better". That really isn't the case. The controls would be different, sure. More accessible to people coming from those other games? Perhaps. But "better"? We can't even begin to qualify that statement. The controls work perfectly within the framework of
this game. The detractors need to stop blaming this game for not being like others.
If you don't like the controls then it is best to just move along rather then spend page after page trying to convince yourselves, and the rest of us, that this is somehow the game's fault, and we (the supporters) are just too dense to get it.
Sony has shown a lot of faith in GG's vision, and up to this point GG has been rock steady. They have developed something new and exciting and sure enough, as has been evinced by this current thread of conversation, gamers are going through some growing pains. If GG bows to the vocal minority, the atrophied gamer, then I think we all lose.
Perhaps this won't be the game that ends up being the next CS or COD4, but I do think it is the herald of a new control paradigm that will become more standard going forward. Not for all shooters, sure. But for some? Absolutely. We only benefit from bold attempts. As gamers, it behooves us to embrace new ideas. However, with that said, we should also be critical of their implementation. Not because we are stubborn and resistant to change, but because we can appreciate their success and should seek to propel those successes forward. Unfortunately, much of the current conversation does not seem reflect the intent of the latter.