ChorizoPicozo
Member
Not that smart.
I dont think so. The last jedi was aboutJust saw the film and I was wondering if the monologue Edward Norton has about “disruption” at the pool is the directors answer to the critics of his “The Last Jedi”?
I felt very invested after the mid-movie twist. The entirety of the second act is "How are these characters getting out of a situation we've seen go so badly!" And you still had the mystery of the attempt on Mile's life still hanging in the air and how this all tied in to the events from a new perspective (trying to sound vague for anyone accidentally browsing to this thread, though I've already seen someone post open spoilers).
God I hope not, hopefully Bob Iger knows about not throwing good money after bad.Is Rian still getting his own star wars trilogy?
My theory was exact the same! It would have been SO much betterI'm actually really surprised the ending wasn'tthe twin WASN'T dead, they were running a long con against Craig and Norton both. After all, we really have no proof of the twins death, say she survived the monoxide poisoning and got her twin (not some pedestrian school teacher but someone equally formidable) to help get revenge and STEAL the Mona lisa. In other words, the black lady is actually as bad, if not worse, than the others.
Translation: Turned off my brain and I enjoyed it.I didn't watch with my extremely critical eye. Just chill and watch whatever happens. Craigs performance wss awesome. The glee when having the chance for a real case again but still resevered and serious enough to acknowledge he couldn't be a "bodyguard" while keeping his composure for his chance to escape his solitary insanity inducing state was a joy to watch.
Guess I get joy out of movies like I do out of games and music. Good fragments do a lot for me.
Translation: Turned off my brain and I enjoyed it.
Also, anyone found it odd that no one had a problem with what that person did to that valuable thing?
The only thing it subverted was my bowel movements after watching that shitshow...I dont think so. The last jedi was about
Subverting expectations.
I'm actually really surprised the ending wasn'tthe twin WASN'T dead, they were running a long con against Craig and Norton both. After all, we really have no proof of the twins death, say she survived the monoxide poisoning and got her twin (not some pedestrian school teacher but someone equally formidable) to help get revenge and STEAL the Mona lisa. In other words, the black lady is actually as bad, if not worse, than the others.
Subverting expectations with the most boring end possible makes me wonder if it was worth itOh yeah, I was convincedand that would be the twist.the twin was still alive,
But in the end, Johnson is all about subverting those expectations, so no clever twist for us!
Not to mention give Blanc some actual detecting to do and then he could decide to intervene or let it play out.Subverting expectations with the most boring end possible makes me wonder if it was worth it
If the other twin was alive, also in the island, changing places with her sister from time to time would lead to a much more rewatchable movie where you would be guessing in what scenes were X or Y
Yes!Also, anyone found it odd that no one had a problem with what that person did to that valuable thing?
These two films are easily two of the most overrated films I've seen in years.
People heralding them as some return to a golden era of cinema when they barely scrape past the realm of mediocrity. Glass Onion was fractionally better than the first film but again suffered from a shite final act.
Hey man I mean I've got nothing against those who enjoyed the films! More power to you lot! But they just didn't meet my expectations and left me severely underwhelmed.
I’ve never seen this. What an odd strawman.People heralding them as some return to a golden era of cinema
You must have missed all the reviewers and articles mentioning how Knives Out had revived the whodunnit genre and made murder mysteries interesting and mainstream againI’ve never seen this. What an odd strawman.
Well phrasing that as ‘a return to the golden age of cinema’ is a stretch imhoYou must have missed all the reviewers and articles mentioning how Knives Out had revived the whodunnit genre and made murder mysteries interesting and mainstream again
It was very critically acclaimed when KO first released. I think it was because it only had to be better than TLJ (lowest bar ever). I also feel critics stick up for RJ for all that manufactured "toxic fandom" he endured for making TLJ - pointing out how out of touch critics are with the audience. Like many have already posted in this thread, he is not nearly as clever or subversive as he thinks, yet he will most likely be a critical darling for the rest of his career.Well phrasing that as ‘a return to the golden age of cinema’ is a stretch imho
For sure the first was acclaimed. But using ‘return to the golden age of cinema’ was just hyperbole from the author.It was very critically acclaimed when KO first released. I think it was because it only had to be better than TLJ (lowest bar ever). I also feel critics stick up for RJ for all that manufactured "toxic fandom" he endured for making TLJ - pointing out how out of touch critics are with the audience. Like many have already posted in this thread, he is not nearly as clever or subversive as he thinks, yet he will most likely be a critical darling for the rest of his career.