Launching a Kickstarter campaign on an E3 press conference

If nintendo or microsoft was funding it but it seems like Sony will be funding the majority of it and this is guaging interest.

Other products have done it and there is nothing wrong with Sony doing this for Shenmue.
Than blame those companies that didn't want to fund it.

that's what i've been saying lol
 
It doesn't say the type of reactions to E3 matter. Just don't do em. Read the policy.


Just saying.


Anyway i don't see the problem really. This is a game that's been wanted for over a decade. I think there can be an exception for this since E3 is the perfect place for the getting the word out for something this big.

wut

all E3 threads are "reactions". he's refering to a specific ruling during this time of year and I don't think this thread fits that at all and the fact that it's 10 pages already should say so enough. what's banned is backseat modding

Seems like the same situation as Amplitude

what happened there?
 
The great thing about Kickstarter is that it requires very little startup cost since the whole point is to fund a project in the first place.

Most successful kickstarters already have something to show before they go up. I don't know if I would call that "very little startup".

Like I said, they also lose the ability to kickstart other properties once they've established that they aren't capable of creating the thing consumers wanted.

Shenmue is also a passion project of Yu Suzuki. I don't see much in the way of publisher focus testing happening to something like this.

All of the negatives people have established so far are hypothetical what-ifs, where as all the benefits are things that are actually happening right now.

I understand being skeptical of things in this industry given where we currently are, but I think you have to choose your battles, and this isn't one of them.
 
It would have been awesome if they announced the Kickstarter on the stage, then someone brings over a big oversized check like the ones golfers win.

Made payable to: Shenmue 3

lol
 
Really don't have a problem with it. If it were some different circumstance maybe, but Yu was obviously coming to Sony for help and Sony said "look man, this is great, but a lot of people think Shenmue sucks or don't care about it, and after providing necessary funding ($40 mil 90's dollars) to make a legit Shenmue game, we don't think it would succeed." But since they respect Yu, they gave him a chance to show interest in the game, and even helped him out with the E3 announcement. If Sony thinks it's lukewarm, no harm no foul, if it does, Sony knows there's something worth investing in. It's investment procurement 101.

Yes, this is an obvious marketing move, but it's also a favor to one of the most prolific devs of the previous decade. In E3 literally EVERYTHING is marketing. That's why devs say "actual in-game footage" when it ain't, that's why there's fake voice chatter, and that's why people get pissed when their demo isn't running right.
Bay2 was dead too and Nintendo paid for everything upfront and yet the whole gaming community was in a uproar. How would people feel if this was ms or Nintendo?
 
16,515 backers
$1,398,377 pledged of $2,000,000 goal
31 days to go

Yeah... I didn't watch the press conference, but 2 million is pretty low, when the it was said that Shenmue 1 cost 40 million. Don't get me wrong, Shenmue is amazingly good game, and I can't wait to play the third one, but Sony could just as well funded the whole thing.
 
wut



slippery slope

regardless of the specifics in this scenario, a plausible "future" that should be possible for this (backed by the type of indie games that sell too) is for publisher to say "hey, people actually do want these games, maybe we don't need to kickstart some of em"

but.. yeah. that kinda goes the other way in terms of what's actually safest for a publisher, so tough luck
I'm not really sure what problem you're talking about here. What's your worst case scenario? That they, say, change their mind on Dark Souls 4 and say they'll make it but only if they get $10 million from Kickstarter? And either the vast majority of people who pledged get the game for cheaper than retail in return for their support or the game that wasn't going to get made still doesn't get made?

Publishers are never going to hold guaranteed, proven moneymakers behind crowdfunding walls, and people are never going to pledge to a Kickstarter that doesn't present a good value and acceptable level of risk (in terms of quality moreso than success/failure) to them.

This could've saved THQ and stopped that LOTR MOBA.
 
Why in the world do people think this game is being funded on the $2mil when the predecessor is among the top ten most expensive ever at over $100mil. This gauges interest and with Sony having exclusivity on console, they likely made an agreement to be one of the investors if the Kickstarter was indeed showing fan support for the idea.
 
The last Shenmue game was over a decade ago plus many fans of this franchise, like me, has been waiting for Shenmue 3 for a while. These are the reasons why it's a non-issue for me. This is almost similar to Igarashi's Bloodstained Kickstarter, a game that is supposed to be the spiritual successor to Castlevsnia Symphony of the Night: old franchises revived which depend on interest gained through Kickstarter.
 
wut

all E3 threads are "reactions". he's refering to a specific ruling during this time of year and I don't think this thread fits that at all and the fact that it's 10 pages already should say so enough. what's banned is backseat modding

What you think fits doesn't matter. Rules are rules. I'm not backseat modding. Just pointing something out.


But i'm not going to debate this with you any further. It's an interesting topic none the less. :)
 
Sony's involved. There's zero percent chance that the game costs only 2 mil from start to finish.

Kickstarter was used because they've realized it can now be used as marketing. Especially on a cult game like this, giving people the chance to directly fund a portion of game development on something like this is going to appeal to a ton of people.

Ok . So if Sony is involved and it will cost way more than 2 million than why even do a Kickstarter? Is Sony not able to afford that extra 2 million?

I'm not buying the Kickstarter is just trying to establish market interest angle either. Raising 2 million from die hard fans won't help much if the game is still much more expensive to make and bombs.
 
I'm not really sure what problem you're talking about here. What's your worst case scenario? That they, say, change their mind on Dark Souls 4 and say they'll make it but only if they get $10 million from Kickstarter? And either the vast majority of people who pledged get the game for cheaper than retail in return for their support or the game that wasn't going to get made still doesn't get made?

Publishers are never going to hold guaranteed, proven moneymakers behind crowdfunding walls, and people are never going to pledge to a Kickstarter that doesn't present a good value and acceptable level of risk (in terms of quality moreso than success/failure) to them.

This could've saved THQ and stopped that LOTR MOBA.

you're being very optimistic about a future where apparently publishers would potentially be able to halve their money output while retaining or even gaining brand value, while avoiding risk by not doing it "unless.."

im glad we're getting Shenmue 3, I just think this certainly means something for the future and the way in which they did it doesnt really strike me as hopeful. I wanna know more about what happened here

the former statement certainly doesnt necessarelly sound like the worst thing, but I think it can be handled better. you don't think its kind of a big deal? something that brings up questions or limits?

What you think fits doesn't matter. Rules are rules. I'm not backseat modding. Just pointing something out.


But i'm not going to debate this with you any further. It's an interesting topic none the less. :)

It's all good. im just saying I think I understood the rules
 
you're being very optimistic about a future where apparently publishers would potentially be able to halve their money output while retaining or even gaining brand value

im glad we're getting Shenmue 3, I just think this certainly means something for the future and the way in which they did it doesnt really strike me as hopeful. I wanna know more about what happened here



It's all good. im just saying I think I understood the rules
You don't think Shenmue is a rather unusual case? It's been fan demanded, but without proven interest for many years. I doubt we should worry about Sony tossing us a bunch of games to fund when there are many that they are paying for themselves outside of Shenmue's demand test.
 
You don't think Shenmue is a rather unusual case? It's been fan demanded, but without proven interest for many years. I doubt we should worry about Sony tossing us a bunch of games to fund when there are many that they are paying for themselves outside of Shenmue's demand test.

I think it's gonna be a huge success but I don't disagree with you; at that point we're all just guessing
 
Bay2 was dead too and Nintendo paid for everything upfront and yet the whole gaming community was in a uproar. How would people feel if this was ms or Nintendo?

I have no clue about that situation, never followed it. I bet people would react differently if it was Nintendo though, because it may be harder to separate Nintendo's friendly "for-the-gamers" spirit from the fact that it has investment interests like any other company, and it would feel like a betrayal to ignorant fans.
 
How are people mad about this? Fund if you want to show interest. Shenmue wasn't the big system seller back in the day, to my knowledge. Wasn't Yu hinting kickstarter for a while? 2mil to guarantee interest send reasonable before someone jumps all in.
 
If Sony is publishing, yeah it's a little bit slimy.

If Sony is not publishing and they just did it to get hardcore goodwill and promote this game on their platform then nothing wrong with that.

And everyone just assumes Sony is publishing but I'm not so sure. Someone has to be of course, but Sony would have plenty of incentive just to promote it at the conference as a potential exclusive or even just a game coming to their platform even if they weren't publishing. That's not enough to convince me they have a deal. The confirmed and physical PC version even tilts me to skeptical.
 
The Shenmue 3 Kickstarter was a great marketing and PR move. They could easily have just dropped a CG trailer and said "Coming Soon, lol", but the Kickstarter route allows them to create a buzz and to create a sense of "engagement" with the Shenmue fans who have been dying for this for the last 10+ years.

At the end of the day, the $2 million (or probably $3-5 million) that this Kickstarter will earn will be nothing compared to the actual budget of the game. It's all about getting the word out that Shenmue is back.

Kickstarter themselves are involved in this as well. They'll greatly benefit from a PR point of view.
 
Bay2 was dead too and Nintendo paid for everything upfront and yet the whole gaming community was in a uproar. How would people feel if this was ms or Nintendo?

There wasn't as much time between the Bayos as there was between Shenmue. Gaming communities were in an uproar because the reality of Bayo2's dependency on Nintendo hadn't been properly established first. I think if the property had languished for a decade only to be suddenly revived by Nintendo, you would have had a very different reaction.

As for Nintendo paying for everything upfront, do we know if that financially worked out for them? Was the cost investment for Bayo 2 as much as for something like Shenmue 3? I don't know that you can make a direct apples to apples comparison with the info we have.
 
i dont know anything about the scope of the game or about videogames budgets, except that every generic shooter seems to cost way more than 2 million dollars. is it safe to assume someone, sony, has to be paying something to make it happen? or are 2 million really enough for a shenmue 3? (or even 5 million, including stretch goals)
 
Their whole E3 conference is REALLY sneaky once you get past the OMFG kneejerk reaction.

TLG! But...it looks exactly the same as it did 6 years, and its still not very exciting. "2016" huh...

FF7! But...who knows when that will ever come out, see Versus and KH3.

SHENMUE 3! But...a goddamn Kickstarter campaign? Pretttttty tacky

Meanwhile, the Vita is deader than dead, and Sony's 2015 line-up still lookin' real flabby and sick. They hope you don't notice that as they talk about the future.

This quote is more accurate than most people realise. Also I prefer the old way of doing things: Release a product then get people to pay for it based on the strength/quality of said product. It's good people get to fund the game and guarantee a copy for around the same price it would cost to buy the game anyways, but when games don't meet their targets or the game turns out to be shit is when stuff can really go wrong.
 
you're being very optimistic about a future where apparently publishers would potentially be able to halve their money output while retaining or even gaining brand value, while avoiding risk by not doing it "unless.."

im glad we're getting Shenmue 3, I just think this certainly means something for the future and the way in which they did it doesnt really strike me as hopeful. I wanna know more about what happened here

the former statement certainly doesnt necessarelly sound like the worst thing, but I think it can be handled better. you don't think its kind of a big deal? something that brings up questions or limits?
Ha, I'm really not trying to sound optimistic, I'm just having a hard time thinking of a scenario where this comes close to the depths we've already hit with things like $30 day one season passes for unannounced and undescribed content.

Going beyond what I said before, I guess there's the game turning out like dogshit, but that's a risk that comes with any Kickstarter. The other big thing that you seem to be leaning towards is that publishers get a couple million in the bank for free and purposely skimp because they have that money in the bank. I don't see that as all that likely given the sales ceiling of most of these large projects and the usefulness of crowdfunding as a PR and interest-gauge.

I mean, I understand how it could make someone feel a little apprehensive, just dealing with publishers in such a front-loaded situation, but you aren't putting yourself at any more risk than you're willing to bear, and there are tangible benefits to the consumer in a well-run Kickstarter. And on the other hand, the crap ones'll get weeded out.

Then again, a lot of my argument rests on people being educated about Kickstarter and educating themselves on a game before diving in, and judging by some comments in the other thread, those probably aren't safe things to bet on.
 
i dont know anything about the scope of the game or about videogames budgets, except that every generic shooter seems to cost way more than 2 million dollars. is it safe to assume someone, sony, has to be paying something to make it happen? or are 2 million really enough for a shenmue 3? (or even 5 million, including stretch goals)

There will be a publisher. Could be Sony, could be Sega, could be a joint venture, but someone pick up the game once it reaches $2 mil.
 
Ha, I'm really not trying to sound optimistic, I'm just having a hard time thinking of a scenario where this comes close to the depths we've already hit with things like $30 day one season passes for unannounced and undescribed content.

Going beyond what I said before, I guess there's the game turning out like dogshit, but that's a risk that comes with any Kickstarter. The other big thing that you seem to be leaning towards is that publishers get a couple million in the bank for free and purposely skimp because they have that money in the bank. I don't see that as all that likely given the sales ceiling of most of these large projects and the usefulness of crowdfunding as a PR and interest-gauge.

I mean, I understand how it could make someone feel a little apprehensive, just dealing with publishers in such a front-loaded situation, but you aren't putting yourself at any more risk than you're willing to bear, and there are tangible benefits to the consumer in a well-run Kickstarter. And on the other hand, the crap ones'll get weeded out.

Then again, a lot of my argument rests on people being educated about Kickstarter and educating themselves on a game before diving in, and judging by some comments in the other thread, those probably aren't safe things to bet on.


thing is you don't really know what "risk" you're putting yourself in since you can basically have a say by waiting to see what fans do and say nothing yet have complete control on how you look coming away from it once it's done, y'know?

this could potentially sound good, but I don't much believe in the "they're never gonna put huge things behind crowdfunding" thing you say. At a certaint point if this works so well why wouldnt they? and whose to say what probably would sell or wouldn't without kickstarter?

again, we're all speculating at this point and that's good and fun. thing with this specifically for me, mainly, is like I said the lack of transparency

I just hope someone asks Boyes something about it. surprised it hasnt happened yet
 
I don't see the problem since it's a long dead game. What I do cringe about is if it'll have a small budget overall that it won't make the game look graphically advanced. One of the appeals of the game a decade and a half ago was all it offered on top of being a graphical powerhouse.
This will be a long wait (I expect longer than 2 years), so it doesn't really matter for now. We are talking about two more E3's at least of it being mentioned.
 
If Sony is publishing, yeah it's a little bit slimy.

If Sony is not publishing and they just did it to get hardcore goodwill and promote this game on their platform then nothing wrong with that.

And everyone just assumes Sony is publishing but I'm not so sure. Someone has to be of course, but Sony would have plenty of incentive just to promote it at the conference as a potential exclusive or even just a game coming to their platform even if they weren't publishing. That's not enough to convince me they have a deal. The confirmed and physical PC version even tilts me to skeptical.

Out of left field, Microsoft announces they'll be publishing it.

And that Nintendo is developing it!
 
It rubbed me the wrong way a bit.

Same here. As if Sony didn't have the bank to get this game made? As many fuckin moneyhat deals as they presented tonight (first on, exclusively on, blah blah blah). Oh no, if they wanted to make the game, they could have funded it. If we're funding it, it should be on every platform.

He didn't need Sony's stage to make this pitch either. It would have gotten roughly the same money behind it if he announced this shit on Twitter.

Nope, I don't like the precedent it sets. Particularly because developers aren't really held to timelines and delivery dates like they would be under a traditional publishing agreement. It's good that this game is being made at all, but if they believed in the project, they would have invested in it...and going the Kickstarter route allows them to sidestep any real oversight or expectations. Not that this particular developer would take advantage of Kickstarter, but others have and will in the future if this becomes "a thing".

Sony probably spent 2 million on drinks for press people today, not funding this but showcasing it is fucking weird.

yes. never mind every other 3rd party game that came on stage like, "play it first on PlayStation". Get the fuck outtahere. So you're saying you have bank to moneyhat all these exclusive timings but not enough to bankroll one of the most beloved and dormant franchises in gaming history? Fuck outta my face, Sony.
 
thing is you don't really know what "risk" you're putting yourself in since you can basically have a say by waiting to see what fans do and say nothing yet have complete control on how you look coming away from it once it's done, y'know?

this could potentially sound good, but I don't much believe in the "they're never gonna put huge things behind crowdfunding" thing you say. At a certaint point if this works so well why wouldnt they? and whose to say what probably would sell or wouldn't without kickstarter?

again, we're all speculating at this point and that's good and fun. thing with this specifically for me, mainly, is like I said the lack of transparency

I just hope someone asks Boyes something about it. surprised it hasnt happened yet

I'm still not sure what you want them to ask. You don't need them to ask if someone will pick it up once it reaches $2 million. You know that much, you already said so. Does it matter if that person is Sony or Sega or the zombie corpse of THQ? It doesn't change anything they're already shown on the kickstarter page.
 
It really was very odd and I kinda felt like it was in bad taste. It would have made a lot more sense if they were funding the game or at the very least promised to match whatever is pledged on Kickstarter,
 
Brings the guy on stage for show off to announce a kickstarter campaign. And not only that, they force the game to have its exclusive debut on their console. What if you fund the game and you own a PS3,too bad, not only you need to fund the game but also you need to purchase a PS4, what a joke.
 
I'm still not sure what you want them to ask. You don't need them to ask if someone will pick it up once it reaches $2 million. You know that much, you already said so. Does it matter if that person is Sony or Sega or the zombie corpse of THQ? It doesn't change anything they're already shown on the kickstarter page.

I wanna know why it's not coming out on Xbox, for example

It's not if I think it's gonna get picked up after 2mil, I wanna know if money exchanged hands before the kickstarter


I don't own any console, jic
 
I thought Adam Boyes made it very clear when he said " we don't have anything to do with the project" or something along those lines.

Unless I'm deaf?
 
As far as I see it, there are two alternatives. One is what we got, a kickstarter for Shenmue 3 announced at Sonys E3 conference. The other alternative, no Shenmue 3 at all. This is really all I care about.

I have absolutely no worries about this supposed precedent this has set. There is a very limited list of games that can get away with this, games like Shenmue 3 is on it. Other games that people want, like Uncharted 4, Halo 4 and Zelda Wii U are not on it. Either way, I say let them try it. People have already demonstrated that there is a limit to what they are willing to back on kickstarter. If big publishers think they can get away with this on the regular, they will be proven wrong.

Pretty much my thoughts exactly. Shenmue was one of those rare games and seemingly roadblocked for years by risk or whatever and seemingly difficult to convince the suits of.
 
they force the game to have its exclusive debut on their console. What if you fund the game and you own a PS3,too bad, not only you need to fund the game but also you need to purchase a PS4, what a joke.

Can I just say words too? That makes them true? Is that how this works? Like, when I string them together, they have relevant meaning and form a logical structure? Do these ideas even have to be verified or can I just go for it?

Do you just throw money at things and hope for the best? That somehow maybe this seemingly random transaction of funds only, possibly works out in your favor in the best case scenario? Do you think this is how Kickstarter operates?
 
This is a system a lot of people want to use, this doesn't overshadow other Kickstarter campaigns whatsoever.

Small project makers like to make the debate that they are losing attention/money when bigger companies make Kickstarters for their products.

How are you losing money? Because someone spent it elsewhere? If the product was never on Kickstarter you wouldn't have that backer anyways because they would had bought that product anyways. Odds are you never sold people on that dollar in the first place, stop complaining about competition.

This isn't a slimey or a bad move whatsoever. There's a game people want, they have the option to show the game will sell with Kickstarter. The Announcement wasn't just a great PR move, but to further prove the point that companies are rejecting all these great game ideas on what they think consumers will buy other than making games we know we want to buy.

I would love to see a system like this used again for other big titles we're dying to see a sequel of.
 
I imagine the KS is not actually for funding, but to prove that there is market interest.

Yeah, I can guarantee the game is going to cost a LOT more than $2,000,000 to make, so there's got to be some Sony support going on as well I think.
 
I may be late to this thread, but if Sony said they would match whatever money the fans raised, that may have been better. It allows fans to ultimately get the game they want, and Sony looks good from a PR standpoint
 
Brings the guy on stage for show off to announce a kickstarter campaign. And not only that, they force the game to have its exclusive debut on their console. What if you fund the game and you own a PS3,too bad, not only you need to fund the game but also you need to purchase a PS4, what a joke.

There is so much stupid in this post that I hope this is a form of Satire or some sort of twisted joke.
 
I'm pretty sure Sony is putting money into this project. I mean, developing games ain't cheap, and a game like shenmue, wooohoohooo nnnope, no way its cheap. Its like some people have some common sense horse blinders and see this and think that shenmue is actually going to be done with only a 2 million budget.

Cmon people yeh got brainz, use em'
 
Top Bottom