walking fiend
Member
OP is full of win; definitely the best comic-book film I have ever seen, and I have seen A LOT of them. Probably helps that the comic itself is not just your teenage shit.
Wait, I think we're singing of the same hymn sheet here because I don't disagree with any of this (although I would say Evey becomes something more than V ever could be, a creator). In fact, that's pretty much what I said in my previous post.
See? We're brain buddies!
I also kinda hoped this thread would be about War Zone
Best Movie Based in a Comic Universe: The Dark Knight
Best Comic Book Adaptation: A History of Violence
Best Superhero Movie: The Incredibles
I feel like The Rocketeer was really great. Was it?
but I think V for Vendetta is pretty rough, and silly in ways I don't think Moore was intending. It reads like it was written by a really young man who still believes in superficial anarchy as a valid political force, and as such, even when it has some strong points to make, it comes off kind of hollow and dumb.
The adaptation streamlines a LOT of that, and jettisons a fair amount of the early 80s silliness, and it improves the story overall, even if it reframes the thematic point of the novel..
Not even one mention? COME ON.
It's even funnier when you know that Guy Fawkes wanted to turn England into a quasi-fascist religious dictatorship.I feel like V for Vendetta is the perfect example of a great film rendered unwatchable by its' own fanbase. On it's own, it's fine - but when the Guy Fawkes mask became a thing, the whole film kind of just becomes even more political than it needs to be. It goes from exaggerated social commentary (which it is good at) to literal social commentary (which it is not very good at).
And even so fails to make a valid point. Like said, V goes as a hero (or anti-hero) something that he should not be IMO.
ITT: Opinions.
V for Vendetta is, however, a really good movie. One in which I believe the film does the source material better than the source material. A lot of comics fans sort of instinctively recoil at that, but I think V for Vendetta is pretty rough, and silly in ways I don't think Moore was intending. It reads like it was written by a really young man who still believes in superficial anarchy as a valid political force, and as such, even when it has some strong points to make, it comes off kind of hollow and dumb.
Despite that, though, the book is a considerably more nuanced story than the Wachowskis'. Like Viewtiful said, the movie was really just a dumb and vapid kneejerk response to the Bush administration and a not-so-subtle endorsement of 9/11 truthers. The comic doesn't offer any easy answers to its political framework while the movie offers an extremely easy answer to its story.
There's also a great 'How did this get made' episode about the movie. (with the director as guest)Yo for real, that movie is a ton of fun. A must for action movie junkies.
Fantastic action choreography with a more military style and really brutal violence. If you get the DVD, some damn good commentary about being a female action director and making it on the cheap.
This was a fun movie.
Persepolis.jpg
Runners up: The Adventures of Tintin, Oldboy, and Ghost World.
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, right?
It was. I love that movie.
This was a fun movie.
the original TMNT was surprisingly dark considering it was being made off the popularity of the cartoon/toys rather than the original comics.To the ones saying TMNT: yes, the movies are faithful to the animated series, but not to the darker original comics.
I thought this was gonna be about A History of Violence
It's an adaptation of a comic.
Scott Pilgrim and Ghost World are right up there for "best Comic Book Movie," as well. Ghost World also improved on Clowes' book, much in the same way the Wachowskis made V for Vendetta a better story overall.
edit: There's "Akira," to consider, as well.
No. It was boring. I also didn't enjoy the graphic novel that much.
American Splender would probably be my pick for best comic book movie. I never got around to Ghost World.