It's not only Japan that has a population problem. Or maybe it's not even a problem, maybe it's good that their population is decreasing. Maybe automation will cover for the lack of young workforce.
Most countries in Europe have women who give birth to less than 2.1 babies on average. That's means most of Europe is decreasing in population, if it wasn't for the mass immigration from countries where the birth rate is very high - mainly North Africa and Middle East.
Our capitalist society is made on the premise of constant growth. Which means more and more people generationg more and more produce. Even China is semi capitalist. But what happens in the end, when there simply are too many people? And what's going to be done about it?
Some people say we need to be more effective, but effectiveness can only take you so far. There's a limit to that. Others say that the richer the countries become, the less children will be born. And going by numbers, this is true. People in rich countries care more about education and career than family. It's easy to see this because first time mothers become older and older. People want to have a stable life first, then they start a family. But many women also discover their biological clock, and that it's getting increasingly difficult to get pregnant after you're 35.
Maybe people have a subconcious sense that the earth is overpopulated, and therefore the instinct to have children is weakened? Or maybe, in strive for constant development, humans have become so advanced that our modern lifestyle has become so demanding that people simply don't have either time nor energy to start a family. People say this is the reason why so many Japanese are uninterested in sexual relationships. They have no energy or time left after all work.
As more and more people are lifted out of poverty due to development, will the earth's population start to fall? And if that happens, will capitalism be destroyed? Or will it simply invent a way to make up for less workforce? What do you think? Will human population shrink naturally, or will force be needed (like 1 child policy and such)?
Most countries in Europe have women who give birth to less than 2.1 babies on average. That's means most of Europe is decreasing in population, if it wasn't for the mass immigration from countries where the birth rate is very high - mainly North Africa and Middle East.
Our capitalist society is made on the premise of constant growth. Which means more and more people generationg more and more produce. Even China is semi capitalist. But what happens in the end, when there simply are too many people? And what's going to be done about it?
Some people say we need to be more effective, but effectiveness can only take you so far. There's a limit to that. Others say that the richer the countries become, the less children will be born. And going by numbers, this is true. People in rich countries care more about education and career than family. It's easy to see this because first time mothers become older and older. People want to have a stable life first, then they start a family. But many women also discover their biological clock, and that it's getting increasingly difficult to get pregnant after you're 35.
Maybe people have a subconcious sense that the earth is overpopulated, and therefore the instinct to have children is weakened? Or maybe, in strive for constant development, humans have become so advanced that our modern lifestyle has become so demanding that people simply don't have either time nor energy to start a family. People say this is the reason why so many Japanese are uninterested in sexual relationships. They have no energy or time left after all work.
As more and more people are lifted out of poverty due to development, will the earth's population start to fall? And if that happens, will capitalism be destroyed? Or will it simply invent a way to make up for less workforce? What do you think? Will human population shrink naturally, or will force be needed (like 1 child policy and such)?
Last edited:
