Martinski43
Member
Best X-men movie and best CBM movie since TDK so... yeah.
Xmen and X2 are good too but Logan is TDK tier.
Xmen and X2 are good too but Logan is TDK tier.
Best X-men movie and best CBM movie since TDK so... yeah.
Xmen and X2 are good too but Logan is TDK tier.
Yeah, it really is forced nonsense to make a sad story about Logan. It's pulled off effectively, but it's a kick in the face to people who are invested in the universe.
OP's reaction kinda reminds me of a Chrono Trigger fan when they first play Chrono Cross. Great game for sure. Just be ready for some bullshit lol.
That's really stretching it. Logan isn't the best cbm to come out this year.
Gotta agree. It's in my top 3 superhero films for sure.Best X-men movie and best CBM movie since TDK so... yeah.
Xmen and X2 are good too but Logan is TDK tier.
It was made to mimick​ the gritty Western tone of movies like Unforgiven...I'm not opposed to Wolverine movies being super violent, I just feel like they saw how successful Deadpool was and went a little too crazy with the whole 'claws in faces' thing.
You have bad taste.
Honestly, I wouldn't call the violence gratuitous. The way violence is presented couldn't be further from Deadpool. Yes, there's blood and gore, but it's always presented in a gritty matter-of-fact "yes, this is what six foot-long super-blades moving at the speed of punches would do" fashion, but the movie rarely lingers on the gore. It was actually much less gory than I was expecting after reading reviews.I'm not opposed to Wolverine movies being super violent, I just feel like they saw how successful Deadpool was and went a little too crazy with the whole 'claws in faces' thing.
Honestly, I wouldn't call the violence gratuitous. The way violence is presented couldn't be further from Deadpool. Yes, there's blood and gore, but it's always presented in a gritty matter-of-fact "yes, this is what six foot-long super-blades moving at the speed of punches would do" fashion, but the movie rarely lingers on the gore. It was actually much less gory than I was expecting after reading reviews.
Was mainly talking in regards to the claws in face commentsnot even the scene where kids are killing adult men in the most graphically fucked up way possible? that part felt forced and kind of made me care less about these children
I'm glad it has nothing to do with Singer-verse
Because Deadpool and Logan are my recent favorite Fox Marvel
This isn't set after DOFP. Exposition within the movie makes this a certainty, the only movie that you can really assume happens is X1.It just seemed really shitty to go from such a positive hopeful ending of a brand new better future in end of DOFP to this shit.
I mean, I don't actually think this is anywhere near true.Yup. The OP is why I hate comic book fans who get so obsessed with plots and continuity and connecting everything while never stopping to actually appreciate a movie.
Yup. The OP is why I hate comic book fans who get so obsessed with plots and continuity and connecting everything while never stopping to actually appreciate a movie.The movie is great because it doesn't give a shit about you or your precious canon. Best comic book movie since The Dark Knight, easily.
Was mainly talking in regards to the claws in face comments
The stuff with the kids felt different from the way Logan's fighting was portrayed. Which is understandable; they were fueled by revenge, rage and anger on being experimented on, forced to fight each other, and treated as products rather than people
So yeah, those gruesome kills made sense for the kids, and I wouldn't really call them gratuitous, just realistic. Logan was just killing people to finish them as fast as possible. The kids were partially getting revenge on their tormentors as well as escaping, thus the more explicitly brutal deaths that didn't sugarcoat what powers would actually do to a person if used lethally
This isn't set after DOFP. Exposition within the movie makes this a certainty, the only movie that you can really assume happens is X1.
Yeah, it really is forced nonsense to make a sad story about Logan. It's pulled off effectively, but it's a kick in the face to people who are invested in the universe.
OP's reaction kinda reminds me of a Chrono Trigger fan when they first play Chrono Cross. Great game for sure. Just be ready for some bullshit lol.
Well, its not impossible but it makes the timeline of escalation quite tight.Wha?
Sauce.Hugh Jackman said:When you see the full movie youll understand. Not only is it different in terms of timeline and tone, its a slightly different universe. Its actually a different paradigm and that will become clear.
Its a stand alone movie in many ways. Its not really beholden to time lines and story lines in the other movies. Obviously, Patrick Stewart was in there so we have some crossover but it feels very different and very fresh. [Following the timelines] becomes a chess game that you try to serve, which actually doesnt help to tell a story and its sort of been a bit all over the place. Im not critical of it X-Men was the first movie really in comic book [form]. No one thought thered be another [with] different directors different off shoots.
Best X-men movie and best CBM movie since TDK so... yeah.
Xmen and X2 are good too but Logan is TDK tier.
Have you ever read X-Men comics? They don't tend to have happy futures. Wolverines entire life is depressing.
Well, its not impossible but it makes the timeline of escalation quite tight.
Hugh is clearly talking about Logan's reliance on the other movies. It stands on its own without any need to see the previous films. Its setting's themes and tone are unlike any of the previous films.Well, its not impossible but it makes the timeline of escalation quite tight.
Sauce.
There are mentions in the film to X1 and XMO: Wolverine.
They say that no 'new mutants' had been born in 20 years which is forgivable in terms of timeline, given that we don't see any 'new' mutants in X3.
You can take it in continuity if you like but the X-Men movies don't really give a shit about continuity which just allows you to assume - at face value - what's what.
For me, I think its a stretch to imagine that there've been no 'new mutants' for 20 years, DOFP is 6 years before so there should be no child under the age of 14 that has 'mutant powers' and yet at the end of DOFP Xavier is running a functioning school.
I mean, I'm not going to watch the ending scenes and presume the age of every child because I honestly can't be bothered and I don't care that much.
Hope I cleared some things up.
we should depict mean shit because it exists? im not sure what your point is
The comics can be stupid sometimes. Even soap operas, some of which have lasted as long as comics, have happy story arcs once in a while.This. I thought the whole selling point of the X-Men is that mankind hates them 24/7.
Name a X-Men story line with a happy ending for mutants.... ok thank you, there isn't one.
Perhaps but its clear that the X-Men franchise isn't logically consistent as a single universe anyway so its easy enough to just assume certain things aren't.I think he's talking about the feel and setting of the movie, compared to other X-Men films, and the fact that it's not a direct sequel to anything. Not that it's literally in its own Earth-2 or whatever. He sounds like he's using "timeline" and "universe" pretty loosely.
Yeah, I get this which is exactly why I pointed out that they make reference to X-Men 1 in my very first post (and the second too).As for DoFP, that movie literally was a different timeline. The Sentinel filled future is changed when Wolverine is sent back in time 50 years to 1973. Everything after that is reset. Apocalypse is set in the 80s. Dark Phoenix is likely set in the 80s as well because of the age of the cast members returning. The actions taken in those movies lead to a climate that will prevent the future seen in DoFP. In the movie Logan, Charles and Logan mention the Statue of Liberty, which was the location of the first movie's climax, so that was an event that occurred despite of the timeline changes.
Logan is set so far in the future from the new timeline for a couple reasons. It removes itself from the immediacy of any loose threads from the rest of the series, and it features pessimistic political commentary on current state of affairs in the US.
Hugh Jackman and James Mangold confirms that Hugh's quotes in that interview were taken out of context, and that the film is definitely set in the "Happy Ending DOFP timeline". It wasn't an ambiguous matter where the film-makers were concerned.
X-24 worked well for the film and I'm not sure what you mean by "goofy kid scientist" scenes. This feels like film critique by way of CinemaSins.But how do you apologize for x-24, and the goofy kid scientist scenes?
Metal Gear Solid 1 did the super baby method better.
And the after-credits scene for Apocalypse references the company in this movie.
Perhaps but its clear that the X-Men franchise isn't logically consistent as a single universe anyway so its easy enough to just assume certain things aren't.
source?Hugh Jackman and James Mangold confirms that Hugh's quotes in that interview were taken out of context, and that the film is definitely set in the "Happy Ending DOFP timeline". It wasn't an ambiguous matter where the film-makers were concerned.
X-24 worked well for the film and I'm not sure what you mean by "goofy kid scientist" scenes. This feels like film critique by way of CinemaSins.