viciouskillersquirrel
Member
A short exchange in the Matrix anniversary thread about the lack of brown people in Lord of the Rings reminded me of a rather long, but very interesting article I came across* on the conservative politics of LotR:
http://dir.salon.com/story/ent/feature/2002/12/17/tolkien_brin/print.html
I won't quote the whole thing here, since it is quite long, but the main thrust of the article is that Tolkien's work is infused with a very reactionary sentiment: "Things will never be as good as they were in the good old days."
Add to this the fact that only Numeronians of "pure blood" ever got speaking roles in the books and that the only people of any colour throughout the hexology were in Sauron's camp, you get a vision of a very post-colonial conservative British mindset, personified in many ways in the hobbits of the Shire and their way of life.
What do you guys think? Was Tolkien racist (even unintentionally)? Do people read too much into these things?
*
http://dir.salon.com/story/ent/feature/2002/12/17/tolkien_brin/print.html
I won't quote the whole thing here, since it is quite long, but the main thrust of the article is that Tolkien's work is infused with a very reactionary sentiment: "Things will never be as good as they were in the good old days."
Add to this the fact that only Numeronians of "pure blood" ever got speaking roles in the books and that the only people of any colour throughout the hexology were in Sauron's camp, you get a vision of a very post-colonial conservative British mindset, personified in many ways in the hobbits of the Shire and their way of life.
What do you guys think? Was Tolkien racist (even unintentionally)? Do people read too much into these things?
*
While trying to find something else about the MASSIVE, anonymous peasant underclass the World of LotR would need to be populated with to provide food for all these manly warriors.