Lord of the Rings - Do you think it's racist?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Count of Monte Sawed-Off said:
This is the correct answer. The Lord of the Ring's was Tolkien's attempt to create a mythology for Britain. Since that mythology would be centered around the people who lived in that take on Britain it only makes since that the characters would be white. Although I guess he could have added a Tolkien
heh heh
black character if he really wanted to, but that wasn't in the story he was trying to tell.

The fact that all of the main cast is White is not the concern, it's his portrayal of the "enemy" ("The Orcs are stated to be curruption of the human form seen in Elves an Men. They are squat, broad, flat-nosed, sallow skinned, with wide mouths and slant eyes;in fact, degraded and repulsive versions of the least lovely Mongol types") and the war between them that raises questions.
 
viciouskillersquirrel said:
That's the best part :D

Whether you agree with the article I linked to or not, it raises some great points (perhaps less about Tolkien and more about the black/white (lawful good/chaotic evil) tropes in fiction and mythology in general) and one I found really intriguing was this passage:

I severly doubt Lord of the Rings has an unreliable narrator. One of many reasons being that LotRs has an omniscient narrator in the 3rd person.

Yeah, pretty much. People aren't always internally consistent. It's easy to be consciously anti-racist but subconsciously harbour racist attitudes, benign or no (think Obama's grandma getting nervous around young black men who weren't her grandson). In Tolkien's case, I imagine him believing in the inherent humanity and rights of every person regardless of skin colour, but having an attitude of British culture being more advanced, civilised, just, gentle or what-have-you than most or all the others.

It's not much of a stretch to imagine this, given his background and the way he waxes nostalgic about the Shire.

Using that logic you can accuse anyone and everyone of "subconsciously harbouring racist attitudes". So unless you can prove this is true of Tolkein specifically your entire argument is rather pointless.
 
Artadius said:
You know, you could just read the book and enjoy it for what it is.

Exchange book with movie / show / game.

Or you could both question the motives and enjoy the literature.
 
harSon said:
Or you could both question the motives and enjoy the literature.

None of us have that kind of time. Our movie / show / book / game backlogs continue to grow every day. Well, mine at least.
 
grandjedi6 said:
I severly doubt Lord of the Rings has an unreliable narrator. One of many reasons being that LotRs has an omniscient narrator in the 3rd person.
I wasn't saying that it does. In that passage, the author is talking more about the absolute good/evil dynamic inherent in romantic stories than LotR specifically.

grandjedi6 said:
Using that logic you can accuse anyone and everyone of "subconsciously harbouring racist attitudes". So unless you can prove this is true of Tolkein specifically your entire argument is rather pointless.
I can't prove anything and in truth, I wasn't trying to - it's a work of fiction. It'd be as though I wanted to prove that the Amtrak Wars series was fascist. Some might think it is, some might not. I just wanted to know what people thought about this.
 
harSon said:
Or you could both question the motives and enjoy the literature.

QFT. I find a lot of enjoyment out of most forms of entertainment when it's discussed afterwards, especially when it's something worth dissecting.

As for LOTR, I've always picked up the light/dark theme in the basic good/evil sense, and nothing more. But I can see why people get all up in arms about it. They can go read the Earthsea books, which I actually prefer more.
 
harSon said:
There's certainly some validity to the statement but I honestly can't be bothered with some thinly veiled racism from a novel written in the early to mid 1900s. While unfortunate, I've come to expect a lot of things from that era to be overly racist. It is what it is.

In a nutshell, this.

It changes over time. Until then...
 
It's honestly kind of misfortunate that the black color is so associated with evil and bad stuff. I do believe that in LOTR, the enemies are all in black and dark colors because in our culture to this day dark and black equals evil more so than any other color. In LOTR, things are very simple in that sense. Evil is evil, good is good, very little gray area there, the differentiation is simple and strong, and signified with the most obvious color choices.

Why is dark = evil in our culture, I won't pretend to know, but it wouldn't surprise me if it has nothing to do with racism and everything to do with innate fear of shadows and sounds during the night, a time of day where people, and especially kids, would always feel more scared and vulnerable.
 
VeritasVierge said:
I consider it like Gone With The Wind. It's just a reflection of the time when it was written. Same with alot of comic books that were started back in the 50s and 60s. So many main characters were exclusively white to the point the media is now trying more to diversify major comic book characters by changing their race.

/thread

This man speaks wisdom.
 
Passively racist at most, he was creating a alternate mythology for Britain, a man of his time simply wouldn't think anything else but British=White, there was no maliciousness behind it.
 
Well, if there's reincarnation; maybe I'll come back and a perpetually whingeing person of color to bitch about whitey.

In the meantime I'm going to enjoy the epic tales of badasses being badasses and what not.

I say instead of focusing on bitching about whitey, do something about putting your own culture, folktales, and cool shit out there for my consumption. I'm game for anything involving hordes of people clobbering each other. See also my raging hard-on for R3K stuff.
 
If it's anything it's undertones, and not blatant racism. You can take it however you like really, it's up to the reader.
 
Whoa, whoa... everyone is so worried about the missing "brown people" in Middle Earth. What about the missing Asians?

mamacint said:
Passively racist at most, he was creating a alternate mythology for Britain, a man of his time simply wouldn't think anything else but British=White, there was no maliciousness behind it.

That's pretty much it in a nutshell.
 
harSon said:
The fact that all of the main cast is White is not the concern, it's his portrayal of the "enemy" ("The Orcs are stated to be curruption of the human form seen in Elves an Men. They are squat, broad, flat-nosed, sallow skinned, with wide mouths and slant eyes;in fact, degraded and repulsive versions of the least lovely Mongol types") and the war between them that raises questions.

Don't read racism into the 'Mongol types' quote. It's just another way of saying "Orcs. They're gross. Think, like, messed-up versions of the ugliest Chinese dudes you've ever seen." He's not commenting on the appearance or character of 'Mongol types' in general - just saying that the Orcs look like a degraded version of their least attractive people.

And seriously, Sauron, Saruman and the Orcs/Goblins/Uruks are the main bad guys; all utterly free of racial allegory. The Oriental pirates, elephant-riding Africans and scimitar-wielding Arabs are just exotic mercenaries from far off lands who are fighting for the bad guy. He could just as easily have used a battalion of evil ninjas, and most of us wouldn't have read a commentary on the whole Japanese nation into their actions. But a group of demonic black-skinned men going to war on elephants is apparently representative of the entire population of Africa, and Tolkien's literary treatment of them ought to be viewed as indicative of his racial biases...
 
The Take Out Bandit said:
Well, if there's reincarnation; maybe I'll come back and a perpetually whingeing person of color to bitch about whitey.

In the meantime I'm going to enjoy the epic tales of badasses being badasses and what not.

I say instead of focusing on bitching about whitey, do something about putting your own culture, folktales, and cool shit out there for my consumption. I'm game for anything involving hordes of people clobbering each other. See also my raging hard-on for R3K stuff.

Hmm, so anyone thinking that there are racist undertones in LOTR must be a "person of color perpetually whining and bitching about whitey".

I didn't really get that from reading this thread, but I'm glad we have you to come into it and explain it for us

... my man.
 
so if a bunch of aliens, came, invaded, and when some people call them "the enemy" or "the grays" will people be up in arms "OMG YOU ARE TEH RACIST, YOU ONLY SEE THE COLOR OF TEH SKIN!"

grow up people, it needed an enemy, and the same it could have been from the depths of hell or from the mud that man was made by the bible.


IT'S A STORY PEOPLE, LET IT GO.
 
Yeah, it's obvious that hobbits are meant as a black stereotype. I mean, the man looks down on them, they spend all their time drinking and smoking ganga, they're clearly drawn to bling, and they get all the shit jobs nobody else wants.
 
viciouskillersquirrel said:
A short exchange in the Matrix anniversary thread about the lack of brown people in Lord of the Rings reminded me of a rather long, but very interesting article I came across* on the conservative politics of LotR:

http://dir.salon.com/story/ent/feature/2002/12/17/tolkien_brin/print.html

I won't quote the whole thing here, since it is quite long, but the main thrust of the article is that Tolkien's work is infused with a very reactionary sentiment: "Things will never be as good as they were in the good old days."
Eh. He modeled it after other older myths, (Greek myths for example reference a series of different ages, and an age that has dragons etc storming around and guys hurling thunderbolts and driving the sun around would at the very least seem a bit more exciting than modern mundanity.) and he centered it around England, which didn't have the most diverse population around the time he was basing the story.
 
Aaron said:
Yeah, it's obvious that hobbits are meant as a black stereotype. I mean, the man looks down on them, they spend all their time drinking and smoking ganga, they're clearly drawn to bling, and they get all the shit jobs nobody else wants.

wow :lol
 
Aaron said:
Yeah, it's obvious that hobbits are meant as a black stereotype. I mean, the man looks down on them, they spend all their time drinking and smoking ganga, they're clearly drawn to bling, and they get all the shit jobs nobody else wants.

And yet the Hobbits simplistic worldview and purity proved to be the only way to overcome evil.
 
I have read the LOR 5 (or maybe 6 times) and whether you like it or not, yes, it is racist.

There are also other major problems with the way the author sees color and race ("dark" people coming from "south" the only Sauron's allies among men), blood and nobility (kings healing people because they are "king", people should be king by the right of lineage even if they have not demonstrated -any- leadership quality whatsoever, etc..), women (don't even get me started there..), love (ditto), etc. I was always wondering where he gets this bullshit from and years later I learned that he was also very religious.

But he is also a great writer. I read LOR several times because the way "the black riders chasing hobbits (when they just left their home)" creeps me out every time I read that part or how I can feel the thirst and hunger of Frodo and Sam near the end. But man do I hate the boring parts. do I ever..
 
Artadius said:
None of us have that kind of time. Our movie / show / book / game backlogs continue to grow every day. Well, mine at least.

This whole premise could be shit or not, but if your backlog is supposedly keeping you from critical thinking skills perhaps you should...allow yourself more room?
 
Gadfly said:
....blood and nobility (kings healing people because they are "king", people should be king by the right of lineage even if they have not demonstrated -any- leadership quality whatsoever, etc..)

I don't think that royalty and the divine right to rule are things that are too out of place. He is constructing a fictional medieval world.

women (don't even get me started there..)
Eowyn.

I will agree that I did not like how Arwen was treated as a prize in the books, and disappointingly after what happened in Fellowship, in the movies as well.

love (ditto), etc.

One does not read LOTR for the romantic aspects, although the tale of Beren and Luthien is full of all sorts of win.
 
Yes. The original LOTR is racist. Then again, it's fiction. So it's fictional racism. So you have nothing to worry about.
 
Short answer: no.

Long answer: Yes, there IS racism in the LOTR, but if anything, it's a criticism of it. Look how every race in the mythology fucked up by hating each other and go for autarcy.
In the end, it's the union between races that eventually allows them to kick Sauron's ass.
Now yes, colored folks were on Sauron's side. That's more of a geographical thing than race IMO. If anything, it might be an allegory for good west vs evil east. I mean, Tolkien did serve in the army during WW2 (when he started to write the LotR).
Tolkien blatantly condemned nationalism, nazis and apartheid. Seeing racism in the LotR is stretching it a LOT.
Every so called 'superior race" eventually destroyed itself. Fanatic elves, numenoreans, dwarves from the Moria.

viciouskillersquirrel said:
Add to this the fact that only Numeronians of "pure blood" ever got speaking roles in the books and that the only people of any colour throughout the hexology were in Sauron's camp, you get a vision of a very post-colonial conservative British mindset, personified in many ways in the hobbits of the Shire and their way of life.

Have you read the Silmarillion?
As I said, the so called "superior human race" (which was half human half elvish btw) fucked up big time and fell for Sauron's manipulations.
 
xDangerboy said:
I would like to think it was unintentional. But regardless, whether or not it is true doesn't change the quality of the book.
when you say quality, you're talking about its lack of right?

i read LotR about 3 times in my younger years... but as I've got older and my tastes matured i absolutely can't stand to read it anymore. it's just not very good.

as for the racist issue... i always got that impression, but I was never sure if I was seeing something that wasn't really there.

RedShift said:
What I want to know is how a medieval setting had access to PO-TA-TOES.
did we invent potatoes only recently?
 
RedShift said:
What I want to know is how a medieval setting had access to PO-TA-TOES.
neorej said:
Potatoes came to Europe from the Americas. So in medieval times, we had no taters. We had beer. No taters.
Of course, they also had no Halflings, no Elves, no Dwarves, and no Ents, no magic rings, and no Mordor. Middle Earth is not Europe.

On the other hand, if 'we' includes the peoples of the Americas, then 'we' did have potatoes!
 
idahoblue said:
Of course, they also had no Halflings, no Elves, no Dwarves, and no Ents, no magic rings, and no Mordor. Middle Earth is not Europe.

On the other hand, if 'we' includes the peoples of the Americas, then 'we' did have potatoes!

Have you ever been to old European cities? They got doors that are about 2,5 feet in height. Damn straight we got Dwarfs and Halflings! And with the shitloads of woods we had back then, I'm pretty damn sure we had a few elventribes as well.
 
So there are magical rings, balrogs, and all that shit, and people discuss the fact that they're eating potatoes and that shouldn't be possible? wtf.
 
Aaron said:
Yeah, it's obvious that hobbits are meant as a black stereotype. I mean, the man looks down on them, they spend all their time drinking and smoking ganga, they're clearly drawn to bling, and they get all the shit jobs nobody else wants.
:lol This made me laugh until I choked on my tea. Thanks.
 
neorej said:
Have you ever been to old European cities? They got doors that are about 2,5 feet in height. Damn straight we got Dwarfs and Halflings! And with the shitloads of woods we had back then, I'm pretty damn sure we had a few elventribes as well.
LOL, I am happy to be corrected on the historical existence of Dwarves and Halflings and Elves!
 
Raist said:
So there are magical rings, balrogs, and all that shit, and people discuss the fact that they're eating potatoes and that shouldn't be possible? wtf.

This thread started about a piece of fiction being racist or not. Whether or not potatoes should've been in Middle Earth is a logical next step.
 
neorej said:
Potatoes came to Europe from the Americas. So in medieval times, we had no taters. We had beer. No taters.
uhm... so you're applying OUR history to a fictional universe?

...

:P
 
No. I mean, you could try to inject some racial themes into it if you wanted to, but even the notion that the forces of evil include those with darker complexions is kind of tied to the fact that "every else" other than the England analog is supposed to have already fallen to Sauron... and, as you may have noticed, white people aren't the norm over the globe.

harSon said:
The fact that all of the main cast is White is not the concern, it's his portrayal of the "enemy" ("The Orcs are stated to be curruption of the human form seen in Elves an Men. They are squat, broad, flat-nosed, sallow skinned, with wide mouths and slant eyes;in fact, degraded and repulsive versions of the least lovely Mongol types") and the war between them that raises questions.
I somehow think Tolkien would regret this comment if he were around today. I know there is a lot of discussion back and forth about it, but it's worth pointing out that it isn't in The Lord of the Rings. Therefore, it's not part of the work, and thus from a strictly literal point of view, it doesn't matter. (See modern/post modern/"new rhetoric" folks).

It doesn't excuse it, mind you, but Tolkien's many other writings and public statements seem to clearly point to him -not- being a racist, and strongly rejecting all the "racial theories" that were so popular before WWII.

Scrow said:
when you say quality, you're talking about its lack of right?
i read LotR about 3 times in my younger years... but as I've got older and my tastes matured i absolutely can't stand to read it anymore. it's just not very good.
Scrow, I know this is about tastes, and we all have different tastes, but I must ask ... why do you feel it is "not very good"?
 
iamblades said:
You have to understand that LOTR was intended to be a replacement mythology for the English, and not a commentary or allegory intended for contemporary situations.

/thread
 
DavidDayton said:
Scrow, I know this is about tastes, and we all have different tastes, but I must ask ... why do you feel it is "not very good"?
it plods on in excessive detail to the point of boredom.

also, the characters aren't very interesting. they're very two dimensional.

honestly, i think books like SoIaF have spoilt the LotR experience for me now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom