KO Traveling Hobo
Member
That article reminds me of that Three Little Pigs book that was told from the Wolf's perspective. :lol
Count of Monte Sawed-Off said:This is the correct answer. The Lord of the Ring's was Tolkien's attempt to create a mythology for Britain. Since that mythology would be centered around the people who lived in that take on Britain it only makes since that the characters would be white. Although I guess he could have added a Tolkienblack character if he really wanted to, but that wasn't in the story he was trying to tell.heh heh
viciouskillersquirrel said:That's the best part
Whether you agree with the article I linked to or not, it raises some great points (perhaps less about Tolkien and more about the black/white (lawful good/chaotic evil) tropes in fiction and mythology in general) and one I found really intriguing was this passage:
Yeah, pretty much. People aren't always internally consistent. It's easy to be consciously anti-racist but subconsciously harbour racist attitudes, benign or no (think Obama's grandma getting nervous around young black men who weren't her grandson). In Tolkien's case, I imagine him believing in the inherent humanity and rights of every person regardless of skin colour, but having an attitude of British culture being more advanced, civilised, just, gentle or what-have-you than most or all the others.
It's not much of a stretch to imagine this, given his background and the way he waxes nostalgic about the Shire.
Artadius said:You know, you could just read the book and enjoy it for what it is.
Exchange book with movie / show / game.
harSon said:Or you could both question the motives and enjoy the literature.
I wasn't saying that it does. In that passage, the author is talking more about the absolute good/evil dynamic inherent in romantic stories than LotR specifically.grandjedi6 said:I severly doubt Lord of the Rings has an unreliable narrator. One of many reasons being that LotRs has an omniscient narrator in the 3rd person.
I can't prove anything and in truth, I wasn't trying to - it's a work of fiction. It'd be as though I wanted to prove that the Amtrak Wars series was fascist. Some might think it is, some might not. I just wanted to know what people thought about this.grandjedi6 said:Using that logic you can accuse anyone and everyone of "subconsciously harbouring racist attitudes". So unless you can prove this is true of Tolkein specifically your entire argument is rather pointless.
whoa now let's not get crazy with this whole "thinking" businessharSon said:Or you could both question the motives and enjoy the literature.
:lolfistfulofmetal said:As a full blooded Urukai, I find the representation of my kind in the movie insulting.
:Oetiolate said:I am openly racist toward undead armies.
harSon said:Or you could both question the motives and enjoy the literature.
harSon said:There's certainly some validity to the statement but I honestly can't be bothered with some thinly veiled racism from a novel written in the early to mid 1900s. While unfortunate, I've come to expect a lot of things from that era to be overly racist. It is what it is.
VeritasVierge said:I consider it like Gone With The Wind. It's just a reflection of the time when it was written. Same with alot of comic books that were started back in the 50s and 60s. So many main characters were exclusively white to the point the media is now trying more to diversify major comic book characters by changing their race.
Woman, you mean.Mashing said:/thread
This man speaks wisdom.
mamacint said:Passively racist at most, he was creating a alternate mythology for Britain, a man of his time simply wouldn't think anything else but British=White, there was no maliciousness behind it.
harSon said:The fact that all of the main cast is White is not the concern, it's his portrayal of the "enemy" ("The Orcs are stated to be curruption of the human form seen in Elves an Men. They are squat, broad, flat-nosed, sallow skinned, with wide mouths and slant eyes;in fact, degraded and repulsive versions of the least lovely Mongol types") and the war between them that raises questions.
The Take Out Bandit said:Well, if there's reincarnation; maybe I'll come back and a perpetually whingeing person of color to bitch about whitey.
In the meantime I'm going to enjoy the epic tales of badasses being badasses and what not.
I say instead of focusing on bitching about whitey, do something about putting your own culture, folktales, and cool shit out there for my consumption. I'm game for anything involving hordes of people clobbering each other. See also my raging hard-on for R3K stuff.
Eh. He modeled it after other older myths, (Greek myths for example reference a series of different ages, and an age that has dragons etc storming around and guys hurling thunderbolts and driving the sun around would at the very least seem a bit more exciting than modern mundanity.) and he centered it around England, which didn't have the most diverse population around the time he was basing the story.viciouskillersquirrel said:A short exchange in the Matrix anniversary thread about the lack of brown people in Lord of the Rings reminded me of a rather long, but very interesting article I came across* on the conservative politics of LotR:
http://dir.salon.com/story/ent/feature/2002/12/17/tolkien_brin/print.html
I won't quote the whole thing here, since it is quite long, but the main thrust of the article is that Tolkien's work is infused with a very reactionary sentiment: "Things will never be as good as they were in the good old days."
Aaron said:Yeah, it's obvious that hobbits are meant as a black stereotype. I mean, the man looks down on them, they spend all their time drinking and smoking ganga, they're clearly drawn to bling, and they get all the shit jobs nobody else wants.
Aaron said:Yeah, it's obvious that hobbits are meant as a black stereotype. I mean, the man looks down on them, they spend all their time drinking and smoking ganga, they're clearly drawn to bling, and they get all the shit jobs nobody else wants.
Artadius said:None of us have that kind of time. Our movie / show / book / game backlogs continue to grow every day. Well, mine at least.
Gadfly said:....blood and nobility (kings healing people because they are "king", people should be king by the right of lineage even if they have not demonstrated -any- leadership quality whatsoever, etc..)
Eowyn.women (don't even get me started there..)
love (ditto), etc.
Are you saying black people are simple?TheHeretic said:And yet the Hobbits simplistic worldview and purity proved to be the only way to overcome evil.
viciouskillersquirrel said:Add to this the fact that only Numeronians of "pure blood" ever got speaking roles in the books and that the only people of any colour throughout the hexology were in Sauron's camp, you get a vision of a very post-colonial conservative British mindset, personified in many ways in the hobbits of the Shire and their way of life.
when you say quality, you're talking about its lack of right?xDangerboy said:I would like to think it was unintentional. But regardless, whether or not it is true doesn't change the quality of the book.
did we invent potatoes only recently?RedShift said:What I want to know is how a medieval setting had access to PO-TA-TOES.
Scrow said:did we invent potatoes only recently?
RedShift said:What I want to know is how a medieval setting had access to PO-TA-TOES.
Of course, they also had no Halflings, no Elves, no Dwarves, and no Ents, no magic rings, and no Mordor. Middle Earth is not Europe.neorej said:Potatoes came to Europe from the Americas. So in medieval times, we had no taters. We had beer. No taters.
idahoblue said:Of course, they also had no Halflings, no Elves, no Dwarves, and no Ents, no magic rings, and no Mordor. Middle Earth is not Europe.
On the other hand, if 'we' includes the peoples of the Americas, then 'we' did have potatoes!
:lol This made me laugh until I choked on my tea. Thanks.Aaron said:Yeah, it's obvious that hobbits are meant as a black stereotype. I mean, the man looks down on them, they spend all their time drinking and smoking ganga, they're clearly drawn to bling, and they get all the shit jobs nobody else wants.
LOL, I am happy to be corrected on the historical existence of Dwarves and Halflings and Elves!neorej said:Have you ever been to old European cities? They got doors that are about 2,5 feet in height. Damn straight we got Dwarfs and Halflings! And with the shitloads of woods we had back then, I'm pretty damn sure we had a few elventribes as well.
Raist said:So there are magical rings, balrogs, and all that shit, and people discuss the fact that they're eating potatoes and that shouldn't be possible? wtf.
uhm... so you're applying OUR history to a fictional universe?neorej said:Potatoes came to Europe from the Americas. So in medieval times, we had no taters. We had beer. No taters.
I somehow think Tolkien would regret this comment if he were around today. I know there is a lot of discussion back and forth about it, but it's worth pointing out that it isn't in The Lord of the Rings. Therefore, it's not part of the work, and thus from a strictly literal point of view, it doesn't matter. (See modern/post modern/"new rhetoric" folks).harSon said:The fact that all of the main cast is White is not the concern, it's his portrayal of the "enemy" ("The Orcs are stated to be curruption of the human form seen in Elves an Men. They are squat, broad, flat-nosed, sallow skinned, with wide mouths and slant eyes;in fact, degraded and repulsive versions of the least lovely Mongol types") and the war between them that raises questions.
Scrow, I know this is about tastes, and we all have different tastes, but I must ask ... why do you feel it is "not very good"?Scrow said:when you say quality, you're talking about its lack of right?
i read LotR about 3 times in my younger years... but as I've got older and my tastes matured i absolutely can't stand to read it anymore. it's just not very good.
iamblades said:You have to understand that LOTR was intended to be a replacement mythology for the English, and not a commentary or allegory intended for contemporary situations.
it plods on in excessive detail to the point of boredom.DavidDayton said:Scrow, I know this is about tastes, and we all have different tastes, but I must ask ... why do you feel it is "not very good"?