LOST 06.17/18/18.5: "The End" (Everything Else Was Just Progress)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Meier said:
That's the thing. These crazy curveballs they were throwing were eventually supposed to get hit out of the park into Answer Cove. The theory culture existed because there was an expectation people might eventually be proven right.
The producers from Season 1 told the audience not to expect every question answered. It was never their intention to answer every scientific or theological question the show posed. That would be impossible. They focused on the characters, like they always had. It was LOST through and through, and if you expected more than you are only fooling yourself.
 
Jackson said:
Lost is just a remake of the tv show Cheers

Island = Bar
815/Others = Patrons
Jack = Sam
Kate = That annoying chick
Sawyer = Woody

Ending: The bar closes up, but all those great times we had will live on forever = Everyone dies and goes to heaven.
:lol haha right you could put this ending with any tv show in history. Hey we all lived for five season full of wacky hijinks in apartment 201 in santa monica. we all moved on with our lives but we die and meet here again and get a connection and Jack, Chrissy,Janet,Larry, the ropers, and mr.furley all move on together to whatever is next.But we will never explain why Chrissy never came back.Terri you stay outside.
 
Deadly said:
I wished that Jack would have got the chance to tell Locke something like "You were right" or "I believe you now" and see Locke give a smile. Damn that would have been awesome closure to the real Locke.

I think it was not needed.

When Jack and Locke embraced each other, all they felt was love for each other. The was no need for anyone to apologize.


-------------fan fiction---------------

And then Jack and Locke have sex.

/------------fan fiction---------------
 
Finally chiming in here, but I thought the finale' was amazing. I honestly thought I was going to be very upset at how things ended on the island. I didn't know how they were actually going to resolve everything. I will definitely be buying the Blu-ray for this season day one. Especially since some of the answers everyone is looking for are supposed to be on there. My favorite parts of the finale':

- Mine actually started during the recap before the show. I remembered how crazy it was when Charlie died, as well as when Sawyer was trying to hold onto Juliette and how he said he wouldn't let her go. Combine that with the part at the vending machine in the hospital, yeah.. That was sad.

- Jack going down the cliff after MiB.. That whole scene was awesome.

- The scene when Jack fixed Locke in the flash sideways.. Powerful scene when Locke was talking to him.

- The scene with Ben and Hugo on the island when Ben became his #2.

- Scene in flash sideways where Ben and Locke made amends.. Honestly one of the best moments in the show for me.

- And I really thought that the last few seconds, Vincent coming out of the forest and Jack dying looking up in the bamboo forest at the plane flying overhead... Just perfect for me.
 
pxleyes said:
The producers from Season 1 told the audience not to expect every question answered. It was never their intention to answer every scientific or theological question the show posed. That would be impossible. They focused on the characters, like they always had. It was LOST through and through, and if you expected more than you are only fooling yourself.

That's right. Submit because they told you to.
 
RubxQub said:
I re-baselined my expectations, and enjoyed the shit out of the show I love.

I don't feel cheated by what was given to me, and I accept that we'll never know the answer to all those questions this show created. Others aren't so willing to accept that, and I get it.

I'm much more adaptable to change than most.


Nothing about the way the show wrapped is going to change the ride I enjoyed throughout the entire series or will stop me from rewatching the show a thousand times over before I die.

Oh please, lets not get an ego trip here. It seems you are just willing to apologize more for a series you like than others.
 
Why didn't Mr. Eko come back?

It's one of the most asked questions about Lost's final season. After all, everyone else returned! So what gives?

Sources tell me exclusively:

Lost's Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje--who played the iconic Mr. Eko--was offered a guest spot in last night's Lost series finale, but he...wait for it...turned it down.

According to ABC and Lost insiders, Adewale was offered a hearty sum to do one scene in the last hurrah, but the actor wanted five times the amount that was offered. It didn't work out.

http://lostmediamentions.blogspot.com/2010/05/eko-turned-down-finale-guest-spot.html
 
I cant believe it but im so perfectly content with lost, never thought it could do that to me but i could leave it now and consider it one of the best shows ive ever seen, hands down, no if's or but's about it. Best.Finale.Ever.
 
CrankyJay said:
That's right. Submit because they told you to.
I cant help it if you create your own expectations. Don't create these arbitrary rules for yourself when watching the show and you'll enjoy it a hell of a lot more.
 
VistraNorrez said:
They were different in the flashsideways, most of them just had to make one more change to let go. Their development in the flashsideways was incredibly important to their characters. I don't believe it was purgatory like a lot of people, just another plane of existence crucial in their development.



They aren't and weren't. Most of the mysteries were explained, just not all the mysteries were important. The character stuff was more important and that's just how the show worked. The writers have been very upfront about this for a long time.

It's not a cop out, it's the way they chose to tell the story. Which is legitimate. If you don't like that, then that's fine. But don't fault the show for something it isn't. Just say you don't like the show and let go.
Sorry but what you say sounds hugely revisionist. ABC marketed this season saying it would reveal all answers, so how could that show have nothing to do about mystery and be all about characters?
 
Well.... I have to say that I am feeling pretty satisfied with the way everything turned out. I really feel like certain peoples obsession with getting answers was killing all of the fun. I am a Heroes fan so if you want to see some bad character development with a sci-fi slant look no further. All in all it was a very good finale.
 
bill0527 said:
I must be the only person that thought his first theory made sense.

When Rose tells Jack twice that he can let go now, is when he starts his purgatory, or his journey to his final destination.

You are not alone...I like that theory/ending better than the nonsensical collective bubble universe where Locke cares little for Helen in the end that everyone else seems to believe.
 
http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/wat...26_losts_mr_eko_turned_down_finale_guest.html

Sources tell me exclusively:

Lost's Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje--who played the iconic Mr. Eko--was offered a guest spot in last night's Lost series finale, but he...wait for it...turned it down.

According to ABC and Lost insiders, Adewale was offered a hearty sum to do one scene in the last hurrah, but the actor wanted five times the amount that was offered. It didn't work out.

:lol :lol :lol

What a fucking ass.
 
gdt5016 said:
I think it was not needed.

When Jack and Locke embraced each other, all they felt was love for each other. The was no need for anyone to apologize.
Not as an apology but more like a "told you so" moment :lol But yeah, not saying it was necessary, it just would've been even more awesome.
 
Well, the ending has been discussed from every possible angle, positive and negative. So I'll say this....

I've watched this series from day 1. While I came for the intrigue of the island and its mysteries, I stayed for the characters in which I bonded with. I knew when it ended last night that some would love it, some would hate it. I'm not religious in the least bit, but I absolutely loved it.

Are there a ton of loose strings? Absolutely. But Im not bothered by that. If some questions got answered, great. If not, thats fine too, as long as what I got was what I really needed from the finale.... closer for all the characters that I have followed and been attached to for 6 years. I thought that was achieved. To think that a show that for 6 seasons gave you 1 answer for every 5 questions, that was completely about the mystery would be handing out definite answers for everything would be foolish. For me, this episode was the best of the series, and while I completely can see why those who are disappointed in the lack of answers to some of the bigger questions went unanswered, I thought the episode was masterful (as IGN put it) and was a perfect way to close the book on an incredible journey.
 
silentspork said:
I hope you aren't trying to inspire some insightful debate by calling people that liked the finale apologists.
Oh I loved the finale, I think it's perfect as an ending. But I think it's absurd to now say that this show was only character driven when it wasn't. You simply can't hide the plot holes that way.
 
Interfectum said:
Oh please, lets not get an ego trip here. It seems you are just willing to apologize more for a series you like than others.

Or you could not apologize for the show and just interpret what was actually shown. It's possible to be satisfied that way as well.

I think it's fine for people to have their own opinions and reactions, but to claim that the show needs to be apologized for is way off base. There are answers and resolution right there in the text of the series. It's fine to not be satisfied with them, but they were dutifully laid out. There was, naturally, stuff they didn't answer for any multitude of reasons, but as far as the point of the show, of the characters' arcs, of the overarching plot of six seasons; everything was resolved.
 
Fine, it's decided then. Every single television show from here on out will end with all of the main characters hugging and smiling in place of wrapping up a coherent storyline and we'll all be okay with it! Yay! :lol
 
bill0527 said:
Things we learned today.

I also learned that Mr. Eko wanted 5 times the amount he was being offered to show up at the finale. He also wanted out after his first season on the island. Sounds like the whole thing was a miserable experience for him.

Thats sad to read.

A memorable character, would have been great to see him in the finale and more seasons.
 
NinjaCodah said:
Oh I loved the finale, I think it's perfect as an ending. But I think it's absurd to now say that this show was only character driven when it wasn't. You simply can't hide the plot holes that way.
The creators never claimed it was anything more than a character drama. How forgetful some people are.
 
Goddamn i am so happy im not like some people in this thread :lol :lol must be an awful feeling to watch a show for 6 seasons and feel cheated. Luckily im not :D :D :D
 
NinjaCodah said:
Sorry but what you say sounds hugely revisionist. ABC marketed this season saying it would reveal all answers, so how could that show have nothing to do about mystery and be all about characters?

Blame ABC's marketing team then.

They did answer a lot, though. Whether they answered it to an extent you are satisfied with is one thing, but you can't say that you don't have a better understanding of the island and everything on it than you did before this season started.
 
CrankyJay said:
Fine, it's decided then. Every single television show from here on out will end with all of the main characters hugging and smiling in place of wrapping up a coherent storyline and we'll all be okay with it! Yay! :lol

How was a coherent storyline not resolved? I hear a lot of this going around and yet not one person has refuted my repeated summation and explanation of it.
 
Its not like they answered nothing, they've actually answered quite a bit throughout the series. They didn't answer all the stuff I expected them to answer in the last season, but I'm honestly not to beat up about it, I don't know if that makes me an apologist but I'm very satisfied with the ending to this show.

I don't necessarily agree that it was solely a character drama, though. The characters were the main point, yes, but the writers wanted us to care about these mysteries. Hopefully the dvd extras they were talking about and the encyclopedia clear some more stuff up.
 
pxleyes said:
The creators never claimed it was anything more than a character drama. How forgetful some people are.
This season was marketed saying it would finally answer questions. That's the shtick of the show, what kept most people watching.
 
BenjaminBirdie said:
How was a coherent storyline not resolved? I hear a lot of this going around and yet not one person has refuted my repeated summation and explanation of it.
Don't tell him a show called LOST could end with the characters finding eachother, even in death. Shh, that's apparently cheap and unoriginal.
 
Interfectum said:
Oh please, lets not get an ego trip here. It seems you are just willing to apologize more for a series you like than others.
If that's what you want to call it, go for it.

All I know is that I'm on cloud 9 after last night and you're in the depths of hell. Surely we can agree I'm happier than you are, right?

...and who wouldn't want to be happy?

This show is over. It is what it is. You can sit there and seethe about how much it didn't make you happy, or you can just move on. I've already gone through my "this show isn't going to be about answers" disappointment and moved on well before last night.

I don't care that you're disappointed (I've already said I sympathize with what you and others are experiencing...I get it and get why), I care that you're saying my interpretation of the show is invalid because it doesn't jive with yours.

It's entirely possible for this show to be shitty to some and wonderful to others. I acknowledge both and just so happen to be on the wonderful side.
 
NinjaCodah said:
This season was marketed saying it would finally answer questions. That's the shtick of the show, what kept most people watching.
And it did. Go back look at what you knew going into Season 6. I'm sorry every hour wasn't a sit-down Q&A session.
 
sprsk said:
The whole series was complete gibberish. Confirmed by the cop-out ending.
I feel the same way. Although to be fair, I loved the first 5 seasons. However, Season 6 just felt rushed and underdeveloped.
 
BenjaminBirdie said:
How was a coherent storyline not resolved? I hear a lot of this going around and yet not one person has refuted my repeated summation and explanation of it.

Jut ignore the troll, you'll never convince them otherwise.
 
RubxQub said:
If that's what you want to call it, go for it.

All I know is that I'm on cloud 9 after last night and you're in the depths of hell. Surely we can agree I'm happier than you are, right?

...and who wouldn't want to be happy?

This show is over. It is what it is. You can sit there and seethe about how much it didn't make you happy, or you can just move on. I've already gone through my "this show isn't going to be about answers" disappointment and moved on well before last night.

I don't care that your disappointed (I've already said I sympathize with what you and others are experiencing...I get it and get why), I care that you're saying my interpretation of the show is invalid because it doesn't jive with yours.

It's entirely possible for this show to be shitty to some and wonderful to others. I acknowledge both and just so happen to be on the wonderful side.

Well put.
 
ostrichKing said:
Why was Helen not with Locke in the end?

Maybe she moved on already? Maybe Locke needed to move on with those people, but when they get where they are going, he will be with Helen again.

Like I said earlier, I think too much is being made of who was and who wasn't in the room. It clearly wasn't an exact science...based more on some sort of collective feeling.

Hurley and Bens conversation, to me, implied that they are still going to be chums, Ben simply needs more time. He also said that Ana-Lucia "isn't ready", implying that she will move on in her own time. Mrs. Hawking knows that Faraday is going to move on at some point as well.
 
BobFromPikeCreek said:
It'd have just been nice if things seemed even remotely planned.
How are any of those things important at all?

Security system - Rousseau was a nutter that was wrong. Mystery solved Scooby Doo.

Random killings - Who says they were random? You? Sounds to me like its just unexplained backstory. Do we really need a flashback to show MiB raging that Lapidus isnt on the plane and goes into a frenzy killing the Heroes guy? No we dont.

Mechanical sounds with Black Smoke - We dont know what becomes of the Island in the end. We know that Hurley and Ben protect it for sometime before they eventually die. How long is their reign? 5 years? 5000? Knowing what we know about the magic/EM and how it effects space/time heres a famous quote that i think sums it up: Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.

This is just my opinion but these things are not important enough to be answered because they have zero bearing on the story being told. Maybe when a show comes out during Hurleys time with the Island this will become pressing enough to be answered.
 
The Lost finale should be a viewing comprehension test for all TV critics. If you don't get that everything outside of the flash sideways scenes actually happened to these people -- before they died -- you're blacklisted, or (worse) condemned to watch and write only about NBC shows.
 
Hari Seldon said:
Anyone else find it really funny that the "Holy Grail" last supper chalice was a shitty plastic water bottle? :lol

It was an Oceanic bottle. Bringing things back to the pilot.
 
NinjaCodah said:
This season was marketed saying it would finally answer questions. That's the shtick of the show, what kept most people watching.
The ABC's marketing team and the people telling the story the way they want to are not the same people. Besides, they answered plenty of questions and left other answers implied with only a modicum of thought by the viewer.

If you want something that is only about the mysteries I would suggest sticking with playing something as vapid as Myst.
 
flyover said:
The Lost finale should be a viewing comprehension test for all TV critics. If you don't get that everything outside of the flash sideways scenes actually happened to these people -- before they died -- you're blacklisted, or (worse) condemned to watch and write only about NBC shows.

Truth.
 
The mystery was there to propel the characters, the characters were not there to propel the mysteries. The show would've failed very fast if the characterization was half-assed. And I do think the mysteries were half-assed at times, but that didn't ever damper my enthusiasm.

And yet they still serviced the mysteries. They answered lots of questions, and they mostly made sense.

I just find it bizarre that we reach the end of character arcs, plenty of us were crying and just feeling an incredible amount of emotions, yet the hurley bird or the outrigger are bothering people.

It just seems like priorities are out of wack when the concern is for peripheral information. Maybe that's a failure of no emotional attachment to the characters. I can understand that. I think a case could be made for not liking the characters. No one likes everyone. So the only thing one can look at is the mystery. And there is no way a mystery can satisfy everyone. We all have too different of ideas for success across the board. And so if you don't like the characters and don't like the mystery, then yes the show will fail.

But I think it's so valid when the emotion works for a viewer. I think emotion trumps just about anything else. It's what every single human can understand at an instinctual level. It doesn't need an answer. It just hits you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom