• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

LOST |OT|

Status
Not open for further replies.
Willy105 said:
It's stupid to put someone on ignore. It's the same as covering your eyes when someone comes into the room. Pretending it's not there doesn't make it go away.
Then you have no right to complain about a single Erigu post.
 
Qwomo said:
Then you have no right to complain about a single Erigu post.

I do that?

Wait, so if you don't ignore a problem, then that means you can't complain about it? Isn't that when you start complaining about it?
 
Willy105 said:
No, not them. They are terrible.
But so is...
Ah, well.

To get rid of the people in there.
Drastic.
Even if Jack and the others were still protected against him (and that's unclear, actually), why not try and exploit again that weird loophole that allowed him to kill some candidates in the submarine instead?
I mean, that plan to destroy the island assumes that:
1) unplugging the island would immediately void potentially inconvenient rules,
2) the candidates wouldn't find a way to avoid sinking with the island.
Plus, Mother said that fucking with the heart of the island would be a very bad idea.
But on the other hand, Widmore and Jacob did plan to send Desmond there as a last resort against the Man in Black, so... Wait, no, that also makes it sound like a terrible idea.
What the fuck, Smokey?


Qwomo said:
The fact that there are some people who don't have Erigu on ignore is quite odd.
You're doing it wrong.
 
Solo said:
I was always down on S5 and I've cooled off considerably on S6, but S1-S4 make the journey to the ultimately less than fulfilling destination more than worth it.

STILL the best of the best: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYfKHVdmjzQ

Terry O'Quinn *bow*
Damn you! Just watching the clip made me want to sit down and watch the series again. But I don't have the the time for that right now.

Man... the music in this show completely ruins me
 
BenjaminBirdie said:
You hate me a lot more than I hate you.
Dude. I don't hate you. I think you've been ridiculous in our little "debate", but that's about it.

When it comes to subjective entertainment, any party can decide what arguments are valid or not
Bollocks, naturally. For example, an inconsistent plot is an inconsistent plot is an inconsistent plot.
 
Erigu said:
Dude. I don't hate you. I think you've been ridiculous in our little "debate", but that's about it.


Bollocks, naturally. For example, an inconsistent plot is an inconsistent plot is an inconsistent plot.

Sure. But there's a fork in the path in the glen. You can either accept those inconsistencies and enjoy the show as entertainment, or expend all of your energy on that minutia and somehow convince yourself you don't hate the person you're yelling at.
 
BenjaminBirdie said:
You can either accept those inconsistencies and enjoy the show as entertainment, or expend all of your energy on that minutia
Entertainment doesn't have to be dumb as a doorknob, and I wouldn't consider, say, the characters' motivations "minutia".

and somehow convince yourself you don't hate the person you're yelling at.
Who said anything about yelling?
 
Erigu said:
Entertainment doesn't have to be dumb as a doorknob, and I wouldn't consider, say, the characters' motivations "minutia".


Who said anything about yelling?

Ha, okay.

I don't consider Lost to be dumb as a doorknob, or I would have stopped watching it. This is exactly my point. You say ridiculous shit like "dumb as a doorknob," de facto implying the same thing about anyone who enjoyed it, and wonder how one could describe that argumentation as yelling.

Whatever, man. That illustrates everything that is distasteful about the way you interact with people in this thread.
 
hhnghg4ex1.gif
 
I love that this thread is still going.

I love that people are still enjoying this show.

And I love that Erigu is as entertaining as ever.

Lost may have ended, but this thread keeps it alive on GAF.
 
BenjaminBirdie said:
You say ridiculous shit like "dumb as a doorknob," de facto implying the same thing about anyone who enjoyed it, and wonder how one could describe that argumentation as yelling.
People who write negative reviews are awful, awful human beings. And they're loud, too. How could they not be, when they explain themselves?
And professional critics? Man, they actually do that shit for money. Scum. All of them.
 
Since so many want to watch it all over again, why don't we plan a new re-watch, where we can go over each episode like a party like we used to do when the show was still going on?

It can help treat our withdrawal from Lost, and might even help Erigu enjoy it again before the we get into the later seasons.

It can even help new people get in, since the entire show is now available in many places, like Netflix.
 
Erigu said:
People who write negative reviews are awful, awful human beings. And they're loud, too. How could they not be, when they explain themselves?
And professional critics? Man, they actually do that shit for money. Scum. All of them.

"Dumb as a doorknob" is critical thinking?

Please.

Trying to pass off your inflammatory rhetoric as critical thought is ridiculous.
 
Erigu said:
Dude. I don't hate you. I think you've been ridiculous in our little "debate", but that's about it.


Bollocks, naturally. For example, an inconsistent plot is an inconsistent plot is an inconsistent plot.


this is what your argument boils down to? this?
 
Erigu said:
It's a conclusion. Did you miss the part where I explained myself?

"Entertainment doesn't need to be dumb as a doorknob."

Surely you don't need me to unpack this sentence semantically.

It's your conclusion, as you just said. What does your explanation matter?

"I think you're a dumbass. Here is why."
"Did you just call me a dumbass?"
"Yes, but you're not listening to my reasoning."

One of those people was me, one of those people was you.

In that scenario.
 
BenjaminBirdie said:
What does your explanation matter?
...
Eh?

So I argue that the show was dumb as a doorknob...
"You can't just say that! That's ridiculous! That's not critical thinking!"
Ah, but I explained why I think the show was dumb as a doorknob. At lengths.
"What does it matter?"
...
Er... "Good point"? Not sure what to tell you, there...
 
Erigu said:
...
Eh?

So I argue that the show was dumb as a doorknob...
"You can't just say that! That's ridiculous! That's not critical thinking!"
Ah, but I explained why I think the show was dumb as a doorknob. At lengths.
"What does it matter?"
...
Er... "Good point"? Not sure what to tell you, there...

It's subjective, and I don't agree with you. You could point out every inconsistency in the show ever (wait, you probably already have, I doubt there are any depths unplumbed), that doesn't make the show "dumb as a doorknob". Did the show have priorities out of line with your expectations? Sure. Go nuts.

A stupid show? Well that means that anyone who liked it turned their brains off. Are you really ready to make that objective proclamation?
 
BenjaminBirdie said:
It's subjective
What's subjective about the plot not making sense?

You could point out every inconsistency in the show ever (wait, you probably already have, I doubt there are any depths unplumbed)
I haven't exhausted my material yet, actually... And I'm fairly confident there's still more where it came from.
Man, if only we could convert inconsistencies and plot contrivances into pure energy...

A stupid show? Well that means that anyone who liked it turned their brains off. Are you really ready to make that objective proclamation?
As far as the story is concerned? Yup.
 
Erigu said:
What's subjective about the plot not making sense?


I haven't exhausted my material yet, actually... And I'm fairly confident there's still more where it came from.
Man, if only we could convert inconsistencies and plot contrivances into pure energy...


As far as the story is concerned? Yup.


the plot did make sense. you COULD argue that there a few problems here and there, nothing that stopped the final narrative from going forward and doing it well. so you'd be wrong.
 
evil solrac v3.0 said:
the plot did make sense. you COULD argue that there a few problems here and there, nothing that stopped the final narrative from going forward and doing it well. so you'd be wrong.

Exactly. I'm tagging you in and going over to the Breaking Bad thread.
 
evil solrac v3.0 said:
the plot did make sense. you COULD argue that there a few problems here and there, nothing that stopped the final narrative from going forward and doing it well.
Thing is, I disagree with absolutely everything you just said.
It's not "a few problems here and there". The plot made no sense on nearly every level.
 
Erigu said:
Thing is, I disagree with absolutely everything you just said.
It's not "a few problems here and there". The plot made no sense on nearly every level.

This is the problem, Erigu. We did not watch the same show.

We may have tuned in to the same channel at the same time, saw the same images, heard the same music and dialogue, but your experience was so remarkably different from so many others that it comes to show why this is a never-ending conversation between you and the world.
 
Erigu said:
Thing is, I disagree with absolutely everything you just said.
It's not "a few problems here and there". The plot made no sense on nearly every level.


are you sure you watched LOST? abc? Matthew Fox? party of five guy? grins a lot? shouts?
Terry O'quinn? great character actor? won an emmi or two? it was in an island?
 
Willy105 said:
This is the problem, Erigu. We did not watch the same show.
We did, but I could tell it was nonsense because I was paying attention.

For example, do you still think the Man in Black actually needed to destroy the island in order to escape? You were arguing that, not long ago...


evil solrac v3.0 said:
are you sure you watched LOST?
Are you sure you read my previous posts on the topic? I pointed out quite a few things...
 
SpeedingUptoStop said:
One year anniversary of Erigu attention whoring the Lost thread.
Not quite, but I imagine it feels longer when you don't have much to bring to the table...


evil solrac v3.0 said:
I did. it was non-sense.
Your turn to explain why it was nonsense, man.
 
Erigu said:
We did, but I could tell it was nonsense because I was paying attention.

Is that why the answers I give you are very simple and straight to he point, while you take them apart each word at a time, and give me a paragraph explaining why that is the wrong word, despite that word obviously being part of a larger sentence?

That's not paying attention. That's freeze framing to make sure which parts of Hawaii were digitally altered to make it look like an empty island.

For example, do you still think the Man in Black actually needed to destroy the island in order to escape? You were arguing that, not long ago...

Nope, and judging from the post you linked to me, neither did I a month ago.

Needing is not the same as wanting to. For example, he wants to go to Walmart, and took this certain street to get there. Asking why he didn't take another street is not a plot hole.
 
Willy105 said:
Is that why the answers I give you are very simple and straight to he point, while you take them apart each word at a time, and give me a paragraph explaining why that is the wrong word, despite that word obviously being part of a larger sentence?
Could you provide an example of me doing... whatever it is you claim I'm doing?

Nope, and judging from the post you linked to me, neither did I a month ago.
I dunno, it sure looked like it?
"The island held MiB, Jacob held the island. You get rid of Jacob, you can go ahead with getting rid of the island. You get rid of the island, he's free. That's it."
You're basically saying that step 1 is getting rid of Jacob, and step 2 getting rid of the island. Getting rid of the island isn't a luxury, in the scenario you're presenting.
 
Erigu said:
Could you provide an example of me doing... whatever it is you claim I'm doing?

Sure, right here:

"The island held MiB, Jacob held the island. You get rid of Jacob, you can go ahead with getting rid of the island."
Compare with this.

---
I dunno, it sure looked like it?
"The island held MiB, Jacob held the island. You get rid of Jacob, you can go ahead with getting rid of the island. You get rid of the island, he's free. That's it."
You're basically saying that step 1 is getting rid of Jacob, and step 2 getting rid of the island. Getting rid of the island isn't a luxury, in the scenario you're presenting.

Actually, that was the scenario you presented, remember? It was only a month ago.
 
Willy105 said:
Done. What's the problem? Please explain.

Actually, that was the scenario you presented, remember?
No, it was your scenario (I just quoted you, dude... some more: "The island was what kept him from getting out."... clear enough!). I was actually disagreeing with it.
I pointed out that the show never said anything about the Man in Black needing to destroy the island in order to escape (just that the candidates had to die), and that he didn't seem concerned about that at all until Widmore whispered in his ear.
It's all there.
 
The more I think about MiB/smokey, the less his actions make sense to me. They should've just left smokey as the mysterious island defense force and have it save the day in the end like the Jurassic Park T-Rex. Or something like that.
 
Erigu said:
Done. What's the problem? Please explain.

Same thing I said before. You took something very simple and inflated it until it lost the cohesiveness it had before.

He went to Walmart (Why did he go to Walmart? Why did he take that route? What did he go to buy? He didn't need to buy anything. Did he? Why didn't they tell us? Why is he going anywhere? How did he even get there? Where did he go? Who is he? This show sucks.)

Which is odd, since him going to Walmart wasn't the important part, it was the effect it had on the fridge.


No, it was your scenario (I just quoted you, dude... some more: "The island was what kept him from getting out."... clear enough!). I was actually disagreeing with it.
I pointed out that the show never said anything about the Man in Black needing to destroy the island in order to escape (just that the candidates had to die), and that he didn't seem concerned about that at all until Widmore whispered in his ear.
It's all there.

Oh OK, you are right, I think. You confused me for a moment.

So as it turns out the island was needed to be destroyed for him to get out, that's why he set out to destroy it. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
 
I think I have only rewatched one random episode of Lost since it finished. I never even rewatched the finale. I really did like it though. I miss the show. It was so fun to watch and so much fun to talk about with friends. One day I am going to rewatch it though. I am curious how I will feel about the sideways on a rewatch.
 
Willy105 said:
You took something very simple and inflated it until it lost the cohesiveness it had before.
Dude. I didn't change anything.

So as it turns out the island was needed to be destroyed for him to get out, that's why he set out to destroy it. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
Ah, so we do agree that's what you said and meant.

All right, then:
If the Man in Black needs to destroy the island in order to escape (your theory), what is Widmore so worried about?

Wasn't Jacob and Widmore's plan to have Desmond unplug the island in order to "de-power" the Man in Black?
If that's the source of the Man in Black's powers, doesn't that mean that destroying the island would turn him back into a mere mortal? If he needs to do that in order to escape, doesn't that mean that he can't escape with his powers?
In short, the threat level of an escaped Man in Black would barely reach "Pissed-Off 48-Year-Old Hobo" on a bad day. My money is on mankind surviving that one. And yet, Widmore talks about the End of Days. What gives?

"Ah, but you see, destroying the island would kill everything on the planet as a result! That's what Mother was warning the kids about, with the magical light and everything! The Man in Black would kill everybody indirectly, merely by escaping! See? It all makes sense!"
Nope, not quite. If that were the problem, why would Widmore discuss the safety of his daughter with the Man in Black? This exchange would make no sense:
MAN IN BLACK: Now, Charles, it's clear you're not afraid to die. So, there's only one way to motivate you to tell me what I want to know. Soon, this will all be over. I'll get what I want. And I'll finally leave this island. And when I do, the first thing I'm going to do is kill your daughter...Penny.
WIDMORE: You'll kill her whether I talk to you or not.
MAN IN BLACK: No, I won't. I give you my word.
WIDMORE: And I'm supposed to take your word?
MAN IN BLACK: You tell me why you came back here and I won't hurt your daughter.
WIDMORE: I brought Desmond Hume back here because of his unique resistance to electromagnetism. He was a measure of last resort.
... or should I say, it would make even less sense... 'Cause that whole sequence is still pretty damn bad even if the Man in Black doesn't need to destroy the island...

First off, what were Widmore, Zoe and the Man in Black doing there anyway? Widmore and Zoe acted like there was a reason (aside from the glass of tap water, I mean), but oh no! the Man in Black showed up before they could explain! Now, that's just bad luck. Just like when Tom was about to tell Jack how exactly the Swan explosion/implosion/whatever prevented the Others from sending Ben to a facility for his tumor but couldn't finish his sentence. It's not that the writers had no idea and were merely pretending there was a good reason (but you'll never know what it was)! Not at all!
So they just all show up in the same place and at the same time. Ah, but we don't want Miles and Richard to die, so they leave (why do Widmore and Zoe stay? because fuck you, they just do, okay?). No, wait: it's been a while since the Man in Black turned into the Smoke Monster so let's say Richard inexplicably decides to go talk to him. And then, he (somehow) survives the encounter and reunites with Miles ("somehow" still: Miles just wasn't in a hurry after all), so it makes no difference in the end.
That's not contrived.

And then...
"Am I supposed to take your word? Yes? Cool. Just checking. I'll just forget about you slicing my assistant's throat seconds ago simply because I asked her not to say anything. Oh, and that thing about you being THE DESTROYER OF WORLDS. Allow me to spill the beans regarding our secret last resort plan right away."
I mean, c'mon... Really, Widmore? Really? Weren't you supposed to be some kind of ruthless badass who plays by his own rules? And in just one episode, we learn that one talk with Jacob "made you see the error of your ways" (somehow, and whatever that entails: we'll never know the specifics, naturally), and now, one talk with the Man in Black, "Evil Incarnate" and all that jazz, and you just take his fucking word?
And then you're just shot by Ben because, well, turns out you weren't protected by magical rules after all. I just love how the audience is supposed to buy that those "rules" that appeared to prevent those two from killing each other were actually just a "gentleman's agreement". That doesn't sound like a shitty cop-out of a retcon at all. "Killing you would be unseemly... so I'll go after your daughter. Like a gentleman."
Damn, Widmore. Is that what your character amounted to, in the end? Good thing you weren't hyped as a major antagonist...

So Widmore is okay with spilling the beans to the Man in Black... but he'll just whisper because he doesn't want Ben to hear. "Evil Incarnate Dude? Sure, he can hear it. But Ben? No way! Can't let that happen!"
What's up with those weird priorities, Widmore? Just how many idiot balls did you ingest before coming to the island?
Of course, the real reason is that the writers want to keep that mystery intact for the next seaso... Er... Wait, no. There's just one episode left, so there's not much of a point, really. Hmm.
Could it be that the writers simply didn't know what to have Widmore say? I mean, how would you put it, exactly? It is quite troublesome to have Widmore explain Jacob's plan to dispose of the Man in Black and have the Man in Black go "hey, that sounds like a sweet plan! I guess I'll go ahead and do just that! what could possibly go wrong? oh, hi, Jack! what? you want to come, too? because you believe you could use Desmond against me? hahaha! silly Jack, why would you think that? I've never heard anything so stupid since, well, a couple of hours ago, in fact!" (and of course, later: "noooo! I'm mortal again! and completely shocked at this turn of events even if part of me feels I really shouldn't be!").


Aaaaaanyway...

Say, guys, why did Locke wait so long before attacking Widmore's camp? I mean, the fence apparently was an issue in "Recon", but not so much at the end of the season. What changed?
 
Erigu said:
Not quite, but I imagine it feels longer when you don't have much to bring to the table...



Your turn to explain why it was nonsense, man.


no, I won't.

Wasn't Jacob and Widmore's plan to have Desmond unplug the island in order to "de-power" the Man in Black?
If that's the source of the Man in Black's powers, doesn't that mean that destroying the island would turn him back into a mere mortal? If he needs to do that in order to escape, doesn't that mean that he can't escape with his powers?
In short, the threat level of an escaped Man in Black would barely reach "Pissed-Off 48-Year-Old Hobo" on a bad day. My money is on mankind surviving that one. And yet, Widmore talks about the End of Days. What gives?


the island needs to be plugged back in otherwise the world ends. if it's plugged back in mib gets his powers back and all hell breaks loose if he's out of the island. unplug the island, kill the man impersonating Locke, plug island back in, island and world saved. THE. END.
 
Erigu said:
Dude. I didn't change anything.

If you take something apart a sentence fragment at a time, it's going to change it's meaning, because it is no longer about the big picture.


Ah, so we do agree that's what you said and meant.

All right, then:
If the Man in Black needs to destroy the island in order to escape (your theory), what is Widmore so worried about?

Wasn't Jacob and Widmore's plan to have Desmond unplug the island in order to "de-power" the Man in Black?
If that's the source of the Man in Black's powers, doesn't that mean that destroying the island would turn him back into a mere mortal? If he needs to do that in order to escape, doesn't that mean that he can't escape with his powers?
In short, the threat level of an escaped Man in Black would barely reach "Pissed-Off 48-Year-Old Hobo" on a bad day. My money is on mankind surviving that one. And yet, Widmore talks about the End of Days. What gives?

Well, who would know more about the Man in Black? The Man in Black, or outsiders? Even Richard, who has been in the island since forever, didn't know the whole picture, only the immediate next step in the hierarchy from him.

Taking everything at face value with researching into it, it would seem that they are simply carrying out a plan they hope will work, even if it may not for the reasons you theorized above. The characters would not know what we as a viewer know.

It's how we watch the good guys operate an attack on an enemy base, even though we know it's a trap. So we watch these guys just set themselves up, and by the end of the episode, the trap springs, and we have to wait till the next episode to see them get out.

Except in Lost, they skip that part to tell the rest of the story that is more interesting and have Giacchino play songs for us, which frankly, is a lot more pleasing than having to hear Widmore again.

"Ah, but you see, destroying the island would kill everything on the planet as a result! That's what Mother was warning the kids about, with the magical light and everything! The Man in Black would kill everybody indirectly, merely by escaping! See? It all makes sense!"
Nope, not quite. If that were the problem, why would Widmore discuss the safety of his daughter with the Man in Black? This exchange would make no sense:

... or should I say, it would make even less sense... 'Cause that whole sequence is still pretty damn bad even if the Man in Black doesn't need to destroy the island...

First off, what were Widmore, Zoe and the Man in Black doing there anyway? Widmore and Zoe acted like there was a reason (aside from the glass of tap water, I mean), but oh no! the Man in Black showed up before they could explain! Now, that's just bad luck. Just like when Tom was about to tell Jack how exactly the Swan explosion/implosion/whatever prevented the Others from sending Ben to a facility for his tumor but couldn't finish his sentence. It's not that the writers had no idea and were merely pretending there was a good reason (but you'll never know what it was)! Not at all!
So they just all show up in the same place and at the same time. Ah, but we don't want Miles and Richard to die, so they leave (why do Widmore and Zoe stay? because fuck you, they just do, okay?). No, wait: it's been a while since the Man in Black turned into the Smoke Monster so let's say Richard inexplicably decides to go talk to him. And then, he (somehow) survives the encounter and reunites with Miles ("somehow" still: Miles just wasn't in a hurry after all), so it makes no difference in the end.
That's not contrived.

And then...
"Am I supposed to take your word? Yes? Cool. Just checking. I'll just forget about you slicing my assistant's throat seconds ago simply because I asked her not to say anything. Oh, and that thing about you being THE DESTROYER OF WORLDS. Allow me to spill the beans regarding our secret last resort plan right away."
I mean, c'mon... Really, Widmore? Really? Weren't you supposed to be some kind of ruthless badass who plays by his own rules? And in just one episode, we learn that one talk with Jacob "made you see the error of your ways" (somehow, and whatever that entails: we'll never know the specifics, naturally), and now, one talk with the Man in Black, "Evil Incarnate" and all that jazz, and you just take his fucking word?
And then you're just shot by Ben because, well, turns out you weren't protected by magical rules after all. I just love how the audience is supposed to buy that those "rules" that appeared to prevent those two from killing each other were actually just a "gentleman's agreement". That doesn't sound like a shitty cop-out of a retcon at all. "Killing you would be unseemly... so I'll go after your daughter. Like a gentleman."
Damn, Widmore. Is that what your character amounted to, in the end? Good thing you weren't hyped as a major antagonist...

So Widmore is okay with spilling the beans to the Man in Black... but he'll just whisper because he doesn't want Ben to hear. "Evil Incarnate Dude? Sure, he can hear it. But Ben? No way! Can't let that happen!"
What's up with those weird priorities, Widmore? Just how many idiot balls did you ingest before coming to the island?
Of course, the real reason is that the writers want to keep that mystery intact for the next seaso... Er... Wait, no. There's just one episode left, so there's not much of a point, really. Hmm.
Could it be that the writers simply didn't know what to have Widmore say? I mean, how would you put it, exactly? It is quite troublesome to have Widmore explain Jacob's plan to dispose of the Man in Black and have the Man in Black go "hey, that sounds like a sweet plan! I guess I'll go ahead and do just that! what could possibly go wrong? oh, hi, Jack! what? you want to come, too? because you believe you could use Desmond against me? hahaha! silly Jack, why would you think that? I've never heard anything so stupid since, well, a couple of hours ago, in fact!" (and of course, later: "noooo! I'm mortal again! and completely shocked at this turn of events even if part of me feels I really shouldn't be!").

It's awesome how you play this all out in your head.


Aaaaaanyway...

Say, guys, why did Locke wait so long before attacking Widmore's camp? I mean, the fence apparently was an issue in "Recon", but not so much at the end of the season. What changed?

Ask Jim Galasso.
 
Walkabout is so monumentally overrated. It's a pretty good episode (if you completely forget everything that happens afterwards), but latching onto the 4th episode of the show as some signal of the shows overall quality is kind of hilarious. The staging of the "Don't tell me what i can't do!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" scene is so over the top and unintentionally funny.
 
Spotless Mind said:
Walkabout is so monumentally overrated. It's a pretty good episode (if you completely forget everything that happens afterwards), but latching onto the 4th episode of the show as some signal of the shows overall quality is kind of hilarious. The staging of the "Don't tell me what i can't do!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" scene is so over the top and unintentionally funny.

Walkabout is an absolute classic.

It was the one that sold the show on so many people.

Although later Seasons blew Season 1 away, Walkabout is still the "Statue of Liberty" of the show, showing people what they are in for when they go into the show.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom