• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

LOST |OT|

Status
Not open for further replies.
I still maintain that the monster was always down there, just chillin', and then when MiB fell down there it was all like, WTF. Jacob killed MiB when he slammed his skull into a fucking rock. There are no 'rules' just traditions that have been passed down so long that the islands inhabitants think they're true; Jacob and the Man in Black could kill each other whenever they felt like it.
 
Drealmcc0y said:
So basically it (AGAIN) comes down to whether the writers knew what they were doing or not.
I'm not sure how you managed to bold that sentence and still come to that conclusion.
 
Red UFO said:
I still maintain that the monster was always down there, just chillin', and then when MiB fell down there it was all like, WTF. Jacob killed MiB when he slammed his skull into a fucking rock. There are no 'rules' just traditions that have been passed down so long that the islands inhabitants think they're true; Jacob and the Man in Black could kill each other whenever they felt like it.

This is why getting definitive answers is a bad thing.

Using the information we were given, you came to your own conclusion that works best for you.

I have my own answers that I love. I see some people have their own answers and I disagree with them, but I wouldnt tell them they were wrong.
 
Red UFO said:
There are no 'rules' just traditions that have been passed down so long that the islands inhabitants think they're true; Jacob and the Man in Black could kill each other whenever they felt like it.
Wouldn't that make the whole show even dumber than it already is?


Drealmcc0y said:
I didnt bold anything
My bad: it was bolded in the original post already, indeed.
So the question now becomes "how did you manage to miss it?"

Using the information we were given, you came to your own conclusion that works best for you.
I have my own answers that I love. I see some people have their own answers and I disagree with them, but I wouldnt tell them they were wrong.
Why not, when said answers make no sense?
Or does it not matter?
 
Erigu said:
Wouldn't that make the whole show even dumber than it already is?



My bad: it was bolded in the original post already, indeed.
So the question now becomes "how did you manage to miss it?"


Why not, when said answers make no sense?
Or does it not matter?

It makes sense to me, and thats all that matters
 
Drealmcc0y said:
It makes sense to me, and thats all that matters
Does that mean you give up on arguing it makes sense here? After all, if all that matters is that it makes sense to you, that means you're simply not open to discussion, right?
As long as we're clear.


Red UFO said:
I dunno, maybe
Probably, even, yeah.
If there were no rules preventing the Man in Black from killing his brother, why didn't he do just that? He had thousands of years and magical smoke powers. Why did he try and manipulate other people to do the deed for him?

who cares apart from you really though?
Well, if you don't think it matters whether or not the story makes sense, you can just say so, indeed.
Here again: as long as we're clear.


Willy105 said:
This show is so awesome. Three thousand three hundred and fifty eight posts and counting.
Yup, that's how quality is measured, indeed.
 
404Ender said:
Awesome-ness doesn't need to be a measure of quality.
And the awesomeness of the show (rather than its quality) being directly proportional to the number of posts in this topic makes much more sense, indeed.
Thank you, 404Ender. I would have missed the true wisdom of Willy105's words, if it hadn't been for you.
 
Erigu said:
And the awesomeness of the show (rather than its quality) being directly proportional to the number of posts in this topic makes much more sense, indeed.
Thank you, 404Ender. I would have missed the true wisdom of Willy105's words, if it hadn't been for you.

You'll notice that crappy shows get fewer posts.

It's all relative.
 
Currently watching season 1 "Homecoming". Episode about Charlie stealing from girl to support heroine addiction.

Ive seen the episode at least 4 times and I just caught "The Office" reference.

When the girl invites hime in for "tea", he asks her where her father is and she responds "I think he's buying some paper company up in Slough."

Awesome.
 
Red UFO said:
I still maintain that the monster was always down there, just chillin', and then when MiB fell down there it was all like, WTF. Jacob killed MiB when he slammed his skull into a fucking rock. There are no 'rules' just traditions that have been passed down so long that the islands inhabitants think they're true; Jacob and the Man in Black could kill each other whenever they felt like it.
Erigu was right, though. This interpretation of the "The Rules" doesn't really add up at all. It'd just make everything on the show even more meaningless.

I know Jacob and his brother are severely retarded, but even I would give them more credit than that.
 
Catalix said:
Erigu was right, though. This interpretation of the "The Rules" doesn't really add up at all. It'd just make everything on the show even more meaningless.

I know Jacob and his brother are severely retarded, but even I would give them more credit than that.

Its meaningless to you, but he likes it, so let him have it.
 
uh dude... no one's stopping him from concocting his own theories about the show (however faulty they may be).
 
I think that them misunderstanding some age-old traditions and believing them to be actual rules makes a lot more sense than a woman saying 'you cannot hurt each other, I made it so'
 
Red UFO said:
I think that them misunderstanding some age-old traditions and believing them to be actual rules makes a lot more sense than a woman saying 'you cannot hurt each other, I made it so'
I think the power of the island manifesting in making these beliefs true. They believed they couldn't kill each other, so they couldn't. Simple as that.

If we can't believe the island has the power to do something like that then how do we explain Locke being able to walk and Rose being cured of cancer?
 
Red UFO said:
I think that them misunderstanding some age-old traditions and believing them to be actual rules makes a lot more sense than a woman saying 'you cannot hurt each other, I made it so'
I certainly wouldn't argue that Mommy being able to make up rules just like that makes sense (why not make it a rule that nobody can approach the Heart of the Island, while you're at it?). But that obviously is what the the writers had in mind. Mother saying that was they (crappy) justification for all the drama.

And again, if there were no rules in the first place, that means... what? They heard their adoptive mother say that they couldn't hurt each other, pretty much immediately proceeded to hurt each other, and then all of a sudden decided "oh shit! that was a rule, and it (obviously!) means we're not physically capable of killing one another!"? That makes sense? And the Man in Black then spent centuries plotting his brother's death without even trying to simply kill him?

Show's bad enough as it is, really...
 
I love it when a show keeps it characters and improves them, im so sick of shows having a different bad guy/new guy for one season and then cast them away.

I cant believe Benjamin Linus sticked in the show so long, i really liked that guy.
 
Erigu said:
I certainly wouldn't argue that Mommy being able to make up rules just like that makes sense (why not make it a rule that nobody can approach the Heart of the Island, while you're at it?). But that obviously is what the the writers had in mind. Mother saying that was they (crappy) justification for all the drama.

And again, if there were no rules in the first place, that means... what? They heard their adoptive mother say that they couldn't hurt each other, pretty much immediately proceeded to hurt each other, and then all of a sudden decided "oh shit! that was a rule, and it (obviously!) means we're not physically capable of killing one another!"? That makes sense? And the Man in Black then spent centuries plotting his brother's death without even trying to simply kill him?

Show's bad enough as it is, really...

Makes just as much sense as it would if they physically couldn't hurt each other.

I should clarify that I do dearly love LOST, but you really can't say that the plot isn't a mess by the end of it.
 
Red UFO said:
Makes just as much sense as it would if they physically couldn't hurt each other.
It's bad either way, sure... You'd have to accept the idea that the Man in Black really wasn't trying very hard to escape though, and, dramatically speaking, I'd sooner be willing to believe (read: "fanwank") that the protectors of the island were restricted in terms of what rules they could establish...

And the show isn't exactly subtle about the "rule" thingy: "hey, maybe one day you'll get to make up your own rules! *wink wink wink*"... To believe that they just thought they couldn't hurt each other, I'd also have to ignore all that heavy-handed "there you go, now stop asking!" stuff. I'd argue that makes it even more of a stretch.

Ah, well. It's probably not really worth it debating which is more nonsensical anyway.
 
Raiden said:
I love it when a show keeps it characters and improves them, im so sick of shows having a different bad guy/new guy for one season and then cast them away.

I cant believe Benjamin Linus sticked in the show so long, i really liked that guy.
It seems LOST had the best of both worlds. We had overarching antagonists like Ben and Widmore that we could watch evolve (or regress) over an extended period of time. But it's nice that we got our fair share of unapologetic one-off villains, like Ethan, Mikhail, or Keamy and the mercenaries. Those dudes were a lot of fun to watch as well, for the short time they appeared.
 
Erigu said:
It's bad either way, sure... You'd have to accept the idea that the Man in Black really wasn't trying very hard to escape though, and, dramatically speaking, I'd sooner be willing to believe (read: "fanwank") that the protectors of the island were restricted in terms of what rules they could establish...

And the show isn't exactly subtle about the "rule" thingy: "hey, maybe one day you'll get to make up your own rules! *wink wink wink*"... To believe that they just thought they couldn't hurt each other, I'd also have to ignore all that heavy-handed "there you go, now stop asking!" stuff. I'd argue that makes it even more of a stretch.

Ah, well. It's probably not really worth it debating which is more nonsensical anyway.

Maybe he is right. Ben did just shoot Widmore in the face despite them both thinking the rules prevented them from kill each other.
 
Red UFO said:
Makes just as much sense as it would if they physically couldn't hurt each other.

I should clarify that I do dearly love LOST, but you really can't say that the plot isn't a mess by the end of it.
I get what you were going for, and it probably could've fit, but we have seen Jacob's rules physically enforced on a few occasions. Like Michael not being able to die or Jack and the dynamite stick. So it doesn't seem like the rules are just all "in their heads."

Now how the Island protectors are able to create or enforce The Rules is another story. I doubt it matters anyway...

And yeah, I'm right there with you on that last part. Few shows manage to peirce my heart as much as LOST does, but oh man, much of the mythology ends up being sloppy as hell.

bachikarn said:
Maybe he is right. Ben did just shoot Widmore in the face despite them both thinking the rules prevented them from kill each other.
It's a shame we never found out what exactly Ben was referring to when he said "He changed he rules!" It might not even have anything to do with Jacob's brand of super-duper, reality-altering powers. It could have just been a good old fashioned gentlemanly agreement between him and Widmore. Like a "family members are off limits" type of deal.

But all I can do is speculate, the writers were extra vague about the specifics of the Ben-Widmore feud.
 
Catalix said:
But all I can do is speculate, the writers were extra vague about the specifics of the Ben-Widmore feud.

Which is unfortunate because I found that conflict much more compelling than the one between Jacob and MIB.
 
Catalix said:
it's nice that we got our fair share of unapologetic one-off villains, like Ethan, Mikhail, or Keamy and the mercenaries. Those dudes were a lot of fun to watch as well, for the short time they appeared.
Ethan: "OMG, he has superpowers! How did he manage to hang Charlie while he was being chased? And why did he do that, for that matter? He's like an insane supervillain!" -> Nah, he's just some regular guy.

Mikhael: "OMG, he's still alive after the fence! Wasn't his brain fried?!" -> Again, they're just regular guys. Lucky regular guys. The fence wasn't set to a lethal level, merely to "blood spurting from all orifices" (that's the level you use when you want to be almost safe from possible intruders). Good thing, too, because the plot really needed him. To die. Right after that.

Keamy: "... Just a regular guy, right?" -> Dude, no! He's got that convenient supernatural "cabin fever" (good guys are immune). That's probably why he came up with the worst insurance policy ever.
"If you kill me, you can kiss good-bye to... our... boat...? Wait a second."
It's like he tried really hard to emulate his favorite movie villains but fumbled on that one detail.

It's a shame we never found out what exactly Ben was referring to when he said "He changed he rules!"
... before rushing to that ancient monster summoning device.
Yeah, good luck making sense of all that.

It might not even have anything to do with Jacob's brand of super-duper, reality-altering powers. It could have just been a good old fashioned gentlemanly agreement between him and Widmore.
For Ben and Widmore, that appears to be the official explanation, yeah.

Like a "family members are off limits" type of deal.
"You killed my daughter, and that was against the rules, so now I get to kill yours! The rules have changed! ... Just not to the point where we can actually kill each other though. Not quite."
And that's how Ben could just leave unharmed. And kill a whole bunch of Widmore's men. And threaten his daughter's life. Like a gentleman.
There again, good luck making sense of that.
 
Erigu said:
Ethan: "OMG, he has superpowers! How did he manage to hang Charlie while he was being chased? And why did he do that, for that matter? He's like an insane supervillain!" -> Nah, he's just some regular guy.

Mikhael: "OMG, he's still alive after the fence! Wasn't his brain fried?!" -> Again, they're just regular guys. Lucky regular guys. The fence wasn't set to a lethal level, merely to "blood spurting from all orifices" (that's the level you use when you want to be almost safe from possible intruders). Good thing, too, because the plot really needed him. To die. Right after that.
Incredibly benign explanations for extraordinary occurrences sort of became LOST's m.o. over time. I guess the writers used that particualr storytelling technique as a get out of jail free card, when they felt certain elements were getting a little too crazy and needed to be scaled back a bit. Minor retcons (like the nature of Ethan and Mikhail's "abilities") didn't really bother me as much in the earlier seasons though, even when it caused a few plot-related inconsistencies. In those cases, I thought it was handled well enough.

... before rushing to that ancient monster summoning device.
Yeah, good luck making sense of all that.
But don't you get it? It was summoning HIM. Case closed.
I just kinda chuckle whenever I try to imagine the circumstances that would lead Ben into thinking the secret Egyptian toilet and The Smoke Monster were inextricably linked. I mean, what hoops did MiB have to go through in order to foster such an esoteric con?

oh wow, they even used the word "gentlemanly" :lol
 
Finished Deus Ex Machina just now and it got me thinking about the title of the episode and what it refers to in the episode.

The trebuchet Locke and Boone try to use to smash the glass on the hatch is similar to the cranes used to lower actors onto the stage that helped coin the phrase Deus Ex Machina. Just another one of those interesting Lost references.

Its clear that Mr Eko's brothers plane is the Deus Ex Machina. It opened up a number of new plotlines even if it didnt directly solve Lockes problem (opening the hatch). Since using this type of plot device can be considered "cheating" is the episode title a little wink and nod to the viewers?



I tried to see if this was discussed in the OT for this episode. Turns out there were only the 63 replies in the episode thread. Kind of funny considering what a great episode it was. Another great episode, The Variable, ended up with 1700+ replies. Funny to read these threads during a re-watch, lots of funny/insightful stuff.

As I'm rewatching the series on BluRay I have been taking screenshots of various scenes at 1080p. Anybody interested in me uploading and posting some links here?
 
MacAttack said:
Finished Deus Ex Machina just now and it got me thinking about the title of the episode and what it refers to in the episode.

The trebuchet Locke and Boone try to use to smash the glass on the hatch is similar to the cranes used to lower actors onto the stage that helped coin the phrase Deus Ex Machina. Just another one of those interesting Lost references.

Its clear that Mr Eko's brothers plane is the Deus Ex Machina. It opened up a number of new plotlines even if it didnt directly solve Lockes problem (opening the hatch). Since using this type of plot device can be considered "cheating" is the episode title a little wink and nod to the viewers?



I tried to see if this was discussed in the OT for this episode. Turns out there were only the 63 replies in the episode thread. Kind of funny considering what a great episode it was. Another great episode, The Variable, ended up with 1700+ replies. Funny to read these threads during a re-watch, lots of funny/insightful stuff.

As I'm rewatching the series on BluRay I have been taking screenshots of various scenes at 1080p. Anybody interested in me uploading and posting some links here?

I would like to see those pictures :)

I think the dream is from MiB.

He is testing Locke to see if he is the perfect candidate for manipulation.

He gives Locke a dream thinking that what lies in the plane is the key to getting into the hatch, but theres nothing in the plane but heroin and Boones death. What does Locke say as its revealed that his sign is faulty? "I dont understand.... I dont understand!" Remind you of anything?

I really like the speech at the beginning of the episode:

Locke: "Its a game, my favourite game actually, I used to play it with my brother, its called mousetrap"

Boy: "How do you play?"

Locke: "Well you start with all these parts off the board, then one by one, you build the trap. Shoe, bucket, tub, piece by piece it all comes together. Then you wait until your opponent lands on the old cheese wheel here and if you set it up just right, you spring the trap."

Godly
 
I'll still maintain that the show was far more interesting when the Island was a character. When the Island stopped being a character (as it was simply replaced by MiB + Jacob)...that's when everything went bad.
 
TheExodu5 said:
What? No. Season 6 is what made the Island an inanimate object. Prior to this, the Island had a will of its own.

What? The island was always just an island.

and in any case, Jacob and his influence were introduced as early as season 3.
 
BigNastyCurve said:
So basically it went bad after season 1...

The island was still a prominent character through Season 4, and even some of Season 5. It was at its best in Season 1, but it was still an important character until they say "no lol, it wasn't the island, silly, it was MiB and Jacob".

Blader5489 said:
What? The island was always just an island.

Absolutely not. Just watch some of the early interviews where they describe the creation of the show, and the idea of having the island as the main character.

The characters all referred to the Island as a living breathing thing with a will of its own. Even when Michael dies: "The island is done with you." (don't remember the exact phrasing)
 
TheExodu5 said:
The characters all referred to the Island as a living breathing thing with a will of its own. Even when Michael dies: "The island is done with you." (don't remember the exact phrasing)
You could say it was Jacob!
... So Jacob killed Ilana.
 
TheExodu5 said:
The island was still a prominent character through Season 4, and even some of Season 5. It was at its best in Season 1, but it was still an important character until they say "no lol, it wasn't the island, silly, it was MiB and Jacob".



Absolutely not. Just watch some of the early interviews where they describe the creation of the show, and the idea of having the island as the main character.

The characters all referred to the Island as a living breathing thing with a will of its own. Even when Michael dies: "The island is done with you." (don't remember the exact phrasing)

:lol

That doesn't mean the island is *literally* a character, like Jack or Locke. The island is a character in Lost in the same way that Baltimore is a character in The Wire: it's a setting that affects and is effected by characters, rather than being just a backdrop.

And the line when Michael died was, "You can go now, Michael."
 
Well Locke saying:

"The island brought us here" was just his perception.

He couldnt say "Jacob brought us here"

He had no idea who Jacob was, thats the only way he could make sense of it.

Besides the island is a character, its more than just an island.
 
Drealmcc0y said:
Well Locke saying [...]
Why stop there? There are many other examples, and the characters still talk like that in season 6 (again: Ilana's death).

Besides the island is a character, its more than just an island.
... I don't even know whose side you're on, there. Do you?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom