Angry Fork said:
I don't know if these are 100% the correct answers but i'll give my opinion on them.
Thanks. Should be more interesting than BenjaminBirdie amusingly sidestepping the whole thing (even when I narrow it down to one question? dude, come on!) and coming up with the good old "appeal to subjectivity" cop-out just so the post wouldn't appear completely empty...
Because people like whidmore know how to find it by other means.
Yeah? That thing Zoe wanted to confirm with Jin? Maybe.
But those would be
scientific means. That's recent, and something that could be avoided by not inviting a whole bunch of scientists to stay on your magical island (and then slaughtering them all because they got too curious, shockingly enough for scientists).
I don't get this question, are you asking why the protectors are doing that cycle to begin with? If that's the case I don't know, valid question.
Well, I don't know that they're
aware they're perpetuating a cycle (and I'm only calling that a cycle because
the writers did), but their motivations for inviting (apparently?) all those people and murdering them once they get too curious are a bit of a mystery to me, considering how powerful those protectors seem to be. Surely, there would be other ways.
I guess you could argue Mother was just a psychotic bitch, alright (even if the "he/she did that because he/she's
crrrrazy" motivation is a tad overused on this show), but the DHARMA thing...
I don't think this needs to be explained. It's just a cool wink that stuff like this happened in the past hundreds or thousands of years ago. It doesn't need to directly relate with anything going on in the present day because it's just not important enough.
Well, like I said earlier, it's still really odd how the island apparently once hosted an entire civilization that could build huge structures like the statue or the temple. How does that happen? Which protector let that happen and why (and what of the cork? how/why was it built?)?
If it was before Jacob, what's up with those depictions of a smoke monster, under the temple?
If it was Jacob, what was Barry doing? Did he use them to complete his wheel? Did he really need an entire civilization for that? Next time we see him, he's apparently slaughtering people (whom he now sees as "corrupters" or whatever, for reasons that were never elucidated) as soon as they set foot on the island (and then, not so much, but let's say that's because he (
finally) realized he could use them to kill his brother), so what gives? What happened?
Speaking of which, how would hiring Richard help the next guests of Jacob against the monster anyway? They both seemed to agree it was this great idea, but I'm not seeing it: the best Richard could do was to warn the possible survivors against the smoke monster so they wouldn't be manipulated (and yet he apparently forgot to tell Ben, whoops! advisor is a hard job).
I guess there could be the magical ash (whatever that's supposed to be), but damn, that's unpractical, kinda silly (again: broom? no?) and somewhat underused anyway, it seems (we haven't seen any circle of ash apart from the one around the cabin and the one that's hurriedly set up around the temple in season 6, I believe? Locke didn't fail to notice it when he first visited the cabin, but there was no such scene when he left the Others' camp...).
The statue's and the foot etc. are just cool things from the past that you wonder about. It would be nice to see all of it answered (and shown who the egyptians were, what they did, etc.) but it's ultimately pointless imo.
Well, in the end, yeah...
I don't remember what Dogen was for to be honest.
It was never really made clear. His death apparently rendered the temple vulnerable... so... er... he was powering the magical ash? *shrug*
We don't really know what he was to the Others either... He knew more than Ben about Barry and had actually met Jacob (unlike Widmore and Ben when they were
leaders)... but then again, it doesn't look like his existence was this huge secret kept from the leaders either (Ben knew about the temple, Cindy,
of all people, was there)... Heh...
Same thing about Ilana and her group, incidentally...
i'm not sure what you mean by pick off-island.
He presented him that deal off-island.
That sounds somewhat less silly than picking a bunch of "lost" individuals, arranging (somehow) for them all to take the same flight that crashes on the island, and wait three years of drama and death before coming out of the bushes and explaining what
that was all about, what he wants from them "and please hurry, 'cause I let myself get killed for no reason, and the end of the world is near, now!"
Was the 100+ years earlier one the one where he impersonated Richard's wife?
Yes.
(and let's not wonder how he managed to impersonate her when her body wasn't on the island)
This feels like a weak complaint though, this isn't something the writers should actively give you an answer for when there are way more important things to think about. It's not even a real 'mystery'/mythology question it's more a character motivation thing.
I'd argue those matter, too. A lot, in fact.
Have no clue, but again this isn't something that people should list when saying "Lost sucks because it didnt answer this." It's stupid but it's not that big of a deal.
Well, let's say "
Lost sucks because it's stupid", then. ^^
And I'd argue Jacob's death was a pretty big deal, actually. All the season 6 drama stems from it, after all, so it would have been nice to have some kind of justification for it.
[The rules]
I'm assuming they couldn't think of a good enough answer that would connect with everything else.
Same here. In the end, those were just convenient plot contrivances.
Doesn't matter to me personally. It's established that she knows somehow and that's all you need to know imo, just the fact that she's some weird shaman type character.
That's... pretty weak.
Just say she's psychic or something and that'll be enough, but I wouldn't' want them to say that because then it puts things into too far of a supernatural territory.
Okay, but what, then? ^_^;
for the time jumps I thought they were explained that it was just random.
I don't think they explained anything on the show. If they were just random, they were quite convenient though...
Outside of the show:
Cuse: Damon, "Why did some items disappear and others didn't when individuals were shifting through time. Boats did not disappear as well as some other items that were clearly from other times, like the Zodiac..." Y'know, whatwhat's up with all of that? What are the rules of that?
Lindelof: II think the characters have discussed what the rules are, and what they came up with is pretty much the same is what we've come up with as writers, which is, when the initial flash happened, that is, when Ben first turned the donkey wheel, ififif you were touching something, for example, you were holding on to a jar of peanut butter, or you were inin a Zodiac, or wearing your clothes, then whatever you were touphysically in contact with came with them. And was awas with that group for any flashes subsequent to that. So the Zodiac wasFaraday was riding in the Zodiac along with Frogurt and some others at the time of the initial flash, and therefore, any time that the sky flashed beyond that point, the Zodiac would actually move with them, although, when they returned to the beach, itit appears that somebody has taken the Zodiac. But, if they're not touching something, objects from other times do not travel with them. So...
Cuse: What about dead bodies?
Lindelof: Well, Charlotte does not travel
Cuse: Hm, interesting.
Lindelof: um, does not travel with Faraday when the final flash occurs, butwho knows?there might be different properties because that was a wheel-related flash, too.
Cuse: Right.
("who knows?", huh?)
And for what it's worth:
A joke, sure, but the "bubble" thing might really be how they explain why some characters time traveled and others didn't. Guess that bubble conveniently extended to Jin and but not quite to Richard and the Others despite them being right next to Locke.
The ashes are dumb but it doesn't bother me.
I believe the Lost Encyclopedia stated that Ilana took Jacob's ashes for protection, which would, I guess, make
some sense (Barry can't do anything to Jacob because of the rules, and that extends to his dead body, hence his ashes act as a barrier), but what of the ash from before Jacob's death? Did we miss some funny bit where Jacob patiently burned his hair and fingernails for a hundred years while Richard was desperately trying to outrun Barry through the jungle? And again, what does that have to do with Dôgen?
I was assuming the lists were because they wanted to 'help' whoever was there and were good people. However then it was implied that they have contact with Jacob and Jacob told them to make lists of people or something.
According to Ben in the season 5 finale, the lists (or
some of them, anyway... it's such a mess) came from Jacob (and I don't believe the guy had any reason to lie at that point, right?).
Why the selection, Jacob? You brought them all here in the first place, didn't you?
I don't know which one it was at this point. I'm of the belief that some of the others didn't want foreigners who were good people to die, so they looked up info on them with their super duper computers to find out if they were good people and then let them blend into their society or whatever.
Those would be
other lists, then... And one has to wonder what their criteria were for letting some people at the mercy of the smoke monster...
(I forget: weren't you supposed to help with that, Richard? Now that you have this conveniently monster-proof fence, you could actually do something about it, so... Ah, well.)
This is obviously the big one. Walt stuff was not answered and that's definitely a valid complaint but I don't think Walt's stuff matters in the broad spectrum of things.
I don't think Walt is "obviously the big one", actually... It's an obvious loose end, but he got phased out relatively early on, and I'd have a more of a problem with the motivations of Ben, Widmore, the Others, Jacob, Barry... Most of the drama and conflict stemmed from those, up till the end. Kinda important.
But speaking of Walt and how he got phased out (puberty, you so unexpected), funny how they apparently figured they could bring him back, what with the idea of having a 3-year time skip ("let's remind people of Walter with
a webisode! he's relevant after all! he has some freaky powers, y'all!"), but in the end... "Hey, fuck that shit. We don't know what to do with him, and it was hard enough to get him off the island / the show the first time around. Let's say he meets Locke after school, tells him something ominous [
no payoff there, naturally], and that's it."
Half of the things you listed imo seem like nitpicking and things that aren't necessary for the overall narrative. They're just things you would've liked answered, but not ones that needed to be.
Well, I disagree, as explained above. :þ
At the end of the day the writers made up a bunch of shit as they went along and it couldn't hold it's own weight at times.
So we at least agree that they were lying when they kept pretending they always knew what was up with their mysteries as they were introducing them?
(... well, I say "they were", but it's not like they stopped)
But for me, that's okay. I'm fine with that because Lost has soooo many OMFG HOLY SHIT NO WAY WTF moments that they just supersede questions regarding Walt or whatever other random thing that doesn't make sense.
I like moments like that as well, but I'd rather they made some sense. It doesn't take much skill to come up with "OMFG WTF" moments when you don't care about them making some kind of sense in the end. That's the Donald Kaufman school of writing, and it certainly isn't worthy of praise.
The thing I was personally disappointed with was 'across the sea' explanation with the cork in the light thing etc. that stuff was stupid as shit but whatever. It's hard to think of something that connects years worth of tacked-on shit one after another.
Well, yeah. But who put the tacked-on shit there in the first place (while repeatedly denying it was tacked-on shit, naturally)?
It's that lack of care and foresight I have a problem with.
(Not that they stopped at simply being poor writers: they
also had to be pretentious, lying assholes about it, apparently.)