I'm going to be recollecting my thoughts as I go, but I wanted to do this while the thought was still fresh in my head. Sorian, you've been acting way too weird with CrimsonSophia, such that I'm wondering if you're all not riding the same boat together.
So...what are the odds that you've read a stretch of posts, made 5 hours into day 1, and a single pair appear to be doing everything that set your alarm bells saying 'Right'? I'll give Sorian the benefit of not being so transparent at this moment, but:
Here we have you basically passively tilting discussion away from them-
And then we have you full on diverting attention. Why? I can't remember anyone else who warranted that much belief from you(there wasn't) and it's peculiar that you're defending not one, but both of the pair today. And your line of questioning is subject too. Sorian uses the 'I agree with you but X takes precedence' or what I like to call the carrot and stick method. On one hand, he acknowledges that the Crimsonphia pair may have a problem, while on the other he's saying, let's put that aside for now and focus on something substantial.
And then there's this post thread below that appears to try and give Sophia's claim legitimacy early on
By writing and directing a set narrative. For what purpose? I don't know, I have my suspicions but nothing concrete.
Sophia has done nothing "right" actually. By herself, she'd still be sitting at a null. Anything positive I've had to say has been about Crimson alone. This is hardly a new tactic, I always delete 1 or 2 players early on day 1 and leave them for re evaluation for later in the game if they actually end up being top notch scum that got good points early on. Crimson has taken that role as the straight man towns town and he can have it. It leads to a quick death on a night that scum have nothing better to do.
It's not diverting attention away when I say that I[/] don't care about their read, you all do you. I like giving myself the least amount of work with still high odds of success.